Lives in isolation: stories and struggles of low-income African American women with panic disorder.

Research evidence points to the existence of racial-ethnic disparities in both access to and quality of mental health services for African Americans with panic disorder. Current panic disorder evaluation and treatment paradigms are not responsive to the needs of many African Americans. The primary individual, social, and health-care system factors that limit African Americans' access to care and response to treatment are not well understood. Low-income African American women with panic disorder participated in a series of focus-group sessions designed to elicit (1) their perspectives regarding access and treatment barriers and (2) their recommendations for designing a culturally consistent panic treatment program. Fear of confiding to others about panic symptoms, fear of social stigma, and lack of information about panic disorder were major individual barriers. Within their social networks, stigmatizing attitudes toward mental illness and the mentally ill, discouragement about the use of psychiatric medication, and perceptions that symptoms were the result of personal or spiritual weakness had all interfered with the participants' treatment seeking efforts and contributed to a common experience of severe social isolation. None of the focus-group members had developed fully effective therapeutic relationships with either medical or mental health providers. They described an unmet need for more interactive and culturally authentic relationships with treatment providers. Although the focus-group sessions were not intended to be therapeutic, the women reported that participation in the meetings had been an emotionally powerful and beneficial experience. They expressed a strong preference for the utilization of female-only, panic disorder peer-support groups as an initial step in the treatment/recovery process. Peer-support groups for low-income African American women with panic disorder could address many of the identified access and treatment barriers.

Failure of amoxicillin to produce false-positive urine screens for cocaine metabolite.

Amoxicillin has been causally linked in the lay and medical literature to false-positive urine drug screens for cocaine metabolites. An exhaustive search of the peer-reviewed medical literature revealed no data to support this link. We hypothesized that amoxicillin does not cause false-positive urine drug screens for cocaine metabolites. To test this hypothesis, we examined the urine of 33 subjects administered a course of amoxicillin, subjecting the specimens to four common urine screening immunoassays. Thirty-one specimens were negative for the cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine (BE), by all four screening methods; two were positive for BE by all four screening methods. Both positive specimens were confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for the presence of BE at > 150 ng/mL. Three specimens that screened negative, but produced absorbance values that were intermediate between negative and positive controls, were submitted for GC-MS analysis; BE was detected in all three specimens at concentrations of 54, 94, and 119 ng/mL. Twenty-eight specimens produced screening results indistinguishable from negative controls. Within the limitations of the study design, we conclude that amoxicillin is unlikely to produce false-positive urine screens for cocaine metabolites.

Amenorrhea: common causes and evaluation.

Amenorrhea, either primary (before menarche) or secondary (after menarche), is a frequently encountered clinical condition in the primary care office. A patient-oriented approach, utilizing focused diagnostic studies, provides an etiology in the majority of cases.