Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 52
Filtrar
1.
Eplasty ; 23: e43, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37664813

RESUMEN

Background: Tracheostomy has been proposed for patients with expected prolonged intubation. This study aims to determine the outcomes of tracheostomy on patients with burn inhalation injuries requiring mechanical ventilation. Methods: This study is a retrospective review from 2011 to 2019. Inclusion criteria were recording of inhalation injury, ventilator support (at least 24 hours), and total body surface area of <15%. The patients were stratified into 2 groups: tracheostomy (group 1) versus no tracheostomy (group 2). The outcome measures were in-hospital mortality rate, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days, and ventilator- associated pneumonia (VAP). Results: A total of 33 burn patients met our inclusion criteria. Group 1 consisted of 10 patients and group 2 of 23 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of percent total body surface area. There was a higher intensive care unit length of stay at 23.8 days in group 1 compared with 3.16 days in group 2, a higher hospital length of stay at 28.4 days in group 1 compared with 5.26 days in group 2, and higher ventilator days in group 1 with 20.8 days compared with 2.5 days in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of mortality. The incidence of VAP was also significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Conclusions: The ideal timing and implementation of tracheostomy with inhalation injury has yet to be determined. In this study, tracheostomy was associated with much longer lengths of stay and pneumonia. The impact of the underlying lung injury versus the tracheostomy itself on these observations is unclear. The challenge of characterizing the severity of an inhalation injury based on early visual inspection remains.

2.
Trauma Case Rep ; 37: 100572, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34977320

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH) are uncommon injuries classically associated with high-energy blunt traumatic mechanisms. Motor vehicle collisions cause the highest proportion of all TAWH. Literature is currently limited, with some debate existing over surgical management strategies. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old man presented after falling from a short step stool while landscaping his yard. On exam, an exquisitely tender lateral flank mass was present with peristaltic movement. CT imaging revealed a TAWH with incarcerated large and small bowel. He was taken to the OR for exploratory laparotomy and mesh hernia repair. The patient was discharged on the third postoperative day with no untoward complications. DISCUSSION: This patient's mechanism and injury pattern are together a rare combination. Exam findings and radiologic technologies are used to hone the clinical index of suspicion for TAWH. Traumatic abdominal wall defects can have unusual anatomic borders, not always obeying well-known hernia patterns. In this case, the potential space for visceral herniation was created by an 11th rib fracture with associated avulsion of the oblique musculature. Operative approach can be open or laparoscopic, however concomitant injuries directly influence surgical management. Evidence for mesh versus primary repair for TAWH is conflicted by the current literature. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly any amount of blunt abdominal force can cause TAWH. For wall defects with bowel herniation caused directly by trauma, the safest approach may involve exploratory laparotomy. Future multi-center studies may be able to distinguish TAWH repair strategies based on herniation through old defects versus newly-created abdominal wall injuries.

3.
Eplasty ; 21: e8, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35603018

RESUMEN

Background: Alcohol use has been associated with poor wound healing in traumatic injuries as it impairs immune function and lowers leukocyte production. The aim of this study is to describe the association of alcohol use on the outcomes of patients with burn injuries. It is proposed that the use of alcohol can have a detrimental effect on burn patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of the American Burn Association Burn Registry from 2002 through 2011 was conducted. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: burn patients with a blood alcohol level above the legal limit 0.08 mg/dl on admission (group 1) vs burn patients with a blood alcohol level below the legal limit of 0.08 mg/dl on admission (group 2). The outcome measures included in-hospital mortality rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and total days on a ventilator. Results: A total of 11,286 burn patients met the inclusion criteria. There were a total of 1,544 patients in group 1 and a total of 9,742 patients in group 2. The percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) involvement of the burns was statistically similar in both groups, with an average of 2.08% in group 1 and 2.32% in group 2. There was a significantly higher ICU LOS at 5.91 days in group 1 compared to 3.66 in group 2. The days on a ventilator were significantly higher in group 1 at 5.67 days versus group 2 at 3.06 days. The in-hospital mortality was also significantly higher in group 1 at 4.86% compared to group 2 at 3.91%. Conclusion: Burn patients who tested above the legal limit for alcohol on admission were associated with increased inpatient mortality, as well as increased ICU LOS and total days on a ventilator. An elevated admission blood alcohol level may be an independent predictor of worse outcome in patients with burn injury, leading to an increase in resource needs and health care costs.

