Collecting Sociodemographic Data in Pediatric Emergency Research: A Working Group Consensus.

Understanding and addressing health care disparities relies on collecting and reporting accurate data in clinical care and research. Data regarding a child's race, ethnicity, and language; sexual orientation and gender identity; and socioeconomic and geographic characteristics are important to ensure equity in research practices and reported outcomes. Disparities are known to exist across these sociodemographic categories. More consistent, accurate data collection could improve understanding of study results and inform approaches to resolve disparities in child health. However, published guidance on standardized collection of these data in children is limited, and given the evolving nature of sociocultural identities, requires frequent updates. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network, a multi-institutional network dedicated to pediatric emergency research, developed a Health Disparities Working Group in 2021 to support and advance equitable pediatric emergency research. The working group, which includes clinicians involved in pediatric emergency medical care and researchers with expertise in pediatric disparities and the conduct of pediatric research, prioritized creating a guide for approaches to collecting race, ethnicity, and language; sexual orientation and gender identity; and socioeconomic and geographic data during the conduct of research in pediatric emergency care settings. Our aims with this guide are to summarize existing barriers to sociodemographic data collection in pediatric emergency research, highlight approaches to support the consistent and reproducible collection of these data, and provide rationale for suggested approaches. These approaches may help investigators collect data through a process that is inclusive, consistent across studies, and better informs efforts to reduce disparities in child health.

Feasibility of text message follow-up for pediatric asthma care after an emergency department visit.

Background: Many children seen in the Emergency Department (ED) for asthma do not follow-up with their primary care provider. Text messaging via short message service (SMS) is a ubiquitous, but untested means of providing post-ED asthma follow-up care.Objective: To evaluate responses to an asthma assessment survey via SMS following an ED visit and estimate the likelihood of response by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Methods: We recruited 173 parents of children 2-17 years-old presenting for ED asthma care to receive a follow-up text (participation rate: 85%). One month later, parents received via SMS a 22-item survey that assessed asthma morbidity. We assessed response rates overall and by various sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including age, parental education, and indicators of asthma severity.Results: Overall, 55% of parents (n = 95) responded to the SMS survey. In multivariable logistic regression (MLR), parents who graduated high school had a four-fold higher response rate compared to parents with less than a high school degree (OR: 4.05 (1.62, 10.13)). More parents of children with oral steroid use in the prior 12 months responded to survey items (OR: 2.53 (1.2, 5.31)). Reported asthma characteristics included: 48% uncontrolled, 22% unimproved/worse, 21% with sleep disruption, and 10% who were hospitalized for asthma.Conclusions: Text messaging may be a viable strategy to improve post-ED asthma assessment and to identify children with persistent symptoms in need of enhanced care or modification of care plans.

Describing the Patient Population of a Pediatric Emergency Department Based on Visit Frequency.

OBJECTIVE: A small number of children in the United States use a disproportionate share of emergency healthcare services. Our study objective was to examine characteristics associated with frequent pediatric emergency department (PED) utilization. METHODS: A retrospective cohort-sequential study of patients seen in the PED of an urban children's hospital was conducted. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: infrequent users (<4 visits during index year 2017) and frequent users (≥4 visits in 2017). Frequent PED users were further divided into persistent frequent (≥4 visits in the year before and after 2017) and incidental frequent (≥4 visits in 2017). Patient- and visit-level characteristics were analyzed for associations with PED utilization. RESULTS: In 2017, there were 82,361 visits by 56,767 patients to our PED. Frequent users comprised 4% of the total patient volume but accounted for 13% of visits. Compared with infrequent users, frequent users were younger, more likely publicly insured, and English speaking. Frequent user visits were more likely to occur outside clinic hours, be triaged as emergent, and involve subspecialists. Compared with visits by incidental frequent users, visits by persistent frequent users were more likely to be emergent or urgent, and involve subspecialists, diagnostic imaging, laboratory testing, and medication administration. CONCLUSIONS: Although the percentage of frequent users to a PED in 2017 was low, they made up a disproportionate share of total visits. Differences between persistent and incidental frequent PED users suggest that these subgroups may benefit from tailored interventions to reduce frequent PED utilization.

Trends in ED Resource Use for Infants 0 to 60 Days Evaluated for Serious Bacterial Infection.

