A Retrospective Genomic Landscape of 661 Young Adult Glioblastomas Diagnosed Using 2016 WHO Guidelines for Central Nervous System Tumors.

The authors present a cohort of 661 young adult glioblastomas diagnosed using 2016 WHO World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, utilizing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to explore their genomic landscape and assess their relationship to currently defined disease entities. This analysis explored variants with evidence of pathogenic function, common copy number variants (CNVs), and several novel fusion events not described in literature. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) mutational signatures, anatomic location, and tumor recurrence are further explored. Using data collected from CGP, unsupervised machine-learning techniques were leveraged to identify 10 genomic classes in previously assigned young adult glioblastomas. The authors relate these molecular classes to current World Health Organization guidelines and reference current literature to give therapeutic and prognostic descriptions where possible.

Comprehensive genomic profiling reveals molecular subsets of ASXL1-mutated myeloid neoplasms.

A large-scale genomic analysis of patients with ASXL1-mutated myeloid disease has not been performed to date. We reviewed comprehensive genomic profiling results from 6043 adults to characterize clinicopathologic features and co-mutation patterns by ASXL1 mutation status. ASXL1 mutations occurred in 1414 patients (23%). Mutation co-occurrence testing revealed strong co-occurrence (p < 0.01) between mutations in ASXL1 and nine genes (SRSF2, U2AF1, RUNX1, SETBP1, EZH2, STAG2, CUX1, CSF3R, CBL). Further analysis of patients with these co-mutations yielded several novel findings. Co-mutation patterns supported that ASXL1/SF3B1 co-mutation may be biologically distinct from ASXL1/non-SF3B1 spliceosome co-mutation. In AML, ASXL1/SRSF2 co-mutated patients frequently harbored STAG2 mutations (42%), which were dependent on the presence of both ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutation (p < 0.05). STAG2 and SETBP1 mutations were also exclusive in ASXL1/SRSF2 co-mutated patients and associated with divergent chronic myeloid phenotypes. Our findings support that certain multi-mutant genotypes may be biologically relevant in ASXL1-mutated myeloid disease.

Influencing Best Practices for Genomic and Germline Testing in Urology.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated germline and somatic testing practices and compared results from tissue and liquid biopsy specimens in a large community urology setting. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on advanced prostate cancer patients from a single community practice between June 2016 and September 2021. Clinical data and sequencing results from tissue and liquid biopsy specimens were available for 389 patients. Genomic data were available for 81 tissues and 74 liquid biopsy specimens. Comparison of genomic findings included 81 tissues and 27 liquid biopsy specimens. The number of actionable biomarkers and patients screened and enrolled in clinical trials was assessed from germline and somatic testing. Frequency of pathogenically altered genes, alteration types, and biomarkers were assessed from tissue and liquid specimens. Alteration frequency was compared between specimen types for the top 25 altered genes. RESULTS: Clinically relevant alterations were found from germline and somatic testing in both tissue and liquid biopsy specimens. The frequency of microsatellite instability-high, tumor mutational burden-high, or alterations in homologous recombination repair genes was consistent with published findings. Concordance between tissue and liquid findings varied with low circulating tumor DNA. CONCLUSIONS: Germline and somatic testing is critical for treatment decisions and should be standard of care for community practices. Liquid biopsy is a viable alternative when circulating tumor DNA is high.

