Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Dent ; 46(1): 63-67, 2024 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38449038

RESUMEN

Purpose: To describe triazolam in pediatric dental mild to moderate sedation and report changes to overall visit behavior for permanent first molar extraction. Methods: This retrospective chart review from 2018 to 2022 analyzed demographic, procedural, and behavioral data for children eight years and older receiving triazolam for a permanent first molar extraction. The outcomes included adverse events measured by deviations in heart rate and oxygen saturation and changes to overall visit-level Frankl scores from the referral to sedation visit. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted. Results: The study population (n equals 82) was predominantly female (61 percent), English-speaking (85 percent), and White (41 percent) or Black (39 percent). The most common indication for mild to moderate sedation was dental anxiety (28 percent). There were zero instances of adverse events requiring emergency intervention or the use of reversal medication. The change in visit-level Frankl scores was significantly positive (P<0.001). Conclusion: Triazolam is likely a safe choice for mild to moderate sedation, leading to improved overall visit behavior in children undergoing a permanent first molar extraction.


Asunto(s)
Triazolam , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Triazolam/efectos adversos , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Diente Molar , Derivación y Consulta
2.
Pediatr Dent ; 43(1): 33-41, 2021 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33662248

RESUMEN

Purpose: U.S. pediatric dentists require access to hospital operating rooms (ORs) to deliver safe and effective dental care to some children but have reported denial of access to ORs for general anesthesia (GA), causing long waiting times, deferral of medically necessary dental care, and unmeasured pain and anxiety for patients. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the extent and possible underlying causes of operating room access denial. Methods: Public policy advocates (PPAs) of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry completed a written or electronic questionnaire about state-specific OR denials during March 2020. Results: Responses from 50 states and the District of Columbia showed 34 PPAs (67 percent) acknowledging OR access problems, with 14 out of 34 (41 percent) reporting a moderate or major problem. Western district PPAs reported the fewest states affected (four out of 11; 36 percent). Hospitals and reimbursement emerged as frequent foci for denials in comment analysis. Conclusions: Operating room access denial is a problem for pediatric dentists in the majority of U.S. states and the District of Columbia; in those states reporting it as a problem, it was considered moderate or major in significance by almost half.


Asunto(s)
Quirófanos , Odontología Pediátrica , Niño , Odontólogos , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
4.
Pediatr Dent ; 42(2): 116-122, 2020 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32276677

RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to use National Poison Data System (NPDS) data to identify cases of local anesthetic (LA) adverse events related to dentistry for children. Methods: NPDS data were queried for all human cases from 2004 to 2018 that identified a parenteral LA agent as the substance, in children 12 years old and younger, which led to a medical outcome classification ranging from moderate to death. For cases that met inclusion criteria, deidentified records with case notes were requested. Results: Twenty-seven dental cases that met review criteria and had available case notes were reviewed. Most subjects were female (N equals 20 out of 27, 74 percent), and the average subject age was 6.8 years. Twenty cases (74 percent) had a moderate effect, seven cases (26 percent) had a major effect, and no fatalities were reported. The most common clinical effects classification was a seizure (N equals 13, 48 percent). One case of LA overdose was identified. Conclusions: No cases of permanent damage or fatal outcomes were found. Seizure activity following the administration of local anesthetic was the most common event, suggesting intravascular administration or a toxic dose.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Dental , Sobredosis de Droga , Anestesia Local , Niño , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...