OBJECTIVES: We examined trends in resource use for infants undergoing emergency department evaluation for serious bacterial infection, including lumbar puncture (LP), antibiotic administration, hospitalization, and procalcitonin testing, as well as the association between procalcitonin testing and LP, administration of parenteral antibiotics, and hospitalization. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of infants aged 0 to 60 days who underwent emergency department evaluation for serious bacterial infection with blood and urine cultures from 2010 to 2019 in 27 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System. We examined temporal trends in LP, antibiotic administration, hospitalization, and procalcitonin testing from 2010 to 2019. We also estimated multivariable logistic regression models for 2017-2019, adjusted for demographic factors and stratified by age (<28 and 29-60 days), with LP, antibiotic administration, and hospitalization as dependent variables and hospital-level procalcitonin testing as the independent variable. RESULTS: We studied 106 547 index visits. From 2010 to 2019, rates of LP, antibiotic administration, and hospitalization decreased more for infants aged 29 to 60 days compared with infants aged 0 to 28 days (annual decrease in odds of LP, antibiotics administration, and hospitalization: 0 to 28 days: 5%, 5%, and 3%, respectively; 29-60 days: 15%, 12%, and 7%, respectively). Procalcitonin testing increased significantly each calendar year (odds ratio per calendar year 2.19; 95% confidence interval 1.82-2.62), with the majority (91.1%) performed during 2017-2019. From 2017 to 2019, there was no association between hospital-level procalcitonin testing and any outcome studied (all P values > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of LP, antibiotic administration, and hospitalization decreased significantly for infants 29 to 60 days during 2010-2019. Although procalcitonin testing increased during 2017-2019, we found no association with hospital-level procalcitonin testing and patterns of resource use.

National COVID-19 vaccine program progress and parents' willingness to vaccinate their children.

Vaccinating children against COVID-19 is critical as a public health strategy in order to reach herd immunity and prevent illness among children and adults. The aim of the study was to identify correlation between willingness to vaccinate children under 12 years old, and vaccination rate for adult population in Canada, the United States, and Israel. This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey study (COVID-19 Parental Attitude Study) of parents of children 12 years and younger presenting to 12 pediatric emergency departments (EDs). Parental reports of willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 when vaccines for children will be approved was correlated to country-specific rate of vaccination during December 2020-March 2021, obtained from ourworldindata.org. Logistic regression models were fit with covariates for week and the corresponding vaccine rate. A total of 720 surveys were analyzed. In Canada, administering mostly first dose to the adult population, willingness to vaccinate children was trending downward (correlation = -0.28), in the United States, it was trending upwards (correlation = 0.21) and in Israel, initially significant increase with decline shortly thereafter (correlation = 0.06). Odds of willingness to vaccinate in Canada, the United States, and Israel was OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.63-1.07, OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.99-1.56, and OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.95-1.12, respectively. A robust population-based vaccination program as in Israel, and to a lesser degree the United States, led to increasing willingness by parents to vaccinate their children younger than 12 years against COVID-19. In Canada, slow rate of vaccination of the adult population was associated with lower willingness to vaccinate children.

Caregiver Willingness to Vaccinate Their Children against COVID-19 after Adult Vaccine Approval.

Vaccines against COVID-19 are likely to be approved for children under 12 years in the near future. Understanding vaccine hesitancy in parents is essential for reaching herd immunity. A cross-sectional survey of caregivers in 12 emergency departments (ED) was undertaken in the U.S., Canada, and Israel. We compared reported willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19 with an initial survey and post-adult COVID-19 vaccine approval. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed for all children and for those <12 years. A total of 1728 and 1041 surveys were completed in phases 1 and 2, respectively. Fewer caregivers planned to vaccinate against COVID-19 in phase 2 (64.5% and 59.7%, respectively; p = 0.002). The most significant positive predictor of willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 was if the child was vaccinated per recommended local schedules. Fewer caregivers plan to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, despite vaccine approval for adults, compared to what was reported at the peak of the pandemic. Older caregivers who fully vaccinated their children were more likely to adopt vaccinating children. This study can inform target strategy design to implement adherence to a vaccination campaign.

Caregiver-reported delay in presentation to pediatric emergency departments for fear of contracting COVID-19: a multi-national cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if caregivers of children presenting to pediatric emergency departments (EDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic are delaying presenting to care for fear of contracting COVID-19. METHODS: This was a pre-planned secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey study of caregivers accompanying their children aged 0-19 years to 16 pediatric EDs in 5 countries from May to June 2020. An anonymous online survey, completed by caregivers via RedCAP, included caregiver and child demographics, presenting complaints, if they delayed presentation and whether symptoms worsened during this interval, as well as caregiver concern about the child or caregiver having COVID-19 at the time of ED visit. RESULTS: Of 1543 caregivers completing the survey, 287 (18.6%) reported a delay in seeking ED care due to concerns of contracting COVID-19 in the hospital. Of those, 124 (43.2%) stated their child's symptoms worsened during the waiting interval. Caregiver relationship to child [mother] (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.27-2.76), presence of chronic illness in child (OR 1.78. 95% CI 1.14-2.79), younger age of caregiver (OR 0.965, 95% CI 0.943-0.986), and caregiver concerns about lost work during the pandemic (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12) were independently associated with a COVID-19-related delayed presentation in multivariable regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one in five caregivers reported delaying ED presentation for their ill or injured child specifically due to fear of contracting COVID-19 while in hospital, with mothers, younger caregivers, caregivers of children with chronic illness, and those concerned about lost work more likely to report delaying ED presentation.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Déterminer si les aidants des enfants qui se présentent aux services d'urgence pédiatriques (SU) pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 retardent leur présentation pour prendre soin d'eux par crainte de contracter la COVID-19. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une analyze secondaire planifiée à l'avance d'une étude d'enquête transversale auprès des soignants accompagnant leurs enfants âgés de 0 à 19 ans dans 16 urgences pédiatriques de 5 pays entre mai et juin 2020. Une enquête anonyme en ligne, remplie par les soignants via RedCAP, comprenait les données démographiques du soignant et de l'enfant, les plaintes présentées, s'ils ont retardé la présentation et si les symptômes se sont aggravés pendant cet intervalle, ainsi que l'inquiétude du soignant quant à la présence de COVID-19 chez l'enfant ou le soignant au moment de la visite aux urgences. RéSULTATS: Sur les 1 543 soignants ayant répondu à l'enquête, 287 (18.6 %) ont déclaré avoir retardé le recours aux urgences par crainte de contracter le COVID-19 à l'hôpital. Parmi eux, 124 (43.2%) ont déclaré que les symptômes de leur enfant s'étaient aggravés pendant l'intervalle d'attente. Dans l'analyse de régression multivariable, le lien entre la personne qui s'occupe de l'enfant et la mère (OR 1.85, IC95 % 1.27­2.76), la présence d'une maladie chronique chez l'enfant (OR 1.78, IC95 % 1.14-2.79), le jeune âge de la personne qui s'occupe de l'enfant (OR 0.965, IC95 % 0.943-0.986) et les préoccupations de la personne qui s'occupe de l'enfant concernant la perte de travail pendant la pandémie (OR 1.08, IC95 % 1.04­1.12) ont été associés de manière indépendante à une présentation tardive. CONCLUSIONS: Près d'un soignant sur cinq a déclaré avoir retardé la présentation aux urgences de son enfant malade ou blessé par crainte de contracter le COVID-19 pendant son séjour à l'hôpital, avec les mères, les jeunes aidants, les soignants d'enfants souffrant de maladies chroniques et les personnes préoccupées par la perte de travail sont plus susceptibles de retarder la présentation aux urgences.

Text messages by wireless mesh network vs voice by two-way radio in disaster simulations: A crossover randomized-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Communication failures secondary to damaged infrastructure have caused difficulties in coordinating disaster responses. Two-way radios commonly serve as backup communication for hospitals. However, text messaging has become widely adopted in daily life and new technologies such as wireless mesh network (WMN) devices allow for text messaging independent of cellular towers, Wi-Fi networks, and electrical grids. OBJECTIVE: To examine the accuracy of communication using text-based messaging transmitted over WMN devices (TEXT-WMN) compared to voice transmitted over two-way radios (VOICE-TWR) in disaster simulations. Secondary outcomes were patient triage accuracy, perceived workload, and device preference. METHODS: 2 × 2 Latin square crossover design: 2 simulations (each involving 15 min of simulated hospital-wide disaster communication) by 2 modalities (TEXT-WMN and VOICE-TWR). Physicians were randomized to one of two sequences: VOICE-TWR first and TEXT-WMN second; or TEXT-WMN first and VOICE-TWR second. Analyses were conducted using linear mixed effects modeling. RESULTS: On average, communication accuracy significantly improved with TEXT-WMN compared to VOICE-TWR. Communication accuracy also significantly improved, on average, during the second simulation compared to the first. There was no significant change in triage accuracy with either TEXT-WMN or VOICE-TWR; however, triage accuracy significantly improved, on average, during the second simulation compared to the first. On average, perceived workload was significantly lower with TEXT-WMN compared to VOICE-TWR, and was also significantly lower during the second simulation compared to the first. Most participants preferred TEXT-WMN to VOICE-TWR. CONCLUSION: TEXT-WMN technology may be more effective and less burdensome than VOICE-TWR in facilitating accurate communication during disasters.

Willingness to Vaccinate Children against Influenza after the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with parents who plan to vaccinate their children against influenza next year, especially those who did not vaccinate against influenza last year using a global survey. STUDY DESIGN: A survey of caregivers accompanying their children aged 1-19 years old in 17 pediatric emergency departments in 6 countries at the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Anonymous online survey included caregiver and child demographic information, vaccination history and future intentions, and concern about the child and caregiver having COVID-19 at the time of emergency department visit. RESULTS: Of 2422 surveys, 1314 (54.2%) caregivers stated they plan to vaccinate their child against influenza next year, an increase of 15.8% from the previous year. Of 1459 caregivers who did not vaccinate their children last year, 418 (28.6%) plan to do so next year. Factors predicting willingness to change and vaccinate included child's up-to-date vaccination status (aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.29-3.32, P = .003); caregivers' influenza vaccine history (aOR 3.26, 95% CI 2.41-4.40, P < .010), and level of concern their child had COVID-19 (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in risk perception due to COVID-19, and previous vaccination, may serve to influence decision-making among caregivers regarding influenza vaccination in the coming season. To promote influenza vaccination among children, public health programs can leverage this information.

Leaving Without Being Seen From a Pediatric Emergency Department: Identifying Caregivers' Perspectives Using Q-methodology.

OBJECTIVE: National rates of left (or leaving) without being seen (LWBS) in pediatric emergency departments (PED) are higher than general emergency departments. We investigated coexisting perspectives on LWBS. METHODS: Q-methodology was implemented through a mixed-methods design. Semistructured interviews elicited a concourse of caregivers' thoughts on waiting in the PED and their consideration of LWBS. Themes from the concourse were identified and framed as statements. Caregivers sorted these statements, which ranged from choosing to stay versus leave the PED before their child is seen by a physician. Sorted data were analyzed through centroid factor analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-seven caregivers contributed interview data, from which 31 themes were identified and framed as statements. Thirty-one different caregivers contributed Q-sort data, from which 2 factors were revealed, each representing a unique perspective on LWBS. Most caregivers (26 of 31) shared the following perspective: "I would leave the PED before my child is seen by a doctor if there are no reassessments for my child while we are in the queue, no updates on our queue position, or no explanations for wait time." The remaining caregivers (5 of 31) perceived feelings of uncertainty and helplessness, lack of updates, and competing obligations as primary influences on LWBS. CONCLUSIONS: Elements that factor into caregivers' decision to LWBS from a PED include lack of reassessments, lack of updates on queue position, and lack of information about the triage process. Quality improvement interventions for decreasing LWBS rates should account for diverse coexisting perspectives such as these.

Factors associated with parents' willingness to enroll their children in trials for COVID-19 vaccination.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken an unprecedented global toll and vaccination is needed to restore healthy living. Timely inclusion of children in vaccination trials is critical. We surveyed caregivers of children seeking care in 17 Emergency Departments (ED) across 6 countries during the peak of the pandemic to identify factors associated with intent to participate in COVID-19 vaccine trials. Questions about child and parent characteristics, COVID-19 expressed concerns and parental attitudes toward participation in a trial were asked.Of 2768 completed surveys, 18.4% parents stated they would enroll their child in a clinical trial for a COVID-19 vaccine and 14.4% would agree to a randomized placebo-controlled study. Factors associated with willingness to participate were parents agreeing to enroll in a COVID-19 vaccine trial themselves (Odds Ratio (OR) 32.9, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (21.9-51.2)) having an older child (OR 1.0 (1.0-1.01)), having children who received all vaccinations based on their country schedule (OR 2.67 (1.35-5.71)) and parents with high school education or lower (OR 1.79 (1.18-2.74)). Mothers were less likely to enroll their child in a trial (OR 0.68 (0.47-0.97)). Only one fifth of families surveyed will consider enrolling their child in a vaccine trial. Parental interest in participation, history of vaccinating their child, and the child being older all are associated with parents allowing their child to participate in a COVID vaccine trial. This information may help decision-makers and researchers shape their strategies for trial design and participation engagement in upcoming COVID19 vaccination trials.

Caregiver willingness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19: Cross sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: More than 100 COVID-19 vaccine candidates are in development since the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence was published in January 2020. The uptake of a COVID-19 vaccine among children will be instrumental in limiting the spread of the disease as herd immunity may require vaccine coverage of up to 80% of the population. Prior history of pandemic vaccine coverage was as low as 40% among children in the United States during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. PURPOSE: To investigate predictors associated with global caregivers' intent to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, when the vaccine becomes available. METHOD: An international cross sectional survey of 1541 caregivers arriving with their children to 16 pediatric Emergency Departments (ED) across six countries from March 26 to May 31, 2020. RESULTS: 65% (n = 1005) of caregivers reported that they intend to vaccinate their child against COVID-19, once a vaccine is available. A univariate and subsequent multivariate analysis found that increased intended uptake was associated with children that were older, children with no chronic illness, when fathers completed the survey, children up-to-date on their vaccination schedule, recent history of vaccination against influenza, and caregivers concerned their child had COVID-19 at the time of survey completion in the ED. The most common reason reported by caregivers intending to vaccinate was to protect their child (62%), and the most common reason reported by caregivers refusing vaccination was the vaccine's novelty (52%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of caregivers intend to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, though uptake will likely be associated with specific factors such as child and caregiver demographics and vaccination history. Public health strategies need to address barriers to uptake by providing evidence about an upcoming COVID-19 vaccine's safety and efficacy, highlighting the risks and consequences of infection in children, and educating caregivers on the role of vaccination.

Caregivers' Willingness to Accept Expedited Vaccine Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Survey.

PURPOSE: This study determined the predictors of caregivers' willingness to accept an accelerated regulatory process for the development of vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: An international cross-sectional survey was administered to 2557 caregivers of children in 17 pediatric emergency departments (EDs) across 6 countries from March 26, 2020, to June 30, 2020. Caregivers were asked to select 1 of 4 choices with which they most agreed regarding a proposed COVID-19 vaccine-approval process, in addition to questions regarding demographic characteristics, the ED visit, and attitudes about COVID-19. Univariate analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test for comparing non-normally distributed continuous variables, an independent t test for comparing normally distributed continuous variables, and a χ2 or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for determining independent factors associated with caregivers' willingness to accept abridged development of a COVID-19 vaccine. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. FINDINGS: Almost half (1101/2557; 43%) of caregivers reported that they were willing to accept less rigorous testing and postresearch approval of a new COVID-19 vaccine. Independent factors associated with caregivers' willingness to accept expedited COVID-19 vaccine research included having children who were up to date on the vaccination schedule (odds ratio [OR] = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.29-2.31), caregivers' concern about having had COVID-19 themselves at the time of survey completion in the ED (OR = 1.1; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16), and caregivers' intent to have their children vaccinated against COVID-19 if a vaccine were to become available (OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.54-2.21). Compared with fathers, mothers completing the survey were less likely to approve of changes in the vaccine-development process (OR = 0.641; 95% CI, 0.529-0.775). IMPLICATIONS: Less than half of caregivers in this worldwide sample were willing to accept abbreviated COVID-19 vaccine testing. As a part of an effort to increase acceptance and uptake of a new vaccine, especially in order to protect children, public health strategies and individual providers should understand caregivers' attitudes toward the approval of a vaccine and consult them appropriately.

Clinical Utility of Noninvasive Method to Measure Specific Gravity in the Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians rely on any combination of signs and symptoms, clinical scores, or invasive procedures to assess the hydration status in children. Noninvasive tests to evaluate for dehydration in the pediatric population are appealing. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study is to assess the utility of measuring specific gravity of tears compared to specific gravity of urine and the clinical assessment of dehydration. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort convenience sample study, in a pediatric emergency department at a tertiary care children's hospital. We approached parents/guardians of children aged 6 months to 4 years undergoing transurethral catheterization for evaluation of urinary tract infection for enrollment. We collected tears and urine for measurement of tear specific gravity (TSG) and urine specific gravity (USG), respectively. Treating physicians completed dehydration assessment forms to assess for hydration status. RESULTS: Among the 60 participants included, the mean TSG was 1.0183 (SD = 0.007); the mean USG was 1.0186 (SD = 0.0083). TSG and USG were positively correlated with each other (Pearson Correlation = 0.423, p = 0.001). Clinical dehydration scores ranged from 0 to 3, with 87% assigned a score of 0, by physician assessment. Mean number of episodes of vomiting and diarrhea in a 24-hour period were 2.2 (SD = 3.9) and 1.5 (SD = 3.2), respectively. Sixty-two percent of parents reported decreased oral intake. CONCLUSION: TSG measurements yielded similar results compared with USG. Further studies are needed to determine if TSG can be used as a noninvasive method of dehydration assessment in children.