Change over time in patient-reported symptoms and quality of life in Edmonton interdisciplinary menopause clinics: preliminary cohort study of clinic patients and waitlist patients.

OBJECTIVE: Specialized interdisciplinary menopause clinics in Edmonton provide care for women suffering from severe menopausal symptoms. Our objectives were to evaluate changes over time in patient-reported menopause symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in a cohort of clinic patients, compared to a cohort of women recruited from the clinic waitlists. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of consecutive new patients in two clinics. Consenting women completed a generic menopause symptom severity questionnaire (MSSQ) and the menopause-specific quality of life (MENQOL) questionnaire at their first clinic and at a follow-up visit. Demographics, medical and obstetric histories, and medication use were extracted from patient charts. Women on the clinics' waitlists were enrolled as controls; corresponding data for baseline and follow-up were collected in mailed-in surveys. Descriptive and paired statistics were used for data analysis. Agreement plot was created to visualize the agreement between MSSQ and MENQOL scores. RESULTS: A total of 139 women were recruited: 98 attended the clinic and 41 were from the waitlist. Follow-up data were available for 99 women (71 clinic and 28 waitlist). There were no significant differences between clinic and waitlist patient characteristics. Women attending the clinics experienced significant reduction in symptom severity (mean MSSQ scores) and improvement in QOL (reduced MENQOL "bother" scores). Women on the clinic waitlist did not demonstrate significant changes over a similar timeframe. MENQOL correlated well with menopause symptom severity assessment. CONCLUSION: Women attending specialized menopause clinics experienced improvement in symptoms and QOL, whereas women on the waitlists did not experience these changes. : Video Summary: Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/MENO/A418.

Perspectives and decision-making about menopausal therapies in women who had bilateral oophorectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the process of decision-making about menopausal treatments in women who have had surgical menopause as a result of bilateral oophorectomy (≤50 y). METHODS: We used a descriptive qualitative research design. Women who had a surgical menopause were purposefully selected from the Edmonton Menopause Clinics. Focus groups were held, each with six to nine participants. All sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: We conducted five focus groups from June 30 to July 21, 2016 (N = 37). One-third of the women had the surgery within the last 5 years. Almost all women had a concurrent hysterectomy (97%) and were current users of hormone therapy (70%). Four main themes identified were "perceptions of surgical menopause," "perceptions of received support," "being my own advocate," and "concept of adequate support." Women shared that the experience was worse than their expectations and did not believe they were given adequate support to prepare them to make therapy decisions. Women had to "be their own advocates" and seek support from within the healthcare system and outside to cope with their health issues. To make an informed decision about treatments postsurgery, women expressed a need to learn more about the symptoms of surgical menopause, treatment options, resources, avenues for support, and stories of similar experiences, preferably before the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several modifiable deterrents to decision-making in early surgical menopause which can help inform the development of a patient decision aid for this context.