Efficacy of everolimus plus octreotide LAR in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumor and carcinoid syndrome: final overall survival from the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 RADIANT-2 study.

Background: In the phase 3 RADIANT-2 study, everolimus plus octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) showed improvement of 5.1 months in median progression-free survival versus placebo plus octreotide LAR among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors associated with carcinoid syndrome. The progression-free survival P-value was marginally above the prespecified threshold for statistical significance. Here, we report final overall survival (OS) and key safety update from RADIANT-2. Patients and methods: The RADIANT-2 trial compared everolimus (10 mg/day, orally; n = 216) versus placebo (n = 213), both in conjunction with octreotide LAR (30 mg, intramuscularly, every 28 days). Patients, unblinded at the time of progression or after end of double-blind core phase following primary analysis, were offered open-label everolimus with octreotide LAR (open-label phase). In the open-label phase, patients had similar safety and efficacy assessments as those in the core phase. For OS, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using unadjusted Cox model and a Cox model adjusted for prespecified baseline covariates were calculated. Results: A total of 170 patients received open-label everolimus (143 crossed over from the placebo arm; 27 in the everolimus arm continued to receive the same treatment after unblinding). The median OS (95% CI) after 271 events was 29.2 months (23.8-35.9) for the everolimus arm and 35.2 months (30.0-44.7) for the placebo arm (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.49). HR adjusted for baseline covariates was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.84-1.38). The most frequent drug-related grade 3 or 4 AEs reported during the open-label phase were diarrhea (5.3%), fatigue (4.7%), and stomatitis (4.1%). Deaths related to pulmonary or cardiac failure were observed more frequently in the everolimus arm. Conclusion: No significant difference in OS was observed for the everolimus plus octreotide LAR and placebo plus octreotide LAR arms of the RADIANT-2 study, even after adjusting for imbalances in the baseline covariates. Clinical Trial Number: NCT00412061, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of follicular lymphoma in patients 40 years of age and younger: an analysis from the National Lymphocare Study†.

BACKGROUND: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with median age at diagnosis in the seventh decade. FL in young adults (YAs), defined as diagnosis at ≤40 years, is uncommon. No standard approaches exist guiding the treatment of YA FL, and little is known about their disease characteristics and outcomes. To gain further insights into YA FL, we analyzed the National LymphoCare Study (NLCS) to describe characteristics, initial treatments, and outcomes in this population versus patients aged >40 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the NLCS database, we stratified FL patients by age: 18-40 (YA), 41-60, 61-70, 71-80, and >80 years. Survival probability was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. We examined associations between age and survival using hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from multivariable Cox models. RESULTS: Of 2652 eligible FL patients in the NLCS, 164 (6%) were YAs. Of YA patients, 69% had advanced disease, 80% had low-grade histology, and 50% had good-risk disease according to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI). Nineteen percent underwent observation, 12% received rituximab monotherapy, and 46% received chemoimmunotherapy [in 59% of these: R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)]. With a median follow-up of 8 years, overall survival (OS) at 2, 5, and 8 years was 98% (95% CI 93-99), 94% (95% CI 89-97), and 90% (95% CI 83-94), respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 years (95% CI 5.6-not reached). CONCLUSIONS: In one of the largest cohorts of YA FL patients treated in the rituximab era, disease characteristics and outcomes were similar to patients aged 41-60 years, with favorable OS and PFS in YAs. Longer-term outcomes and YA-specific survivorship concerns should be considered when defining management. These data may not support the need for more aggressive therapies in YA FL. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Roche/Genentech ML01377 (U2963n).

Improved time to treatment failure with an intermittent oxaliplatin strategy: results of CONcePT.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin is an integral component of colorectal cancer treatment, but its use is limited by neurotoxicity. The Combined Oxaliplatin Neurotoxicity Prevention Trial (CONcePT) tested intermittent oxaliplatin (IO) administration and the use of concurrent calcium and magnesium salts (Ca/Mg), two modifications intended to reduce neurotoxicity and extend the duration of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this trial involving double randomization, 140 patients were randomized to receive modified FOLFOX7 plus bevacizumab with IO (eight-cycle blocks of oxaliplatin treatment) versus continuous oxaliplatin (CO); and Ca/Mg versus placebo (pre- and postoxaliplatin infusion). The primary end point was time-to-treatment failure (TTF). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were entered and treated up to the point of early study termination due to concerns by the data-monitoring committee (DMC) that Ca/Mg adversely affected tumor response. Tumor response was not a study end point. Given DMC concerns, an additional independent, blinded radiology review of all images showed no adverse effect of treatment schedule or Ca/Mg on response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. The IO schedule was superior to CO [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.581, P = 0.0026] for both TTF and time-to-tumor progression (TTP) (HR = 0.533, P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: An IO dosing schedule had a significant benefit on both TTF and TTP versus CO dosing in this trial despite the very attenuated sample. There was no effect of Ca/Mg on response.

Carcinoma of unknown primary with gastrointestinal profile: immunohistochemistry and survival data for this favorable subset.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of unknown primary with a "gastrointestinal profile" is an emerging, favorable entity. Distinguishing this entity is of increasing significance given the progress in the treatment of colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 74 carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) patients with CDX2+ tumors were chosen from the databases at M.D. Anderson and Sarah Cannon Cancer Centers between 2004 and 2010. Data on clinical and pathological characteristics including therapy and survival were recorded. RESULTS: 20 patients had ascites on presentation; the predominant sites of metastases included liver (30 %), carcinomatosis (50 %), and nodes (51 %). Based on immunohistochemistry, 2 cohorts were created: Cohort 1-"consistent with lower GI profile" included 34 patients [CDX-2+, CK20+, CK7-] and Cohort 2-"probable lower GI profile" included 40 patients [CDX2+, irrespective of CK7/CK20 status]. Excluding 6 outliers, Cohorts 1 and 2 had 32 and 36 patients, respectively; their median survivals were 37 and 21 months, respectively. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, only liver metastases were found to negatively influence survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study provides encouraging indications that CUP patients with gastrointestinal profiles benefit from site-specific therapy. We recommend all CUP patients, especially those with abdominal nodes, isolated carcinomatosis or liver metastases, to undergo optimal immunohistochemistry (IHC) to check for a gastrointestinal profile of CUP.

Panel discussion on B cells and rituximab: mechanistic aspects, efficacy and safety in rheumatoid arthritis and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The clinical potential of rituximab (MabThera/Rituxan), a selective B-cell-depleting agent, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is rapidly becoming apparent. The data presented at an official satellite symposium of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Congress (2003, Lisbon, Portugal), reinforce the rationale for the use of this novel agent in RA and have provided an early indication of its clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability. The symposium presentations were followed by a panel discussion and a question and answer session in which the participants were able to shed further light on specific mechanistic issues relating to effects on B-cell populations based on available data and their own clinical experience of rituximab. Additionally, the implications of current results for longer-term clinical efficacy and safety were discussed. It is becoming clear that rituximab (alone or in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) is highly efficacious in RA. Extensive data from patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma show that early concerns over increased infection rates due to prolonged suppression of B cells have not been realized. The effects of rituximab on long-term RA outcomes, such as joint erosion and duration of response (particularly in patients receiving combination therapy), are eagerly anticipated.

Weekly docetaxel with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: Phase II trials of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network.

BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of weekly docetaxel when paired with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine as the second-line treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with progressive nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after one previous chemotherapeutic regimen, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and measurable lesions were eligible for treatment in these Phase II trials. Patients who had not received gemcitabine previously were treated with docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2), and gemcitabine, 800 mg/m(2), both of which were administered intravenously (i.v.) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. If the patients had received gemcitabine as part of first-line therapy, they were treated with docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2), and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m(2) i.v., on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were reevaluated after two courses of treatment, and responding patients continued treatment for six courses or until disease progression. RESULTS: Forty patients were treated with a combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine, and 23 patients received docetaxel and vinorelbine. The docetaxel/gemcitabine combination was reasonably well tolerated, with moderate myelosuppression and a few nonhematologic toxicities reported. The objective response rate was 10%, with a 1-year survival rate of 20%. The docetaxel/vinorelbine combination was found to be poorly tolerated, with Grade 3/4 leukopenia reported in 71% of patients and neutropenic fever reported in 70% of patients despite frequent dose reductions and omission of the Day 15 doses. Enrollment onto this regimen was stopped prematurely due to toxicity, and after no major responses were observed in the first 20 evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of weekly docetaxel/gemcitabine appears to be feasible and relatively well tolerated as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, whereas a weekly combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine did not appear to be tolerable at the doses and schedule used in the current study. Neither regimen showed a level of activity that suggested any advantage compared with the results obtained with single-agent docetaxel in this setting.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin adjuvant therapy alone or with radiotherapy for resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a feasibility study of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin given in the adjuvant setting alone for patients with resected Stage IB disease and combined with radiotherapy for patients with resected Stages II and IIIA disease and selected patients with Stage IIIB and IV disease (Revised International System for Staging of Lung Cancer). METHODS: One hundred two patients with resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma were treated in the postoperative period with 3 courses of paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) over 1 hour and carboplatin area under the curve of 6 i.v. every 3 weeks for 3 courses. Patients with Stage IB received no further therapy, and those with higher stages also subsequently received radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin over 6 weeks. The median age was 61 years, with 56 men and 46 women, and the predominant histologic type was adenocarcinoma. Twenty pneumonectomies, 80 lobectomies, and 2 other procedures were performed. Ninety percent of the patients (92 of 102) received all 3 courses of adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin (84% received full doses). Seventy-three percent received full doses of radiotherapy and concurrent weekly chemotherapy (49 of 67 patients), and 14 others received greater than 75% of the radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. RESULTS: Toxicity of the chemotherapy was mild with only three hospitalizations for neutropenia and fever and no treatment-related deaths. Severe hypersensitivity occurred in six patients (6%). Concurrent radiation therapy and weekly chemotherapy also was well tolerated with the exception of Grade 3-4 esophagitis observed in 27% (17 of 67 patients). Follow-up was short with a median of 10 months, and 65% of all patients remained progression free. CONCLUSIONS: Three courses of paclitaxel and carboplatin is tolerable, feasible, and can be delivered in most patients in the adjuvant setting. Subsequently, in higher stage patients, concurrent postoperative radiation therapy and weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin is well tolerated and delivered in most patients. Definitive prospective randomized Phase III adjuvant trials are warranted.

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and long-term continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced squamous and other selected carcinomas: results of a Phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and long-term continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of advanced squamous carcinomas of various primary sites. METHODS: Patients were eligible for this trial if they had metastatic squamous carcinoma at any site except the lung. In addition, patients with locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck were eligible, if they were considered unlikely to be cured with combined modality therapy. Sixty patients entered this trial between February 1995 and March 1999; 12 patients (20%) had received 1 previous chemotherapy regimen, whereas 48 patients (80%) were previously untreated. All patients received the following regimen: paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), 1-hour intravenous infusion, Days 1 and 22; carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 6.0 intravenously, Days 1 and 22; 5-FU 225 mg/m(2)/day, by 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion, Days 1-35. Treatment courses were repeated at 6-week intervals; responding patients continued treatment for a maximum of 4 courses (24 weeks). RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 60 patients treated (65%) had objective responses to this regimen, with 25% complete responses. Twelve patients (22%) remain progression free from 7 to 63 months (median, 35 months) after completion of therapy. Complete responses were observed in squamous carcinomas from various primary sites including head and neck, esophagus, cervix, vagina, anus, and unknown primary. The most frequent Grade 3/4 toxicities observed with this 3-drug regimen included leukopenia (48%), diarrhea (17%), mucositis (28%), and portacath-related events (13%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and long-term infusional 5-FU is feasible, well tolerated, and highly efficacious in patients with advanced squamous carcinomas of various primary sites. This regimen merits further investigation.

Paclitaxel-based three-drug combinations for the treatment of small cell lung cancer: a review of the Sarah Cannon Cancer Center experience.

Between June 1993 and September 1999, 217 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) entered three sequential phase II trials evaluating novel paclitaxel-containing three-drug combination chemotherapy regimens. Patients with limited- or extensive-stage SCLC, no previous treatment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2 were eligible. Trials 1 and 2 evaluated the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and etoposide; in the second trial, doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin were higher than in the first trial. Trial 3 evaluated the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan. Patients with limited-stage disease received radiation therapy to the primary tumor site and mediastinum, beginning concurrently with the third course of chemotherapy. All patients received four courses of chemotherapy, administered at 21-day intervals. All three regimens were highly active and produced high response rates in both limited- and extensive-stage SCLC. Median survivals for regimens 1, 2, and 3 in extensive-stage patients were 8, 10, and 8.5 months, respectively. Median survivals in limited- stage disease were 16, 20, and 15 months, respectively. Although definitive comparisons of these regimens cannot be made on the basis of sequential trials, the higher-dose paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide regimen seemed superior; with this regimen, 4-year survival in limited-stage disease was 23%. Paclitaxel-containing three-drug regimens, as evaluated in these three phase II trials, were feasible and highly active in the first-line treatment of SCLC. Randomized trials will be necessary to definitively evaluate the efficacy of these regimens as compared with traditional platinum/etoposide combinations. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 4):43-47.

Weekly docetaxel in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced breast cancer: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel administered weekly to elderly or poor-performance status patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with advanced breast cancer who were either over the age of 65 or considered to be poor candidates for combination chemotherapy received docetaxel 36 mg/m2 weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. The median age of patients in this trial was 74 years, and 73% of patients had one or more visceral sites of metastases. Seventy-five percent of patients received weekly docetaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer, and the other 25% received it as second-line treatment. Thirty-six patients were assessable for efficacy, and all patients were assessed for toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 448 doses of weekly docetaxel were administered to 41 patients. Thirteen patients (36%) had objective responses to treatment, and an additional 13 patients (36%) had stable disease or minor response. Median time to progression for responding and stable patients was 7 months (range, 3 to 27 months). Median survival for the entire group was 13 months, with 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates of 61% and 29%, respectively. Severe neutropenia occurred in only 0.4% of courses, and no other hematologic toxicity was observed. Grade 3/4 fatigue was the most common toxicity, occurring in 20% of patients. CONCLUSION: Weekly docetaxel therapy is active and well tolerated by elderly and/or poor-performance status patients with advanced breast cancer. This treatment can be administered with minimal myelosuppression. Weekly docetaxel provides an additional option for treatment in this difficult subgroup of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Well-tolerated combination regimens containing weekly docetaxel merit evaluation for this patient population.

Weekly docetaxel as a single agent and in combination with gemcitabine in elderly and poor performance status patients with advanced non--small cell lung cancer.

Administering docetaxel weekly at a relatively low dose minimizes myelosuppression and reduces nonhematologic toxicities. In a community-based phase II trial conducted in 39 elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced non--small cell lung cancer, weekly 36 mg/m(2) docetaxel produced a response rate of 20%. The response rate was 26% in patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Actual 1-year survival was 28% and actuarial 2-year survival was 15%. These results are similar to those achieved with other active single agents. The regimen of weekly docetaxel used was associated with minimal hematologic toxicity. There were no cases of grade 4 leukopenia, febrile neutropenia, toxicity-related hospital admissions, or treatment-related death. Nonhematologic toxicities were also mild, even in performance status 2 patients. In a subsequent phase II trial, a similar group of patients received weekly docetaxel at 30 mg/m(2) plus weekly gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2), both drugs given on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Preliminary analysis of data for the first 41 patients enrolled show an objective response rate of 29%, with an additional 45% of patients having stable disease. Although 26% of patients missed the day 15 dose of gemcitabine and docetaxel because of myelosuppression, the combination regimen was generally well tolerated. There were no hospitalizations caused by complications of myelosuppression. One patient developed bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, possibly treatment-related, and died of respiratory failure. Further evaluation of weekly docetaxel-based combinations is indicated. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 9):21-25.

Gemcitabine in the second-line therapy of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity of single-agent gemcitabine in previously treated patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Between January 1997 and October 1998, 39 patients were enrolled in this multicenter Phase II trial performed in the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. Twenty-seven patients (69%) had adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; 35 patients (90%) had previously received treatment with chemotherapy regimens containing both a platinum agent and a taxane. Only 21% of patients had ever responded to previous therapy. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day course. Three of 36 evaluable patients (8%) had partial responses, and 9 patients (25%) had minor responses or stable disease with improved symptoms. The median time to progression for patients with partial responses or stable disease/improved symptoms was 5 months. Treatment was well tolerated, with uncommon grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Gemcitabine produced a low objective response rate in this refractory patient population, although approximately one-third of patients experienced symptomatic improvement. Treatment with gemcitabine was well tolerated. Because gemcitabine has activity against a variety of adenocarcinomas, further evaluation of this agent as part of first-line therapy for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site is appropriate.

Taxane-based chemotherapy for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term follow-up on survival of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site treated with taxane-based chemotherapy in a multicenter community-based setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with three sequential phase II trials between 1995 and 1998 as follows: Study I: paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) Day 1, carboplatin AUC = 6 i.v. Day 1, and oral etoposide 50 mg daily alternating with 100 mg daily days 1-10 every 3 weeks; Study II: docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. Day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. Day 1, repeated every 3 weeks; Study III: docetaxel 65 mg/m2 i.v. Day 1, carboplatin AUC 6 i.v. Day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. A total of 144 patients (71 on Study I, 26 on Study II, 47 on Study III) were treated (45% had well differentiated carcinoma, 48% had poorly differentiated carcinomas, and 6% poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors). The majority of the patients had multiple sites of metastatic disease. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of all evaluable patients responded to therapy (27% partial and 9% complete responses). The median survival was 10 months with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year survivals of 42%, 22%, 17%, and 17%, respectively. Follow-up ranges from 11 to 50 months. Women survived significantly longer than men. Thirty-one patients remain alive and 14 are progression-free. The primary toxicity was leukopenia with the carboplatin regimens and nausea and vomiting with the cisplatin regimen. A review of the survival of several large previously reported series of patients was compared to results after taxane-based chemotherapy. A compelling argument is made that chemotherapy is superior to best supportive care alone and that taxane-based chemotherapy is superior to other forms of chemotherapy. However, prospective randomized trials will be necessary to definitively demonstrate the superiority of this treatment compared to other therapies for these patients. CONCLUSION: Taxane-based chemotherapy for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site appears to be clinically beneficial and is associated with long-term survival for a minority of patients at 2-, 3-, and 4-year follow-up.

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract: a phase II trial of the Minnie pearl cancer research network.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with advanced unresectable urothelial carcinoma entered this multi-centered, community-based, phase II trial between May 1997 and December 1999. All patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) by 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 8, and 15; courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients who had objective response or stable disease continued treatment for six courses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 54 patients (54%; 95% confidence interval, 40% to 67%) had major responses to treatment, including 7% complete responses. With a median follow-up of 24 months, 16 patients (30%) remain alive and nine (17%) are progression-free. The median survival for the entire group was 14.4 months; 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 57% and 25%, respectively. Seven (47%) of 15 patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy responded to paclitaxel/gemcitabine. Grade 3/4 toxicity was primarily hematologic, including leukopenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and anemia (28%). Ten patients (19%) required hospitalization for neutropenia and fever, and one patient had treatment-related septic death. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in the first- or second-line treatment of patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. Response rate and duration compare favorably with those produced by other active, first-line regimens. This regimen should be further evaluated in phase II and III studies, as well as in patients with compromised renal function.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) in combination with radiation therapy and the potential of weekly administration in elderly and/or poor performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

A randomized phase II trial conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer showed that induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy was feasible when cisplatin was administered together with either gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or paclitaxel. The dominant toxicity was esophagitis. Preliminary survival data are encouraging. Other trials in progress or planned will elucidate the relative contributions of induction and concurrent therapy to outcome. A phase I study has shown that it is feasible to combine docetaxel (Taxotere: Aventis, Antony, France) with concomitant radiotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung or esophageal cancer. Giving the drug once every 3 weeks during standard radiotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose is 40 mg/m2 per cycle. The dose-limiting toxicities are neutropenia and esophagitis. However, it is possible to escalate the total docetaxel dose to 60 mg/m2 per cycle by weekly administration of 20 mg/m2. Beyond this point, esophagitis is dose limiting. In the palliative-intent treatment setting, the weekly administration of docetaxel is also likely to be a helpful new approach to administering the drug in subgroups of patients such as the elderly and those with concomitant disease. Weekly docetaxel (36 mg/m2/wk) was administered to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who were elderly (median age, 71 years) or had poor performance status. In this unfavorable group, weekly docetaxel produced a 19% objective response rate and with further follow-up, 1-year survival is 28%. This level of activity is similar to other single agents recently evaluated in more favorable patient groups. The lack of myelosuppression seen with weekly administration suggests that the dose intensity of docetaxel could be maintained in combination regimens.

Monoclonal antibody therapy in lymphoid malignancies.

The concept of targeted therapy for patients with advanced cancer has intrigued researchers for many years. The lymphoid malignancies are particularly good candidates for this therapeutic approach, due to the identification of multiple lymphocyte-specific antigens. The recent introduction of rituximab marks the beginning of a new era in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies. Rituximab is one of the most active single agents for patients with refractory indolent lymphoma, producing response rates of approximately 50%, with low toxicity and a brief duration of treatment. Additional uses of rituximab are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials, and are briefly reviewed. As a first-line agent, responses of approximately 70% are produced in patients with indolent lymphoma, with minimal toxicity. A substantial percentage of patients can be successfully retreated with rituximab, with second remission durations longer than the first remission (14-16 months versus 12 months). Multiple combination regimens using rituximab plus chemotherapy are also being evaluated. Although the role of these combined approaches is incompletely defined, high complete response rates can be obtained, with a higher rate of molecular complete remission (i.e., eradication of detectable bcl-2 rearrangements) than has been observed in patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Rituximab is also being evaluated in other CD20(+) lymphoid malignancies including large-cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Within the next 12 months, several additional monoclonal antibodies will be available for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies. These include the radioimmunoconjugates tositumomab (Bexxar) and ibritumomab (Zevalin), as well as Campath-1H (anti-CD52) monoclonal antibody. Early clinical data with each of these agents are also briefly reviewed.