Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
2.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(9): e16335, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965709

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Various electrodiagnostic criteria have been developed in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Their performance in a broad representation of GBS patients has not been evaluated. Motor conduction data from the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS) cohort were used to compare two widely used criterion sets and relate these to diagnostic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis criteria. METHODS: From the first 1500 patients in IGOS, nerve conduction studies from 1137 (75.8%) were available for the current study. These patients were classified according to nerve conduction studies criteria proposed by Hadden and Rajabally. RESULTS: Of the 1137 studies, 68.3% (N = 777) were classified identically according to criteria by Hadden and Rajabally: 111 (9.8%) axonal, 366 (32.2%) demyelinating, 195 (17.2%) equivocal, 35 (3.1%) inexcitable and 70 (6.2%) normal. Thus, 360 studies (31.7%) were classified differently. The areas of differences were as follows: 155 studies (13.6%) classified as demyelinating by Hadden and axonal by Rajabally; 122 studies (10.7%) classified as demyelinating by Hadden and equivocal by Rajabally; and 75 studies (6.6%) classified as equivocal by Hadden and axonal by Rajabally. Due to more strictly defined cutoffs fewer patients fulfilled demyelinating criteria by Rajabally than by Hadden, making more patients eligible for axonal or equivocal classification by Rajabally. In 234 (68.6%) axonal studies by Rajabally the revised El Escorial (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) criteria were fulfilled; in axonal cases by Hadden this was 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: This study shows that electrodiagnosis in GBS is dependent on the criterion set utilized, both of which are based on expert opinion. Reappraisal of electrodiagnostic subtyping in GBS is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Electrodiagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Conducción Nerviosa , Humanos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/clasificación , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/fisiopatología , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/clasificación , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/fisiopatología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38291915

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess self-reported symptoms of neuropathy, disability, pain, health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), and autonomic dysfunction in patients with vasculitis. METHODS: Patients with vasculitis (with or without neuropathy) were invited by Vasculitis UK to complete an anonymous online survey. RESULTS: 312 patients (71% female) responded. Median age was 61-70 years. Median duration of vasculitis was 4 years (<2 months to > 15 years). Vasculitic types included granulomatosis with polyangiitis (34%), unspecified ANCA-associated vasculitis (13%), microscopic polyangiitis (11%), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (11%), giant cell arteritis (10%), non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy (2%), and other (19%). Many patients reported foot/hand symptoms suggestive of neuropathy, including numbness (64%), pain (54%), or weakness (40%). 242 patients (78%) met our definition of probable vasculitic neuropathy: diagnosis of neuropathy by vasculitis team OR numbness OR weakness in feet/hands. Only 52% had been formally diagnosed with neuropathy. Compared with 70 patients without neuropathy, neuropathy patients had greater disability measured by the inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (centile mean 63.1 (SD 17.3) vs 75.2 (16.7); p< 0.0001), Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment scale (median 2 (IQR 1-4) vs 0.5 (0-2); p< 0.0001), and modified Rankin scale (median 2 (IQR 1-3) vs 2 (1-2); p= 0.0002); greater pain on an 11-point rating scale (mean 4.6 (SD 2.6) vs 3.5 (2.8); p= 0.0009); and poorer HR-QOL on the EQ5D-3L (summary index mean 0.58 (SD 0.29) vs 0.69 (0.28); p<0.0001). Two-thirds reported autonomic symptoms (not associated with neuropathy). CONCLUSION: Neuropathy is common and associated with significant disability, pain, and impaired HR-QOL in patients with systemic vasculitis.

6.
J Neuroimmunol ; 385: 578248, 2023 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995595

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare demyelinating disease due to a lytic infection of oligodendrocytes caused by John Cunningham polyoma virus (JCV) infection. Idiopathic CD4+ T-cell lymphocytopenia (ICL) is a very rare cause of PML. METHODS: We present an individual with PML secondary to ICL treated with 3 doses of pembrolizumab, a Programmed-Death-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor following with complete resolution of symptoms and conduct a review of the literature. CONCLUSION: This report illustrates the objective clinical and radiological improvement in a patient with PML due to ICL and suggests further study of immune checkpoint inhibitors as potential treatment for patients with PML.


