Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 48
Filtrar
1.
Open Heart ; 7(2)2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32690553

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A multidisciplinary heart valve team is recommended for the evaluation of treatment in patients with valvular heart disease, but evidence supporting this concept is lacking. In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, we thought to analyse the patient selection process by the heart team for different treatment options and the outcome after treatment. METHODS: In this single-centre cohort study, all patients treated for mitral regurgitation between July 2013 and September 2018 were included. Primary end points during follow-up were all-cause mortality and a combined end point, consisting of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular rehospitalisation and mitral valve reintervention. RESULTS: 179 patients (44.8%) were treated using Mitraclip, 185 (46.2%) by surgical repair and 36 (9.0%) by surgical replacement. The mortality risk according to EuroScore II differed significantly between treatment groups (6.6%±5.6%, 1.7%±1.5% and 3.6%±2.7% for Mitraclip, surgical repair and replacement, respectively, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality for the 3 groups were 3.4%, 1.6% and 8.3%, respectively (p=0.091). Overall, surgical repair patients had higher 4-year survival (HR 0.40 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.63), p<0.001) and fewer combined end points (HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.80), p<0.001) compared with surgical replacement and Mitraclip patients. However, patients undergoing Mitraclip for isolated, primary mitral regurgitation achieved very good long-term survival. CONCLUSION: The multidisciplinary heart team assigned only low-risk patients with favourable anatomy to surgical repair, while high-risk patients underwent Mitraclip or surgical replacement. This strategy was associated with lower than expected in-hospital mortality for Mitraclip patients and high 4-year survival rates for patients undergoing surgical or percutaneous repair of isolated primary mitral regurgitation.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Hemodinámica , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/efectos adversos , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/instrumentación , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/mortalidad , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/mortalidad , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Readmisión del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Diseño de Prótesis , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Atr Fibrillation ; 11(5): 2039, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31139293

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traditional surgical treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is performed via sternotomy and on cardiopulmonary bypass. It is very effective in regard to rhythm control, but remains unpopular due to its invasiveness. Truly endoscopic AF treatments have decreased the threshold for electrophysiologists (and cardiologists) to refer, and the reluctance of patients to accept a standalone surgical approach. Practice guidelines from around the world have recognized this as an acceptable therapeutic approach. Current guidelines recommend the HeartTeam approach in treating these complex AF cases. In this study we report our experience with AF HeartTeam approach for surgical stand-alone AF ablation. METHODS: The AF HeartTeam Program began in 2013, patients qualified for inclusion if either of the following was present: failed catheter ablation and/or medication, not suitable for catheter ablation, contraindication to anticoagulation, or patients preferring such an approach. All patients with a complex AF history were assessed by the AF HeartTeam, from which 42 patients were deemed suitable for a totally endoscopic AF procedure (epicardial ablation and LAA closure). Endpoints were intraoperative bidirectional block of the pulmonary veins and closure of left atrial appendage confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Post discharge rhythm follow-up was performed after 3 and 12, 24 and 36 months. Anticoagulation was discontinued 6 weeks after the procedure in patients after documented LAA closure. RESULTS: In total 42 patients underwent the endoscopic procedure (Median CHA2DS2-VASC=3 (1-6), HAS-BLED=2 (1-6)) for paroxysmal (15/42) and non-paroxysmal AF (27/42) respectively. Bidirectional block was obtained in all patients and complete LAA closure was obtained in all but one Patient on TEE (41/42). In one patient the LAA was not addressed due to extensive adhesions. Two patients underwent median sternotomy because of bleeding during the endoscopic surgery early in the series. There were no deaths. Procedure duration was a median of 124min (Range 83-211) and duration of hospitalization was median of 5 days (Range 3-12). During 36 months follow-up survival free of mortality, thromboembolic events or strokes was 100%. Twelve month freedom from atrial arrhythmia off anti-arrhythmic medication was 93% and 89% for paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal patients respectively. 6/42 patients who had an AF recurrence during the follow-up underwent touch-up catheter ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation heart team approach provides excellent outcomes for patients with AF. This approach is beneficial for patients after failed catheter ablation or not candidates for such and offers a very effective mid-term outcome data. In addition to effective rhythm control the protective effect of epicardial LAA closure may play an important role in effectively reducing stroke. The creation of an AF HeartTeam as recommended by the guidelines insures unbiased therapies and provides access to this minimally invasive but effective therapeutic option for AF patients.