5.
Am Surg ; 87(2): 235-241, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32927993

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Twitter at conferences facilitates remote interaction and spread of ideas. Through the use of hashtags, conference information can be gathered, referenced, disseminated, and discussed in 1 electronic location by attendees and nonattendees from remote locations. The aim of this study is to analyze the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress (ACSCC) Twitter hashtag activities and evaluate its impact on meeting participation and engagement for the last 5 annual meetings. METHODS: Twitter hashtags #ACSCC15, #ACSCC16, #ACSCC17, #ACSCC18, and #ACSCC19 were studied to determine tweets, retweets, users, and impressions. Data regarding top influencers and the most tweeted links were analyzed. Symplur Signals, a software that specializes in hashtags, was utilized for the analyses. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, there was a consistent increase in tweets from 12 800 to 18 300 to 24 700, respectively. However, in 2018 and 2019, tweets dropped significantly to 19 700 and 19 300, respectively (P < .05). Additionally, impressions dropped significantly by 24 million impressions from 2017 to 2019 (115.1M to 91.1M, P < .05) despite the growth of users from 2700 in 2015 to 4100 in 2016 and ~6500 in 2017-2019. This change occurred despite no change in meeting attendance rates, regardless of specialty (P > .05). The most influential organizations in hashtag use were the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and Association of Women Surgeons (AWS). CONCLUSION: Despite the significant reduction in views and online engagement activities in the past 2 years, the use of Twitter at the ACS CC has greatly increased the potential dissemination of information but not meeting attendance rates.


Asunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Sociedades Médicas , Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Cirugía General/organización & administración , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
8.
Cureus ; 12(9): e10283, 2020 Sep 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33042718

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Uterine cancer (UC) is one of the leading gynecologic neoplastic disorders in the United States (US), of which over 80% are endometrioid adenocarcinomas (EA). In contrast to EA, carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus is a sporadic and highly malignant tumor, phylogenetically containing both epithelial and mesenchymal histologic elements. This study sought to analyze demographic, pathological retrospectively, and survival characteristics of a large cohort of CS patients compared to EA patients to identify prognostic factors and treatment approaches that may improve the current clinical management of CS patients. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from 88,530 patients diagnosed with uterine malignancy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for 38 years (1973-2010). Extracted variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, paired t-test, and multivariate analysis, while Kaplan-Meier functions were used to compare survival between groups. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS©), version 20.2 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: A total of 3,706 cases of CS comprised 38.2% of uterine sarcomas (n=9,702), and 4.1% of uterine cancers overall (n=88,530). EA made up 88.6% (n=78,481) of all uterine cancers. CS patients presented later in life (68.3±11.5 years) than EA (61.9±12.5 years). 65.2% of CS and 77.8% of EA occurred in Caucasians. The incidence (per million) of EA was higher in Caucasians compared to African-Americans (AA) (41% vs. 26.8%), while the incidence of CS was higher among AA than Caucasians (4% vs. 1.9%, p<0.001). 33.4% of CS was poorly differentiated at presentation, compared to 13.1% of EA. 27.8% of CS patients presented with a distant disease compared to only 4.7% of EA patients. 29.9% of AA patients with CS presented with metastatic disease, compared to 28.2% of Caucasian patients (p<0.001). Mean survival for CS patients (6.6±0.2 years) was significantly lower than that of EA patients (17.7±0.7 years, p<0.001), and AA CS patients had significantly lower survival than Caucasians CS patients (4.5±0.4 years vs. 7.1±0.3 years, p<0.001). CS patients treated with combined surgery and radiotherapy had the highest survival (9.4±0.5 years, p<0.001), while EA patients treated with surgery alone had the highest survival (20.4±1.2 years, p<0.001). Survival among AA CS patients treated with combination therapy was significantly inferior compared to Caucasians (6.5±0.6 years vs. 9.8±0.5 years, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified CS histology (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, CI=1.7-2.1), AA race (OR 1.3, CI=1.2-1.4), age over 40 (OR 3.4, CI=2.9-4.1), undifferentiated grade (OR 3.0, CI=2.6-3.4), and distant metastases (OR 6.2, CI=5.8-6.8) as independently associated with increased mortality (p<0.005). The use of radiotherapy in CS patients was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.1, CI=0.02-0.6, p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Uterine CS is a highly malignant tumor with a significantly worse prognosis than EA. AA has a considerably higher CS incidence compared to EA. Moreover, AA CS had higher tumor grades, higher rates of metastatic disease, and experienced significantly lower overall survival compared to Caucasians despite receiving similar therapy. Primary radiotherapy or combination radiotherapy confers a survival advantage to AA uterine CS patients.