Asunto(s)
Virus JC , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva , Linfocitopenia-T Idiopática CD4-Positiva , Humanos , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/diagnóstico por imagen , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/etiología , Linfocitopenia-T Idiopática CD4-Positiva/complicaciones , Linfocitopenia-T Idiopática CD4-Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico
7.
J Peripher Nerv Syst ; 28(4): 535-563, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37814551

RESUMEN

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy. Symptoms may vary greatly in presentation and severity. Besides weakness and sensory disturbances, patients may have cranial nerve involvement, respiratory insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction and pain. To develop an evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GBS, using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) constructed 14 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome questions (PICOs) covering diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GBS, which guided the literature search. Data were extracted and summarised in GRADE Summaries of Findings (for treatment PICOs) or Evidence Tables (for diagnostic and prognostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. For the six intervention PICOs, evidence-based recommendations are made. For other PICOs, good practice points (GPPs) are formulated. For diagnosis, the principal GPPs are: GBS is more likely if there is a history of recent diarrhoea or respiratory infection; CSF examination is valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain; electrodiagnostic testing is advised to support the diagnosis; testing for anti-ganglioside antibodies is of limited clinical value in most patients with typical motor-sensory GBS, but anti-GQ1b antibody testing should be considered when Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is suspected; nodal-paranodal antibodies should be tested when autoimmune nodopathy is suspected; MRI or ultrasound imaging should be considered in atypical cases; and changing the diagnosis to acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP) should be considered if progression continues after 8 weeks from onset, which occurs in around 5% of patients initially diagnosed with GBS. For treatment, the TF recommends intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, in patients within 2 weeks (GPP also within 2-4 weeks) after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided, or a course of plasma exchange (PE) 12-15 L in four to five exchanges over 1-2 weeks, in patients within 4 weeks after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided. The TF recommends against a second IVIg course in GBS patients with a poor prognosis; recommends against using oral corticosteroids, and weakly recommends against using IV corticosteroids; does not recommend PE followed immediately by IVIg; weakly recommends gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or carbamazepine for treatment of pain; does not recommend a specific treatment for fatigue. To estimate the prognosis of individual patients, the TF advises using the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) to assess outcome, and the modified Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (mEGRIS) to assess the risk of requiring artificial ventilation. Based on the PICOs, available literature and additional discussions, we provide flow charts to assist making clinical decisions on diagnosis, treatment and the need for intensive care unit admission.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Humanos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/terapia , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Nervios Periféricos , Dolor , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Corticoesteroides
8.
Eur J Neurol ; 30(12): 3646-3674, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37814552

