Etelcalcetide Inhibits the Progression of Left Atrial Volume Index Compared to Alfacalcidol in Hemodialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Increased left atrial (LA) size is a risk factor for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. It is closely related to left ventricular hypertrophy and chronic volume overload, both of which are common in hemodialysis. Calcimimetic treatment with etelcalcetide (ETL) previously showed an inhibitory effect on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) progression in this population. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the EtECAR-HD trial, where 62 patients were randomized to ETL or alfacalcidol (ALFA) for 1 year. LA volume index (LAVI) was measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of the study was to investigate whether ETL was associated with a change of LAVI. RESULTS: Median baseline levels of LAVI were 40 mL/m2 (31, 54 IQR) in the ETL group and 36 mL/m2 (26, 46 IQR) in the ALFA group. In the ITT population, the change of LAVI was 5.0 mL/m2 [95% CI: -0.04, 10] lower under ETL, compared to ALFA (p = 0.052, R2adj = 0.259). In the PP population, the difference in LAVI changes widened to 5.8 [95% CI: 0.36, 11], p = 0.037, R2adj = 0.302). Secondary analysis showed that the study delta of LVMI was correlated with the LAVI delta (r = 0.387) and that an inclusion of LVMI delta in the ANCOVA model mediated the effect on LAVI delta to ß = 3.3 [95% CI: -0.04, 10] (p = 0.2, R2adj = 0.323). The same could not be observed for parameters assessing the volume status. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates that ETL could inhibit LAVI progression compared with ALFA. This effect was mediated by the change of LVMI.

Chronic kidney disease is more prevalent among women but more men than women are under nephrological care : Analysis from six outpatient clinics in Austria 2019.

BACKGROUND: A discrepancy between sex-specific treatment of kidney failure by dialysis (higher in men) and the prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the general population (higher in women) has been reported internationally, but the prevalence by sex has not been described for Austria. Sex disparity among nephrology outpatients has not been studied. METHODS: We employed two formulae (2009 CKD-EPI suppressing the race factor, and race-free 2021 CKD-EPI) to estimate the sex distribution of CKD in Austrian primary care, based on creatinine measurements recorded in a medical sample of 39,800 patients from general practitioners' offices (1989-2008). Further, we collected information from all clinic appointments scheduled at nephrology departments of 6 Austrian hospitals (Wien, Linz, Wels, St. Pölten, Villach, Innsbruck) during 2019 and calculated visit frequencies by sex. RESULTS: Using the 2009 CKD-EPI formula, the prevalence of CKD in stages G3-G5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) was 16.4% among women and 8.5% among men aged > 18 years who had attended general practitioners' offices in Austria between 1989 and 2008 and had at least one creatinine measurement performed. Using the 2021 CKD-EPI formula, the respective CKD prevalence was 12.3% among women and 6.1% among men. In 2019, 45% of all outpatients at 6 participating nephrology departments were women. The median of nephrology clinic visits in 2019 was two (per year) for both sexes. CONCLUSION: CKD is more prevalent among Austrian women than men. Men are more prevalent in nephrology outpatient services. Research into causes of this sex disparity is urgently needed.