4.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 19(1): 23-30, 2018 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28065915

RESUMEN

Aims: The Edwards Sapien 3 heart valve prosthesis (S3) is commonly used for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and is available in three sizes. To date no data has been published on the effective orifice area (EOA) and the hemodynamic performance of the three different S3 sizes. The aim of this study was to measure the size-specific EOA and hemodynamic performance of the S3 in short-term and 1-year follow-up. Methods and results: One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients treated by TAVI with a S3 prosthesis at the Heart Clinic Zurich between May 2014 and July 2015 were included. Clinical data were extracted from the Swiss TAVI registry. The EOA was calculated using Doppler echocardiography (peri-interventionally and at discharge) and by 3D-biplane transoesophageal echocardiography (peri-interventionally). Mean transvalvular gradients (dPmean) were additionally calculated with Doppler echocardiography at 30 days and 1 year. Results were analysed separately for the 23 mm (n = 42; 37%), 26 mm (n = 46; 41%), and 29 mm (n = 25; 22%) prostheses. At discharge, the EOAs were 1.6 ± 0.2 cm2 (23 mm S3), 2.0 ± 0.2 cm2 (26 mm S3), and 2.7 ± 0.2 cm2 (29 mm S3), p < 0.001. The dPmeans at discharge were 10.9 ± 6.0 mmHg (23 mm S3), 10.4 ± 3.5 mmHg (26 mm S3), and 8.9 ± 2.8 mmHg (29 mm S3), p = 0.235, and did not significantly change over time within any of the S3 sizes. Conclusions: Post-TAVI, the EOAs of the three different S3 prosthesis sizes differ significantly, the transvalvular gradients, however, are comparable. Mean transvalvular gradients remain stable over time and document good prosthesis function after 1 year.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/anatomía & histología , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Análisis de Varianza , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Cohortes , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Suiza , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 50(3): 219-226, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29177981

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are life-saving device therapy, and patients often carry devices for decades with interim pulse generator exchanges. Inappropriate shocks are associated with impaired quality of life and increased mortality, but available data on their incidence and etiology outside of clinical trials is limited and usually restricted to the lifespan of a singular device. We hypothesized that the incidence in clinical practice is underestimated and aimed this study to retrospectively assess the long-term incidence and etiology of inappropriate shocks in a real-world cohort of patients with multiple ICDs over a long follow-up period. METHODS: Patients with ICDs implanted between 1998 and 2012 in two Swiss cardiology departments and at least one device exchange in the same department thereafter were included in this cohort. Retrospective analysis with follow-up until 2016 was conducted to assess incidence and etiology of inappropriate ICD shocks. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-nine ICDs were implanted in 100 patients (mean age: 60.1 ± 11.7; 80% male). Over a mean follow-up time of 11.2 (± 3.6) years, 555 shocks occurred in 55 patients. One hundred twenty-three (22%) shocks in 23 (23%) patients were inappropriate. Supraventricular arrhythmia and oversensing were the most frequent causes of inappropriate shock. Patients with younger age or previous supraventricular arrhythmias were at increased risk of inappropriate shocks. Patients with inappropriate shocks during the lifespan of their first ICD were at increased risk for inappropriate shocks in subsequent devices. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate shocks are an underestimated and frequent problem in clinical practice with an incidence that may exceed numbers of previously reported clinical trials with shorter follow-up periods. Patients at increased risk for inappropriate shocks need careful evaluation of potential therapeutic optimization strategies including pharmacological treatment, device programming, electrophysiological ablation, device downgrading, and telemonitoring.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Causas de Muerte , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/mortalidad , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/terapia , Ablación por Catéter/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 32(3): 439-47, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26645684

