Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(6): e2318977, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37338902

RESUMEN

Importance: In the US, unaccompanied migrant children and adolescents (hereinafter referred to as children) are predominantly from Central America's Northern Triangle. While unaccompanied migrant children are at high risk for psychiatric sequelae due to complex traumatic exposures, longitudinal investigations of psychiatric distress after resettlement are lacking. Objective: To identify factors associated with emotional distress and longitudinal changes in emotional distress among unaccompanied migrant children in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this retrospective cohort study, the 15-item Refugee Health Screener (RHS-15) was administered between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, to unaccompanied migrant children as part of their medical care to detect emotional distress. Follow-up RHS-15 results were included if they were completed before February 29, 2020. Median follow-up interval was 203 days (IQR, 113-375 days). The study was conducted in a federally qualified health center that provides medical, mental health, and legal services. Unaccompanied migrant children who completed the initial RHS-15 were eligible for analysis. Data were analyzed from April 18, 2022, to April 23, 2023. Exposures: Traumatic events before migration, during migration, during detention, and after resettlement in the US. Main Outcomes and Measures: Emotional distress, including symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, as indicated by the RHS-15 (ie, score ≥12 on items 1-14 or ≥5 on item 15). Results: In total, 176 unaccompanied migrant children completed an initial RHS-15. They were primarily from Central America's Northern Triangle (153 [86.9%]), were mostly male (126 [71.6%]), and had a mean (SD) age of 16.9 (2.1) years. Of the 176 unaccompanied migrant children, 101 (57.4%) had screen results above the positive cutoff. Girls were more likely to have positive screen results than boys (odds ratio, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.15-5.34]; P = .02). Follow-up scores were available for 68 unaccompanied migrant children (38.6%). On the follow-up RHS-15, most scored above the positive cutoff (44 [64.7%]). Three-quarters of unaccompanied migrant children who scored above the positive cutoff initially continued to have positive scores at follow-up (30 of 40), and half of those with negative screen scores initially had positive scores at follow-up (14 of 28). Female vs male unaccompanied migrant children (unstandardized ß = 5.14 [95% CI, 0.23-10.06]; P = .04) and initial total score (unstandardized ß = 0.41 [95% CI, 0.18-0.64]; P = .001) were independently associated with increased follow-up RHS-15 total score. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that unaccompanied migrant children are at high risk for emotional distress, including symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress. The persistence of emotional distress suggests that unaccompanied migrant children would benefit from ongoing psychosocial and material support after resettlement.


Asunto(s)
Niño Abandonado , Distrés Psicológico , Migrantes , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Migrantes/psicología , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , América Central/etnología , Niño Abandonado/psicología , Niño Abandonado/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 68(1): 99-106, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36322615

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Responsive and sensitive parenting promotes the development of self-regulation and lowers stress in children, which in turn is associated with greater educational and economic achievement and better physical and emotional health later in life. Dyadic parent-child video-feedback programs can help parents learn effective parenting skills, yet these programs are estimated to retain only about half of eligible participants. Programs vary widely, and little is known about what is valued by parents who do complete these programs. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the goals, experiences, and outcomes important to mothers who completed a video-feedback program. METHODS: Transcripts of exit interviews of participants in a video-feedback program (N = 31) were analyzed using qualitative description methodology. Trustworthiness was achieved through deep engagement with the material, following an iterative process in analyzing transcripts, and member checks to confirm results. RESULTS: Mothers enrolled in the program to better understand their child, help their child learn, and to develop closer connections with their child. Elements of the program that helped mothers achieve these goals were (1) positive feedback and support by the therapist, (2) dedicated one-on-one time spent with their infant, (3) help with concrete needs, and (4) learning from watching videotaped play sessions. As a result, mothers reported greater confidence as caregivers, use of more responsive and sensitive parenting strategies, and improvements in their children's behaviors and their own mental health. DISCUSSION: Incorporating elements of the program found to be most useful in this study into video-feedback programs may make video-feedback programs more attractive to parents and increase retention. Midwives and women's health care providers may incorporate elements of the program into their clinical practice and advocacy, with special attention to elements most valued by parents themselves.


Asunto(s)
Madres , Padres , Lactante , Humanos , Femenino , Madres/psicología , Padres/psicología , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Emociones , Relaciones Madre-Hijo
3.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 33(1): 120-135, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35153209

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates a video-feedback program's effectiveness in promoting responsive and sensitive parenting for families in care in a community health center located in the South Bronx, New York City. METHODS: Change in measures of parent responsiveness/sensitivity (Global Rating Scale), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7), and parenting stress (Parenting Stress Index-Short Form) were analyzed for mother-infant dyads (N=34) completing a six-session videofeedback program between 2014 and 2016. RESULTS: Participants were primarily mothers of color (30% African American; 63% Hispanic) with young infants (mean age 8 months). At program completion, mothers demonstrated a significant improvement of 19% in maternal responsiveness and fewer depressive and anxious symptoms. CONCLUSION: Cost-effectiveness studies are needed to compare parenting interventions by setting (community health center, home, or mental health facility) for acceptability and effectiveness to determine best practice models for communities challenged by poverty, trauma, and health disparities.


Asunto(s)
Madres , Responsabilidad Parental , Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Retroalimentación , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Relaciones Madre-Hijo , Madres/psicología , Ciudad de Nueva York , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología
4.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 65(2): 238-247, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600026

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Three midwifery credentials are granted in the United States: certified nurse-midwife (CNM), certified midwife (CM), and certified professional midwife (CPM). Confusion about US midwifery credentials may restrict growth of the midwifery profession. This survey assessed American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) members' knowledge of US midwifery credentials. METHODS: ACNM members (N = 7551) were surveyed via email in 2017. The survey asked respondents to report demographic information and to identify correct statements about the education, certification, and scope of practice of CNMs, CMs, and CPMs. Responses to 17 items about all midwives certified in the United States, a 5-item subset specific to CNMs/CMs, and one item related to location of midwifery practice by credential were analyzed. RESULTS: Nearly a quarter of the membership (22.1%) responded to the survey. Higher scores on the survey indicated greater identification of correct statements about the education, certification, scope, and location of practice of CNMs, CMs, and CPMs. Significant differences in scores were found among ACNM members based on their level of education, degree of professional involvement in midwifery, and prior practice as a nurse. ACNM members with higher scores on the survey held a doctorate, worked in Region I, and had greater professional leadership involvement in midwifery organizations. Participants with less nursing experience prior to their midwifery education also scored significantly higher on the survey. DISCUSSION: Although two-thirds of respondents correctly answered items on the preparation, credentialing, and scope of practice of CNMs, CMs, and CPMs, a significant minority had gaps in knowledge. Results of this survey suggest the need for outreach about US midwifery credentials. Future research to replicate and expand upon this survey may benefit the profession of midwifery in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Certificación/tendencias , Habilitación Profesional/tendencias , Partería/tendencias , Enfermeras Obstetrices/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/tendencias , Adulto , Certificación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Habilitación Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Partería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermeras Obstetrices/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rol de la Enfermera , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sociedades de Enfermería/tendencias , Estados Unidos
5.
Midwifery ; 79: 102534, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31522111

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore how the International Confederation of Midwives Global Standards for Midwifery Education are currently used and their influence, if any, on the development of education programs globally. Secondarily, to identify current challenges to midwifery education. DESIGN: Cross-sectional exploratory descriptive qualitative study using focus groups and one-on-one interviews to collect data about knowledge of and use of the Education Standards and participants perceived current challenges to midwifery education. Interviews conducted in English, Spanish, and French. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Midwife educators, education directors, or regulators attending one of four national/international conferences or one-on-one interviews in person or via internet. Thematic analysis was employed using the Framework approach for data analysis. FINDINGS: There were 11 focus groups and 19 individual interviews involving 145 midwives from 61 countries. There was a general awareness of the Education Standards amongst the participants although knowledge about the specifics of the document was lacking. The Standards were mainly used as a reference and greater use was made when developing new educational programs. The Standards identified as most difficult to meet included: organization and administration of the program, ensuring that teachers were formally prepared as teachers, meeting targets for teacher to student ratios and that 50% of educational time took place in the clinical setting. Universally endorsed challenges to midwifery education were: 1) inability to accommodate the increase in curricular content without compromising prior content or lengthening programs; 2) insufficient resources including lack of classroom and clinical teachers; 3) medicalization of childbirth and health system changes limiting student exposure to the midwifery care model; 4) role conflict and competition for clinical experience with other health professionals. KEY CONCLUSIONS: The Education Standards need to be more widely disseminated and implemented. Stronger collaborations with clinical settings and government systems are required to solve the current challenges to midwifery education. IMPLICATION OF PRACTICE: Well-educated midwives can provide the majority of maternal and neonatal care, however it will require an investment in strengthening midwifery programs globally for this goal to be achieved.


Asunto(s)
Instrucción por Computador/normas , Curriculum/normas , Partería/educación , Adulto , Congresos como Asunto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Salud Global , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Sociedades de Enfermería
6.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 30(1): 40-46, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30827967

RESUMEN

Medical homes are an underused resource to promote enrollment in high-quality early education in urban areas. This report summarizes a newly implemented, unique, and replicable community health center-based outreach program designed to help families apply to and enroll in Pre-K programs in the South Bronx region of New York City.


Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Escuelas de Párvulos/organización & administración , Preescolar , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Escuelas de Párvulos/economía
7.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 64(2): 209-216, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30407720

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Group prenatal and well-baby care is a system of health care visits that occur in a group setting. Each individual session lasts approximately 2 hours, allowing more time for education and support than can occur in an individual visit. Compared with individual care, research suggests that group care is associated with similar or better short-term outcomes, but no studies have yet examined potential long-term benefits beyond one year postpartum. The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to elicit women's recall about content covered in group prenatal and well-baby care and whether they were or were not continuing to use skills discussed during group prenatal and well-baby care 2 or more years after their group ended. METHODS: Eligible women participated in group prenatal and/or well-baby care between 2008 and 2012, were aged at least 18 years, and were English-speaking. Of the 127 eligible women, 32 were reached and 17 agreed to participate. Women were interviewed on average 3 years after group prenatal or well-baby care ended using a semistructured interview guide. Transcripts were reviewed and coded by each team member. Final codes and themes were identified using an iterative review process among the research team. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: sustained change, transferable skills, and group as a safe haven. All women were still using strategies discussed during group and had made sustained improvements in nutrition, stress management, and/or in the quality of their interactions with their children, partner, or families. The group environment was described as a safe haven: a respectful, nonjudgmental space that allowed women to share and support each other while learning new skills. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to document that group prenatal and well-baby care is associated with long-term benefits in areas not yet reported in the literature: nutrition, family communication, and parenting.


Asunto(s)
Salud del Lactante , Recuerdo Mental , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Atención Prenatal/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Procesos de Grupo , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , New York , Investigación Cualitativa , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
8.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 62(2): 232-239, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28384395

RESUMEN

Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders are among the most common mental health conditions encountered by women of reproductive age. When left untreated, perinatal mood and anxiety disorders can have profound adverse effects on women and their children, ranging from increased risk of poor adherence to medical care, exacerbation of medical conditions, loss of interpersonal and financial resources, smoking and substance use, suicide, and infanticide. Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders are associated with increased risks of maternal and infant mortality and morbidity and are recognized as a significant patient safety issue. In 2015, the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care convened an interdisciplinary work group to develop an evidence-based patient safety bundle to address maternal mental health. The focus of this bundle is perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. The bundle is modeled after other bundles released by the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care and provides broad direction for incorporating perinatal mood and anxiety disorder screening, intervention, referral, and follow-up into maternity care practice across health care settings. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión/terapia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo
9.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 46(2): 272-281, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28190757

RESUMEN

Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders are among the most common mental health conditions encountered by women of reproductive age. When left untreated, perinatal mood and anxiety disorders can have profound adverse effects on women and their children, ranging from increased risk of poor adherence to medical care, exacerbation of medical conditions, loss of interpersonal and financial resources, smoking and substance use, suicide, and infanticide. Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders are associated with increased risks of maternal and infant mortality and morbidity and are recognized as a significant patient safety issue. In 2015, the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care convened an interdisciplinary workgroup to develop an evidence-based patient safety bundle to address maternal mental health. The focus of this bundle is perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. The bundle is modeled after other bundles released by the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care and provides broad direction for incorporating perinatal mood and anxiety disorder screening, intervention, referral, and follow-up into maternity care practice across health care settings. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Depresión , Salud Materna/normas , Salud Mental/normas , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Consenso , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/prevención & control , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(3): 422-430, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28178041

RESUMEN

Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders are among the most common mental health conditions encountered by women of reproductive age. When left untreated, perinatal mood and anxiety disorders can have profound adverse effects on women and their children, ranging from increased risk of poor adherence to medical care, exacerbation of medical conditions, loss of interpersonal and financial resources, smoking and substance use, suicide, and infanticide. Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders are associated with increased risks of maternal and infant mortality and morbidity and are recognized as a significant patient safety issue. In 2015, the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care convened an interdisciplinary workgroup to develop an evidence-based patient safety bundle to address maternal mental health. The focus of this bundle is perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. The bundle is modeled after other bundles released by the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care and provides broad direction for incorporating perinatal mood and anxiety disorder screening, intervention, referral, and follow-up into maternity care practice across health care settings. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/terapia , Obstetricia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Ansiedad/psicología , Protocolos Clínicos , Consenso , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Depresión/psicología , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Anamnesis , Obstetricia/métodos , Obstetricia/organización & administración , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Atención Perinatal/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Derivación y Consulta
11.
Child Obes ; 12(3): 171-8, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27035857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nationally, approximately 24% of preschool children are overweight or obese, with low-income communities disproportionately affected. Few interventions to prevent obesity in children at greatest risk have demonstrated positive results. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness of a novel group well-child care intervention for primary obesity prevention at age 2 years. METHODS: Well Baby Group (WBG) is an alternative to traditional well-child care offered at a federally qualified health center in the South Bronx. Facilitated by a pediatrician and nutritionist, WBG fosters positive dietary behaviors, responsive parenting and feeding practices, and peer support during the first 18 months of life. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to test the effect of WBG on rates of overweight/obesity at 2 years (BMI-for-age ≥85th percentile) using a nonrandomized comparison group of children receiving traditional care at our center over the same period. RESULTS: Characteristics of mothers and infants were comparable between intervention (n = 47) and comparison (n = 140) groups. Children enrolled in WBG were significantly less likely to be overweight/obese at 2 years than children receiving traditional well-child care (2.1% vs. 15.0%; OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.94; p = 0.02). In multivariable regression analysis, WBG remained a significant independent protective factor (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.93; p = 0.04), adjusting for birthweight and parity. CONCLUSIONS: WBG, a replicable model integrated into primary care visits, affords a unique opportunity to intervene consistently and early, providing families in at-risk communities with increased provider time, intensive education, and ongoing support. Further study of group well-child care for primary obesity prevention is warranted to confirm the effectiveness of the model.


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Madres/educación , Responsabilidad Parental , Obesidad Infantil/prevención & control , Prevención Primaria , Aumento de Peso , Adulto , Preescolar , Consejo Dirigido/métodos , Ejercicio Físico , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Madres/psicología , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Pobreza , Atención Primaria de Salud , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 59(4): 388-98, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24986225

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gaining too much weight in pregnancy is associated with perinatal complications and increases the risks of future obesity for both women and their infants. Unfortunately, women enrolled in intervention trials have seen little improvement in adherence to prenatal weight gain recommendations compared to women receiving standard prenatal care. Therefore, the purpose of this descriptive mixed-methods study was to explore factors related to excessive weight gain in pregnancy. METHODS: Nonpregnant nulliparous women, currently pregnant women, and postpartum women (N = 43) were recruited from a health center serving an inner-city minority community. Women completed questionnaires on knowledge, self-efficacy, and behaviors related to nutrition, exercise, and prenatal weight gain. Fifteen of these women participated in focus groups. Focus group data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti (Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Codes were created, themes were identified, and consensus was reached through multiple iterations of the analysis by study personnel. RESULTS: Excessive weight gain was common. Nutritional knowledge was poor and significantly lower among nonpregnant nulliparous women. Women felt sure that they could engage in healthy behaviors, but few did so. Participants in focus groups identified multiple barriers to healthy behaviors in pregnancy and made suggestions on how to help women more readily make improvements in these behaviors. DISCUSSION: Strategies identified in this study such as providing focused education directed at nonpregnant nulliparous women, stressing portion control, helping women better manage their cravings, and providing more pragmatic support and resources need to be explored in future research.


Asunto(s)
Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Conducta Alimentaria , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Obesidad/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Aumento de Peso , Etnicidad , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Grupos Minoritarios , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 57(5): 454-60, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22845643

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To date, there has been little documentation of how practice-based midwifery networks in the United States might influence the transfer and development of knowledge in childbearing and women's health care. The first phase of this participatory action research project was to conduct a qualitative study with a community of midwifery practices to understand their perspectives on evidence-based practice and how an organized network could facilitate their work. METHODS: Midwives within the community of interest were invited by letter or e-mail to participate in individual or small group interviews about knowledge transfer, primary concerns of evidence-based practice, and potential for a midwifery practice-based research network. Participatory action research strategies and organizational ethnographic approaches to data collection were used to guide qualitative interviews. RESULTS: Eight midwifery practices enrolled in the study with 23 midwives participating in interviews. They attended births at 2 hospitals in the community. Two broad areas of discourse about evidence-based practice were identified: 1) challenges from influential persons, finances and resources, and the cultural perception of midwifery, and 2) strategies to foster best practice in the face of those challenges. The midwives believed a research network could be useful in learning collectively about their practices and in the support of their work. DISCUSSION: Evidence-based practice is a goal but also has many challenges in everyday implementation. Practice-based research networks hold promise to support clinicians to examine the evidence and form strong coalitions to foster best clinical practice. The second phase of this study will work with this community of midwives to explore collective strategies to examine and improve practice.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia , Partería/normas , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería/organización & administración , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Redes Comunitarias , Conducta Cooperativa , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Partería/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
14.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 55(4): 344-56, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20630361

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Evidence indicates lower rates of breast and cervical cancer screening among obese compared to nonobese women. This integrative review examines the association between gynecologic cancer screening and body weight, as well as potential barriers to screening. METHODS: A literature search of standard computerized databases was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published between 1950 and January 2009. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies met the criteria for review. Of the 17 studies that evaluated rates of cervical cancer screening, 13 found obese women significantly less likely than their nonobese counterparts to have had a recent Papanicolaou test, a trend that was stronger in white women when compared to African American women. Eight of the 15 studies examining routine mammography found an inverse association between increasing body weight and recent screening, although findings generally pertained only to women who were white and/or severely obese. Possible barriers to care included embarrassment and perceived weight stigma in the clinical setting, lack of appropriately sized examination equipment, and poor patient-provider communication. DISCUSSION: Further research is needed to clarify the challenges that obese women face in accessing care and to evaluate strategies such as ensuring the availability of appropriate equipment and supplies, the use of alternative screening methodologies, and more culturally sensitive counseling approaches that may improve screening rates in obese women.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico , Obesidad/psicología , Prueba de Papanicolaou , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Frotis Vaginal/psicología , Frotis Vaginal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/psicología , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/etnología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Población Blanca/psicología , Adulto Joven
15.
Ethn Dis ; 20(2): 162-8, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20503897

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe prenatal weight gain and postpartum loss patterns among Hispanic women receiving prenatal care at an urban community health center by language preference. METHODS: Data were abstracted from medical records of prenatal patients seen from 2000-2008. Included were self-identified Hispanic women, English- or Spanish-speaking, aged 16-40 years, with weight measured at < or =13 and at >37 weeks gestation. Women with preexisting diabetes, hypertension, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, multiple gestation, or preterm delivery were excluded. Bivariate (t-test, chi-square) and multivariate regression (linear, polychotomous logistic) statistics were used in the analysis. RESULTS: Of 259 women who met eligibility criteria, 52 (20.1%) were primarily Spanish speakers. Overall, 43.6% exceeded prenatal weightgain recommendations; 30.8% of Spanish speakers vs 46.9% of English speakers (P=.07). Among normal-weight women, Spanish speakers gained below and English speakers gained above that recommended (P=.03). At late postpartum, 22.9% overall returned to their baseline body mass index (BMI +/-0.5 kg/m2); Spanish speakers retained 1.21 vs 1.53 kg/m2 among English speakers, which was not statistically significant. Adjusting for baseline BMI, age, and smoking status, language preference was not associated with prenatal weight gain or postpartum weight retention. In adjusted models, being overweight at baseline was predictive of excessive prenatal weight gain (OR 2.12, 95% CI .99, 4.53; P=.05); older age was protective for postpartum weight retention (OR .90; 95% CI .82, .98; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to prenatal weight gain guidelines was poor and few women returned to their baseline weight at late postpartum, regardless of language preference.


Asunto(s)
Hispánicos o Latinos , Multilingüismo , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Aumento de Peso/etnología , Pérdida de Peso/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Población Urbana , Adulto Joven
16.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 55(2): 90-100, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20189127

RESUMEN

Depression has been estimated to occur in approximately 12% of women, making it one of the most commonly encountered medical conditions affecting pregnancy. Yet many health care providers feel unprepared to manage this condition in pregnancy. This article provides women's health providers the background needed to effectively manage depression and in particular focuses on the use of antidepressant medication in pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/clasificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Madres/psicología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
17.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 55(1): 9-19, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20129225

RESUMEN

Depression is one of the most commonly encountered conditions in women's health, but many providers lack the knowledge and skills needed to identify and manage depression in primary care settings. This article discusses strategies that can improve the identification and treatment of depression. In addition, it describes how these strategies were incorporated into an urban inner-city health center. These strategies used in this setting can be adapted for use in either comprehensive health care centers or in practices providing primarily obstetric and gynecologic services.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/terapia , Salud Mental , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Salud de la Mujer , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Psicometría , Psicoterapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 54(3): 168-75, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19410208

RESUMEN

Group care is an effective approach to prenatal care. Yet difficulties in recruiting, enrolling, and scheduling women into group care present obstacles to optimal program delivery. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of a scheduling system based on women's estimated date of delivery (EDD) decreased gestational age at entry to group care, increased attendance, and improved continuity of care. A total of 13 groups were held; seven groups used a scheduling system based on appointment availability and six groups used a scheduling system based on women's EDD. Compared with the availability-based scheduling system, the EDD-based system decreased mean gestational age (23.2 vs. 21.8 weeks; P = .058) and significantly decreased mean maximum gestational age (31.0 vs. 26.3 weeks; P = .002) at entry to group care. The EDD-based system increased the mean number of sessions offered per group (6.7 vs. 8.2 sessions; P < .001); however, attendance rates were similar across systems. The EDD-based system also increased the percentage of women who had the same initial visit and group provider (78.0% vs. 85.5%; P = .303). The use of this system by other health care facilities could ease the task of enrolling a sufficient number of participants into group care, minimize the need for women to change care providers if they desire group care, and allow more time for educational activities and the development of social networks for women by offering more sessions per group.


Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Procesos de Grupo , Humanos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/organización & administración , Adulto Joven
19.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 53(3): 188-194, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18455092

RESUMEN

Cervical cancer, caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, is the second most common female cancer in the world, causing over a quarter of a million deaths worldwide every year. The quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil) has the potential to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality associated with cervical disease. However, a variety of factors affect the vaccine's success, including exposure to HPV prior to vaccination, duration of protection provided by the vaccine, the in vivo interaction between HPV serotypes, and variation in HPV serotype prevalence worldwide. This article describes the pathophysiology of HPV infection, efficacy and safety of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine, factors that may influence the vaccine's effectiveness in reducing cervical cancer rates, and recommendations for maximizing this effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/normas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Vacuna Tetravalente Recombinante contra el Virus del Papiloma Humano Tipos 6, 11 , 16, 18 , Humanos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/economía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Frotis Vaginal
20.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 53(3): 175-187, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18455091

RESUMEN

Vaccine-preventable infections are common in adults and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Since 2005, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has released more than 15 recommendations governing the use of new vaccines, as well as recommendations for regimen changes for use of older ones, in adults. Understanding these changes and incorporating them into practice is essential to protect adults from vaccine-preventable infections. Because many women receive care in obstetric and gynecologic practices, integrating these services into reproductive health care provides an opportunity to offer vaccination to many women who otherwise might not be offered these recommended vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Programas de Inmunización , Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/métodos , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Vacunas/normas , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Educación Continua , Femenino , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunidad Materno-Adquirida , Inmunización/métodos , Inmunización/normas , Esquemas de Inmunización , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Tétanos/epidemiología , Tétanos/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunas/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...