The systemic renin-angiotensin system in COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 gains cell entry via angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2, a membrane-bound enzyme of the "alternative" (alt) renin-angiotensin system (RAS). ACE2 counteracts angiotensin II by converting it to potentially protective angiotensin 1-7. Using mass spectrometry, we assessed key metabolites of the classical RAS (angiotensins I-II) and alt-RAS (angiotensins 1-7 and 1-5) pathways as well as ACE and ACE2 concentrations in 159 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, stratified by disease severity (severe, n = 76; non-severe: n = 83). Plasma renin activity (PRA-S) was calculated as the sum of RAS metabolites. We estimated ACE activity using the angiotensin II:I ratio (ACE-S) and estimated systemic alt-RAS activation using the ratio of alt-RAS axis metabolites to PRA-S (ALT-S). We applied mixed linear models to assess how PRA-S and ACE/ACE2 concentrations affected ALT-S, ACE-S, and angiotensins II and 1-7. Median angiotensin I and II levels were higher with severe versus non-severe COVID-19 (angiotensin I: 86 versus 30 pmol/L, p < 0.01; angiotensin II: 114 versus 58 pmol/L, p < 0.05), demonstrating activation of classical RAS. The difference disappeared with analysis limited to patients not taking a RAS inhibitor (angiotensin I: 40 versus 31 pmol/L, p = 0.251; angiotensin II: 76 versus 99 pmol/L, p = 0.833). ALT-S in severe COVID-19 increased with time (days 1-6: 0.12; days 11-16: 0.22) and correlated with ACE2 concentration (r = 0.831). ACE-S was lower in severe versus non-severe COVID-19 (1.6 versus 2.6; p < 0.001), but ACE concentrations were similar between groups and correlated weakly with ACE-S (r = 0.232). ACE2 and ACE-S trajectories in severe COVID-19, however, did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. Overall RAS alteration in severe COVID-19 resembled severity of disease-matched patients with influenza. In mixed linear models, renin activity most strongly predicted angiotensin II and 1-7 levels. ACE2 also predicted angiotensin 1-7 levels and ALT-S. No single factor or the combined model, however, could fully explain ACE-S. ACE2 and ACE-S trajectories in severe COVID-19 did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. In conclusion, angiotensin II was elevated in severe COVID-19 but was markedly influenced by RAS inhibitors and driven by overall RAS activation. ACE-S was significantly lower with severe COVID-19 and did not correlate with ACE concentrations. A shift to the alt-RAS axis because of increased ACE2 could partially explain the relative reduction in angiotensin II levels.

Sex Differences in the Recognition, Monitoring, and Management of CKD in Health Care: An Observational Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Reported sex differences in the etiology, population prevalence, progression rates, and health outcomes of people with CKD may be explained by differences in health care. METHODS: We evaluated sex as the variable of interest in a health care-based study of adults (n=227,847) with at least one outpatient eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 measurement denoting probable CKD in Stockholm from 2009 to 2017. We calculated the odds ratios for diagnosis of CKD and provision of RASi and statins at inclusion, and hazard ratios for CKD diagnosis, visiting a nephrologist, or monitoring creatinine and albuminuria during follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 227,847 subjects, of whom 126,289 were women (55%). At inclusion, women had lower odds of having received a diagnostic code for CKD and were less likely to have received RASi and statins, despite having guideline-recommended indications. In time-to-event analyses, women were less likely to have received a CKD diagnosis (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.45) and visited a nephrologist (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.48) regardless of disease severity, presence of albuminuria, or criteria for referral. Women were also less likely to undergo monitoring of creatinine or albuminuria, including those with diabetes or hypertension. These differences remained after adjustment for comorbidities, albuminuria, and highest educational achievement, and among subjects with confirmed CKD at retesting. Although in absolute terms all nephrology-care indicators gradually improved over time, the observed sex gap persisted. CONCLUSIONS: There were profound sex differences in the detection, recognition, monitoring, referrals, and management of CKD. The disparity was also observed in people at high risk and among those who had guideline-recommended indications. PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2022_10_11_JASN2022030373.mp3.

Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase and Serum Calcification Propensity Are Not Influenced by Etelcalcetide vs. Alfacalcidol Treatment, and Only Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Is Correlated With Fibroblast Growth Factor 23: Sub-Analysis Results of the ETACAR-HD Study.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease poses a major risk factor for vascular calcification and high bone turnover, leading to mineralization defects. The aim was to analyze the effect of active vitamin D and calcimimetic treatment on fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), serum calcification propensity (T50), a surrogate marker of calcification stress and bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) in hemodialysis. This is a subanalysis of a randomized trial comparing etelcalcetide vs. alfacalcidol in 62 hemodialysis patients for 1 year. We compared the change of BAP and serum calcification propensity between the two medications and assessed the influence of FGF23 change over time. We found no significant differences in the change of BAP or serum calcification propensity (T50) levels from baseline to study end between treatment arms (difference in change of marker between treatment with etelcalcetide vs. alfacalcidol: BAP : 2.0 ng/ml [95% CI-1.5,5.4], p = 0.3; T50: -15 min [95% CI -49,19], p = 0.4). Using FGF23 change over time, we could show that BAP levels at study end were associated with FGF23 change (-0.14 [95% CI -0.21, -0.08], p < 0.001). We did not observe the same association between FGF23 change and T50 (effect of FGF23 change on T50: 3.7 [95% CI -5.1, 12], p = 0.4; R 2 = 0.07 vs. R 2 = 0.06). No significant difference was found in serum calcification propensity (T50) values between treatment arms. FGF23 was not associated with serum calcification propensity (T50), but was negatively correlated with BAP underlying its role in the bone metabolism. Clinical Trial Registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03182699].

The Other Way Around: Living With Chronic Kidney Disease From the Perspective of Men.

A wealth of evidence has suggested sex (biological) and gender (sociocultural) differences in the prevalence, progression, and outcomes of persons with chronic kidney disease. Much of this evidence tends to emphasize differences in which women are disadvantaged, and less attention is paid to findings in which women are better off or similar to men. However, gender medicine recognizes that men and women have different disease determinants, presentation, and attitudes, and it pertains to both sexes. In this review, we revisit chronic kidney disease through the perspective of men, and illustrate a population segment at need of stringent preventative and management strategies.

Sex-Specific Differences in Mortality and Incident Dialysis in the Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

Introduction: More men than women start kidney replacement therapy (KRT) although the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is higher in women than men. We therefore aimed at analyzing sex-specific differences in clinical outcomes among 8237 individuals with CKD in stages 3 to 5 from Brazil, France, Germany, and the United States participating in the Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (CKDopps). Methods: Fine and Gray models, evaluating the effect of sex on time to events, were adjusted for age, Black race (model A); plus diabetes, cardiovascular disease, albuminuria (model B); plus estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope during the first 12 months after enrollment and first eGFR after enrollment (model C). Results: There were more men than women at baseline (58% vs. 42%), men were younger than women, and men had higher eGFR (28.9 ± 11.5 vs. 27.0 ± 10.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Over a median follow-up of 2.7 and 2.5 years for men and women, respectively, the crude dialysis initiation and pre-emptive transplantation rates were higher in men whereas that of pre-KRT death was more similar. The adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) between men versus women for dialysis were 1.51 (1.27-1.80) (model A), 1.32 (1.10-1.59) (model B), and 1.50 (1.25-1.80) (model C); for pre-KRT death, were 1.25 (1.02-1.54) (model A), 1.14 (0.92-1.40) (model B), and 1.15 (0.93-1.42) (model C); for transplantation, were 1.31 (0.73-2.36) (model A), 1.44 (0.76-2.74) (model B), and 1.53 (0.79-2.94) (model C). Conclusion: Men had a higher probability of commencing dialysis before death, unexplained by CKD progression alone. Although the causal mechanisms are uncertain, this finding helps interpret the preponderance of men in the dialysis population.

Kidney Function, Kidney Replacement Therapy, and Mortality in Men and Women.

Introduction: Women are more likely to have chronic kidney disease (CKD), compared with men, yet they are less likely to receive dialysis. Whether this sex disparity, which has predominantly been observed in nephrology-referred or CKD-specific cohorts so far, has a biological root cause remains unclear. Methods: We extracted general population data from the Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements project (SCREAM) (N = 496,097 participants, 45.5% men, 54.5% women). We used Cox regression to model male-to-female cause-specific hazard ratios (csHRs) for the competing events kidney replacement therapy (KRT, by dialysis or transplantation) and pre-KRT death, adjusted for baseline age, baseline kidney function (assessed via estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] and eGFR slope), and comorbidities. Furthermore, we modeled sex-specific all-cause mortality by eGFR, again adjusted for age, eGFR slope, and comorbidities at baseline. Results: Compared with women, men were significantly more likely to receive KRT (fully adjusted male-to-female csHR for KRT 1.41 [95% CI 1.13-1.76]) but also more likely to experience pre-KRT death (csHR 1.36 [95% CI 1.33-1.38]). Differences between men and women regarding all-cause mortality by eGFR indicated a higher mortality in men at low eGFR values. Conclusion: Our data show that sex differences in CKD outcomes persist even after controlling for important comorbidities and kidney function at baseline. While future studies with a wider range of biological factors are warranted, these data suggest that nonbiological factors may be more important in explaining existing sex disparities in CKD progression and therapy.

Feasibility of Dialysate Bolus-Based Absolute Blood Volume Estimation in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Absolute blood volume (ABV) is a critical component of fluid status, which may inform target weight prescriptions and hemodynamic vulnerability of dialysis patients. Here, we utilized the changes in relative blood volume (RBV), monitored by ultrasound (BVM) upon intradialytic 240 mL dialysate fluid bolus-infusion 1 h after hemodialysis start, to calculate the session-specific ABV. With the main goal of assessing clinical feasibility, our sub-aims were to (i) standardize the BVM-data read-out; (ii) determine optimal time-points for ABV-calculation, "before-" and "after-bolus"; (iii) assess ABV-variation. METHODS: We used high-level programming language and basic descriptive statistics in a retrospective study of routinely measured BVM-data from 274 hemodialysis sessions in 98 patients. RESULTS: Regarding (i) and (ii), we automatized the processing of RBV-data, and determined an algorithm to select the adequate RBV-data points for ABV-calculations. Regarding (iii), we found in 144 BVM-curves from 75 patients, that the average ABV ± standard deviation was 5.2 ± 1.5 L and that among those 51 patients who still had ≥2 valid estimates, the average intra-patient standard deviation in ABV was 0.8 L. Twenty-seven of these patients had an average intra-patient standard deviation in ABV <0.5 L. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate feasibility of ABV-calculation by an automated algorithm after dialysate bolus-administration, based on the BVM-curve. Based on our results from this simple "abridged" calculation approach with routine clinical measurements, we encourage the use of multi-compartment modeling and comparison with reference methods of ABV-determination. Hopes are high that clinicians will be able to use ABV to inform target weight prescription, improving hemodynamic stability.

Early Postoperative Basal Insulin Therapy versus Standard of Care for the Prevention of Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) might be preventable. METHODS: This open-label, multicenter randomized trial compared 133 kidney transplant recipients given intermediate-acting insulin isophane for postoperative afternoon glucose ≥140 mg/dl with 130 patients given short-acting insulin for fasting glucose ≥200 mg/dl (control). The primary end point was PTDM (antidiabetic treatment or oral glucose tolerance test-derived 2 hour glucose ≥200 mg/dl) at month 12 post-transplant. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population, PTDM rates at 12 months were 12.2% and 14.7% in treatment versus control groups, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.39 to 1.76) and 13.4% versus 17.4%, respectively, at 24 months (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.49). In the per-protocol population, treatment resulted in reduced odds for PTDM at 12 months (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.01) and 24 months (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.24 to 1.20). After adjustment for polycystic kidney disease, per-protocol ORs for PTDM (treatment versus controls) were 0.21 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.62) at 12 months and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.87) at 24 months. Significantly more hypoglycemic events (mostly asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic) occurred in the treatment group versus the control group. Within the treatment group, nonadherence to the insulin initiation protocol was associated with significantly higher odds for PTDM at months 12 and 24. CONCLUSIONS: At low overt PTDM incidence, the primary end point in the intention-to-treat population did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups. In the per-protocol analysis, early basal insulin therapy resulted in significantly higher hypoglycemia rates but reduced odds for overt PTDM-a significant reduction after adjustment for baseline differences-suggesting the intervention merits further study.Clinical Trial registration number: NCT03507829.

Sex Differences in Kidney Transplantation: Austria and the United States, 1978-2018.

BACKGROUND: Systematic analyses about sex differences in wait-listing and kidney transplantation after dialysis initiation are scarce. We aimed at identifying sex-specific disparities along the path of kidney disease treatment, comparing two countries with distinctive health care systems, the US and Austria, over time. METHODS: We analyzed subjects who initiated dialysis from 1979-2018, in observational cohort studies from the US and Austria. We used Cox regression to model male-to-female cause-specific hazard ratios (csHRs, 95% confidence intervals) for transitions along the consecutive states dialysis initiation, wait-listing, kidney transplantation and death, adjusted for age and stratified by country and decade of dialysis initiation. RESULTS: Among 3,053,206 US and 36,608 Austrian patients starting dialysis, men had higher chances to enter the wait-list, which however decreased over time [male-to-female csHRs for wait-listing, 1978-1987: US 1.94 (1.71, 2.20), AUT 1.61 (1.20, 2.17); 2008-2018: US 1.35 (1.32, 1.38), AUT 1.11 (0.94, 1.32)]. Once wait-listed, the advantage of the men became smaller, but persisted in the US [male-to-female csHR for transplantation after wait-listing, 2008-2018: 1.08 (1.05, 1.11)]. The greatest disparity between men and women occurred in older age groups in both countries [male-to-female csHR for wait-listing after dialysis, adjusted to 75% age quantile, 2008-2018: US 1.83 (1.74, 1.92), AUT 1.48 (1.02, 2.13)]. Male-to-female csHRs for death were close to one, but higher after transplantation than after dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence for sex disparities in both countries. Historically, men in the US and Austria had 90%, respectively, 60% higher chances of being wait-listed for kidney transplantation, although these gaps decreased over time. Efforts should be continued to render kidney transplantation equally accessible for both sexes, especially for older women.

Sex differences in chronic kidney disease awareness among US adults, 1999 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is less prevalent among men than women, but more men than women initiate kidney replacement therapy. Differences in CKD awareness may contribute to this gender gap, which may further vary by race/ethnicity. We aimed to investigate trends in CKD awareness and the association between individual characteristics and CKD awareness among US men versus women. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a serial, cross-sectional analysis of 10 cycles (1999-2018) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Adult participants with CKD stages G3-G5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73m2) were included, unless they were on dialysis or medical information was missing. Serum creatinine was measured during NHANES medical exams. CKD stage was classified by eGFR, based on the CKD-EPI formula. CKD awareness was assessed with the question: "Have you ever been told by a health care professional you had weak or failing kidneys", asked in standardized NHANES questionnaires on each survey. Using logistic regression models, we evaluated the association between sex and CKD awareness, adjusting for potential confounders including age, race/ethnicity and comorbidities. We stratified CKD awareness by 5 pre-defined calendar-year periods and conducted all analyses for the complete study population as well as the Caucasian and African American subpopulations. We found that among 101871 US persons participating in NHANES, 4411 (2232 women) had CKD in stages G3-G5. These participants were, on average, 73±10 years old, 25.3% reported diabetes, 78.0% reported hypertension or had elevated blood pressure during medical examinations and 39.8% were obese (percentages were survey-weighted). CKD awareness was more prevalent among those with higher CKD stage, younger age, diabetes, hypertension and higher body mass index. CKD awareness was generally low (<22.5%), though it increased throughout the study period, remaining consistently higher among men compared to women, with a decreasing gender gap over time (adjusted odds ratio [men-to-women] for CKD awareness = 2.71 [1.31-5.64] in period 1; = 1.32 [0.82-2.12] in period 5). The sex difference in CKD awareness was smaller in African American participants, in whom CKD awareness was generally higher. Using serum creatinine rather than eGFR as the CKD-defining exposure, CKD awareness increased with rising serum creatinine, in a close to identical fashion among both sexes during 1999-2008, while during 2009-2018, CKD awareness among women increased earlier than among men (i.e. with lower serum creatinine levels). CONCLUSIONS: CKD awareness is lower among US women than men. The narrowing gap between the sexes in more recent years and the results on CKD awareness by serum creatinine indicate that health care professionals have previously been relying on serum creatinine to inform patients about their condition, but in more recent years have been using eGFR, which accounts for women's lower serum creatinine levels due to their lower muscle mass. Additional efforts should be made to increase CKD awareness among both sexes.