RESUMEN

Incomplete information on characteristics of prosthetic heart valves (PHV) may lead to inappropriate choices for PHV implantation (patient-prosthesis-mismatch) or erroneous interpretation of PHV function after implantation. No single and easy accessible source provides all relevant information on PHV. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of available data for the majority of PHVs and annuloplasty rings. Information was collected by reviewing articles published on www.pubmed.org up to December 2014 and by written contact to all PHV manufacturers. Four areas of interest were defined: (1) PHV image, (2) in vivo transvalvular gradients, (3) effective orifice area (EOA) calculators and (4) PHV dimensions. Available information was classified as complete (all categories), partial (two or three categories) or minimal (one category). 108 PHV (including homografts) and 34 annuloplasty rings systems were identified. The information on PHV was complete, partial or minimal in 19.5, 61.0 and 19.5% of PHV, respectively. In 91.6% a picture of the valve could be obtained, whereas normative data for transvalvular gradients and EOA calculators were available in 63.0 and 25.0% of all PHV, respectively. The available data was summarized on a new open access webpage ( www.valveguide.ch ). There is a lack of accessible data on PHV dimensions, normal transvalvular gradients and effective orifice area calculators, although such information is of crucial importance for proper PHV assessment.


Asunto(s)
Acceso a la Información , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Internet , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Diseño de Prótesis , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Clin Res Cardiol ; 104(2): 136-44, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25301085

RESUMEN

AIMS: Various studies have attempted to identify super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by echocardiographic parameters of reverse remodeling. However, scientific evidence regarding those parameters is scarce. This study aimed at validating the definition of super-response to CRT based on the following frequently employed echocardiographic parameters: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), and end-systolic volume index (ESVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively investigated echocardiographic data and outcomes of 542 patients after CRT implantation. The primary endpoint comprised all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, ventricular assist device implantation (VAD), and hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary endpoints were hospitalization for heart failure, and the combination of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation and VAD. Two approaches were employed defining super-response based on improvement of echocardiographic parameters: one derived from the negative predictive value (NPV) for clinical endpoints, and second from best quartiles of improvement. Using the NPV method, an absolute 25 % increase in LVEF, a relative 38 % reduction in EDVI, and 46 % in ESVI were calculated as optimal cut-offs identifying 4.9, 18.5, and 21.3 % as super-responders. The best quartiles method resulted in lower cut-off values, i.e. 14 % increase in LVEF, 26 % reduction in EDVI, and 36 % in ESVI. All cut-offs except LVEF ≥ 25% were significantly associated with improved outcomes after 5 years (median follow-up 35.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: NPV- and best quartile-based cut-offs validate previously applied empirical echocardiographic cut-offs to define super-response to CRT. These data provide evidence for using these empirical cut-offs in daily practice and facilitate inter-study comparability.


Asunto(s)
Determinación de Punto Final/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/terapia , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suiza/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/mortalidad , Remodelación Ventricular
9.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 70(2): 602-8, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25326088

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of implementing guidelines, coupled with individual feedback, on antibiotic prescribing behaviour of primary care physicians in Switzerland. METHODS: One hundred and forty general practices from a representative Swiss sentinel network of primary care physicians participated in this cluster-randomized prospective intervention study. The intervention consisted of providing guidelines on treatment of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (UTIs), coupled with sustained, regular feedback on individual antibiotic prescription behaviour during 2 years. The main aims were: (i) to increase the percentage of prescriptions of penicillins for all RTIs treated with antibiotics; (ii) to increase the percentage of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prescriptions for all uncomplicated lower UTIs treated with antibiotics; (iii) to decrease the percentage of quinolone prescriptions for all cases of exacerbated COPD (eCOPD) treated with antibiotics; and (iv) to decrease the proportion of sinusitis and other upper RTIs treated with antibiotics. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01358916). RESULTS: While the percentage of antibiotics prescribed for sinusitis or other upper RTIs and the percentage of quinolones prescribed for eCOPD did not differ between the intervention group and the control group, there was a significant increase in the percentage of prescriptions of penicillins for all RTIs treated with antibiotics [57% versus 49%, OR=1.42 (95% CI 1.08-1.89), P=0.01] and in the percentage of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prescriptions for all uncomplicated lower UTIs treated with antibiotics [35% versus 19%, OR=2.16 (95% CI 1.19-3.91), P=0.01] in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, implementing guidelines, coupled with sustained individual feedback, was not able to reduce the proportion of sinusitis and other upper RTIs treated with antibiotics, but increased the use of recommended antibiotics for RTIs and UTIs, as defined by the guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Adhesión a Directriz , Médicos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Atención Primaria de Salud , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Suiza/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
10.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J ; 14(3): 112-20, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24948850

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become an important pillar of contemporary heart failure therapy. The efficacy of CRT, however, critically relies on proper LV lead placement and performance, which is why data regarding the long-term performance of CS leads are of considerable interest. Available studies are limited by a restricted variety of lead vendors, earlier lead models and / or very short follow-up periods. In the current study, we therefore investigated the long-term performance of modern LV leads in a large "real world" cohort of patients undergoing CRT implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: All 193 patients who had successfullyundergone CRT implantation at the University Hospital Zurich between September 2003 and January 2010 were included in the study. An overall stable course of stimulation energy was observed over time; neither ischemic etiology, lead configuration, or severely reduced EF had an influence on the evolution of energy thresholds over time. Interestingly, patients with a high energy threshold at baseline experienced a significant reduction during follow-up. In contrast, a significant drop in impedance was seen following implantation, followed by a steady course for the rest of the observation period. Only 15 patients (9.7%) showed an impedance > 1000 Ohm at any time during their follow-up. Seven lead dislocations were observed during follow up. CONCLUSION: The current comprehensive analysis of long-term performance of modern coronary sinus leads demonstrates excellent stability, performance and safety. These data may have important implications for physicians involved in biventricular pacemaker implantations and in the follow-up care of these patients.

11.
Semin Hematol ; 51(2): 139-46, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24861798

RESUMEN

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most frequent sustained arrhythmia, is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. The risk of stroke depends on risk factors such as age, hypertension, heart failure, and vascular disease. Thus, antithrombotic therapy is a cornerstone in the management of AF. Warfarin is successfully used to reduce thromboembolic events. More recently, direct thrombin (dabigatran) and factor Xa (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) inhibitors have been compared to warfarin in large randomized trials. All new substances have been shown to be non-inferior to warfarin concerning thromboembolic events. Severe bleeding, such as fatal and intracranial bleeding, was less frequent with direct oral anticoagulants. Results of the studies and subgroup analyses are discussed. Further trials using direct oral anticoagulants in special populations such as very old and patients with kidney disease are needed.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Dabigatrán , Embolia/etiología , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Morfolinas/administración & dosificación , Morfolinas/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Rivaroxabán , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Tiazoles/administración & dosificación , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Tiofenos/administración & dosificación , Tiofenos/efectos adversos , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/efectos adversos , beta-Alanina/administración & dosificación , beta-Alanina/efectos adversos , beta-Alanina/análogos & derivados
13.
Cardiol J ; 21(3): 316-24, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23990194

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from chronic heart failure (CHF). Optimal device programming is crucial for maximum patient benefit. The goal of the present study was to assess device settings from CHF patients undergoing CRT optimization in a "real world" setting, and to delineate parameters most frequently requiring adjustment. METHODS: All patients who underwent CRT device implantation in the Cardiology Clinicat the University Hospital Zurich between January 2011 and September 2012 and in whom follow-up was available were included in this analysis. RESULTS: A total of 170 CHF patients were included in this analysis. True biventricular pacing was present in 44% of all patients, while QRS fusion was detected in 49.9%. The majority of the patients presented with suboptimal atrioventricular (AV) delays requiring adjustment. AV delays were therefore shortened due to the presence of QRS fusion in 53.3% and 38.1% of patients (sAV and pAV, respectively) or prolonged because of truncation of the A wave in the left ventricular inflow pulse wave Doppler measurement (17.5% and 28.4% for sAV and pAV, respectively). In contrast, interventricular delay (VV delay) was rarely changed (11.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In our "real world" cohort, a substantial proportion of patients presented to their first post-operative consultation with suboptimal device settings. Our data indicate that the opportunity to optimize device settings is frequently wasted in the "real world", underlining the necessity for expert device follow-up to deliver optimal care to this challenging group of heart failure patients.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/normas , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 62(1): 70-2, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23225506
16.
Eur Heart J ; 35(16): 1051-60, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24371079