Mismatch repair deficiency, next-generation sequencing-based microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden as predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor effectiveness in frontline treatment of advanced stage endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Molecular profiling is developing to inform treatment in endometrial cancer. Using real world evidence, we sought to evaluate frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor vs chemotherapy effectiveness in advanced endometrial cancer, stratified by Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) ≥10 mut/MB and microsatellite instability (MSI). METHODS: Patients with advanced endometrial cancer in the US-based de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Clinico-Genomic Database were included. Data originated from patients treated between January 2011- March 2022 at 280 US clinics. Next-generation sequencing assays were performed via FoundationOne or FoundationOneCDx. Longitudinal clinical data were derived from electronic health records. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment included pembrolizumab, dostarlimab, and nivolumab monotherapies. Time to next treatment, time to treatment discontinuation, and overall survival were assessed with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for known prognostic factors. We used the Likelihood ratio test to compare biomarker performance. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients received chemotherapy and 28 received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy as frontline treatment. Patients who received monotherapy were more likely to be stage III at diagnosis (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 54.6% vs chemotherapy: 15.0%; p<0.001) and more likely to test MSI-high via next-generation sequencing (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 53.6% vs chemotherapy: 19.2%; p<0.001). In MSI-high cancers, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor had a more favorable time to next treatment (aHR: 0.18, p=0.001) and overall survival (aHR 0.29, p=0.045). Additional analyses on 70 unique tumor specimens revealed mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) via immunohistochemistry and MSI-high via next-generation sequencing concordance (91%), with nominal improvement of MSI over dMMR to predict time to treatment discontinuation (p=0.030), time to next treatment (p=0.032), and overall survival (p=0.22). MSI status was concordant with tumor mutational burden ≥10 in 94.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors may have improved efficacy over chemotherapy in frontline treatment for advanced endometrial cancer defined by MSI-high using next-generation sequencing as a nominally better predictor of outcomes than dMMR with immunohistochemistry. This provides the biologic rationale of active phase III trials.

Genomic Profiling Reveals Differences in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Large B-Cell Lymphoma, With Subtyping Suggesting Sensitivity to BTK Inhibition.

BACKGROUND: B-cell primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCL) is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) confined to the CNS. Less than 50% of patients with PCL achieve complete remission with current therapies. We describe the findings from comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of a cohort of 69 patients with PCL, 36 cases of secondary CNS lymphoma (SCL), and 969 cases of DLBCL to highlight their differences and characterize the PCL cohort. In addition, we highlight the differences in frequency of germinal center B-cell like (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes and molecular subtypes, particularly MCD and EZH subtypes, between PCL and DLBCL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine cases of B-cell PCL, 36 cases of secondary CNS lymphoma (SCL), and 969 cases of DLBCL were evaluated by CGP of 405 genes via DNAseq and 265 genes via RNAseq for fusions (FoundationOne Heme). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated from 1.23 Mb of sequenced DNA. RESULTS: Genomic alterations with significant differences between PCL and DLBCL included MYD88, ETV6, PIM1, PRDM1, CXCR4, TP53, and CREBBP, while only MYD88 was significantly different between SCL and DLBCL. PCL cases were significantly enriched for the MCD molecular subtypes, which have an excellent response to BTKi. We report a patient with a durable complete response to BTKi consistent with their genomic profile. EBV status, CD274 amplification, and TMB status suggest that 38% of PCL patients may benefit from ICPI; however further study is warranted. CONCLUSION: CGP of PCLs reveals biomarkers, genomic alterations, and molecular classifications predictive of BTKi efficacy and potential ICPI efficacy. Given the limitations of standard of care for PCL, CGP is critical to identify potential therapeutic approaches for patients in this rare form of lymphoma.

Comparative Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs Chemotherapy by Tumor Mutational Burden in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Importance: The most useful biomarkers for clinical decision-making identify patients likely to have improved outcomes with one treatment vs another. Objective: To evaluate treatment class-specific outcomes of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) vs taxane chemotherapy by tumor mutational burden (TMB). Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness analysis of clinical variables and outcomes used prospectively defined biomarker-stratified genomic data from a deidentified clinicogenomic database. Data included men with previously treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving ICI or single-agent taxane chemotherapy from January 2011 to April 2021 at approximately 280 US academic or community-based cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care). Data were analyzed from July to August 2021. Exposures: Single-agent ICI or single-agent taxanes. Treatments were assigned at discretion of physician and patient without randomization. Imbalances of known factors between treatment groups were adjusted with propensity weighting. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, time to next therapy (TTNT), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 741 men (median [IQR], 70 [64-76] years) with mCRPC received comprehensive genomic profiling and were treated with ICI or single-agent taxane therapy. At baseline, the median (IQR) PSA level was 79.4 (19.0-254) ng/mL, 108 men (18.8%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scores of 2 or greater, and 644 men (86.9%) had received prior systemic treatments for mCRPC. A total of 45 patients (6.1%) received ICI therapy and 696 patients (93.9%) received taxane therapy. Among patients with TMB of fewer than 10 mutations per megabase (mt/Mb) receiving ICI, compared with those receiving taxanes, had worse TTNT (median [IQR], 2.4 [1.1-3.2] months vs 4.1 [2.2-6.3] months; hazard ratio [HR], 2.65; 95% CI, 1.78-3.95; P < .001). In contrast, for patients with TMB of 10 mt/Mb or greater, use of ICIs, compared with use taxanes, was associated with more favorable TTNT (median [IQR], 8.0 [3.4 to unknown] months vs 2.4 [2.4-7.3] months; HR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.15-0.87; P = .02) and OS (median 19.9 [8.06 to unknown] months vs 4.2 [2.69 - 6.12] months; HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.57; P = .001). Among all 741 patients, 44 (5.9%) had TMB of 10 mt/Mb or greater, 22 (3.0%) had high microsatellite instability, and 20 (2.7%) had both. Treatment interactions with TMB of 10 mt/Mb or greater (TTNT: HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.32-0.31; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.076-0.81; P = .02) were stronger than high microsatellite instability alone (TTNT: HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.51; P = .004; OS: HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.13-1.12; P = .08). Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study, ICIs were more effective than taxanes in patients with mCRPC when TMB was 10 mt/Mb or greater but not when TMB was fewer than 10 mt/Mb. The results add validity to the existing TMB cutoff of 10 mt/Mb for ICI use in later lines of therapy, and suggest that ICIs may be a viable alternative to taxane chemotherapy for patients with mCRPC with high TMB.

Correlating ROS1 Protein Expression With ROS1 Fusions, Amplifications, and Mutations.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we sought to further characterize ROS1 protein expression in solid tumors with the complete spectrum of ROS1 genomic alterations. METHODS: ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using the ROS1 (SP384) class I assay per manufacturer's instructions on a variety of solid tumors (n = 32) with known ROS1 genomic alterations. Genomic alterations included fusions (n = 17), gene amplifications (n = 10), and short-variant mutations (n = 11). RESULTS: Of the 32 cases with ROS1 IHC results, 100% (11 of 11) with canonical ROS1 fusions were positive for ROS1 IHC. Among noncanonical ROS1 fusions, only two (of five) cases with SQSTM1-ROS1 and RDX-ROS1 fusions were positive for ROS1 IHC whereas PTPRK-ROS1 (two) and TTC28-ROS1 fusions were negative for ROS1 IHC. One sample with a canonical ROS1 fusion and co-occurring ROS1 resistance mutation (6094G>A, p.G2032R) was positive for ROS1 IHC. A total of 10% (one of 10) of ROS1 amplified tumors were positive for ROS1 IHC. None of the cases (zero of five) with ROS1 short-variant mutations were positive for ROS1 protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that if ROS1 IHC was used as a screening tool for ROS1 fusion, a subset of fusion-negative tumors will reveal positive IHC staining highlighting the value of reflexing to genomic profiling to confirm the presence of a targetable fusion-driver before the initiation of therapy. In addition, the ability of comprehensive genomic profiling to detect ROS1 resistance mutations will be important for clinical decision making.

Landscape of Biomarkers in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Using Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are important biomarker tools used for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) given the expanding number of standard-of-care therapies that require companion diagnostic testing. We examined 9450 NSCLC real-world patient samples that underwent both CGP and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC to understand the biomarker landscape in this patient cohort. By assessing National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended biomarkers including genomic alterations, tumor mutational burden (≥10 mutations/Mb cut-off), and PD-L1 expression (Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥ 50% cut-off), we show that CGP + PD-L1 IHC yielded potentially actionable results for 70.5% of the 9,450 patients with NSCLC. Among the remaining 29.5% (2,789/9,450) of patients, 86.7% (2,419/2,789) were potentially eligible for another biomarker-associated therapy and/or clinical trial based on their genomic profile. In addition, in the PD-L1TPS≥50% disease subset, BRAF mutations, MET mutations, MET amplifications, and KRAS mutations were significantly enriched; and in the PD-L1TPS<50%, EGFR mutations, ERBB2 mutations, STK11 mutations, and KEAP1 mutations were enriched. These findings highlight the improved clinical utility of combining CGP with IHC to expand the biomarker-guided therapeutic options available for patients with NSCLC, relative to single biomarker testing alone.

Clinicopathologic and Genomic Landscape of Breast Carcinoma Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with breast carcinoma who have metastatic disease, 15%-30% will eventually develop brain metastases. We examined the genomic landscape of a large cohort of patients with breast carcinoma brain metastases (BCBMs) and compared it with a cohort of patients with primary breast carcinomas (BCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 733 BCBMs tested with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and compared them with 10,772 primary breast carcinomas (not-paired) specimens. For a subset of 16 triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC)-brain metastasis samples, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed concurrently. RESULTS: A total of 733 consecutive BCBMs were analyzed. Compared with primary BCs, BCBMs were enriched for genomic alterations in TP53 (72.0%, 528/733), ERBB2 (25.6%, 188/733), RAD21 (14.1%, 103/733), NF1 (9.0%, 66/733), BRCA1 (7.8%, 57/733), and ESR1 (6.3%,46/733) (p < .05 for all comparisons). Immune checkpoint inhibitor biomarkers such as high tumor mutational burden (TMB-high; 16.2%, 119/733); high microsatellite instability (1.9%, 14/733); CD274 amplification (3.6%, 27/733); and apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like mutational signature (5.9%, 43/733) were significantly higher in the BCBM cohort compared with the primary BC cohort (p < .05 for all comparisons). When using both CGP and PD-L1 IHC, 37.5% (6/16) of patients with TNBC brain metastasis were eligible for atezolizumab based on PD-L1 IHC, and 18.8% (3/16) were eligible for pembrolizumab based on TMB-high status. CONCLUSION: We found a high prevalence of clinically relevant genomic alterations in patients with BCBM, suggesting that tissue acquisition (surgery) and/or cerebrospinal fluid for CGP in addition to CGP of the primary tumor may be clinically warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study found a high prevalence of clinically relevant genomic alterations in patients with breast carcinoma brain metastasis (BCBM), suggesting that tissue acquisition (surgery) and/or cerebrospinal fluid for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in addition to CGP of the primary tumor may be clinically warranted. In addition, this study identified higher positive rates for FDA-approved immunotherapy biomarkers detected by CGP in patients with BCBM, opening a possibility of new on-label treatments. Last, this study noted limited correlation between tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), which shows the importance of testing patients with triple-negative BCBM for immune checkpoint inhibitor eligibility with both PD-L1 IHC and CGP.

Erratum to: FoundationOne CDx testing accurately determines whole arm 1p19q codeletion status in gliomas.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab017.].

Comparison of programmed death-ligand 1 protein expression between primary and metastatic lesions in patients with lung cancer.

Assessment of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the definite diagnostic test to guide treatment for patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Intratumoral heterogeneity and discrepancy of PD-L1 expression between primary and metastatic lesions may increase the risk of tumor misclassification. We performed a retrospective study of the Foundation Medicine, Inc clinical database on lung cancer cases that were evaluated for PD-L1 expression by IHC in the context of routine care. All cases were assessed with the Food and Drug Administration-approved 22C3 pharmDx assay and scoring system. 15,028 lung cancer cases, including 8285 primary tumors and 6743 unmatched metastatic lesions were analyzed. Metastatic lesions (mets) were more frequently high positive (tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%) for PD-L1 expression than primary lesions (33.8% vs 28.4%; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.37; p<0.001). Higher levels in mets than primaries were seen in samples from lymph nodes, pleural fluid, soft tissue and adrenal gland but not in those from liver, brain and bone. Metastatic lesions of patients with non-squamous histology were more likely to have TPS ≥50% in comparison with primary (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.49; p<0.001), but this was not the case for patients with squamous histology (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.06; p=0.197). PD-L1 expression varies with respect to histologic subtype, sampling site and gender, but is generally higher in metastatic sites. This observation may affect future patient management and trial design.

FoundationOne CDx testing accurately determines whole arm 1p19q codeletion status in gliomas.

BACKGROUND: Molecular profiling of gliomas is vital to ensure diagnostic accuracy, inform prognosis, and identify clinical trial options for primary and recurrent tumors. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of reporting the whole arm 1p19q codeletion status from the FoundationOne platform. METHODS: Testing was performed on glioma samples as part of clinical care and analyzed up to 395 cancer-associated genes (including IDH1/2). The whole arm 1p19q codeletion status was predicted from the same assay using a custom research-use only algorithm, which was validated using 463 glioma samples with available fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) data. For 519 patients with available outcomes data, progression-free and overall survival were assessed based on whole arm 1p19q codeletion status derived from sequencing data. RESULTS: Concordance between 1p19q status based on FISH and our algorithm was 96.7% (449/463) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 91.0%. All discordant samples were positive for codeletion by FISH and harbored genomic alterations inconsistent with oligodendrogliomas. Median overall survival was 168 months for the IDH1/2 mutant, codeleted group, and 122 months for IDH1/2 mutant-only (hazard ratio (HR): 0.42; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: 1p19q codeletion status derived from FoundationOne testing is highly concordant with FISH results. Genomic profiling may be a reliable substitute for traditional FISH testing while also providing IDH1/2 status.

Clinicopathologic and Genomic Characterization of PD-L1 Positive Urothelial Carcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab was approved with an accompanying companion diagnostic (CDx) assay (PD-L1 DAKO 22C3) for urothelial carcinoma (UC). In this study, we further characterize the clinicopathologic and genomic features of UC that are programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort of this study consisted of a total of 528 consecutive UC patients with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). All PD-L1 IHC testing was performed using the DAKO 22C3 CDx assay for UC. PD-L1 positivity was determined at a combined positive score ≥ 10. RESULTS: A total of 44.5% (235/528) patients with UC were PD-L1positive . A lower PD-L1 positivity rate was detected in primary (42.3%, 148/350) versus metastatic sites (48.9%, 87/178). PD-L1 positivity was dependent on the location of the metastatic sites. CGP revealed PD-L1positive patients had more frequent genomic alterations (GAs) in TP53 (p = .006) and RB1 (p = .003) and less frequent GAs in FGFR3 (p = .001) and MTAP (p = .028). The APOBEC mutational signature and tumor mutational burden (TMB)-high were more common in PD-L1positive patients. By testing patients with UC with CGP, in addition to PD-L1 IHC, an additional 97 patients (18.4%) in the total cohort were eligible for immunotherapy based on TMB status. CONCLUSION: PD-L1positive and PD-L1negative urothelial carcinomas are genomically different. Also, our study provides the framework for future clinical investigation with regard to specimen site selection for PD-L1 testing as well as candidate biomarker genomic alterations that may predict for better response or lack of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this study, a higher prevalence of TP53 and RB1 alterations and APOBEC mutational signatures in the PD-L1positive urothelial carcinoma disease subset and enrichment of FGFR3 alterations in the PD-L1negative disease subset were found. These data provide the basis for future investigation into the role of these genomic changes as positive and negative predictors of immunotherapy response. Also, differences wer seen in PD-L1 positivity based on the collection site of the sample, which can provide a framework for future clinical trial design and could influence sample selection for PD-L1 testing in patients with urothelial carcinoma when multiple samples are available.

Clinicopathologic and genomic characterization of PD-L1-positive uterine cervical carcinoma.

Positive program death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an approved companion diagnostic guiding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in uterine cervical carcinoma (CXC). The clinical and genomic features of PD-L1-positive (PD-L1positive) CXC have not been previously described. We reviewed the clinicopathologic and molecular features of 647 CXC cases that were tested using DAKO 22C3 PD-L1 IHC and comprehensive genomic profiling during the course of clinical care. PD-L1positive cases were defined via a combined positive score of ≥ 1. No differences were found in age, genetic ancestry, and HPV status of the PD-L1positive (n = 548) and PD-L1negative disease subset. The PD-L1 positivity rate varied by histologic subtype of CXC with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) having a PD-L1 positivity rate of 91% (397/437) and usual-type adenocarcinoma's PD-L1 positivity rate being 60% (35/58). In addition, the PD-L1 positivity rate varied depending on site of the specimen with 89.1% (261/293) positivity rate observed in cervix specimens compared to 25% (2/8) in brain metastases specimens. No significant difference in tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability, and CD274 (encoding PD-L1) amplification was observed between PD-L1positive and PD-L1negative CXC subsets. By combining TMB with PD-L1, an additional 17 patients are eligible for pembrolizumab when compared to PD-L1 testing alone. TERT promoter alterations and APOBEC mutational signature were enriched in the PD-L1positive CXC SCC (p = 0.011, and p = 0.004, respectively). Our study reveals important prevalence data on PD-L1 positivity in CXC non-SCC and suggests that further studies in these histologic subtypes are warranted. In addition, we also provide a key framework to guide both specimen selection and future investigations of predictors of immunotherapy response in cervical cancer patients. Lastly, TERT promoter alterations and APOBEC mutational signature may be a biologically unique subset of PD-L1positive CXC SCC.

Targetable BRAF and RAF1 Alterations in Advanced Pediatric Cancers.

RAF family protein kinases signal through the MAPK pathway to orchestrate cellular proliferation, survival, and transformation. Identifying BRAF alterations in pediatric cancers is critically important as therapeutic agents targeting BRAF or MEK may be incorporated into the clinical management of these patients. In this study, we performed comprehensive genomic profiling on 3,633 pediatric cancer samples and identified a cohort of 221 (6.1%) cases with known or novel alterations in BRAF or RAF1 detected in extracranial solid tumors, brain tumors, or hematological malignancies. Eighty percent (176/221) of these tumors had a known-activating short variant (98, 55.7%), fusion (72, 40.9%), or insertion/deletion (6, 3.4%). Among BRAF altered cancers, the most common tumor types were brain tumors (74.4%), solid tumors (10.8%), hematological malignancies (9.1%), sarcomas (3.4%), and extracranial embryonal tumors (2.3%). RAF1 fusions containing intact RAF1 kinase domain (encoded by exons 10-17) were identified in seven tumors, including two novel fusions TMF1-RAF1 and SOX6-RAF1. Additionally, we highlight a subset of patients with brain tumor with positive clinical response to BRAF inhibitors, demonstrating the rationale for incorporating precision medicine into pediatric oncology. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Precision medicine has not yet gained a strong foothold in pediatric cancers. This study describes the landscape of BRAF and RAF1 genomic alterations across a diverse spectrum of pediatric cancers, primarily brain tumors, but also encompassing melanoma, sarcoma, several types of hematologic malignancy, and others. Given the availability of multiple U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved BRAF inhibitors, identification of these alterations may assist with treatment decision making, as described here in three cases of pediatric cancer.

A pan-cancer analysis of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and gene amplification, tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability in 48,782 cases.

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) currently has the most Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals as a companion diagnostic (CDx) for immunotherapies in specific tumor types; however, multiple other immunotherapy biomarkers exist. We performed this study to examine and report the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in a wide variety of tumor types and examine its relationship to microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and CD274 (PD-L1) gene amplification. We performed a retrospective analysis of all cases in which both PD-L1 IHC (using the DAKO 22C3 IHC assay with either tumor proportion score (TPS) or combined positive score (CPS); or the VENTANA SP142 assay with infiltrating immune cell score (IC)) and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) were tested at Foundation Medicine between January 2016 and November 2019. Of note, PD-L1 positivity is defined per the CDx indication and tumor proportion score (TPS ≥ 1) for indications without a CDx claim; and TMB positivity is defined as ≥10 mutations/Mb. A total of 48,782 cases were tested for PD-L1 IHC and CGP. Immune cell expression of PD-L1 was more frequently identified than tumor cell expression of PD-L1. We saw a high correlation between PD-L1 expression and CD274 gene amplification (p < 0.0001), MSI and TMB (p < 0.0001), and PD-L1 and TMB (p < 0.0001). In addition, the combination of PD-L1 and TMB identified four unique disease subsets PD-L1-/TMB-, PD-L1+/TMB-, PD-L1-/TMB+, and PD-L1+/TMB+ with varying prevalence dependent on tumor type. Lastly, 50.3% (24527/48782) of the overall cohort was positive for at least one of the CDx or exploratory biomarkers described above. This is the largest pan-cancer analysis of relevant biomarkers associated with response to checkpoint inhibitors to date, including more than 48,000 cases. Additional clinical trials with treatment outcome data in individual tumor types are needed to determine whether the double positive PD-L1+/TMB+ disease subset would respond best to immunotherapy.

Clinicopathologic, genomic and protein expression characterization of 356 ROS1 fusion driven solid tumors cases.

Based on the approvals of crizotinib and entrectinib by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of ROS1 positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we sought to examine the mutational profile of a variety of solid tumors (excluding sarcomas) with ROS1 fusions that underwent comprehensive genomic profiling. A review of our database was performed to extract all nonsarcoma patients with ROS1 fusions that were discovered by the hybrid capture-based DNA only sequencing assays. We examined the coalterations representing potentially targetable biomarkers, resistance alterations and other alterations in these cases. In addition, we examined the histologic characteristics and protein expression with immunohistochemistry (IHC). From a series of clinically advanced nonsarcoma solid tumors, 356 unique cases with ROS1 fusions included 275 (77.2%) NSCLC and 81 (22.8%) non-NSCLC. Ten novel ROS1 fusions were discovered. Importantly, the NSCLC ROS1 fusionpos tumors had a higher PD-L1 IHC expression positivity when compared to the NSCLC ROS1 fusionneg population (P = .012, Chi-squared). The frequency of known and likely anti-ROS1 targeted therapy resistance genomic alterations in NSCLC was 7.3% (20/275) and in non-NSCLC was 4.9% (4/81). Overall, the coalteration profile of ROS1 fusionpos NSCLC and non-NSCLC was similar with only three genes altered significantly more frequently in non-NSCLC vs NSCLC: TERT, PTEN, APC. In our study, we characterized a large cohort of ROS1 fusionpos NSCLC and non-NSCLC solid tumors and discovered 10 novel ROS1 fusions.

Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid to Guide Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors.

Despite advances in systemic therapies for solid tumors, the development of brain metastases remains a significant contributor to overall cancer mortality and requires improved methods for diagnosing and treating these lesions. Similarly, the prognosis for malignant primary brain tumors remains poor with little improvement in overall survival over the last several decades. In both primary and metastatic central nervous system (CNS) tumors, the challenge from a clinical perspective centers on detecting CNS dissemination early and understanding how CNS lesions differ from the primary tumor, in order to determine potential treatment strategies. Acquiring tissue from CNS tumors has historically been accomplished through invasive neurosurgical procedures, which restricts the number of patients to those who can safely undergo a surgical procedure, and for which such interventions will add meaningful value to the care of the patient. In this review we discuss the potential of analyzing cell free DNA shed from tumor cells that is contained within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a sensitive and minimally invasive method to detect and characterize primary and metastatic tumors in the CNS.

Molecular profiling of mesonephric and mesonephric-like carcinomas of cervical, endometrial and ovarian origin.

Mesonephric carcinoma is a rare cancer that most often arises within the cervix, and less frequently, in the ovary and endometrium. A retrospective search of our CLIA-certified and CAP-accredited reference molecular laboratory database (Foundation Medicine, Inc.) identified 20 mesonephric or mesonephric-like, cervical (n = 10), endometrial (n = 5), ovarian (n = 4) or peri-bladder (n = 1) carcinomas that had undergone comprehensive genomic profiling via next generation sequencing. Activating KRAS mutations were present in 90%, 18 of 20 cases, including G12V (n = 7), G12D (n = 6), G12A (n = 3) and G12C (n = 2). Other recurrent alterations were identified in ARID1A (25%), PIK3CA (20%), CTNNB1 (15%), TP53 (10%), MLL2 (10%) and CDKN2A (10%). One KRAS wild-type case had a GATA3 mutation as the sole alteration, while the second KRAS wild-type case had an EGFR exon 20 insertion D770_N771insSVD alteration. All tumors were negative for HPV DNA, microsatellite instability, high tumor mutational burden and homologous recombination deficiency. A circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) liquid biopsy from peripheral blood, which was performed 6 years after original solid tumor resection in one patient with suspected lung metastasis, revealed concordance of KRAS alteration, gains of chromosomes 1q, 2, 10, 12 and 20, plus new TP53 alterations in the liquid biopsy compared to the original sample. KRAS G12 mutation is major driver of mesonephric and mesonephric-like carcinomas, with less frequent contribution by ARID1A and PIK3CA pathways in tumors of non-cervical origin. ctDNA liquid biopsy may be useful in detecting mutations in recurrent or metastatic patients, who may potentially be eligible for trials against emerging targeted therapies.