Exploring cognitive progression subtypes in the Framingham Heart Study.

INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by complex underlying neuropathology that is not fully understood. This study aimed to identify cognitive progression subtypes and examine their correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS: Participants of this study were recruited from the Framingham Heart Study. The Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) method was used to identify cognitive progression subtypes based on eight cognitive domains. RESULTS: Three cognitive progression subtypes were identified, including verbal learning (Subtype 1), abstract reasoning (Subtype 2), and visual memory (Subtype 3). These subtypes represent different domains of cognitive decline during the progression of AD. Significant differences in age of onset among the different subtypes were also observed. A higher SuStaIn stage was significantly associated with increased mortality risk. DISCUSSION: This study provides a characterization of AD heterogeneity in cognitive progression, emphasizing the importance of developing personalized approaches for risk stratification and intervention. Highlights: We used the Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) method to identify three cognitive progression subtypes.Different subtypes have significant variations in age of onset.Higher stages of progression are associated with increased mortality risk.

Is Catheter Ablation Associated with Preservation of Cognitive Function? An Analysis From the SAGE-AF Observational Cohort Study.

Objectives: To examine the associations between catheter ablation treatment (CA) versus medical management and cognitive impairment among older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Ambulatory patients who had AF, were ≥ 65-years-old, and were eligible to receive oral anticoagulation could be enrolled into the SAGE (Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements)-AF study from internal medicine and cardiology clinics in Massachusetts and Georgia between 2016 and 2018. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tool at baseline, one-, and two years. Cognitive impairment was defined as a MoCA score ≤ 23. Multivariate-adjusted logistic regression of longitudinal repeated measures was used to examine associations between treatment with CA vs. medical management and cognitive impairment. Results: 887 participants were included in this analysis. On average, participants were 75.2 ± 6.7 years old, 48.6% women, and 87.4% white non-Hispanic. 193 (21.8%) participants received a CA before enrollment. Participants who had previously undergone CA were significantly less likely to be cognitively impaired during the two-year study period (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.97) than those medically managed (i.e., rate and/or rhythm control), even after adjusting with propensity score for CA. At the two-year follow-up a significantly greater number of individuals in the non-CA group were cognitively impaired (MoCA ≤ 23) compared to the CA-group (311 [44.8%] vs. 58 [30.1%], p=0.0002). Conclusions: In this two-year longitudinal prospective cohort study participants who underwent CA for AF before enrollment were less likely to have cognitive impairment than those who had not undergone CA.

Multimodal Machine Learning for 10-Year Dementia Risk Prediction: The Framingham Heart Study.

BACKGROUND: Early prediction of dementia risk is crucial for effective interventions. Given the known etiologic heterogeneity, machine learning methods leveraging multimodal data, such as clinical manifestations, neuroimaging biomarkers, and well-documented risk factors, could predict dementia more accurately than single modal data. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop machine learning models that capitalize on neuropsychological (NP) tests, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures, and clinical risk factors for 10-year dementia prediction. METHODS: This study included participants from the Framingham Heart Study, and various data modalities such as NP tests, MRI measures, and demographic variables were collected. CatBoost was used with Optuna hyperparameter optimization to create prediction models for 10-year dementia risk using different combinations of data modalities. The contribution of each modality and feature for the prediction task was also quantified using Shapley values. RESULTS: This study included 1,031 participants with normal cognitive status at baseline (age 75±5 years, 55.3% women), of whom 205 were diagnosed with dementia during the 10-year follow-up. The model built on three modalities demonstrated the best dementia prediction performance (AUC 0.90±0.01) compared to single modality models (AUC range: 0.82-0.84). MRI measures contributed most to dementia prediction (mean absolute Shapley value: 3.19), suggesting the necessity of multimodal inputs. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a multimodal machine learning framework had a superior performance for 10-year dementia risk prediction. The model can be used to increase vigilance for cognitive deterioration and select high-risk individuals for early intervention and risk management.

Is catheter ablation associated with preservation of cognitive function? An analysis from the SAGE-AF observational cohort study.

Objectives: To examine the associations between catheter ablation treatment (CA) vs. medical management and cognitive impairment among older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Ambulatory patients who had AF, were ≥65-years-old, and were eligible to receive oral anticoagulation could be enrolled into the SAGE (Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements)-AF study from internal medicine and cardiology clinics in Massachusetts and Georgia between 2016 and 2018. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tool at baseline, 1-, and 2 years. Cognitive impairment was defined as a MoCA score ≤ 23. Multivariate-adjusted logistic regression of longitudinal repeated measures was used to examine associations between treatment with CA vs. medical management and cognitive impairment. Results: 887 participants were included in this analysis. On average, participants were 75.2 ± 6.7 years old, 48.6% women, and 87.4% white non-Hispanic. 193 (21.8%) participants received a CA before enrollment. Participants who had previously undergone CA were significantly less likely to be cognitively impaired during the 2-year study period (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.97) than those medically managed (i.e., rate and/or rhythm control), even after adjusting with propensity score for CA. At the 2-year follow-up a significantly greater number of individuals in the non-CA group were cognitively impaired (MoCA ≤ 23) compared to the CA-group (311 [44.8%] vs. 58 [30.1%], p = 0.0002). Conclusion: In this 2-year longitudinal prospective cohort study participants who underwent CA for AF before enrollment were less likely to have cognitive impairment than those who had not undergone CA.