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with improved morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) on optimal medical therapy. The impact of CHF medication optimization following CRT, however, has never been comprehensively evaluated. In the current study, we therefore investigated the effect of CHF medication dosage on morbidity and mortality in CHF patients after CRT implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Chronic heart failure medication was assessed in 185 patients after CRT implantation. During an overall mean follow-up of 44.6 months, 83 patients experienced a primary endpoint (death, heart transplantation, assist device implantation, or hospitalization for CHF). Treatment with higher dosages of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (P = 0.001) and beta-blockers (P < 0.001) as well as with lower dosages of loop diuretics (P < 0.001) was associated with a reduced risk for the primary combined endpoint as well as for all-cause mortality. Echocardiographic super-responders to CRT were treated with higher average dosages of ACE-I/ARBs (68.1 vs. 52.4%, P < 0.01) and beta-blockers (59 vs. 42.2%, P < 0.01). During follow-up, the average dosage of loop diuretics was decreased by 20% in super-responders, but increased by 30% in non-super-responders (P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: The use of higher dosages of neurohormonal blockers and lower dosages of diuretics is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality following CRT implantation. Our data imply a beneficial effect of increasing neurohormonal blockade whenever possible following CRT implantation.


Asunto(s)
Cardiotónicos/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Terapia Combinada , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Inhibidores del Simportador de Cloruro Sódico y Cloruro Potásico/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
PLoS One ; 8(11): e79152, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24223898

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the assessment of diastolic dysfunction (DD) is an integral part of routine cardiologic examinations, little is known about associated electrocardiographic (ECG) changes. Our aim was to investigate a potential role of ECG indices for the recognition of patients with DD. METHODS AND RESULTS: ECG parameters correlating with echocardiographic findings of DD were retrospectively assessed in a derivation group of 172 individuals (83 controls with normal diastolic function, 89 patients with DD) and their diagnostic performance was tested in a validation group of 50 controls and 50 patients. The patient group with a DD Grade 1 and 2 showed longer QTc (422 ± 24 ms and 434 ± 32 ms vs. 409 ± 25ms, p<0.0005) and shorter Tend-P and Tend-Q intervals, reflecting the electrical and mechanical diastole (240 ± 78 ms and 276 ± 108 ms vs. 373 ± 110 ms, p<0.0001; 409 ± 85 ms and 447 ± 115 ms vs. 526 ± 119 ms, p<0.0001). The PQ-interval was significantly longer in the patient group (169 ± 28ms and 171 ± 38ms vs. 153 ± 22ms, p<0.005). After adjusting for possible confounders, a novel index (Tend-P/[PQxAge]) showed a high performance for the recognition of DD, stayed robust in the validation group (sensitivity 82%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value 93%, negative predictive value 82%, accuracy 88%) and proved a substantial added value when combined with the indexed left atrial volume (LAESVI, sensitivity 90%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 95%, negative predictive value 86%, accuracy 91%). CONCLUSIONS: A novel electrocardiographic index Tend-P/(PQxAge) demonstrates a high diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of DD and yields a substantial added value when combined with the LAESVI.


Asunto(s)
Diástole , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Ecocardiografía Doppler/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/patología
18.
Heart ; 99(16): 1158-65, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23813845

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to delineate the role of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients listed for heart transplantation. SETTING: Retrospective observational multicentre study. PATIENTS: 1089 consecutive patients listed for heart transplantation in two tertiary heart transplant centres were enrolled. Of 550 patients (51%) on the transplant list with an ICD, 216 had received their ICD for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death and 334 for secondary prevention. 539 patients did not receive an ICD. INTERVENTION: Treatment with or without an ICD was left to the discretion of the heart failure specialist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality. RESULTS: ICDs appear to be associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality in patients implanted with the device for primary and secondary prevention compared to those without an ICD despite a median time on the waiting list of only 8 months (estimated 1-year: 88±3% vs. 77±3% vs. 67±3%; p=0.0001). A Cox regressional hazard model (corrected for age, sex, underlying heart disease, atrial fibrillation, cardiac resynchronisation therapy, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, ejection fraction, co-medication and year of listing) suggested an independent beneficial effect of ICDs that was most pronounced in patients who had received an ICD for primary prevention (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.85; p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: ICD implantation appears to be associated with an immediate and sustained survival benefit for patients awaiting heart transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Trasplante de Corazón , Prevención Primaria/instrumentación , Prevención Secundaria/instrumentación , Listas de Espera , Adulto , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Femenino , Alemania , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Suiza , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Listas de Espera/mortalidad
19.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 36(9): 1111-6, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23713912

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads become encapsulated intravascularly and in the generator pocket by fibrotic adhesions that accumulate over time. These adhesions are responsible for the difficulty and risk of lead extraction procedures. We developed a classification scheme for pocket adhesions, classified all of the patients in the cohort, and examined the relationship between pocket adhesions and the outcome of the procedure. METHODS: The classification of adhesions with respect to the intraoperative adhesion coverage was as followed: class 0 = adhesion free; class 1 ≤ 30% of adhesion coverage; class 2 = 30-60% of adhesion coverage; and class 3 ≥ 60% coverage. Patient data between December 2010 and March 2012 were collected. A total of 100 leads were extracted from 58 patients (1.7 ± 0.8 leads/patient); the mean lead implant duration was 78.5 ± 66.7 months, and the percentage of PM/ICD leads was 68% (n = 68)/32% (n = 32). RESULTS: Distribution of the leads among classes: 0 = 10; 1 = 17; 2 = 25; and 3 = 48. Average implant times (months) according to the adhesion classes: 0 = 1.2 ± 0.4; 1 = 19.8 ± 19.2; 2 = 79.3 ± 46.6; and 3 = 115.1 ± 106.0 (correlation-coefficient 0.71; P ≤ 0.05). Average numbers of extraction tools used according to the adhesions: 0 = none; 1 = 0.4 ± 0.7; 2 = 1.6 ± 1.0; and 3 = 2.3 ± 1.2 (correlation coefficient = 0.67; P ≤ 0.05). Complete removal was achieved in 100% of the patients in classes 0 and 1; 96% in class 2 (n = 24); and 75% in class 3 (n = 36) (P ≤ 0.05). Mortality = 0. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive adhesions in the generator pocket predict the need for a higher number of extraction tools. High-grade pocket adhesions predict lower success rates with regard to complete lead extraction. Both findings suggest that the degree of pocket adhesions predicts the degree of intravascular adhesions.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Electrodos Implantados/efectos adversos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Adherencias Tisulares/diagnóstico , Adherencias Tisulares/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adherencias Tisulares/clasificación
20.
Europace ; 15(11): 1636-41, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23585255

RESUMEN

AIMS: In this retrospective study we compared different lead extraction techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2009 and December 2012 we performed transvenous lead extraction procedures on 206 leads in 122 patients. Mean implant duration (MID) was 69.6 months (1-384 months). Leads with lead implant duration ≥ 12 months were assigned to groups according to the extraction technique: Group A: no extraction tool; Group B: laser approach; and Group C: mechanical approach. Overall clinical success was 93.3%. Group A showed a significantly lower MID [38.1 (19-122) months] compared with Groups B and C [83.1 (13-168) months; P < 0.0001 vs. 95.4 (12-384) months; P < 0.0001]. Mean implant duration between Groups B and C did not differ significantly (P = 0.28). Clinical and complete procedural success was 100% in Group A. Clinical success rate was higher in Group C than in Group B (97.0 vs. 76.9%, P = 0.018). Complete procedural success did not differ significantly between Groups B and C (88.9 vs. 76.9%; P = 0.132). In Groups B and C, absence of complete procedural success occurred in long implanted leads (MID 107.8 ± 36.4 and 137.6 ± 89.2 months). Relative costs per extracted lead were 49% higher in Group B than in Group C. CONCLUSION: In case of long implanted leads a laser and a mechanical approach are comparable in complete procedural success and safety. Clinical success and cost effectiveness analysis favours the mechanical approach. Regardless of the extraction technique efficacy and safety optimization has to focus on long implanted leads.


Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Rayos Láser , Mecánica , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Remoción de Dispositivos/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA