Alternative vein bypass in octogenarians with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia.

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians are regarded as one of the frailest patient groups among the chronic limb-threatening ischaemia population with high perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. As a result, alternative vein bypass surgery in the absence of sufficient great saphenous vein is often not considered as a potential treatment option. The aim of this study was to compare the results of octogenarians undergoing alternative vein bypass surgery due to chronic limb-threatening ischaemia to younger patients. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective analysis of patients undergoing bypass surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia with alternative autologous vein grafts between 1997 and 2018 was performed. Patients aged over 80 years were compared with those under 80 years. Graft patency rates were assessed and a risk factor analysis for limb loss was performed. RESULTS: In total, 592 patients underwent bypass surgery during the study interval. Twenty-one per cent (n = 126) of patients were 80 years or older. At 4 years, primary, primary-assisted and secondary patency as well as limb salvage rates were not significantly different between the two groups (46% versus 50%, 60% versus 66%, 69% versus 72%, 72% versus 77%, for octogenarians versus non-octogenarians respectively). Major amputations were performed in 27 (21%) octogenarians and 91 (20%) non-octogenarians (P = 0.190). No higher 30-day and long-term mortality rates nor morbidity rates were detected in the octogenarian group with a median follow-up time of 27 (interquartile range 12-56) months. Minor amputation, the reason for alternative vein grafts, as well as the profunda femoris artery as proximal origin of the bypass were risk factors for limb loss in the postoperative course. CONCLUSION: Alternative vein bypass surgery in octogenarians with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia is safe and effective in terms of patency rates, limb salvage and survival compared with younger patients in the absence of sufficient great saphenous vein. Age alone should not be a deterrent from performing bypass surgery.

Long-Term Results of Autologous Bifurcated Carotid Artery Reconstructions.

BACKGROUND: Carotid bifurcation revascularization using interposition grafts is rare. While internal carotid artery (ICA) revascularization is regarded as mandatory, the external carotid artery (ECA) is severed in most instances. Long-term results of an autologous bifurcated carotid artery reconstruction are discussed. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients treated at an academic vascular surgery center. RESULTS: From December 2006 to November 2019, fifty-one patients underwent reconstruction of the carotid artery using an autologous bifurcated interposition graft (38 males, 75%; median age: 68.7 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 60.2-76.5). Thirty-eight patients were asymptomatic (74.5%). Indication for reconstruction was recurrent carotid stenosis unfavorable for endovascular treatment/redo patch plasty (n = 32, symptomatic: n = 7), carotid aneurysm (n = 11, symptomatic: n = 5), neck tumor with vascular involvement (n = 7), trauma (n = 1). Nonreversed valve depleted saphenous vein y-graft from the groin was used in 49 (94.2%) and reversed cubital vein bifurcation in 3 (5.8%) procedures. The median ICA cross-clamp time was 15 min (IQR: 13-20 min). In four procedures (7.7%), a shunt was inserted because of a significant decrease of cerebral perfusion. In one patient, additional intraoperative stent placement of a proximal common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis was performed. Six patients suffered from ischemic neurological deficits (11.5%), all but 1 recovered with no or moderate symptoms. After a median follow-up of 5.2 years (IQR: 1.1-8.7 years), 7 significant asymptomatic stenoses (13.5%) and 2 occlusions (3.8%, one symptomatic) of the ICA, two significant asymptomatic CCA stenoses (3.8%), five significant stenoses (9.6%) and 7 asymptomatic occlusions (13.5%) of the ECA were observed. This prompted 7 re-redo-interventions in 5 patients. Twenty-eight patients (54.9%) died after a median follow-up of 3.3 years (IQR: 0.5-5.6 years). Two of these patients died due to conditions related to the performed carotid artery reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous bifurcated carotid artery interposition graft provides results comparable to other complex ICA revascularizations. Overall survival in this heterogeneous patient cohort is poor. Due to the high risk of stroke and poor long-term outcome, this procedure should be reserved for symptomatic patients with no other option for revascularization.

Vein Bypass Versus Nitinol Stent in Long Femoropopliteal Lesions: 4-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare technical success, patency rates and clinical outcomes of vein bypass (VBP) with angioplasty and nitinol stents (NS) in femoropopliteal Trans-Atlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) II C and D lesions. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Guidelines widely recommend an endovas-cular-first strategy for long femoropopliteal lesions without sufficient data comparing it with vein bypass surgery. METHODS: A single-center prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed, after approval of the local ethics committee, with technical success, primary and secondary patency as primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were limb salvage, survival, complications, and clinical improvement. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2020, 218 limbs (109 per group) in 209 patients were included. Baseline and lesion characteristics were similar in both groups with a mean lesion length of 268 mm. The indication for treatment was chronic limb threatening ischemia in 53% of limbs in both groups. Technical success was feasible in 88% in the stent group. During a 4-year follow-up, primary patency, freedom from target lesion revascularizations, limb salvage, survival and complications showed no significant differences between the groups. At 48 months secondary patency for the bypass group was 73% versus 50% in the stent group ( P = 0.021). Clinical improvement was significantly superior in the bypass group with 52% versus 19% reaching a Rutherford 0 category ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest RCT comparing angioplasty with NS and vein bypass in femoropopliteal TASC II C and D lesions and the first to report 4-year results. The data underline the feasibility of endovascular treatment in long lesions but also emphasize the advantages of VBP.

Preoperative anxiety as predictor of perioperative clinical events following carotid surgery: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Psychological factors like anxiety and depression are recognised to play a causal role in the development of cardiovascular disease and they may also influence outcome after vascular surgery procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of anxiety and depression with postoperative outcome following elective carotid surgery. METHODS: Single centre prospective observational study of patients treated for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis at an academic vascular surgery centre. Preoperative anxiety and depression were evaluated using self-reporting questionnaires: Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S/-T) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A/-D). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were assessed with the primary composite endpoint of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and death. Standard reporting guidelines for carotid disease were applied. RESULTS: From June 2012 to November 2015, 393 carotid endarterectomies (CEA) were performed at our institution. Out of those, 98 asymptomatic patients were available for analysis (78% male; median age, 71.1 years). Median scores of self-reporting questionnaires did not differ from published data of the general population (STAI-T, trait component, median, 36; IQR, 31-42.75; STAI-S, state component, median, 38; IQR, 32-43; HADS-A median, 6; IQR, 3-8; HADS-D median, 4; IQR, 2-7). Cardiovascular risk factors were similar in anxious and non-anxious patients. The composite endpoint of stroke, MI and death occurred significantly more often in patients presenting with a preoperative HADS-A score higher than 6 (10.5%, 95% CI, 3-25; p =.020). CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that preoperative anxiety is associated with the occurrence of intra- and postoperative neurological events in patients undergoing CEA. Patients who had a preoperative HADS-A score of 6 or less had a very low probability of experiencing these complications.

The Upper-Arm Basilic-Cephalic Loop: A Valueable Alternative for Below-Knee Arterial Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances of endovascular interventions, bypass surgery remains the gold standard for treatment of long and complex arterial occlusions in the lower limb. Autologous vein is regarded superior to other options. As the graft of first choice, the great saphenous vein (GSV) is often not available due to previous bypass, stripping or poor quality. Other options like arm veins (AV) are important alternatives. As forearm portions of AVs are often unusable, a graft created from the upper arm basilic and cephalic veins provides a valuable alternative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients treated at an academic tertiary referral center between 01/1998 and 07/2018 using arm veins as the main peripheral bypass graft. Study endpoints were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage and survival. RESULTS: In the observed time period 2702 bypass procedures were performed at our institution for below-knee arterial reconstructions. Vein grafts used included the ipsilateral GSV (iGSV; n = 1937/71.7%), contralateral GSV (cGSV; 192/7.1%), small saphenous vein (SSV; 133/4.9%), prosthetic conduits (61/2.3%) and different configurations of AV (379/14%). In the majority of patients receiving AV grafts a complete continuous cephalic or basilic vein (CAV) was used (n = 292/77%). If it was not possible to use major parts of these 2 veins, either spliced arm vein grafts (SAV) (42/11%) or an upper arm basilic-cephalic loop graft (45/12%) were used. Median follow-up was 27 (interquartile range: 8-50) months. After 3 years secondary patency (CAV: 85%; SAV: 62%; loop: 66%; p = 0.125) and limb salvage rates (CAV: 79%, SAV: 68%; loop: 79%; p = 0.346) were similar between the 3 bypass options. CONCLUSION: The encouraging results of alternative AV configurations highlight their value in case the basilic or cephalic veins are not useable in continuity. Especially for infragenual redo-bypass procedures, these techniques should be considered to offer patients durable revascularization options.