9.
Ann Plast Surg ; 85(4): 376-378, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931682

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carbon monoxide is a gas produced by the combustion of hydrocarbon products that binds to heme molecules, 240 times more than oxygen, producing carboxyhemoglobin (COHb). As a result of its high affinity, there is shift of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve, compromising oxygen transport and delivery to tissues. Our study aim was to evaluate COHb elevation on admission as a predictor of worse outcomes in burn patients. METHODS: This is a 10-year retrospective review of the American Burn Association Burn Registry from 2002 to 2011. We stratified the patients into 2 groups: adult patients with normal COHb on admission (group 1) versus elevated COHb (group 2). Elevated COHb levels were defined as greater than 10% on the first arterial blood gas. Outcome measures included in-hospital mortality rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS (ICU-LOS), and ventilator days. χ and t test analyses were used with significance defined as a P value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 6365 burn patients meet our inclusion criteria. There were 5775 patients in group 1 and 590 patients in group 2. Group 1 had an average age of 39.29 years compared with 42.62 years in group 2. The total body surface area was higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (6.24 vs 4.65) and with a statistically significant increase in partial thickness burns at 4.97 in group 1 compared with 3.27 in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of full thickness total body surface area. The hospital LOS was significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1 (15.34 vs 9.66). There was a significantly higher ICU-LOS at 12.89 days in group 2 compared with 4.01 in the group 1 (P = 0.0001, t test). There were higher ventilator days in group 2 at 9.23 than those in group 1 at 2.05 (P < 0.0001, t test). The in-hospital mortality was also significantly higher in group 2 at 15.59% than in group 1 at 1.33% (P = 0.0001, χ). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated COHb on admission was associated with an increased hospital and ICU-LOS, average ventilator days, and in-hospital mortality. The presence of elevated COHb of greater than 10% on an initial arterial blood gas suggests worse outcomes and increased need of resource utilization during the index hospital admission.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Carboxihemoglobina , Adulto , Biomarcadores , Quemaduras/terapia , Carboxihemoglobina/análisis , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Am Surg ; 86(7): 803-810, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32683920

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An invitation to speak at a national meeting represents the advancement of one's career and indicates acceptance and the attention of the scientific community. Studies have revealed gender disparities across medical and surgical society meetings. The purpose of our study was to assess the current trend of women surgeon speakers at major national trauma surgery conferences during the last 4 years (ie, 2016-2019). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of conference programs of major trauma surgery association annual meetings including the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST), and the Western Trauma Association (WTA) was conducted. Our primary outcome was the number and proportion of women surgeon speakers at each conference each year. RESULTS: Twelve conference programs from three national trauma surgery association annual meetings were reviewed. A total of 2029 speakers were included; 608 (30%) of which were female and 1421 (70%) of which were male. The proportion of women speakers ranged from 22.3% to 41.4%. The number of women speakers increased each year from 2016 to 2019: (EAST: 25.2%-39.8%, P = .049; AAST: 27.1%-41.4%, P < .00001, and WTA: 27.8%-33.3%, P = . 0.573). CONCLUSION: The number of women surgeon speakers at national trauma surgery conferences significantly increased from 2016 to 2019. The increase in women trauma surgeon speakers is encouraging and should be celebrated, but organizational leadership should take this information into account while extending invitations to surgeons for speaking opportunities and continue to promote diversity and inclusivity.


Asunto(s)
Congresos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
15.
Am Surg ; 86(3): 273-279, 2020 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32223810

RESUMEN

This study aimed to identify factors that promote and impede research participation and productivity by Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) surgeons. In addition, the study aimed to determine what changes can be implemented by surgical departments to improve this research productivity and granting. A 25-question anonymous research survey tool was offered to EAST surgeons. The questions analyzed factors including demographics, career accomplishments, current institution type, educational/research background, perceived barriers to research, and current research productivity, including grants. Chi-square tests were used to analyze significance at P < 0.05. The overall response rate was 26.2 per cent (445/1699). Most respondents reported not having any protected research time (86.3%), and no research resources were provided by their institution (78.7%). Factors that were significantly associated with greater research productivity included protected research time (P < 0.0001), having a mentor (P < 0.001), practicing in a university-affiliated hospital (P < 0.0001), publication(s) before completing residency training (P = 0.02), having institutional resources dedicated to research (P = 0.015), and male gender (P = 0.003). Age, race, marital status, and additional educational qualifications were not associated with statistically significant differences in research productivity in this study (P > 0.05). EAST surgeons are more likely to have scholarly productivity if they are supported with protected time, mentors, nonclinical staff dedicated to research, a history of research before completion of residency, and research resources from their institution. Barriers to research productivity include lack of institutional support, lack of protected research time, and increased regulatory policies.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Financiera/economía , Cirujanos/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Eficiencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Cirujanos/psicología , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
17.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 88(3): 454-460, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31923051

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to be a deadly injury. Universally accepted guidelines regarding the use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in trauma patients presenting with TBI have not been established. The purpose of this review was to identify and review the current literature and present the evidence for anticoagulant chemoprophylaxis regimens in patients with TBI. METHODS: A search of five databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, JAMA Network, and Cochrane Journals was conducted for studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria were used for quality of evidence assessment. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in this review: 1 randomized controlled trial, 2 prospective observational studies, 10 retrospective reviews, and 5 systematic reviews. Most studies demonstrated that early chemoprophylactic administration is associated with a decreased incidence of VTE in patients with TBI without an increase in intracranial bleed. CONCLUSION: For patients with TBI resulting in intracranial hemorrhages, administration of VTE chemoprophylaxis is warranted for those patients with stable repeat computed tomography scans. Early chemoprophylaxis, at 24 to 72 hours is associated with reduced VTE incidence without a corresponding increase or exacerbation of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with TBI who have a stable repeat head computed tomography scan. More studies are needed to establish guidelines for the safety and efficacy of VTE prophylaxis protocols in adult patients with TBI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracraneales/inducido químicamente , Tiempo de Tratamiento
18.
World J Surg ; 44(5): 1492-1497, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major contributor to death and complications. Previous studies have identified gender disparities among trauma patients. This study aims to examine the association between gender and outcomes in TBI patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Review of our trauma registry: Patients were classified into groups according to their gender. Demographics extracted from the registry included age, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), head abbreviated injury score (AIS), and the presence of an epidural hematoma (EDH). The primary outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS), craniotomy rate, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and readmission rates. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-five patients with TBI were studied: 62.1% (n = 581) were male and 37.9% (n = 354) were female. There were no differences in GCS, ISS, and head AIS. Males were younger [53 (IQR 30-77) vs. 76 (IQR 49.25-84), p < 0.05] and were more likely to have an EDH (9.6% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.007). Males also had a longer median ICU-LOS [4 days (IQR 2-8) vs. 3 days (IQR 0-5), p < 0.05] and were significantly more likely to require a craniotomy (44.6% vs. 19.2%, p < 0.001). In addition, males were more likely to develop VAP (4.1% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.004). Predicted survival (79.2% vs. 72.9%) and actual mortality rates (4.5% vs. 4.5%) were similar in both genders (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the context of our study, male patients with TBI were significantly younger, were more likely to sustain an EDH, and were also more likely to require a craniotomy, but mortality rates between both genders were similar. The male gender was also associated with a significantly increased ICU-LOS and VAP.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Resultados de Cuidados Críticos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma
19.
J Burn Care Res ; 41(2): 293-298, 2020 02 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504601

RESUMEN

While previous studies have examined factors that affect research productivity for surgeons in general, few studies address research productivity specifically of burn specialists. This study aimed to identify factors that promote and impede research participation and productivity of burn surgeons and help elucidate what changes can be made by departments/divisions to improve the research productivity. A 44-question anonymous research survey tool was administered to burn surgeons who are members of the American Burn Association (ABA). The questions analyzed factors such as demographics, career accomplishments, current institution type, educational background, research background, barriers to conducting research, and current research productivity. Chi-square tests were used to analyze significance at P < .05. Most respondents reported not having any protected research time (71.4%) or resources provided by their institution (84.5%). A majority believed increasing regulatory policies/institutional review board restrictions have negatively impacted productivity (65.1%). Factors associated with positive impact on research productivity included having a mentor, conducting research prior to completing residency, and provision of research resources from the institution such as statistical support, start-up funds, grant writing support, and laboratory space. Age and sex had no statistical impact on research productivity. Burn surgeons are more likely to publish research and to receive grants when they have mentors, a history of research prior to completion of residency, and research resources from their institution. Barriers to research productivity include lack of institutional support, lack of protected research time, and increased regulatory policy.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Quemaduras/cirugía , Eficiencia , Cirujanos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mentores , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
20.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 88(4): 522-535, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688792

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to be a devastating source of morbidity and mortality in obese patients who suffer traumatic injuries or obese surgery patients. High incidence rates in VTE despite adherence to prevention protocols have stirred interest in new dosing regimens. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature and present the existing VTE chemoprophylaxis regimens for obese trauma and surgical patients in terms of efficacy and safety as measured by the incidence of VTE, anti-factor Xa levels, and the occurrence of bleeding events. METHODS: An online search of seven literature databases including PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, GoogleScholar, JAMA Network, CINAHL, Cochrane, and SAGE Journals was performed for original studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of VTE chemoprophylaxis dosing regimens according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the quality of evidence was determined using the GRADE Working Group criteria. RESULTS: Of the 5,083 citations identified, 45 studies with 27,717 patients met inclusion criteria. In this group, six studies evaluated weight-based dosing regimens, four used a weight-stratified or weight-tiered strategy, five used a body mass index-stratified approach, 29 assessed fixed-dose regimens, and two used continuous infusions. The majority of the studies evaluated anti-factor Xa levels as their primary outcome rather than reduction in VTE. CONCLUSION: Weight-based and high fixed-dose chemoprophylaxis regimens achieved target anti-Xa concentrations more frequently than standard fixed-dose regimens but were not associated with a reduction in VTE. Additionally, high fixed-dose approaches are associated with increased bleeding complications. Further evaluation with large randomized trials is warranted in trauma and surgery patients with obesity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Obesidad/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/sangre , Índice de Masa Corporal , Peso Corporal , Quimioprevención/efectos adversos , Quimioprevención/métodos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Monitoreo de Drogas , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/administración & dosificación , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/efectos adversos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/sangre , Humanos , Incidencia , Obesidad/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tromboembolia Venosa/sangre , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Heridas y Lesiones/sangre , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...