Estimated Carbon Emissions Associated With Dental Treatment For Early Childhood Caries.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the environmental impact of travel and anesthetic gas emissions associated with treating early childhood caries at a single institution. Methods: Outpatient preventive, treatment, and modeled general anesthesia (GA) cases in children 71 months old and younger were included in this retrospective chart review. The main outcomes were kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (kgCO2e) for travel- and anesthetic gas-related emissions. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used. Results: Most subjects had a caries treatment visit (n equals 3,630 out of 5,767), and nine percent of treatment visits (n equals 353 out of 3,630) received nitrous oxide (N2O), which added 29.4 kgCO2eto the visit emissions. Children without caries treatment had lower travel-related emissions (median equals 7.5 kgCO2e; interquartile range [IQR] equals 7.6) than children with caries treatment (median without N2O equals 8.7 kgCO2e; IQR equals 18.2; median with N2O equals 8.4 kgCO2e; IQR equals 10.3). Modeled GA travel emissions were estimated at 16.4 kgCO2e (IQR equals 21.9) with between 3.8-12.9 kgCO2e in anesthetic gas emissions. Total emissions were greatest for N2O treatment visits (median equals 43.3 kgCO2e; IQR equals 22.8). Conclusions: Travel-related emissions were greatest for children requiring caries treatment. Minimizing patient travel may reduce environmental impact. Nitrous oxide contributes a significant amount to a dental visit???s environmental impact. Community-focused models of care and applying systematic and practical case selection to reduce excess N2O emissions could reduce dental care-related carbon emissions.

COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Behavioral and Attitudinal Changes in Caregivers.

Purpose: To identify pandemic-related behavioral and attitudinal changes in caregivers. Methods: A 38-question cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed to English-speaking caregivers accompanying children for dental care in a hospital dental clinic. The questionnaire surveyed caregiver beliefs and behaviors regarding COVID19, whether the pandemic altered their use of medical and dental care or at-home health habits, as well as their attitudes toward medical and dental teams. Results: The 594 respondents varied in age, marital status, education and income level. Trust was high regarding medical and dental teams, government public health management and mask policies for children. However, those respondents who did not think children should be required to wear masks at school if the health department recommended it and respondents who did not think that government agencies would protect them if another pandemic happened were less likely to change perceptions on dental care, preventive dentistry, sugar intake and toothbrushing (P<0.05). No other strong and consistent relationships were found. Conclusions: In a safety-net dental clinic population, over half of caregivers changed dental behaviors and attitudes following the pandemic. Caregivers cynical of mask mandates and governmental pandemic management were not in the group to change their dental attitudes and behaviors. No other consistent pattern of demographic variables offered a clear profile of group beliefs and behaviors, suggesting the necessity of inquiring individuals and families about their oral health perceptions and behaviors.

Restorative and patient factors associated with repeat general anesthesia for dental treatments in young children: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with higher odds of undergoing repeat general anesthesia (GA2) for dental treatments. METHODS: The authors studied children up to age 48 months of age enrolled in Medicaid who underwent dental treatment under first general anesthesia (GA1). The authors used a case-control design to compare children who had a GA2 within 48 months of GA1 (case patients) with those who did not (control patients). RESULTS: In total, 60 case patients were age and sex matched to 120 control patients. Mean (SD) age at GA1 was 38 (5.2) months for case participants and 40 (4.7) months for control participants (P = .08). Higher caries involvement of maxillary incisors (P = .04), and lower caries involvment of canines (P = .003), first molars (P = .012), and second molars (P < .001) at GA1 was associated with higher odds of occurrence of GA2. There was a significant inverse association between full-coverage restoration on canines (P = .003), first molars (P = .001), and second molars (P = .002) at GA1 and occurrence of GA2. There was a significant direct association between the use of composites or sealants on second molars in GA1 and occurrence of GA2 (P = .02). The number of extractions at GA1 was not associated significantly with the occurrence of GA2. CONCLUSIONS: The use of full-coverage restorations on primary molars and canines under general anesthesia (GA) was associated with lower odds of occurrence of GA2. Resin restorations and sealants on primary second molars were associated with higher odds of occurrence repeat GA. The findings support preferential use of full-coverage restorations for young children undergoing dental GA. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Full-coverage restorations should be considered strongly for young children undergoing GA for dental treatments to reduce the risk of requiring GA2.

Associations Between Oral Health Fatalism and Demographic Factors, Dental Practices, Fatalism, and Oral Health Self-Efficacy.

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between demographics, dental beliefs and practices, fatalism, oral health self-efficacy, and oral health fatalism (OHF) among parent (guardian, caregivers). Methods: English-speaking parents of children presenting for dental care at a hospital dental clinic, a dental surgery center, and two private practices answered a 33-item questionnaire regarding demographics, general fatalistic views, and dental beliefs, practices, and history. Participants rated their agreement with the OHF statement: "Most children eventually develop dental cavities." Results: More than half (58.4 percent) of parent respondents (n equals 332) were Caucasian, and 44.6 percent had education beyond high school. Most were female (81.3 percent), with public (Medicaid) insurance (67.5 percent), and were raising three (average) children. Less than 30 percent endorsed the OHF statement, and 42.5 percent were neutral. Higher OHF was found in parents of children with Medicaid insurance (P=0.02), fair (P=0.01) or poor (P=0.03) dental health, previous caries history (P=0.02), and those attending their first dental visit (P=0.03). Higher OHF was found in parents whose children do not brush their teeth when asked (P=0.02) or who do not behave when a parent helps (P=0.02), as well as those who subscribe to general fatalism beliefs (P=0.002). Conclusions: Higher oral health fatalism was associated with general fatalism, low oral health self-efficacy, parents of children with Medicaid insurance, suboptimal dental health, and first dental visits. Future studies investigating whether OHF can change over time and the role providers play in OHF can help dental professionals understand parent health behaviors and plan for health promotion interventions.