Comparison of postoperative clinical outcome in medial-pivotal and gradually reducing radius design cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty-A multicenter analysis of propensity-matched cohorts.

Purpose: To clarify differences in surgery duration, postoperative knee range of motion (ROM), anterior and posterior (AP) laxity, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) in patients undergoing medial-pivot (MP) and GRADIUS cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgeries. Methods: We examined patients who underwent either MP or CR TKA at six different Japanese centres. Patients were propensity score matched for age, sex, and preoperative hip-knee angle (HKA). We compared the groups' average surgery duration, postoperative knee ROM, AP laxity, and FJS 1 year after surgery. Results: There were 86 study patients: 43 MP and 43 CR TKA matched for age, sex, and preoperative HKA. The MP group enjoyed a significantly shorter surgery duration (89.1 ± 10.9 mins vs. 95.7 ± 12.0 mins, p = 0.0091) and significantly better postoperative knee flexion than the CR group (123.7 ± 9.1° vs. 115.3 ± 12.4°, p < 0.001). The MP had significantly smaller postoperative AP laxity with 30° of knee flexion than the CR group (3.4 ± 1.3 vs. 5.6 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.001). Conversely, postoperative AP laxity with 90° of knee flexion was significantly larger for the MP group (3.6 ± 1.3 vs. 2.7 ± 1.9 mm, p = 0.0098). There were no between-group differences in postoperative FJS. Conclusions: The MP group showed better postoperative knee flexion, midrange AP knee stability, and shorter surgery duration. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Preliminary Evaluation of the Efficacy of Postoperative Early Weight-bearing Rehabilitation Protocol for Patients after Double-level Osteotomy.

OBJECTIVE: There are no reports describing in detail postoperative rehabilitation after double-level osteotomy (DLO). Consequently, the establishment of a safe and effective rehabilitation protocol is required. METHODS: This retrospective study included 26 patients with varus knees who underwent DLO. No patient had obvious fracture around the femoral osteotomy sites, as evaluated using computed tomography (CT) 3 weeks postoperatively. From 3 days postoperatively, gait training with early weight bearing was performed using our parallel bar protocol. Range of motion exercises were permitted as tolerated. Radiological evaluation was performed to confirm the presence or absence of fracture around the femoral osteotomy sites using CT at 3 weeks and X-ray at 6 weeks postoperatively. X-ray imaging 6 months postoperatively indicated no femoral correction loss. Additionally, the time from initiation to completion of the protocol and the time from initiation to achievement of independent gait were recorded. RESULTS: No fractures around the femoral osteotomy sites in any patient were found using CT 3 weeks postoperatively and X-rays 6 weeks postoperatively. There was no correction loss at the femoral osteotomy site according to X-ray findings 6 months postoperatively. The mean time until completion of the parallel bar protocol was 19.8 ± 6.2 (7-30) days, and that from the initiation of rehabilitation to the achievement of independent gait was 26.8 ± 7.1 (16-45) days. CONCLUSION: Patients without fracture around the femoral osteotomy site during the rehabilitation period could achieve independent gait within an average of <1 month using the parallel bar protocol. Early weight-bearing walking and independent walking could be achieved using this protocol.