Arm Vein versus Small Saphenous Vein for Lower Extremity Bypass in the Absence of Both Great Saphenous Veins.

BACKGROUND: Bypass surgery remains the gold standard for long and complex arterial occlusions in the lower limb. The vein is regarded superior to prosthetic conduits in peripheral arterial bypass surgery. However, this option is often limited because of previous bypass, stripping, or poor quality of the ipsilateral and/or contralateral great saphenous vein (GSV). Under these circumstances, the arm vein (AV) and small saphenous vein (SSV) are the only alternative autologous vein grafts. METHODS: We analyzed all consecutive patients treated at an academic tertiary referral center between January 1998 and July 2018 using either the AV or SSV as the main peripheral bypass graft. Study end points were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival. RESULTS: In total, 416 bypass procedures using exclusively AV (n = 327) or SSV (n = 89) were performed. There was a predominance of male gender. The majority of risk factors were evenly distributed between groups. The mean follow-up period was 2.3 years (0.9 to 13.3 years). Five-year primary and secondary patency rates were 39% (95% CI: 31-47%) and 67% (59-75%) for AV and 53% (41-66%) and 76% (67-86%) for SSV, respectively (P = 0.2 and 0.25). The five-year limb salvage and survival rates were 71% (68-81%) and 84% (77-90%) for AV and 78% (67-88%) and 90% (82-98%) for SSV, respectively (P = 0.52 and 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Both AV and SSV are equally effective alternatives for peripheral bypass if no GSV is available. Although there was a trend toward better results with the SSV, there was no significant difference between the 2 options.

Alternative Venous Conduits for Below Knee Bypass in the Absence of Ipsilateral Great Saphenous Vein.

OBJECTIVE: Vein is regarded superior to artificial graft in peripheral arterial bypass surgery. However, this option is often limited owing to previous use or removal of the ipsilateral greater saphenous vein (iGSV). In this case, the contralateral great saphenous vein (cGSV), the small saphenous vein (SSV), or arm veins (AV) are possible alternatives. Experience with all three grafts for below knee vein bypass is reported. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated at an academic tertiary referral centre between January 1998 and July 2018 using the cGSV, SSV, or AV as the main peripheral bypass graft were analysed. Study end points were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival. RESULTS: Over the observed time period, 2642 bypass operations for treatment of peripheral artery disease with below knee target arteries were performed at the authors' institution: 1937 procedures using the iGSV; 644 bypass procedures using the cGSV (n = 186; 28.9%), SSV (n = 101; 15.7%), or AV (n = 357; 55.4%); and 61 procedures using a prosthetic graft. The median follow up period was 2.3 years (range 9 days-18.5 years). Thirty day mortality was 1.9% for the whole group and similar between the three groups. After five years, primary and secondary patency rates were comparable between the three groups. Secondary patency was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66-83) in the cGSV and SSV groups, and 65% (95% CI 57-73) in the AV group (p = .47). Limb salvage and survival after five years were, respectively, 73% (95% CI 65-81) and 89% (95% CI 82-95) in the cGSV group, 79% (95% CI 69-89) and 87% (95% CI 79-95) in the SSV group, and 74% (95% CI 68-80) and 83% (77-89) in the AV group (p = .46). CONCLUSION: All three types of alternative autologous vein graft are equal regarding outcome parameters. Vascular surgeons should consider all autologous options if their preferred choice is not available.

Nitinol Stent Versus Bypass in Long Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare patency rates and clinical outcomes of nitinol stents and primary vein bypass in long femoropopliteal lesions. BACKGROUND: An endovascular-first strategy for long femoropopliteal lesions is widely recommended without sufficient data comparing it with bypass surgery. Nitinol stents are widely used as the standard endovascular therapy. METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial was performed with the primary endpoints of technical success, primary and secondary patency. Secondary endpoints were limb salvage, survival, complications, and clinical improvement. RESULTS: A total of 110 limbs (55 per group) in 103 patients were treated. Baseline and lesion characteristics were similar, with a mean lesion length of 276 mm. Critical limb threatening ischemia was the indication for treatment in 49% of limbs in both groups. Technical success was achieved in 87% in the stent group. During a 2-year follow-up, patency rates, limb salvage, survival and complications showed no significant differences between both groups. At 24 months, primary and secondary patency rates for the stent group were 60% and 72% versus 56% and 73% in the bypass group, respectively. Clinical improvement was significantly better in the bypass group. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences regarding patency rates, limb salvage, survival, or complications after 2 years. Technical success and clinical improvement in the bypass group were significantly better, but the promising results of the stent group suggest that an endovascular-first strategy for femoropopliteal lesions up to 30 cm may be reasonable. Mid- as well as long-term results need to be awaited.

Trans-Iliac Bypass Grafting for Vascular Groin Complications.

OBJECTIVES: Groin complications following vascular reconstruction, extensive trauma, or severe radiation induced scarring may complicate future revascularisation procedures of the lower limb. Although several techniques have been described, only few cases of trans-iliac bypass grafting have been published. The aim of this study was to perform a review of the literature on trans-ilac bypass grafting and add the authors' experience. METHODS: A single centre retrospective data analysis and a literature review of all trans-iliac bypass procedures was performed. Data on indication, patency, limb salvage, and survival were collected. Study endpoints were patency, limb salvage, and patient survival. RESULTS: Eight trans-iliac wing bypass grafting procedures were performed in our institution between 2003 and 2018, which represents the largest single centre series. Twenty-three procedures were reported in the literature between 1989 and 2018. Prior to the bypass procedure in the eight patients, six had local infection and two irradiation of the groin. The indication for operation was ischaemia in six cases, bleeding in one case, and infection in another case. The external iliac artery was most often used for the proximal (6 cases) and the superficial femoral artery for distal anastomosis (6 cases). Great saphenous vein was the most commonly used graft material (6 cases). The median follow up was five years with three bypass occlusions after 1, 2, and 8 months, followed by two successful thrombectomy procedures. There were no major amputations and only one death after five months, which was not procedure related. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-iliac bypass grafting is a viable alternative extra-anatomic bypass technique in patients with vascular groin complications. Patency as well as limb salvage and survival are good and may be comparable to those reported for autologous in situ repair and obturator canal bypass grafting.

Small Saphenous Vein and Arm Vein as Bypass Grafts for Upper Extremity Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Bypass in the upper extremity is a rare procedure mainly performed for chronic ischemia, trauma, or hemodialysis access complications. Feasibility and success of use of the arm vein and small saphenous vein (SSV) for autologous vein bypass have been reported in peripheral artery bypass procedures. There are very few reports on the use of alternative veins in upper extremity bypass. We report our experience with arm vein and SSV as a graft source in upper extremity arterial disease. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a consecutively collected case series in an academic tertiary referral center from January 2010 to February 2018. Study end points were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival. RESULTS: In total, 47 patients were treated with upper extremity bypass either using the SSV (n = 17) or arm veins (n = 30). Indications were either acute (n = 12) or chronic ischemia (n = 35) caused by acute (n = 8) and chronic (n = 9) trauma, sequela of iatrogenic interventions (n = 4), peripheral artery disease (n = 14), thrombangiitis obliterans (n = 3), and dialysis-access-related complications (n = 9). An arm vein was used in 30 and the SSV in 17 patients. Primary patency after 12 months was 87% with the SSV and 75% with an arm vein (P = 0.8) and 63% and 75% after 36 months (P = 0.9). Secondary patency were 100% with an arm vein and 100% with the SSV after 36 months (P = 0.4). One patient had to undergo major amputation and 2 minor amputations. CONCLUSIONS: Arm vein revascularization using the primarily arm vein or SSV as a bypass conduit can be performed with reasonable mortality and morbidity rates and provide good results comparable with the greater saphenous vein.

The Small Saphenous Vein: An Underestimated Source for Autologous Distal Vein Bypass.

OBJECTIVES: The small saphenous vein (SSV) is a potential vein source for bypass if neither greater saphenous vein nor arm vein is available. This study reports experience using SSV as part of an all autologous vein bypass policy. METHODS: This study comprised single centre retrospective data analysis of all consecutive patients treated at an academic tertiary referral centre from January 1998 to February 2017 using the SSV as the main peripheral bypass graft. Study endpoints were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty operations were performed in 118 patients using SSV. Indications were peripheral arterial occlusive disease (n = 91; Rutherford classification 3: n = 11; 4: n = 21; 5,6: n = 59), acute ischaemia (n = 14), popliteal artery aneurysm (n = 12), and bypass revisions (n = 3). Median follow up was 30.5 months (10 months-13.7 years). Primary patency after one, three and five years was 68% (CI: 59-77%), 58% (49-68%), and 54% (45-64%). Secondary patency was 83% (76-89%) after one year and 77% (69-85%) after three and five years. Limb salvage after one year was 88% (82-94%) and 78% (70-86%) after five years. Survival was 96% (92-99%) after one year and 91% (85-97%) at five years. Multivariable analysis identified redo surgery as an independent risk factor. Patients receiving a primary (n = 59) vs. a redo bypass (n = 61) were compared. Primary patency and secondary patency were both significantly better in the primary bypass group than in the redo group (p = .0036 and p = .0003, respectively). Limb salvage was also significantly better in primary bypass patients than in the redo group (p = .0007), whereas overall survival did not differ significantly (p = .48). CONCLUSION: The SSV is a valuable alternative vein graft in peripheral bypass surgery. It achieves excellent long-term results, particularly in patients with primary procedures but also acceptable results in patients with redo surgery.

Alternative Debranching in Patients with Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm after Open and Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Management of recurrent thoracoabdominal aneurysmal disease of the aorta is challenging. We report three patients with previous endovascular or open aortic repair requiring redo repair by treatment by stent-graft implantation of the thoracoabdominal aorta and visceral debranching using an antegrade inflow from the ascending aorta. All three interventions were successful, with two patients alive 5 and 2 years, respectively, after this operation, while the third patient died 2 days after the procedure due to cardiac failure. No paraplegia was observed. As complications from complex open and endovascular procedures are increasing, vascular surgeons should get familiar with alternative management options.

Autologous Bifurcated Carotid Artery Reconstruction: Technique and 2 Year Follow Up.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Carotid bifurcation resection with subsequent reconstruction is performed infrequently. While internal carotid artery (ICA) revascularisation is regarded as mandatory, the external carotid artery (ECA) is severed in most instances. Indications for and results of an autologous bifurcated carotid artery reconstruction are discussed. METHODS: This was a single centre retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients treated at an academic vascular surgery centre. RESULTS: From December 2006 to August 2015, 47 patients underwent reconstruction of the carotid artery using an autologous bifurcated interposition graft (36 men; median age 68.3 years [range 41-87 years]; 33 asymptomatic [70%]). The indication for reconstruction was recurrent carotid stenosis unfavorable for endovascular treatment/redo patch plasty (n = 29; symptomatic: n = 12), carotid aneurysm (n = 10), neck tumour with vascular involvement (n = 7), and trauma (n = 1). Groups were not different with regard to vascular risk factors. Non-reversed valve depleted saphenous/accessory saphenous vein from the groin was used in 44 (94%), and reversed valve depleted cubital vein bifurcation graft in three patients (6%). Median ICA cross clamp time was 17 min (range 8-30 min). Five patients suffered from intra-operative ischaemic neurological deficits (11%), of which all were temporary except one. One tumour patient died on post-operative day 1 due to bleeding. Median follow up was 28.3 months (range 0.1-97.4 months). Tumour erosion required graft ligation in one patient 7 months after reconstruction. Five significant stenoses of the ICA (11%), nine (19%) stenoses of the ECA, and two (4%) common carotid artery stenoses, with four (8%) re-redo interventions, were observed. Thirteen patients (28%) died after a median follow up of 6.7 months (range 1.7-56.7 months), all unrelated to the vascular procedure. CONCLUSION: Autologous bifurcated carotid artery interposition graft avoids the use of prosthetic graft material, the ECA remains patent in 80%, and it provides mid-term results comparable with other redo carotid artery procedures. Therefore, this procedure should be reserved for symptomatic patients with no other revascularisation option.

Tibiodistal vein bypass in critical limb ischemia and its role after unsuccessful tibial angioplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Technical progress in angioplasty expanded its application to very distal arterial lesions of the lower extremity. In cases of unsuccessful angioplasty tibiodistal bypass surgery may be required for limb salvage. We investigated the long-term outcome of this technique in patients with critical limb ischemia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether tibiodistal bypasses done after unsuccessful tibial angioplasty had inferior patency, limb salvage, or survival rates compared with primary tibiodistal bypasses. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective data analysis included all distal bypass procedures originating from a tibial artery. Primary study end points were primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage. Secondary end points included survival, wound healing, and systemic and local complications. Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards were applied. RESULTS: There were 61 tibiodistal vein bypasses for critical limb ischemia performed in 23 years. Indications for tibiodistal bypass was Rutherford category 5 in 41 cases (67%) and category 6 in 20 cases (33%). Procedures were allocated to group A (primary bypass; n = 28) and group B (bypass after unsuccessful tibial angioplasty; n = 33). Primary patency was 55% versus 53% at 1 year and 47% versus 44% at 3 years (P = .58). Secondary patency was 59% versus 64% at 1 year and 52% versus 55% at 3 years (P = .36). Limb salvage was 96% versus 90% at 1 year and 91% versus 85% at 3 years (P = .44). Overall survival rates were 91% versus 97% at 1 year and 85% versus 92% at 3 years (P = .76). The median follow-up was 4.0 years in group A and 4.9 years in group B. In multivariate analyses for loss of primary patency and limb loss, no significant predictors could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that tibiodistal vein bypass is a feasible, efficient, and safe technique in patients with critical limb ischemia. It provides acceptable primary and secondary patency rates to prevent major amputation and ensure survival. Previous unsuccessful tibial angioplasty had no significant impact on tibiodistal vein bypass outcome. This technique should be part of the armamentarium of vascular surgeons.

Paclitaxel-coated versus plain balloon angioplasty in the treatment of infrainguinal vein bypass stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of plain vs paclitaxel-coated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with infrainguinal vein bypass stenosis. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive patients treated by infrainguinal bypass PTA. Primary study end points were primary and assisted primary patency. Secondary end points were clinical and hemodynamic improvement, limb salvage, and survival. Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards were applied. RESULTS: From April 2008 to November 2014, 83 infrainguinal vein bypasses were treated for graft stenosis by plain (group A, n = 41) or by paclitaxel-coated PTA (group B, n = 42). The groups did not differ significantly in mean age (71.9 years for both groups; P = .99), hypertension (P = 1.0), hyperlipidemia (P = .5), diabetes (P = .6), coronary artery disease (P = 1.0), smoking (P = 1.0), preoperative ankle-brachial index (P = .08), or bypass characteristics (below-knee, P = .82). Technical success rate was 100% for both groups. Mean follow-up was 2.9 years for group A patients and 2.2 years for group B patients (P = .08). No patient was lost to follow-up. Primary patency rates were 88% vs 87% and 73% vs 75% (P = .19) and assisted primary patency rates were 88% vs 90% and 77% vs 84% (P = .76) for group A and B patients at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Repeat target lesion revascularization rates were 22% vs 14% (P = .17). At the last follow-up, there were eight vs seven bypass occlusions (P = .74) for group A and B patients, respectively. In univariate analysis, proximal in-graft stenosis (Cox F, P = .041), bypass failure <6 months after bypass surgery (Cox F, P = .013), more than one bypass stenosis per graft (Cox F, P = .047), and redo bypass procedure (Cox F, P = .0001) were significantly related to assisted primary bypass patency. Immediate hemodynamic and sustained clinical improvement rates were 88% vs 86% and 70% vs 73% for group A and B patients, respectively. There were three vs one major amputations (P = .36) and eight vs seven deaths (P = .78) in group A and B patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel-coated and plain angioplasty of significant infrainguinal vein bypass stenoses performed equally well in clinical and hemodynamic improvement and in primary and assisted primary bypass patency rates.

Arm veins versus contralateral greater saphenous veins for lower extremity bypass reconstruction: preliminary data of a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized study was to determine whether arm vein (AV) or contralateral greater saphenous vein (CGSV) is the better alternative vein source for lower extremity bypass reconstruction. METHODS: Consecutive patients with absent ipsilateral greater saphenous vein undergoing lower extremity revascularization were allocated to group A (AV bypass) or B (CGSV bypass). RESULTS: From 6, 2010, to 11, 2013, 64 patients (32 each group) were randomized. In all, 29 of 93 patients had to be excluded for various reasons. Median age was 76 years vs. 71 years (P = 0.01) for group A and B patients. There were no statistically significant differences regarding gender, cardiovascular risk factors, redo bypass procedures (P = 0.77), below-knee bypass procedures (P = 0.61), median bypass length (P = 0.6), and median length of incision on ipsilateral leg to perform anastomoses (P = 0.2) between group A and B patients, respectively. Incisions for vein harvest were longer in group A (P = 0.003). Overall surgical site infections (SSIs, P = 1.0) and SSI from vein harvest (P = 1.0) were equally distributed. No patient was lost to follow-up (17 vs. 18 months, P = 0.74). There was no statistically significant difference regarding primary (P = 0.77) and secondary (P = 0.25) patency rates at 1 year (group A: 52% vs. group B: 54% and group A: 72% vs. group B: 61%) and at 2 years (52% vs. 48% and 64% vs. 61%), respectively. There were 4 vs. 6 major amputations (P = 0.23) and 5 vs. 2 deaths (P = 0.1) in groups A and B during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest that both AV and CGSV may serve as a secondary vein bypass graft equally well.

Bioabsorbable stent implantation vs. common femoral artery endarterectomy: early results of a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and hemodynamic outcome in patients undergoing treatment of common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic lesions by bioabsorbable stent implantation (BASI group) or by common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFE group). METHODS: A randomized, controlled, single-center, open-label trial was initiated to compare outcomes of BASI or CFE in patients with chronic atherosclerotic occlusive lesions in the CFA. From May 2011 to April 2013, 116 consecutive patients were recruited; after excluding 36 patients, 80 patients (52 men; mean age 72.2±9.6 years) were enrolled 1:1 and are the subject of this intention-to-treat interim analysis (40 patients in each group). The primary endpoint was surgical site infections; secondary outcome measures were technical success, hemodynamic improvement, clinical improvement, patency, limb salvage, and survival. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, or CFA occlusions. The CFE patients presented with 7 surgical site infections (all minor) vs. none in the BASI group (p=0.002) and a longer mean postoperative hospital stay of 7 vs. 2 days for BASI patients (p<0.001). Technical success rates were 97.5% and 100% for the BASI and CFE groups, respectively. Postoperative ankle-brachial index means were comparable (p=0.38). The 30-day primary patency rates were 92.5% and 100% for the BASI and CFE groups, respectively (p=0.038). There were 6 reconstruction failures in CFE patients vs. none in the BASI group (p=0.02); 5 failures involved initial CFA occlusions. At 1 year, the primary and secondary patency rates were 80% vs. 100% (p=0.007) and 84% vs. 100% (p=0.01) for BASI and CFE patients, respectively. Limb salvage was equivalent, and survival rates were 88% and 90% for BASI vs. CFE patients (p=0.51) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: This interim analysis suggests that BASI is not an option for CFA occlusion and is only a limited option for CFA stenosis. Clinical and hemodynamic results are comparable for BASI and CFE. An increased rate of redo procedures in the BASI patients outweighs lower surgical site infection rates compared to CFE. Short-term patency rates are significantly worse in patients undergoing CFA stenting with BASI.

Characterization of the vasa vasorum in the human great saphenous vein: a scanning electron microscopy and 3D-morphometry study using vascular corrosion casts.

The vasa vasorum (VV) of explanted segments of the human great saphenous vein (Vena saphena magna; HGSV), harvested during dissection for coronary bypass grafts or diseased vein segments from the "Salzburger Landesklinikum," were studied by scanning electron microscopy and three-dimensional morphometry of microvascular corrosion casts. The main objective of this study was to examine the VV's structural arrangement in order to find the most vital segments of the HGSV and in turn to improve the results of coronary bypass surgeries. The study presents a meticulous analysis of the whole microvascular system of the VV of the HGSV and its three-dimensional arrangement. It is one of the first studies yielding detailed quantitative data on geometry of the VV of the HGSV. A detailed insight into different vascular parameters such as vessel diameter, interbranching, intervascular distances, and branching angles at different levels of the VV's angioarchitecture and in different parts of the HGSV in health and disease is given. Further, the geometry of bifurcations was examined in order to compute the physiological optimality principles of this delicate vascular system based on its construction, maintenance, and function.

Successful repair of bilateral common carotid artery dissections from hanging.

The management of blunt carotid artery dissections caused by hanging remains controversial, especially with regard to diagnostic work-up and treatment options. We present 2 men, 49 and 41 years of age, who were treated for bilateral common carotid artery dissection caused by strangulation. In the first patient, additional cricotracheal separation and blunt thyroid gland trauma was observed. Bilateral saphenous vein graft interposition was accomplished in both patients. In the first patient, tracheal repair and suture of the thyroid gland completed the procedure. At 1 year of follow-up, both patients were capable of managing their lives independently. A systematic review of the literature on managing near-hanging and nonfatal strangulation victims is included in this report to allow this case series to be put into perspective.