Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation During Vaginal Hysterectomy With Pre-emptive Local Anesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Hysterectomy is the most frequent gynecological surgery. Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) seems to be related to favorable perioperative outcomes compared to abdominal or laparoscopic approaches. As the population ages, anesthesia that is safer for the elderly, such as local anesthesia (LA) with conscious sedation, is gaining popularity and is related to favorable outcomes in patients' recovery compared to general or regional anesthesia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for women undergoing VH for uterine prolapse under LA and conscious sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study on 40 women with uterine prolapse stage ≥3 who had VH under LA with conscious sedation under either dexmedetomidine (n=20) or propofol (n=20) was performed. A standardized surgical approach with continuous hemodynamic monitoring and sedation assessment using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) was conducted. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the percentage of patients receiving intraoperative fentanyl. RESULTS: Analysis of outcomes demonstrated a significant reduction in the proportion of patients requiring intraoperative rescue fentanyl (35% vs. 5%, respectively, p=0.04) and in postoperative pain scores, with more patients achieving an optimal RSS score of 3 in the dexmedetomidine group. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the present study, dexmedetomidine offered superior analgesia and patient comfort compared to propofol, suggesting a favorable anesthetic profile for VH under LA.

Reply to Akça, B.; Bilotta, F. Time and Type of Administered Fluids during Cesarean Section Might Not Matter for Hemodynamic Outcomes, but There Are Significant Patient Safety Concerns Regarding Colloid Use in Parturients. Comment on "Theodoraki et al. Colloid Preload versus Crystalloid Co-Load in the Setting of Norepinephrine Infusion during Cesarean Section: Time and Type of Administered Fluids Do Not Matter. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1333".

We would like to take this opportunity to thank Drs Akça and Bilotta for their interest and their insightful comments [...].

Colloid Preload versus Crystalloid Co-Load in the Setting of Norepinephrine Infusion during Cesarean Section: Time and Type of Administered Fluids Do Not Matter.

Background and Goal of Study: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is frequently associated with a high incidence of hypotension, which may bring about untoward effects for both the mother and fetus. Recently, norepinephrine has emerged as a promising alternative in maintaining blood pressure in the obstetric setting. Fluid administration is another technique still widely used to prevent maternal hypotension. The optimal fluid strategy to prevent maternal hypotension has not been elucidated yet. It has been recently suggested that the main strategy in the prevention and management of hypotension should be the combination of vasoconstrictive medications and fluid administration. The aim of this randomized study was to compare the incidence of maternal hypotension in parturients receiving either colloid preload or crystalloid co-load in the setting of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion during elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Materials and Methods: After ethics committee approval, 102 parturients with full-term singleton pregnancies were randomly allocated to either 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 5 mL/kg before the onset of spinal anesthesia (colloid preload group) or Ringer's lactate solution 10 mL/kg concurrent with the subarachnoid injection (crystalloid co-load group). In both groups, norepinephrine 4 µg/min starting simultaneously with the administration of the subarachnoid solution was also administered. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of maternal hypotension, defined as systolic arterial pressure (SAP) <80% of baseline. The incidence of severe hypotension (SAP < 80 mmHg), total dose of vasoconstrictive agents administered, as well as the acid-base status and Apgar score of the neonate and any incidence of maternal side effects were also recorded. Results: Data analysis was performed on 100 parturients: 51 in the colloid preload group and 49 in the crystalloid co-load group. No significant differences were demonstrated between the colloid preload group and the crystalloid co-load group in the incidence of hypotension (13.7% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.933) or the incidence of severe hypotension (0% vs. 4%, p = 0.238). The median (range) ephedrine dose was 0 (0-15) mg in the colloid preload group and 0 (0-10) mg in the crystalloid co-load group (p = 0.807). The incidence of bradycardia, reactive hypertension, requirement for modification of vasopressor infusion, time to the first occurrence of hypotension, and maternal hemodynamics did not differ between the two groups. There were no significant differences in other maternal side effects or neonatal outcomes between groups. Conclusions: The incidence of hypotension with a norepinephrine preventive infusion is low and comparable with both colloid preload and crystalloid co-load. Both fluid-loading techniques are appropriate in women undergoing cesarean delivery. It appears that the optimal regimen for prevention of maternal hypotension is a combined strategy of a prophylactic vasopressor such as norepinephrine and fluids.

Pelvic floor reconstructive surgery under local anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: The decision on the appropriate type of anesthesia for pelvic floor repair depends on a variety of factors including patients' age, performance status, comorbidities, cost-effectiveness and personal preferences. We aim to review the literature on urogynecological procedures performed under local anesthesia (LA). METHODS: A systematic search of four electronic databases was conducted for articles published up to May 2020. Studies reporting outcomes of women who underwent pelvic floor reconstructive surgery under LA with or without sedation, were considered eligible. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (14 noncomparative and 5 comparative), including 1626 cases of urogynecological procedures under LA were recruited. Meta-analysis revealed significantly lower mean pain scores in LA group compared to general-regional anesthesia one (GA/RA) at both 4-6 h and 8-18 h postoperatively (160 patients; mean difference [MD], -1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.12, -0.28; p = 0.02 and 160 patients; MD, -0.72; 95% CI: -1.17, 0.27; p = 0.002, respectively). Pain scores at >24 h did not differ among the two groups (160 patients; MD, -0.28; 95% CI: -0.60-0.05; p = 0.10). Intra- and postoperatively morphine use was not different among patients who received LA and GA during prolapse surgery while nausea rates were significantly lower in LA group compared to RA group 8 h postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: LA with or without sedation represents a safe and efficient alternative anesthetic technique for urogynecological procedures with improved pain scores in up to 18 h postoperatively especially in patients who underwent surgery for SUI. LA is feasible and could be offered to patients undergoing pelvic floor surgery allowing a prompt postoperative recovery.

Prevention of hypotension during elective cesarean section with a fixed-rate norepinephrine infusion versus a fixed-rate phenylephrine infusion. Α double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section can be complicated by hypotension, with untoward effects for both the mother and fetus. Frequently used phenylephrine can lead to baroreceptor-mediated reflex bradycardia. The aim of the present study was to compare a fixed-rate prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to a fixed-rate prophylactic phenylephrine infusion during elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two parturients were randomized to either norepinephrine 4 µg/min or phenylephrine 50 µg/min fixed-rate infusions, starting simultaneously with the administration of the subarachnoid solution. The primary endpoint was the incidence of maternal bradycardia. Maternal hemodynamics at specific timepoints, the incidence of hypotension or hypertension, the requirement for ephedrine or atropine bolus administration as well as the acid-base status and Apgar score of the neonate were recorded. RESULTS: The incidence of bradycardia as well as the requirement for atropine administration was lower in the norepinephrine group (4.8% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.004 and 2.4% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.01, respectively). Fetal pH, and fetal blood glucose concentration were higher in the norepinephrine group (p = 0.027 and 0.019, respectively). No difference in the occurrence of hypotension, hypertension, in the requirement for bolus vasoconstrictive medication or in Apgar scores was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-rate infusion of norepinephrine is as effective in the management of hypotension during regional anesthesia for cesarean section as a fixed-rate infusion of phenylephrine, with the avoidance of phenylephrine-induced bradycardia. The more favourable neonatal acid-base profile of noradrenaline might be due to better maintenance of placental blood flow in the noradrenaline group due to its beta action, while the higher fetal glucose concentration in the same group might result from a catecholamine-stimulated glucose metabolism increase and a ß-receptor mediated insulin decrease.