RESUMEN

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy. Symptoms may vary greatly in presentation and severity. Besides weakness and sensory disturbances, patients may have cranial nerve involvement, respiratory insufficiency, autonomic dysfunction and pain. To develop an evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of GBS, using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) constructed 14 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome questions (PICOs) covering diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GBS, which guided the literature search. Data were extracted and summarised in GRADE Summaries of Findings (for treatment PICOs) or Evidence Tables (for diagnostic and prognostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) frameworks. For the six intervention PICOs, evidence-based recommendations are made. For other PICOs, good practice points (GPPs) are formulated. For diagnosis, the principal GPPs are: GBS is more likely if there is a history of recent diarrhoea or respiratory infection; CSF examination is valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain; electrodiagnostic testing is advised to support the diagnosis; testing for anti-ganglioside antibodies is of limited clinical value in most patients with typical motor-sensory GBS, but anti-GQ1b antibody testing should be considered when Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is suspected; nodal-paranodal antibodies should be tested when autoimmune nodopathy is suspected; MRI or ultrasound imaging should be considered in atypical cases; and changing the diagnosis to acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP) should be considered if progression continues after 8 weeks from onset, which occurs in around 5% of patients initially diagnosed with GBS. For treatment, the TF recommends intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, in patients within 2 weeks (GPP also within 2-4 weeks) after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided, or a course of plasma exchange (PE) 12-15 L in four to five exchanges over 1-2 weeks, in patients within 4 weeks after onset of weakness if unable to walk unaided. The TF recommends against a second IVIg course in GBS patients with a poor prognosis; recommends against using oral corticosteroids, and weakly recommends against using IV corticosteroids; does not recommend PE followed immediately by IVIg; weakly recommends gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants or carbamazepine for treatment of pain; does not recommend a specific treatment for fatigue. To estimate the prognosis of individual patients, the TF advises using the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) to assess outcome, and the modified Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score (mEGRIS) to assess the risk of requiring artificial ventilation. Based on the PICOs, available literature and additional discussions, we provide flow charts to assist making clinical decisions on diagnosis, treatment and the need for intensive care unit admission.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Humanos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/terapia , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Nervios Periféricos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Corticoesteroides
9.
Muscle Nerve ; 68(5): 696-713, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37602939

RESUMEN

The perineurium surrounds each fascicle in peripheral nerves, forming part of the blood-nerve barrier. We describe its normal anatomy and function. "Perineuritis" refers to both a nonspecific histopathological finding and more specific clinicopathological entity, primary perineuritis (PP). Patients with PP are often assumed to have nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy until nerve biopsy is performed. We systematically reviewed the literature on PP and developed a differential diagnosis for histopathologically defined perineuritis. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for "perineuritis." We identified 20 cases (11 M/9F) of PP: progressive, unexplained neuropathy with biopsy showing perineuritis without vasculitis or other known predisposing condition. Patients ranged in age from 18 to 75 (mean 53.7) y and had symptoms 2-24 (median 4.5) mo before diagnosis. Neuropathy was usually sensory-motor (15/20), painful (18/19), multifocal (16/20), and distal-predominant (16/17) with legs more affected than arms. Truncal numbness occurred in 6/17; 10/18 had elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein. Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) demonstrated primarily axonal changes. Nerve biopsies showed T-cell-predominant inflammation, widening, and fibrosis of perineurium; infiltrates in epineurium in 10/20 and endoneurium in 7/20; and non-uniform axonal degeneration. Six had epithelioid cells. 19/20 received corticosteroids, 8 with additional immunomodulators; 18/19 improved. Two patients did not respond to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). At final follow-up, 13/16 patients had mild and 2/16 moderate disability; 1/16 died. Secondary causes of perineuritis include leprosy, vasculitis, neurosarcoidosis, neuroborreliosis, neurolymphomatosis, toxic oil syndrome, eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome, and rarer conditions. PP appears to be an immune-mediated, corticosteroid-responsive disorder. It mimics nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy. Cases with epithelioid cells might represent peripheral nervous system (PNS)-restricted forms of sarcoidosis.

10.
J Peripher Nerv Syst ; 28(3): 436-449, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37314318

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ADVANCE-CIDP 1 evaluated facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG; human immunoglobulin G 10% with recombinant human hyaluronidase) efficacy and safety in preventing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) relapse. METHODS: ADVANCE-CIDP 1 was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 54 sites in 21 countries. Eligible adults had definite or probable CIDP and adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scores of 0-7 (inclusive), and received stable intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for ≥12 weeks before screening. After stopping IVIG, patients were randomized 1:1 to fSCIG 10% or placebo for 6 months or until relapse/discontinuation. fSCIG 10% was administered at the same dose (or matching placebo volume) and interval as pre-randomization IVIG. The primary outcome was patient proportion experiencing CIDP relapse (≥1-point increase in adjusted INCAT score from pre-subcutaneous treatment baseline) in the modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included time to relapse and safety endpoints. RESULTS: Overall, 132 patients (mean age 54.4 years, 56.1% male) received fSCIG 10% (n = 62) or placebo (n = 70). CIDP relapse was reduced with fSCIG 10% versus placebo (n = 6 [9.7%; 95% confidence interval 4.5%, 19.6%] vs n = 22 [31.4%; 21.8%, 43.0%], respectively; absolute difference: -21.8% [-34.5%, -7.9%], p = .0045). Relapse probability was higher with placebo versus fSCIG 10% over time (p = .002). Adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with fSCIG 10% (79.0% of patients) than placebo (57.1%), but severe (1.6% vs 8.6%) and serious AEs (3.2% vs 7.1%) were less common. INTERPRETATION: fSCIG 10% more effectively prevented CIDP relapse than placebo, supporting its potential use as maintenance CIDP treatment.


Asunto(s)
Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Hialuronoglucosaminidasa/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/inducido químicamente , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico
11.
Brain Commun ; 5(2): fcad037, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36895957

RESUMEN

The aims of our study were to use whole genome sequencing in a cross-sectional cohort of patients to identify new variants in genes implicated in neuropathic pain, to determine the prevalence of known pathogenic variants and to understand the relationship between pathogenic variants and clinical presentation. Patients with extreme neuropathic pain phenotypes (both sensory loss and gain) were recruited from secondary care clinics in the UK and underwent whole genome sequencing as part of the National Institute for Health and Care Research Bioresource Rare Diseases project. A multidisciplinary team assessed the pathogenicity of rare variants in genes previously known to cause neuropathic pain disorders and exploratory analysis of research candidate genes was completed. Association testing for genes carrying rare variants was completed using the gene-wise approach of the combined burden and variance-component test SKAT-O. Patch clamp analysis was performed on transfected HEK293T cells for research candidate variants of genes encoding ion channels. The results include the following: (i) Medically actionable variants were found in 12% of study participants (205 recruited), including known pathogenic variants: SCN9A(ENST00000409672.1): c.2544T>C, p.Ile848Thr that causes inherited erythromelalgia, and SPTLC1(ENST00000262554.2):c.340T>G, p.Cys133Tr variant that causes hereditary sensory neuropathy type-1. (ii) Clinically relevant variants were most common in voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav). (iii) SCN9A(ENST00000409672.1):c.554G>A, pArg185His variant was more common in non-freezing cold injury participants than controls and causes a gain of function of NaV1.7 after cooling (the environmental trigger for non-freezing cold injury). (iv) Rare variant association testing showed a significant difference in distribution for genes NGF, KIF1A, SCN8A, TRPM8, KIF1A, TRPA1 and the regulatory regions of genes SCN11A, FLVCR1, KIF1A and SCN9A between European participants with neuropathic pain and controls. (v) The TRPA1(ENST00000262209.4):c.515C>T, p.Ala172Val variant identified in participants with episodic somatic pain disorder demonstrated gain-of-channel function to agonist stimulation. Whole genome sequencing identified clinically relevant variants in over 10% of participants with extreme neuropathic pain phenotypes. The majority of these variants were found in ion channels. Combining genetic analysis with functional validation can lead to a better understanding as to how rare variants in ion channels lead to sensory neuron hyper-excitability, and how cold, as an environmental trigger, interacts with the gain-of-function NaV1.7 p.Arg185His variant. Our findings highlight the role of ion channel variants in the pathogenesis of extreme neuropathic pain disorders, likely mediated through changes in sensory neuron excitability and interaction with environmental triggers.

12.
Neurology ; 99(12): e1299-e1313, 2022 Sep 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35981895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Infections play a key role in the development of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and have been associated with specific clinical features and disease severity. The clinical variation of GBS across geographical regions has been suggested to be related to differences in the distribution of preceding infections, but this has not been studied on a large scale. METHODS: We analyzed the first 1,000 patients included in the International GBS Outcome Study with available biosamples (n = 768) for the presence of a recent infection with Campylobacter jejuni, hepatitis E virus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus. RESULTS: Serologic evidence of a recent infection with C. jejuni was found in 228 (30%), M. pneumoniae in 77 (10%), hepatitis E virus in 23 (3%), cytomegalovirus in 30 (4%), and Epstein-Barr virus in 7 (1%) patients. Evidence of more than 1 recent infection was found in 49 (6%) of these patients. Symptoms of antecedent infections were reported in 556 patients (72%), and this proportion did not significantly differ between those testing positive or negative for a recent infection. The proportions of infections were similar across continents. The sensorimotor variant and the demyelinating electrophysiologic subtype were most frequent across all infection groups, although proportions were significantly higher in patients with a cytomegalovirus and significantly lower in those with a C. jejuni infection. C. jejuni-positive patients were more severely affected, indicated by a lower Medical Research Council sum score at nadir (p = 0.004) and a longer time to regain the ability to walk independently (p = 0.005). The pure motor variant and axonal electrophysiologic subtype were more frequent in Asian compared with American or European C. jejuni-positive patients (p < 0.001, resp. p = 0.001). Time to nadir was longer in the cytomegalovirus-positive patients (p = 0.004). DISCUSSION: Across geographical regions, the distribution of infections was similar, but the association between infection and clinical phenotype differed. A mismatch between symptom reporting and serologic results and the high frequency of coinfections demonstrate the importance of broad serologic testing in identifying the most likely infectious trigger. The association between infections and outcome indicates their value for future prognostic models.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Campylobacter , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Infecciones por Campylobacter/complicaciones , Infecciones por Campylobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Humanos , Internacionalidad
13.
J Peripher Nerv Syst ; 27(3): 197-205, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35700346

RESUMEN

Electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies are helpful in diagnosing and subtyping of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Published criteria for differentiation into GBS subtypes focus on cutoff values, but other items receive less attention, although they may influence EDx subtyping: (a) extensiveness of EDx testing, (b) nerve-specific considerations, (c) distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP)-amplitude requirements, (d) criteria for conduction block and temporal dispersion. The aims of this study were to investigate how these aspects were approached by neuromuscular EDx experts in practice and how this was done in previously published EDx criteria for GBS. A completed questionnaire was returned by 24 (of 49) members of the electrophysiology expertise group from the International GBS Outcome Study. Six published EDx criteria for GBS subtyping were compared regarding these aspects. The indicated minimal number of motor nerves to study varied among respondents and tended to be more extensive in equivocal than normal studies. Respondents varied considerably regarding usage of compression sites for subtyping (median/wrist, ulnar/elbow, peroneal/fibular head): 29% used all variables from all sites, 13% excluded all sites, and 58% used only some sites and/or variables. Thirty-eight percent of respondents required a minimal distal CMAP amplitude to classify distal motor latency as demyelinating, and 58% did for motor conduction velocity. For proximal/distal CMAP-amplitude ratio and F-wave latency, a requisite minimal CMAP amplitude was more often required (79%). Also, the various published criteria sets showed differences on all items. Practical use of EDx criteria for subtyping GBS vary extensively across respondents, potentially lowering the reproducibility of GBS subtyping.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Conducción Nerviosa , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Humanos , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(1)2022 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34983806

RESUMEN

Prone positioning is a mainstay of management for those presenting to the intensive care unit with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19. While this is a necessary and life-saving intervention in selected patients, careful positioning and meticulous care are required to prevent compression and traction of the brachial plexus, and resultant brachial plexopathy. We describe two patients who developed a brachial plexus injury while undergoing prone positioning for management of COVID-19 pneumonitis. Both patients were diabetic and underwent prolonged periods in the prone position during which the plexopathy affected arm was abducted for 19 and 55 hours, respectively. We discuss strategies to reduce the risk of this rare but potentially disabling complication of prone positioning.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Humanos , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Posición Prona , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 138: 231-240, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35078730

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the heterogeneity of electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients collected as part of the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS). METHODS: Prospectively collected clinical and EDx data were available in 957 IGOS patients from 115 centers. Only the first EDx study was included in the current analysis. RESULTS: Median timing of the EDx study was 7 days (interquartile range 4-11) from symptom onset. Methodology varied between centers, countries and regions. Reference values from the responding 103 centers were derived locally in 49%, from publications in 37% and from a combination of these in the remaining 15%. Amplitude measurement in the EDx studies (baseline-to-peak or peak-to-peak) differed from the way this was done in the reference values, in 22% of motor and 39% of sensory conduction. There was marked variability in both motor and sensory reference values, although only a few outliers accounted for this. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed extensive variation in the clinical practice of EDx in GBS patients among IGOS centers across the regions. SIGNIFICANCE: Besides EDx variation in GBS patients participating in IGOS, this diversity is likely to be present in other neuromuscular disorders and centers. This underlines the need for standardization of EDx in future multinational GBS studies.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Conducción Nerviosa , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Humanos , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Valores de Referencia
16.
Eur J Neurol ; 28(11): 3556-3583, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34327760

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To revise the 2010 consensus guideline on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). METHODS: Seventeen disease experts, a patient representative, and two Cochrane methodologists constructed 12 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions regarding diagnosis and treatment to guide the literature search. Data were extracted and summarized in GRADE summary of findings (for treatment PICOs) or evidence tables (for diagnostic PICOs). RESULTS: Statements were prepared according to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Typical CIDP and CIDP variants were distinguished. The previous term "atypical CIDP" was replaced by "CIDP variants" because these are well characterized entities (multifocal, focal, distal, motor, or sensory CIDP). The levels of diagnostic certainty were reduced from three (definite, probable, possible CIDP) to only two (CIDP and possible CIDP), because the diagnostic accuracy of criteria for probable and definite CIDP did not significantly differ. Good Practice Points were formulated for supportive criteria and investigations to be considered to diagnose CIDP. The principal treatment recommendations were: (a) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids are strongly recommended as initial treatment in typical CIDP and CIDP variants; (b) plasma exchange is strongly recommended if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective; (c) IVIg should be considered as first-line treatment in motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (d) for maintenance treatment, IVIg, subcutaneous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids are recommended; (e) if the maintenance dose of any of these is high, consider either combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug (Good Practice Point); and (f) if pain is present, consider drugs against neuropathic pain and multidisciplinary management (Good Practice Point).


Asunto(s)
Neurología , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Nervios Periféricos , Intercambio Plasmático , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/diagnóstico , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/terapia
17.
J Peripher Nerv Syst ; 26(3): 242-268, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34085743

RESUMEN

To revise the 2010 consensus guideline on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Seventeen disease experts, a patient representative, and two Cochrane methodologists constructed 12 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions regarding diagnosis and treatment to guide the literature search. Data were extracted and summarized in GRADE summary of findings (for treatment PICOs) or evidence tables (for diagnostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Typical CIDP and CIDP variants were distinguished. The previous term "atypical CIDP" was replaced by "CIDP variants" because these are well characterized entities (multifocal, focal, distal, motor, or sensory CIDP). The levels of diagnostic certainty were reduced from three (definite, probable, possible CIDP) to only two (CIDP and possible CIDP), because the diagnostic accuracy of criteria for probable and definite CIDP did not significantly differ. Good Practice Points were formulated for supportive criteria and investigations to be considered to diagnose CIDP. The principal treatment recommendations were: (a) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids are strongly recommended as initial treatment in typical CIDP and CIDP variants; (b) plasma exchange is strongly recommended if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective; (c) IVIg should be considered as first-line treatment in motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (d) for maintenance treatment, IVIg, subcutaneous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids are recommended; (e) if the maintenance dose of any of these is high, consider either combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug (Good Practice Point); and (f) if pain is present, consider drugs against neuropathic pain and multidisciplinary management (Good Practice Point).


Asunto(s)
Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante , Corticoesteroides , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Neurología , Nervios Periféricos , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/diagnóstico , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/terapia
19.
J Peripher Nerv Syst ; 26(1): 66-74, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33491284

RESUMEN

Sensory neuronopathies are heterogeneous disorders of dorsal root ganglia. The clinical and laboratory features in a single-centre series, including response to treatment and outcome have been described. They retrospectively included 54 patients meeting Camdessanché et al (2009) criteria for sensory neuronopathy. The patients were classified according to their likely aetiology and analysed their demographic, clinical, neurophysiological, histological and spinal MRI features. The outcome with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was evaluated, and the response to treatment was assessed. About 54 patients were included (18 male; median age 54.5 years). The most common initial symptoms were hypoaesthesia, paraesthesia, ataxia and pain. Half of patients had a slow onset, greater than 12 months before seeing a neurologist. The aetiology as possibly inflammatory (meaning nonspecific laboratory evidence of immune abnormality) in 18 patients (33%), paraneoplastic 8 (15%), autoimmune 7 (13%) and idiopathic 6 (11%) was classified. About 31 patients received immune therapy of which 11 (35%) improved or stabilised. Corticosteroids were the most used treatment (24 patients) and cyclophosphamide had the highest response rate (3/6, 50%). At the final follow up (median 24 months) 67% had mRS ≥3 and 46% mRS ≥4, including 15% who died. Worse outcome was associated with generalised areflexia and pseudoathetosis by logistic regression, and with motor involvement and raised CSF protein by univariate analysis. Sensory neuronopathies caused severe disability, especially in patients with generalised areflexia and pseudoathetosis. Of those without an obvious cause, most had some evidence of dysimmunity. Some patients had a positive response to immunotherapy, but rarely enough to improve disability much.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/farmacología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ganglios Espinales , Factores Inmunológicos/farmacología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Trastornos de la Sensación , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ganglios Espinales/patología , Ganglios Espinales/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos de la Sensación/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Sensación/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de la Sensación/etiología , Trastornos de la Sensación/fisiopatología
20.
Brain ; 144(2): 682-693, 2021 03 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33313649

RESUMEN

Reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have emerged during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This epidemiological and cohort study sought to investigate any causative association between COVID-19 infection and GBS. The epidemiology of GBS cases reported to the UK National Immunoglobulin Database was studied from 2016 to 2019 and compared to cases reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were stratified by hospital trust and region, with numbers of reported cases per month. UK population data for COVID-19 infection were collated from UK public health bodies. In parallel, but separately, members of the British Peripheral Nerve Society prospectively reported incident cases of GBS during the pandemic at their hospitals to a central register. The clinical features, investigation findings and outcomes of COVID-19 (definite or probable) and non-COVID-19 associated GBS cases in this cohort were compared. The incidence of GBS treated in UK hospitals from 2016 to 2019 was 1.65-1.88 per 100 000 individuals per year. GBS incidence fell between March and May 2020 compared to the same months of 2016-19. GBS and COVID-19 incidences during the pandemic also varied between regions and did not correlate with one another (r = 0.06, 95% confidence interval: -0.56 to 0.63, P = 0.86). In the independent cohort study, 47 GBS cases were reported (COVID-19 status: 13 definite, 12 probable, 22 non-COVID-19). There were no significant differences in the pattern of weakness, time to nadir, neurophysiology, CSF findings or outcome between these groups. Intubation was more frequent in the COVID-19 affected cohort (7/13, 54% versus 5/22, 23% in COVID-19-negative) attributed to COVID-19 pulmonary involvement. Although it is not possible to entirely rule out the possibility of a link, this study finds no epidemiological or phenotypic clues of SARS-CoV-2 being causative of GBS. GBS incidence has fallen during the pandemic, which may be the influence of lockdown measures reducing transmission of GBS inducing pathogens such as Campylobacter jejuni and respiratory viruses.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA