Racial and Ethnic Differences in Risk Factors and Outcomes in Adults With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Introduction Understanding racial/ethnic differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) lays the foundation for more equitable health care. This study evaluated racial/ethnic differences in risk factors, treatment, and outcomes in patients with AMI. Methods This retrospective study included patients aged 18-50 years hospitalized for AMI between 2006 and 2016. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association of race/ethnicity with all-cause mortality. Results Among 1753 patients hospitalized for type 1 AMI (median age 44 years, 85% male), 35.8% self-identified as White, 9.4% non-Hispanic Black, 37.6% Hispanic, 14.5% Asian, and 2.6% as other. Compared to White patients, Black patients were more likely to have hypertension (53.1% vs 32.2%, p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients were more likely to have diabetes (28.2% vs 15.5%, p < 0.001) and obesity (23.9% vs 17.7%, p = 0.008). There were no substantial differences in revascularization rates or initial medical treatment. However, adherence to statin therapy was lower among Black and Hispanic patients (50.3% and 58.6% for Black and Hispanic vs 67.4% and 72.3% for White and Asian patients, respectively). Over a median follow-up of 7.5 years, Black patients had higher all-cause mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval = 1.09-3.24) compared to White patients, but this difference was no longer significant after adjustments (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval = 0.74-2.36). Discussion and Conclusion There are racial/ethnic differences in risk factors and medication adherence patterns in adults with AMI. To achieve equitable care, programs with tailored intervention addressing needs of different groups should be developed.

Acute myocardial infarction in young adults with chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in young patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to report their characteristics and clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND: Underlying renal dysfunction is a risk factor for poor cardiovascular outcomes in older patients. The implication of CKD in young patients with AMI is not well studied. METHODS: This is a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients aged 18-50 who presented with AMI between 2006 and 2016. Medical records were reviewed to confirm diagnosis and to identify treatment and long-term outcomes. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association of CKD with mortality. RESULTS: Among 1753 young patients with type 1 AMI (median age 45 years, 85.3% male), CKD was present in 112 (6.8%) patients. A higher proportion of CKD patients had concomitant hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and obesity. Use of statin and P2Y12 inhibitors post-AMI was lower in CKD patients. Over a median follow-up of 7.2 years, CKD was associated with higher all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 9.3; 95% CI, 6.3-13.8]. This association persisted after adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and treatment (adjusted HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.2-6.0). CONCLUSION: Presence of CKD was associated with 3.6-fold higher mortality over a median follow-up of 7.2 years. A lower proportion of CKD patients were treated with statin therapy and P2Y12 inhibitors. These findings highlight the need for intensive risk factor modification and optimal use of guideline-directed medical therapies in this high-risk population.

Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Mortality in Patients Aged 60 to 90 Years.

Chronological age alone does not fully reflect a patient's prognosis. We sought to assess the association of cardiorespiratory fitness (quantified by METs) with all-cause mortality among patients aged 60 to 90 years. This retrospective study included patients who underwent exercise treadmill testing at an integrated healthcare system from 2011 to 2019. Patients were categorized into age groups: 60 to <70 years, 70 to <80 years, and 80 to 90 years; and cardiorespiratory fitness level: low (<5 METs), moderate (5 to 10 METs), and high fitness (>10 METs). Mean follow-up was 3.5 years. A total of 40,520 patients were included (mean age 67.7 ± 4.7 years, 48.6% women). Of whom, 27,021 were 60 to <70 years old (66.7%); 12,638 70 to <80 years old (31.2%); and 1,861 80 to 90 years old (4.6%). There were 3,494 patients categorized as low (8.6%), 21,863 as moderate (54%), and 15,163 as high fitness (37.4%). Low fitness level was independently associated with lower survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 to 2.24). Using age 60 to 70 group with high fitness level as reference, the age 80 to 90 group with high fitness level had better survival than their younger counterparts with low fitness level (age 80 to 90 years high fitness level: HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 7.2; age 60 to 70 years low fitness level: HR 4.3, 95% CI 3.1 to 5.9; age 70 to 80 years low fitness level: HR 6.8, 95% CI 5.2 to 8.9) on adjusted analysis. In conclusion, higher cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with better survival. Patients >80 years old with high fitness level have comparable or even better survival than their younger counterparts with submoderate fitness levels. Chronological age alone should not be the only factor when considering prognosis.

Assessment of antibiotic use and concordance with practice guidelines within 3 diverse ambulatory clinic systems.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the rate of antibiotic prescribing at ambulatory clinics, and (2) to assess the concordance of antibiotic prescriptions with published guidelines and Food and Drug Administration-approved indications in terms of drug choices and dosing regimen. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients of all ages receiving at least 1 prescription during ambulatory visits in 2016 to 2017 were observed. OUTCOME MEASURES: For each of the 3 clinic systems included in this study, oral antibiotic prescribing rates were estimated per patient and per ambulatory visit. Then, the concordance of oral antibiotic prescribing was assessed with respect to (1) choice of agent and (2) the dosing regimen by comparing it to the recommended therapeutic regimen (RTR). RESULTS: A total of 284,348 patients receiving at least 1 prescription were included in the analysis. Between clinics, 17.4 to 43.7 per 100 patients received antibiotics. Of the antibiotics prescribed, 48.9% in Clinic A, 48.0% in Clinic B, and 60.7% in Clinic C were considered to be discordant in terms of drug choice. When the dosing regimen was taken into account in addition to the choice of agent, 72.6% in Clinic A, 76.7% in Clinic B, and 81.6% in Clinic C were discordant based on drug choice or dosing regimen. Of the prescriptions written with a discordant dosing regimen, 91.2% in Clinic A, 79.6% in Clinic B, and 91.0% in Clinic C were at a higher dosage than RTR. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic prescribing rates vary by clinics, whereas discordant prescribing is consistently prevalent across clinics. More efforts should be put into ambulatory care to address antibiotic misuse problems, and our method could improve ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship programs.