RESUMEN
Three new acridine-thiazolidinone derivatives (2a-2c) have been synthesized and their interactions with calf thymus DNA and a number of cell lines (leukemic cells HL-60 and L1210 and human epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines A2780) were studied. The compounds 2a-2c possessed high affinity to calf thymus DNA and their binding constants determined by spectrofluorimetry were in the range of 1.37 × 10(6)-5.89 × 10(6) M(-1). All of the tested derivatives displayed strong cytotoxic activity in vitro, the highest activity in cytotoxic tests was found for 2c with IC(50) = 1.3 ± 0.2 µM (HL-60), 3.1 ± 0.4 µM (L1210), and 7.7 ± 0.5 µM (A2780) after 72 h incubation. The cancer cells accumulated acridine derivatives very fast and the changes of the glutathione level were confirmed. The compounds inhibited proliferation of the cells and induced an arrest of the cell cycle and cell death. Their influence upon cells was associated with their reactivity towards thiols and DNA binding activity.
Asunto(s)
Acridinas/síntesis química , Acridinas/farmacología , ADN/metabolismo , Glutatión/metabolismo , Tiazolidinas/síntesis química , Tiazolidinas/farmacología , Acridinas/química , Células HL-60 , Humanos , Sustancias Intercalantes/síntesis química , Sustancias Intercalantes/química , Sustancias Intercalantes/farmacología , Modelos Moleculares , Tiazolidinas/químicaRESUMEN
The configuration and dynamic behavior of O-allyl-S-methyl-N-(acridin-9-yl)iminothiocarbonate (1) and its S-allyl-O-methyl regioisomer (2) were studied using quantum chemical calculations and by applying a novel graphical method to scatter maps obtained from MD simulations for evaluation of an NOE-weighted internuclear distance (r(NOE)). Energy calculations indicated that the Z configuration was predominant for each compound and, further, this was supported both by the calculated chemical shifts and the r(NOE). Both N-inversion- and rotation-type transition-state structures were also calculated for the E/Z isomerization process, the results indicating that the preferred interconversion mechanism for 1 is N-inversion, but contrastingly, interconversion via rotation is equally as probable as N-inversion for 2. This supports the notion that one or the other or both pathways can be active and each system needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.