Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Orv Hetil ; 164(24): 931-941, 2023 Jun 18.
Artículo en Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37330979

RESUMEN

Deprescribing is a planned, systematic process supervised by a healthcare professional. It is considered to be a fundamental part of good prescribing. Deprescribing can be defined as the complete withdrawal of medications as well as dose reduction. The patient's health status, life expectancy, values, preferences and the therapeutic goals should be given serious consideration while planning the deprescribing process. The main objective of deprescribing may vary but reaching the patients' goals and improving their quality of life remain constant priorities. In our article, based on the international literature, we review potential deprescribing targets such as the characteristics of high-risk patients, medications that should prompt a therapy review and the ideal settings for deprescribing. We also cover the steps, risks and benefits of the process, and discuss the existing specific guidelines and algorithms. We provide information on the enablers and barriers of deprescribing among both patients and healthcare professionals, and discuss international initiatives as well as the future of deprescribing. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(24): 931-941.


Asunto(s)
Deprescripciones , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Polifarmacia , Personal de Salud
2.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 26(1): 7-13, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31601132

RESUMEN

Background: Undetected dementia in primary care is a global problem. Since general practitioners (GPs) act as the first step in the identification process, examining their routines could help us to enhance the currently low recognition rates.Objectives: The study aimed to explore, for the first time in Hungary, the dementia identification practices and views of GPs.Methods: In the context of an extensive, national survey (February-November 2014) 8% of all practicing GPs in Hungary (n = 402) filled in a self-administered questionnaire. The questions (single, multiple-choice, Likert-type) analysed in the present study explored GPs' methods and views regarding dementia identification and their ideas about the optimal circumstances of case-finding.Results: The vast majority of responding GPs (97%) agreed that the early recognition of dementia would enhance both the patients' and their relatives' well-being. When examining the possibility of dementia, most GPs (91%) relied on asking the patients general questions and only a quarter of them (24%) used formal tests, even though they were mostly satisfied with both the Clock Drawing Test (69%) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (65%). Longer consultation time was chosen as the most important facet of improvement needed for better identification of dementia in primary care (81%). Half of the GPs (49%) estimated dementia recognition rate to be lower than 30% in their practice.Conclusions: Hungarian GPs were aware of the benefits of early recognition, but the shortage of consultation time in primary care was found to be a major constraint on efficient case-finding.


Asunto(s)
Demencia/diagnóstico , Médicos Generales , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Prim Health Care Res Dev ; 20: e92, 2019 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32799975

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dementia in the elderly constitutes a growing challenge in healthcare worldwide, including Hungary. There is no previous report on the role of general practitioners in the management of dementia. AIM: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the Hungarian general practitioners' attitude toward their patients living with dementia as well as dementia care. Our goal was also to assess their willingness and habits in assessing dementia. Additionally we wanted to explore the role of education about dementia, and its impact on their attitude in dementia management. METHODS: As part of a large survey, a self-administered questionnaire was filled out voluntarily by 402 of general practitioners. According to our preset criteria, 277 surveys were selected for evaluation. Descriptive statistical analysis and Likert-scale analysis were performed. FINDINGS: Half of the doctors (49.8%) indicated that they conducted a test to assess cognitive functions in case of suspicion. Among the respondents who did not assess, 50.0% of physicians cited lack of time as the main reason for not doing so and 14.4% of them had not proper knowledge of testing methods. The respondents most often mentioned feelings toward their patients with dementia, were regret (Likert-scale mean: 3.33), helplessness (3.28) and sadness (3.07). The majority of physicians thought the treatment of dementia was difficult (4.46). Most of the respondents (81.2%) indicated that in the past 2 years they had not participated in any training about dementia. Those practitioners who had participated in some form of education were less likely to feel helpless facing a patient with dementia, and education also determined their approach to dementia care.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/terapia , Médicos Generales/psicología , Geriatría/educación , Geriatría/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Hungría , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Orv Hetil ; 159(32): 1310-1316, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30078356

RESUMEN

It is internationally recognized that the best method for practicing general medical care is family medicine, based on the correct relationship between the physician and the patients/families, where the principles of disease prevention and patient care meet, and the cost-benefit rates are better. In Hungary, a major part of the health reform had been the advancement of a primary care system by the international standards of modern family medicine. The Scientific Association of the Hungarian General Practitioners (SAHGP), founded in 1967, has adviced - from its onset - to introduce a new, independent medical specialty named 'general practice' which was finally realised in 1974. That was followed, according to the Welfare Ministry Order No. 6/1993, by the specific training program for general practice which prescribed, also for the in-service GP-s, to complete an individual postgraduate training, to be ended by a state specialty exam in family practice, under conduction of the regional medical schools. Furthermore, for strengthening the primary healthcare, in 1998 the government established - uniquely in Europe - the National Institute of Primary Healthcare (NIPHC). So a unique task force has gained shape which included the academic sector, the professional NGO and the governmental background institution in order to manage: 1) human resource supply in PHC, 2) to implement statewide professional and public health goals as well as 3) to manage research and development projects. This paper takes a look back at the early events of this process as well as tries to offer an insight into the results and conclusions of the performed research projects, highlighting those which can be potentially usable in further professional development of the Hungarian PHC. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(32): 1310-1316.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Educación Médica/tendencias , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/educación , Médicos de Familia/educación , Academias e Institutos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/tendencias , Humanos , Hungría , Médicos de Familia/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Facultades de Medicina/tendencias
5.
Orv Hetil ; 158(14): 523-532, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28366081

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The experiences gained during the H1N1 flu pandemic in 2009/2010 could serve for a better planning and management of later outbreaks. AIM: The EU-sponsored TELL ME project aimed to provide evidence and develop models for improved risk communication during infectious disease crisis. Among its objectives was to develop original communication strategies regarding appropriate messages related to preventative behavior and advice based on uncertainties also addressing vaccine-resistant groups. METHOD: Focus groups involving family physicians (FPs) were called upon for assessing the main issues during the H1N1 pandemic, the possibilities for improving the preventative process and outcomes. RESULTS: The study demonstrated the key-role of family doctors during outbreaks; patients put their trust in their elected FP, he or she representing a personal example of health behavior. The evidence based information about effectiveness and safety of vaccines are needed in communication towards health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of health care professionals in the communication provides validity, the communication routine of opinion leaders meant to be used for such purpose. The main media message should be: "For prevention go to see your family doctor". Orv. Hetil., 2017, 158(14), 523-532.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Hungría , Subtipo H5N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...