Postpartum hemorrhage: Moving from response to prevention for Alaska Native mothers.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in a population of Alaska Native women. METHODS: A case-control study of 384 women (128 cases, 256 controls) delivering between August 1, 2018, and July 31, 2019, was conducted at a Level III maternal referral center for Alaska Native women in Alaska. Risk factors were assessed via retrospective chart review, and bivariate and conditional regression analyses were conducted to determine odds ratios (ORs) between women with and without postpartum hemorrhage. RESULTS: Body mass index ≥40 (OR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-4.5), antepartum bleeding (OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.2-31.6), previous postpartum hemorrhage (OR 5, 95% CI 2.6-9.8), suspected macrosomia (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.3), macrosomia with birthweight ≥4000 g (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8-5.3), pre-eclampsia with magnesium sulfate (OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.0-8.0), length of third stage of labor >20 min (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.4), oxytocin use >12 h (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.0-14.6), residence in a rural community (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.6), and vitamin D supplementation (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6) were associated with greater risk of postpartum hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Analysis of clinical and geographic risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in Alaska Native women identified important targets for prevention.

911 EMS Activations by Pregnant Patients in Maryland (USA) during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: In the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, United States Emergency Medical Services (EMS) experienced a decrease in calls, and at the same time, an increase in out-of-hospital deaths. This finding led to a concern for the implications of potential delays in care for the obstetric population. HYPOTHESIS/PROBLEM: This study examines the impact of the pandemic on prehospital care amongst pregnant women. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted comparing obstetric-related EMS activations in Maryland (USA) during the pandemic (March 10-July 20, 2020) to a pre-pandemic period (March 10-July 20, 2019). Comparative analysis was used to analyze the difference in frequency and acuity of calls between the two periods. RESULTS: There were fewer obstetric-related EMS encounters during the pandemic compared to the year prior (daily average during the pandemic 12.5 [SD = 3.8] versus 14.6 [SD = 4.1] pre-pandemic; P <.001), although the percent of total female encounters remained unchanged (1.6% in 2020 versus 1.5% in 2019; P = .091). Key indicators of maternal status were not significantly different between the two periods. African-American women represented a disproportionately high percentage of obstetric-related activations (36.2% in 2019 and 34.8% in 2020). CONCLUSIONS: In this state-wide analysis of EMS calls in Maryland early in the pandemic, no significant differences existed in the utilization of EMS by pregnant women. Prehospital EMS activations amongst pregnant women in Maryland only decreased slightly without an increase in acuity. Of note, over-representation by African-American women compared to population statistics raises concern for broader systemic differences in access to obstetric care.

An Undergraduate Surgery Interest Group: Introducing Premedical Students to the Practice of Surgery.

PURPOSE: Early exposure and surgical mentorship can augment interest in surgery. We evaluate the effect and feasibility of offering education and mentorship opportunities in surgery to premedical students at our institution through an undergraduate surgery interest group (USIG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 1-year assessment of our USIG and reviewed its organizational structure, funding resources, media promotion, and educational activities. Our USIG hosted introductory-level surgical skills workshops, guest lectures by surgeons, and various facility tours. To assess participants' interests, as well as the influences on them to pursue a surgical profession, we analyzed pre- and post-event questionnaires. Similar questionnaires were completed by medical students in our medical student surgery interest group to compare any differences in perception between premedical and medical students. RESULTS: Our USIG currently has 378 undergraduate student members, with a higher proportion of women than in our medical student surgery interest group (P < 0.003). Neurosurgery was the most popular career choice among undergraduate participants. Participants reported the highest satisfaction with suturing and high-fidelity trauma surgery skills workshops. Undergraduate participants indicated that their intrinsic interest in the sciences is the highest motivation to pursue a surgical profession. Resident lifestyle and social obligations of a surgical career were actually positive influences for undergraduate participants; in contrast, medical students viewed those variables as negative factors. CONCLUSION: Our USIG was met with enthusiasm by premedical students and faculty alike. Participation strengthened premedical students' interest in pursuing surgery and increased their understanding of the surgical profession. Early mentorship may positively influence premedical students' perception of surgical careers. USIG is economically feasible and time-efficient; we encourage other academic institutions and educators to consider investing in similar interest groups.