Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Food Prot ; 74(3): 446-9, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21375882

RESUMEN

During the past decade, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae have become a matter of great concern in human medicine. ESBL-producing strains are found in the community, not just in hospital-associated patients, which raises a question about possible reservoirs. Recent studies describe the occurrence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in meat, fish, and raw milk; therefore, the impact of food animals as reservoirs for and disseminators of such strains into the food production chain must be assessed. In this pilot study, fecal samples of 59 pigs and 64 cattle were investigated to determine the occurrence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in farm animals at slaughter in Switzerland. Presumptive-positive colonies on Brilliance ESBL agar were subjected to identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing including the disc diffusion method and E-test ESBL strips. As many as 15.2% of the porcine and 17.1% of the bovine samples, predominantly from calves, yielded ESBL producers. Of the 21 isolated strains, 20 were Escherichia coli, and one was Citrobacter youngae. PCR analysis revealed that 18 strains including C. youngae produced CTX-M group 1 ESBLs, and three strains carried genes encoding for CTX-M group 9 enzymes. In addition, eight isolates were PCR positive for TEM ß-lactamase, but no bla(SHV) genes were detected. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed a high genetic diversity within the strains. The relatively high rates of occurrence of ESBLproducing strains in food animals and the high genetic diversity among these strains indicate that there is an established reservoir of these organisms in farm animals. Further studies are necessary to assess future trends.


Asunto(s)
Mataderos , Bovinos/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Heces/microbiología , Porcinos/microbiología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Animales , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Reservorios de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Variación Genética , Humanos , Prevalencia , Suiza
2.
J Food Prot ; 73(5): 973-5, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20501051

RESUMEN

Clostridium difficile is a cause of diarrhea and colitis in humans. The increase of incidence and severity of C. difficile infections in humans in past years is due, at least in part, to the emergence of more virulent strains (PCR ribotypes 027 and 078). Recent studies describe the occurrence of hypervirulent strains in ground meat products. Therefore, food animals and food need to be assessed for their possible role as vectors of C. difficile to humans. In this pilot study, fecal samples of 204 calves and 165 pigs, as well as 46 minced meat products were investigated to determine the occurrence of C. difficile in farm animals at slaughter and in ground meat products at the retail level in Switzerland. C. difficile was isolated from only one fecal sample of a calf. All samples from pigs and ground meat were negative. Further characterization revealed that the isolated strain harbored genes for toxins A and B as well as binary toxin, and belonged to the ribotype 078. Based on these results, low occurrence of C. difficile in farm animals at slaughter and retail ground meat in Switzerland is postulated. However, further studies are necessary to confirm these preliminary data and to assess future trends.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/microbiología , Heces/microbiología , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Productos de la Carne/microbiología , Animales , Bovinos , Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/etiología , Microbiología de Alimentos , Humanos , Prevalencia , Ribotipificación , Porcinos , Suiza/epidemiología
3.
J Chemother ; 13(1): 24-33, 2001 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11233796

RESUMEN

Five different methods for detection of different types of SHV extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) were compared: minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination of beta-lactam with and without clavulanic acid, double-disk synergy test (DDST), inhibitor potentiated disk diffusion test (IPDDT), three-dimensional test (TDT) and PCR/Nhe I test. MIC determination of beta-lactam with and without clavulanic acid was the most sensitive method regardless of the type of beta-lactamase. However the specificity of this method was a little above 90%. IPDDT turned out to be a very sensitive method too but it lacks specificity because 26.9% of ceftazidime sensitive strains (putative ESBL negative), gave a positive result. It is important to put all four disks on the plate because ceftazidime and aztreonam were more sensitive indicators for SHV-5 and SHV-12 beta-lactamase producers while cefotaxime and ceftriaxone were more reliable in detecting SHV-2 beta-lactamase producers. The DDST detected all SHV-5 and SHV-12 beta-lactamase producers and 95.2% of SHV-2, so it was less sensitive than MIC determination but was highly specific, since there were no false negative results observed. The sensitivity of DDST can be improved by using all four disks and placing them at the smaller distance from the central disk (2.5 cm). The TDT was the least sensitive method, particularly for SHV-5 and SHV-12 beta-lactamase producers. The PCR/Nhe I test for detection of ESBL blaSHV genes is a highly sensitive and specific method but it is rather laborious and thus not very practical for use in routine clinical laboratories. Nevertheless it has potential to serve as the gold standard in epidemiological investigations on ESBLs. According to the results of this investigation MIC determination of beta-lactam with and without clavulanic acid, even if only one antibiotic is used and the PCR/Nhe I tests are the most reliable methods for detection of SHV ESBLs.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , beta-Lactamasas/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Cefotaxima/farmacología , Ceftriaxona/farmacología , Ácido Clavulánico/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana/genética , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/instrumentación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , beta-Lactamasas/clasificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...