Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oncol Rev ; 16: 10605, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36531160

RESUMEN

Objective: To investigate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) confers superior outcomes compared to primary debulking surgery (PDS) in patients with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer as well as in patients with high tumour load. Methods: We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and Scopus from inception to March 2021. We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NACT with PDS for women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) stages III and IV. The primary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes were optimal cytoreduction rates, peri-operative adverse events, and quality of life. Results: Six RCTs with a total of 1901 participants were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated similar overall survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.86-1.07]) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.89-1.08]) between NACT and PDS. Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate higher survival for stage IV patients (HR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.71-1.09]) nor for patients with metastatic lesions >5 cm (HR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.69-1.08]) treated with NACT, albeit with some uncertainty due to imprecision. Similarly, no survival benefit was observed in the subgroup of patients with metastatic lesions >10 cm (HR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.78-1.12]). NACT was associated with significantly higher rates of complete cytoreduction (RR = 2.34, 95% CI [1.48-3.71]). Severe peri-operative adverse events were less frequent in the NACT arm (RR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.16-0.72]. Conclusion: Patients with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing NACT or PDS have similar overall survival. NACT is likely associated with higher rates of complete cytoreduction and lower risk of severe adverse events and peri-operative death.

2.
Cureus ; 14(8): e27865, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36110463

RESUMEN

There are no acceptable worldwide recommendations regarding the use of dexamethasone in late-preterm newborns delivered either vaginally or via cesarean section and term gestation that are performed via cesarean section. The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of antenatal intramuscular dexamethasone versus placebo/no-treatment in reducing neonatal respiratory complications in high-risk for imminent preterm birth in late preterm pregnancies and term pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean section. The PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to assess the effectiveness of dexamethasone during late preterm and term gestation. The last literature search was performed on March 20th, 2022. Randomized controlled trials compared antenatal dexamethasone administration with placebo or no treatment. The outcomes of interest were: the incidence of Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions; and the need for ventilatory support or mechanical ventilation. A standardized data form and three independent investigators performed the data extraction. Ten RCTs fulfilled our inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference was found regarding all of the outcomes in the 34th-36th gestational week group. In the >37th gestational week group, a statistically significant difference was found regarding the incidence of RDS [RR (95% CI); p-value: 0.56 (0.36, 0.87); 0.01], TTN [RR (95% CI); p-value: 0.54 (0.42, 0.71); <0.00001], need for ventilatory support [RR (95% CI); p-value: 0.71 (0.52, 0.96); 0.03] and need for mechanical ventilation [RR (95% CI); p-value: 0.56 (0.33, 0.95); 0.03]. To conclude, the antenatal administration of dexamethasone can be considered to prevent neonatal complications and reduce perinatal morbidity in term pregnancies.

3.
J Clin Med ; 11(3)2022 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35160220

RESUMEN

AIM: Fibrates have proven efficacy in cardiovascular risk reduction and are commonly used, in addition to statins, to control hypertriglyceridaemia. Their use is often limited due to reduction in glomerular filtration rate at treatment initiation. However, recent studies suggest benign changes in kidney function and improvement of proteinuria, an established early marker of microvascular disease and kidney disease progression. We summarize the evidence from existing trials and provide a summary of effects of fibrates, alone or in combination, on kidney disease progression and proteinuria. METHODS AND RESULTS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials (PROSPERO CRD42020187764). Out of 12,243 potentially eligible studies, 29 were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis, with a total of 20,176 patients. Mean creatinine increased by 1.05 (95% CI (0.63 to 1.46)) units in patients receiving fibrates vs. comparator, and this was similar in all other subgroups. eGFR showed a bigger decrease in the fibrates arm (SMD -1.99; 95% CI (-3.49 to -0.48)) when all studies were pooled together. Notably, short-term serum creatinine and eGFR changes remained constant in the long-term. Pooled estimates show that fibrates improve albuminuria progression, RR 0.86; 95% CI (0.76 to 0.98); albuminuria regression, RR 1.19; 95% CI (1.08 to 1.310). CONCLUSIONS: Fibrates improve albuminuria in patients with and without diabetes when used to treat hyperlipidaemia. The modest creatinine increase should not be a limiting factor for fibrate initiation in people with preserved renal function or mild CKD. The long-term effects on kidney disease progression warrant further study.

4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 8710, 2021 04 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33888744

RESUMEN

Epidemiological studies have yielded conflicting results regarding climate and incident SARS-CoV-2 infection, and seasonality of infection rates is debated. Moreover, few studies have focused on COVD-19 deaths. We studied the association of average ambient temperature with subsequent COVID-19 mortality in the OECD countries and the individual United States (US), while accounting for other important meteorological and non-meteorological co-variates. The exposure of interest was average temperature and other weather conditions, measured at 25 days prior and 25 days after the first reported COVID-19 death was collected in the OECD countries and US states. The outcome of interest was cumulative COVID-19 mortality, assessed for each region at 25, 30, 35, and 40 days after the first reported death. Analyses were performed with negative binomial regression and adjusted for other weather conditions, particulate matter, sociodemographic factors, smoking, obesity, ICU beds, and social distancing. A 1 °C increase in ambient temperature was associated with 6% lower COVID-19 mortality at 30 days following the first reported death (multivariate-adjusted mortality rate ratio: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90, 0.99, p = 0.016). The results were robust for COVID-19 mortality at 25, 35 and 40 days after the first death, as well as other sensitivity analyses. The results provide consistent evidence across various models of an inverse association between higher average temperatures and subsequent COVID-19 mortality rates after accounting for other meteorological variables and predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection or death. This suggests potentially decreased viral transmission in warmer regions and during the summer season.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Calor , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Clima , Comorbilidad , Salud Global , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico , Material Particulado/análisis , Estaciones del Año , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(3): 312-318, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32541235

RESUMEN

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common complication in patients with cirrhosis and has an incidence of up to 30% in hospitalized patients. Importantly, it may raise their mortality rate up to 30%. Hence, a delayed diagnosis is associated with poor prognosis. This systematic review aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ascitic fluid calprotectin for the early diagnosis of SBP in patients with ascites. This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to February 2020 in the following electronic bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Library and OpenGrey. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to assess risk of bias. Ten studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and the summary sensitivity of a positive ascitic fluid calprotectin assessment to detect SBP was 93% [95% confidence interval (CI) 90-95%] while the summary specificity was 89% (95% CI 80-95%), irrespectively of the method used. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of the test were 8.7 (95% CI 4.4-17.1) and 0.08 (85% CI 0.06-0.12). All studies showed positive correlation between ascitic calprotectin and polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocyte count. Ascitic calprotectin appears to be an excellent alternative to PMN leucocyte count of ≥250 cells/mm3 for the diagnosis of SBP with much faster time to diagnosis. Owing to its substantially high negative predictive value, the test can accurately exclude SBP avoiding unnecessary antibiotics in suspected patients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Peritonitis , Líquido Ascítico/patología , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/patología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Peritonitis/diagnóstico
7.
Can J Kidney Health Dis ; 7: 2054358120954939, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32963791

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Validated tools to improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are lacking. Noninvasive measures of arteriosclerosis and subclinical atherosclerosis such as pulse wave velocity (PWV) and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), respectively, have emerged as promising risk stratification tools and potential modifiable biomarkers. Their wide use as surrogate markers in clinical research studies is based on the strong pathophysiological links with CVD. However, whether their effect as risk stratification or intervention targets is superior to established clinical approaches is uncertain. In this review, we examine the evidence on the utility of PWV, cIMT, and plaque assessment in routine practice and highlight unanswered questions from the clinician's perspective. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar were searched until February 2020. METHODS: This narrative review is based on peer-reviewed meta-analyses, national and international societies' guidelines, and on focused critical review of recent original studies and landmark studies in the field. KEY FINDINGS: Although patients with CKD are considered in the high-risk CVD groups, there is still need for tools to improve risk stratification and individualized management strategies within this group of patients. Carotid intima-media thickness is associated with all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, and events in CKD and hemodialysis cohorts. However, the evidence that measurement of cIMT has a clinically meaningful role over and above existing risk scores and management strategies is limited. Plaque assessment is a better predictor than cIMT in non-CKD populations and it has been incorporated in recent nonrenal-specific guidelines. In the CKD population, one large observational study provided evidence for a potential role of plaque assessment in CKD similar to the non-CKD studies; however, whether it improves prediction and outcomes in CKD is largely understudied. Pulse wave velocity as a marker of arterial stiffness has a strong pathophysiological link with CVD in CKD and numerous observational studies demonstrated associations with increased cardiovascular risk. However, PWV did not improve CVD reclassification of dialysis patients when added to common risk factors in a reanalysis of ESRD cohorts with available PWV data. Therapeutic strategies to regress PWV, independently from blood pressure reduction, have not been studied in well-conducted randomized trials. LIMITATIONS: This study provides a comprehensive review based on extensive literature search and critical appraisal of included studies. Nevertheless, formal systematic literature review and quality assessment were not performed and the possibility of selection bias cannot be excluded. IMPLICATIONS: Larger, prospective, randomized studies with homogeneous approach, designed to answer specific clinical questions and taking into consideration special characteristics of CKD and dialysis, are needed to study the potentially beneficial role of cIMT/plaque assessment and PWV in routine practice.


JUSTIFICATION: Les outils validés pour faciliter l'évaluation des risques de maladies cardiovasculaires (MCV) et de mortalité chez les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT) sont insuffisants. Les mesures non invasives de l'artériosclérose et de l'artériosclérose infraclinique, respectivement la vitesse de l'onde de pouls (VOP) et la mesure de l'épaisseur intima-média de la carotide (EIMc), sont apparues comme des outils prometteurs de stratification des risques et des biomarqueurs potentiellement modifiables. L'usage répandu de la VOP et de l'EIMc comme marqueurs de substitution dans les études cliniques est fondé sur leurs liens physiopathologiques étroits avec les MCV. On ignore toutefois si leur effet pour la stratification des risques ou comme cibles d'intervention est supérieur aux approches cliniques établies. Cette revue examine les données probantes sur la pertinence des mesures de VOP et d'EIMc et de l'analyse plaquettaire dans les pratiques courantes et met en lumière les questions sans réponses du point de vue du clinicien. SOURCES: Les bases de données PubMed et Google Scholar ont été consultées jusqu'en février 2020. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Cette revue narrative est fondée sur des méta-analyses révisées par les pairs, sur les lignes directrices de sociétés nationales et internationales et sur un examen critique et ciblé des études originales récentes et d'études phares dans le domaine. PRINCIPAUX RÉSULTATS: Bien que les patients atteints d'IRT fassent déjà partie des groupes présentant un risque élevé de MCV, l'ajout d'outils pour améliorer la stratification des risques et de stratégies de gestion individualisées est toujours nécessaire pour ce groupe de patients. L'EIMc est associée à la mortalité toutes causes, ainsi qu'aux risques d'événements cardiovasculaires et de mortalité liée aux MCV dans les cohortes de patients atteints d'IRT et hémodialysés. Les preuves soutenant un rôle cliniquement significatif de la mesure de l'EMIc au-delà des scores de risque et des stratégies de gestion existantes sont toutefois limitées. L'analyse plaquettaire s'avère un meilleur prédicteur que l'EIMc dans les populations non atteintes d'IRT et a récemment été intégrée aux lignes directrices non liées aux maladies rénales. Dans les populations atteintes d'IRT, une vaste étude observationnelle a fourni des preuves quant à un possible rôle de l'analyse plaquettaire similaire à celui rapporté dans les études ne portant pas sur des patients atteints d'IRT. Cependant, la question de savoir si cette mesure améliore la prédiction et les résultats des patients atteints d'IRT demeure largement sous-étudiée. La VOP, à titre de marqueur de la rigidité artérielle, a un lien physiopathologique fort avec les MCV en contexte d'IRT, plusieurs études observationnelles ayant démontré des associations avec un risque accru d'événements cardiovasculaires. Par contre, la VOP n'a pas amélioré le reclassement cardiovasculaire des patients dialysés lorsqu'on l'a ajoutée aux facteurs de risques communs dans une nouvelle analyse des cohortes de patients atteints d'IRT disposant de données de VOP. Les stratégies thérapeutiques pour réduire la VOP, indépendamment de la pression artérielle, n'ont pas été étudiées dans le cadre d'essais à répartition aléatoire bien menés. LIMITES: Cette étude fournit une revue complète fondée sur une recherche documentaire approfondie et une évaluation critique des études incluses. Cependant, aucune analyse documentaire systématique formelle ou d'évaluation de la qualité n'ont été effectuées et un biais de sélection ne peut être exclu. CONCLUSION: L'étude d'un rôle potentiellement bénéfique des mesures de VOP et d'EIMc et de l'analyse plaquettaire dans la pratique courante en contexte d'IRT requiert des essais prospectifs de grande envergure avec répartition aléatoire. Ces essais devraient s'articuler autour d'une approche homogène, être conçus pour répondre à des questions cliniques spécifiques et tenir compte des caractéristiques propres aux patients atteints d'IRT et dialysés.

8.
Ann Gastroenterol ; 32(6): 554-564, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31700231

RESUMEN

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common reason to visit a gastroenterologist. IBS was believed to be a functional disease, but many possible pathophysiologic mechanisms can now explain the symptoms. IBS patients are classified into subtypes according to their predominant bowel habit, based on the Rome IV criteria. These include diarrhea-predominant and constipation-predominant IBS, as well as the mixed type, a combination of the two. Usually, IBS treatment is based on the predominant symptoms, with many options for each subtype. A new promising treatment option, fecal microbiota transplantation, seems to have beneficial effects on IBS. However, treating the pathophysiological causative agent responsible for the symptoms is an emerging approach. Therefore, before the appropriate therapeutic option is chosen for treating IBS, a clinical evaluation of its pathophysiology should be performed.

9.
Ann Gastroenterol ; 32(2): 208-210, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30872912

RESUMEN

Mastocytosis is a rare and heterogeneous group of diseases whose common element is the presence of dense mast-cell infiltrates in various tissues. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is frequently affected with vague and subtle manifestations, making the diagnosis of GI mastocytosis rather formidable and challenging. The diagnosis of the disease requires a high level of clinical suspicion and an index of familiarity. To our knowledge, this is the first case of indolent systemic mastocytosis with colonic ulcerations. Because of the unusual presentation of mastocytosis, it was initially misdiagnosed as Crohn's disease; the diagnosis of mastocytosis was established after further evaluation of the patient's history and further investigation. Systemic mastocytosis should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients presenting with abdominal manifestations that cannot be otherwise explained or attributed to common GI pathologies and in cases where the patient's trajectory does not follow the expected course. More research is needed into the epidemiology and the non-classical presentation of systemic mastocytosis in order to increase awareness of the disease in the medical community.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA