Outcomes in patients treated with frontline immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutations and STK11/KEAP1 comutations across PD-L1 levels.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC), the impact of KRAS mutations (m) and comutations with STK11 and KEAP1 on outcomes across different PD-L1 levels remains incompletely understood. We aimed to investigate the frequency of KRAS mutations and comutations across PD-L1 levels, and the association between these mutations and survival, stratified by PD-L1 expression. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study of patients diagnosed with aNSCLC between 2016 and 2021 treated with frontline (chemo)immunotherapy, who underwent molecular genotyping including KRAS, STK11, and KEAP1. Real-world overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (rwPFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Cox multivariable regressions were used to evaluate the association between KRASm and survival across different PD-L1 strata, and to assess whether the association between KRASm and survival differed by PD-L1 level. Finally, within subgroups defined by PD-L1 expression, we used interaction terms to assess whether co-mutations with STK11 and KEAP1 moderated the association between KRAS mutation and survival. RESULTS: Of our 2593-patient cohort, 982 (37.9 %) were KRASm and 1611 (62.1 %) KRASwt. KRASm were enriched in the PD-L1 ≥50 % cohort (334/743, 45 %), but within patients with KRASm, co-mutations with STK11 and KEAP1 were enriched in the PD-L1 0 % cohort. KRASm was associated with significantly worse OS in the PD-L1 0 % cohort compared to the PD-L1 ≥50 % cohort (P for interaction = 0.008). On adjusted analyses stratified by PD-L1, KRASm was associated with worse survival only in the PD-L1 0 % group (OS HR 1.46, p = 0.001). KEAP1 and STK11 comutations were most strongly associated with worse OS in the PD-L1 0 % subgroup; patients with triple KRASm/KEAPm/STK11m PD-L1 0 % NSCLC experienced the worst outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: KRASm are associated with worse overall survival in PD-L1 negative NSCLC; however, this association is largely driven by comutations with STK11 and KEAP1, which are enriched in PD-L1 negative tumors.

Factors Associated With Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Outcomes.

Importance: Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) achieve less favorable clinical outcomes than non-Hispanic White patients, but the source of this disparity is incompletely understood. Objective: To assess whether racial and ethnic disparities in treatment outcomes among patients with LARC could be accounted for by social determinants of health and demographic, clinical, and pathologic factors known to be associated with treatment response. Design, Setting, and Participants: The National Cancer Database was interrogated to identify patients with T3 to T4 or N1 to N2 LARC treated with neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. Patients were diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2017. Data were culled from the National Cancer Database from July 1, 2022, through December 31, 2023. Exposure: Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer followed by surgical resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy. Secondary outcomes were rate of tumor downstaging and achievement of pN0 status. Results: A total of 34 500 patient records were reviewed; 21 679 of the patients (62.8%) were men and 12 821 (37.2%) were women. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 59.7 (12.0) years. In terms of race and ethnicity, 2217 patients (6.4%) were Hispanic, 2843 (8.2%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 29 440 (85.3%) were non-Hispanic White. Hispanic patients achieved tumor downstaging (48.9% vs 51.8%; P = .01) and pN0 status (66.8% vs 68.8%; P = .02) less often than non-Hispanic White patients. Non-Hispanic Black race, but not Hispanic ethnicity, was associated with less tumor downstaging (odds ratio [OR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78-0.94]), less frequent pN0 status (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.83-0.99]), and less frequent pCR (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72-0.92]). Other factors associated with reduced rate of pCR included rural location (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69-0.93]), lack of or inadequate insurance (OR for Medicaid, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.98]; OR for no insurance, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.54-0.78]), and treatment in a low-volume center (OR for first quartile, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.62-0.87]; OR for second quartile, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.70-0.90]; OR for third quartile, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78-0.94]). Clinical and pathologic variables associated with a decreased pCR included higher tumor grade (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49-0.70]), advanced tumor stage (OR for T3, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.42-0.76]; OR for T4, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.22-0.42]), and lymph node-positive disease (OR for N1, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.77-0.89]; OR for N2, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.65-0.82]). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that disparate treatment outcomes for Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients are likely multifactorial in origin. Future investigation into additional social determinants of health and biological variables is warranted.

Effect of neighborhood and individual-level socioeconomic factors on breast cancer screening adherence in a multi-ethnic study.

BACKGROUND: Although mammography can significantly reduce breast cancer mortality, many women do not receive their annual breast cancer screening. Differences in screening adherence exist by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance status. However, more detailed investigations into the impact of neighborhood disadvantage and access to resources on screening adherence are lacking. METHODS: We comprehensively examined the effect of individual social, economic, and demographic factors (n = 34 variables), as well as neighborhood level SES (nSES) indicators (n = 10 variables) on breast cancer screening adherence across a multi-ethnic population (n = 472). In this cross-sectional study, participants were surveyed from 2017 to 2018. The data was analyzed using univariate regression and LASSO for variable reduction. Significant predictors were carried forward into final multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression models where odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals and p-values were reported. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of participants were non-adherent to breast screening guidelines. Race/ethnicity was not associated with adherence; however, increasing age (OR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.95-0.99, p = 0.01), renting a home (OR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.30-0.94, p = 0.04), food insecurity (OR 0.46, 95%CI = 0.22-0.94, p = 0.01), and overcrowding (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.32-0.94, p = 0.01) were significantly associated with lower breast cancer screening adherence. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic indicators at the individual and neighborhood levels impact low breast cancer screening adherence and may help to inform future screening interventions.

SAR-096: Phase II Clinical Trial of Ribociclib in Combination with Everolimus in Advanced Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma (DDL) and Leiomyosarcoma (LMS).

PURPOSE: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) are two common subtypes of soft-tissue sarcoma, a rare group of diseases for which new treatments are needed. Chemotherapy remains the standard option for advanced disease. Targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) in DDL and mTOR in LMS is of biologic interest. When combined, the CDK4 inhibitor ribociclib and the mTOR inhibitor everolimus have shown synergistic growth inhibition in multiple tumor models, suggesting that this combination could be beneficial in patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single arm, open label, multicenter phase II study of the combination of ribociclib and everolimus. Patients were enrolled into one of two cohorts: DDL or LMS with intact Rb. The primary endpoint was progression-free rate (PFR) at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, safety and biomarker analyses. RESULTS: In the DDL cohort, 33.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 15.6%-55.3%] of patients were progression-free at 16 weeks. Median PFS in this cohort was 15.4 weeks (95% CI, 8-36 weeks) with 2 partial responses. In the LMS cohort the PFR at 16 weeks was 29.2% (95% CI, 12.6%-51.1%). Median PFS in this cohort was 15.7 weeks (95% CI, 7.7-NA). Most common toxicities included fatigue (66.7%), anorexia (43.8%), and hyperglycemia (43.8%). Concordance between Rb testing methodologies was poor. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ribociclib and everolimus demonstrates activity in DDL with prolonged stable disease (≥16 weeks) meeting the primary endpoint. Notably partial responses were observed. The primary endpoint was not reached in the LMS cohort. The combination was well tolerated with expected side effects.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Therapy Sequence in Advanced Cancer: A Microsimulation Approach with Application to Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer may undergo multiple lines of treatment, switching therapies as their disease progresses. We developed a general microsimulation framework to study therapy sequence and applied it to metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: We constructed a discrete-time state transition model to study 2 lines of therapy. Using digitized published survival curves (progression-free survival, time to progression, and overall survival [OS]), we inferred event types (progression or death) and estimated transition probabilities using cumulative incidence functions with competing risks. We incorporated within-patient dependence over time; first-line therapy response informed subsequent event probabilities. Parameters governing within-patient dependence calibrated the model-based results to a target clinical trial. We applied these methods to 2 therapy sequences for metastatic prostate cancer, wherein both docetaxel (DCT) and abiraterone acetate (AA) are appropriate for either first- or second-line treatment. We assessed costs and quality-adjusted life-years (5-y QALYs) for 2 treatment strategies: DCT → AA versus AA → DCT. RESULTS: Models assuming within-patient independence overestimated OS time, which corrected with the calibration approach. With generic pricing, AA → DCT dominated DCT → AA, (higher 5-y QALYs and lower costs), consistent for all values of calibration parameters (including no correction). Model calibration increased the difference in 5-y QALYs between treatment strategies (0.07 uncorrected v. 0.15 with base-case correction). Applying the correction decreased the estimated difference in cost (-$5,360 uncorrected v. -$3,066 corrected). Results were strongly affected by the cost of AA. Under a lifetime horizon, AA → DCT was no longer dominant but still cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: $19,463). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a microsimulation approach to study the cost-effectiveness of therapy sequences for advanced prostate cancer, taking care to account for within-patient dependence. HIGHLIGHTS: We developed a discrete-time state transition model for studying therapy sequence in advanced cancers.Results are sensitive to dependence within patients.A calibration approach can introduce dependence across lines of therapy and closely match simulation outcomes to target trial outcomes.

Conditional Dependency of LP-184 on Prostaglandin Reductase 1 is Synthetic Lethal in Pancreatic Cancers with DNA Damage Repair Deficiencies.

The greater efficacy of DNA-damaging drugs for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) relies on targeting cancer-specific vulnerabilities while sparing normal organs and tissues due to their inherent toxicities. We tested LP-184, a novel acylfulvene analog, for its activity in preclinical models of PDAC carrying mutations in the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways. Cytotoxicity of LP-184 is solely dependent on prostaglandin reductase 1 (PTGR1), so that PTGR1 expression robustly correlates with LP-184 cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. Low-passage patient-derived PDAC xenografts with DDR deficiencies treated ex vivo are more sensitive to LP-184 compared with DDR-proficient tumors. Additional in vivo testing of PDAC xenografts for their sensitivity to LP-184 demonstrates marked tumor growth inhibition in models harboring pathogenic mutations in ATR, BRCA1, and BRCA2. Depletion of PTGR1, however, completely abrogates the antitumor effect of LP-184. Testing combinatorial strategies for LP-184 aimed at deregulation of nucleotide excision repair proteins ERCC3 and ERCC4 established synergy. Our results provide valuable biomarkers for clinical testing of LP-184 in a large subset of genetically defined characterized refractory carcinomas. High PTGR1 expression and deleterious DDR mutations are present in approximately one third of PDAC making these patients ideal candidates for clinical trials of LP-184.

Incidence of asymptomatic COVID-19 positivity in cancer patients and effects on therapy.

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is posing unprecedented challenges for patient care, especially for cancer patients. This study looks at asymptomatic (AS) COVID-19 positivity in cancer patients and its effects on their care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of AS patients testing positive for COVID-19 upon screening at Fox Chase Cancer Center between January 2020 and September 2020. Relationships between positive tests and demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment delays were investigated using conditional logistic regression or Mantel-Haenszel tests. RESULTS: Among 4143 AS patients who underwent COVID-19 testing, 25 (0.6%) were COVID-19 positive (cases) and these were matched to 50 controls. The median age was lower in the cases compared to that of the controls (64 vs 70 years old, p = 0.04). Of the cases, 10 patients (40%) never underwent their planned oncologic intervention [6/10 (60%) did not require the planned intervention once deemed okay to proceed]. Of the controls, only 1 patient (2%) did not undergo the planned intervention. Of these 15 COVID-19 positive patients who underwent the planned intervention, 11 (73.3%) had a delay related to COVID-19, with a mean delay duration of 18 days (range: 0-49, SD: 16.72). CONCLUSION: Cancer patients had lower incidence of AS COVID-19 than general population. Delays that occur due to AS COVID screening are not very long and serve as a tool to limit spread of virus. Further studies will be important in addressing delays in cancer care and concerns of patient safety as the pandemic continues.

Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and the impact of PD-L1 and smoking in driver-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy.

PURPOSE: Prior data suggest driver-mutated NSCLC, especially EGFR and ALK tumors, poorly respond to immunotherapy. However, little research using real-world cohorts have been performed, nor is it clear whether PD-L1 and smoking history are predictive of outcomes in such tumors. This study assessed rwPFS in a large cohort with driver-mutated advanced NSCLC treated with single-agent PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors. METHODS: Real-world data from 1746 patients were analyzed and rwPFS with immunotherapy was determined for EGFR, ALK, BRAF, and KRAS tumors. Kaplan-Meier curves characterized rwPFS and correlated with PD-L1 and smoking history. Comparisons were tested using log-rank. RESULTS: Median rwPFS and the percent progression-free at 12 months were greater among KRAS (3.3 months, 21.1%) and BRAF (3.6 months, 20.6%) as compared to EGFR (2.5 months, 8.1%) and ALK tumors (2.3 months, 11.2%). KRAS tumors with PD-L1 ≥ 1% had longer rwPFS than PD-L1 < 1% tumors (4.1 versus 3.2 months, p = 0.001). PD-L1 positivity did not predict rwPFS in EGFR, ALK, or BRAF tumors. However, a smoking history was associated with longer rwPFS in EGFR (2.6 versus 2.3 months, p = 0.048) and ALK tumors (3.0 versus 2.1 months, p = 0.049) as compared to no smoking history. CONCLUSION: Real-world PFS with immunotherapy was greater in KRAS and BRAF as compared to EGFR and ALK tumors. PD-L1 positivity was predictive in KRAS and not associated with rwPFS in other mutation types. While median rwPFS was short for EGFR and ALK tumors, small subsets were progression-free at 12 months. Better characterizing these subsets that benefit, along with developing strategies to overcome immunotherapy resistance in EGFR/ALK tumors are needed.

Analysis of survival data with nonproportional hazards: A comparison of propensity-score-weighted methods.

One of the most common ways researchers compare cancer survival outcomes across treatments from observational data is using Cox regression. This model depends on its underlying assumption of proportional hazards, but in some real-world cases, such as when comparing different classes of cancer therapies, substantial violations may occur. In this situation, researchers have several alternative methods to choose from, including Cox models with time-varying hazard ratios; parametric accelerated failure time models; Kaplan-Meier curves; and pseudo-observations. It is unclear which of these models are likely to perform best in practice. To fill this gap in the literature, we perform a neutral comparison study of candidate approaches. We examine clinically meaningful outcome measures that can be computed and directly compared across each method, namely, survival probability at time T, median survival, and restricted mean survival. To adjust for differences between treatment groups, we use inverse probability of treatment weighting based on the propensity score. We conduct simulation studies under a range of scenarios, and determine the biases, coverages, and standard errors of the average treatment effects for each method. We then demonstrate the use of these approaches using two published observational studies of survival after cancer treatment. The first examines chemotherapy in sarcoma, which has a late treatment effect (i.e., similar survival initially, but after 2 years the chemotherapy group shows a benefit). The other study is a comparison of surgical techniques for kidney cancer, where survival differences are attenuated over time.

Assessing Oncologists' Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data.

BACKGROUND: Despite national guideline recommendations for universal biomarker testing (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and mismatch repair and microsatellite instability [MMR/MSI]) in all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), little is known regarding adherence to these recommendations in routine practice. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with mCRC diagnosed between January 1, 2013, and December 27, 2018, from a de-identified electronic health record-derived database. We analyzed disparities in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and MMR/MSI testing by race, age, sex, and insurance status using χ2 tests and t tests. We evaluated changes in biomarker testing over time with attention to changes around dates of landmark publications and guideline updates using χ2 tests and Cochran-Armitage tests. RESULTS: A total of 20 333 patients were identified of which 66.6% had test results for any biomarker. Rates of test results for all 4 biomarkers statistically significantly increased over time (P < .001). However, as of June 30, 2018, the rate of test results was only 46% for NRAS, 56% for KRAS, and 46% for BRAF. As of December 31, 2017, the rate of MMR/MSI testing was 59%. Higher documented testing rates were associated with younger age, lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and commercial insurance. There were no clinically meaningful and/or statistically significant differences in documented testing rates by tumor sidedness, race, sex, or initial stage. CONCLUSIONS: Increased rates of documented testing for NRAS, BRAF, and MMR/MSI in mCRC was seen between 2013 and 2018 reflecting adoption of guideline recommendations. However, the rate of documented testing remains lower than expected and warrants additional research to understand the extent to which this may represent a clinical practice quality concern.

Incidence of asymptomatic COVID-19 positivity in cancer patients and effects on therapy.

Purpose The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is posing unprecedented challenges for patient care, especially for cancer patients. This study looks at asymptomatic (AS) COVID-19 positivity in cancer patients and its effects on their care. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of AS patients testing positive for COVID-19 upon screening at Fox Chase Cancer Center between January 2020 and September 2020. Relationships between positive tests and demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment delays were investigated using conditional logistic regression or Mantel-Haenszel tests. Results Among 4143 AS patients who underwent COVID-19 testing, 25 (0.6%) were COVID-19 positive (cases) and these were matched to 50 controls. The median age was lower in the cases compared to that of the controls (64 vs 70 years old, p = 0.04). Of the cases, 10 patients (40%) never underwent their planned oncologic intervention [6/10 (60%) did not require the planned intervention once deemed okay to proceed]. Of the controls, only 1 patient (2%) did not undergo the planned intervention. Of these 15 COVID-19 positive patients who underwent the planned intervention, 11 (73.3%) had a delay related to COVID-19, with a mean delay duration of 18 days (range: 0-49, SD: 16.72). Conclusion Cancer patients had lower incidence of AS COVID-19 than general population. Delays that occur due to AS COVID screening are not very long and serve as a tool to limit spread of virus. Further studies will be important in addressing delays in cancer care and concerns of patient safety as the pandemic continues.

Association of tumor size and surgical approach with oncological outcomes and overall survival in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of surgical approach with outcomes in patients with adrenocortical carcinomas smaller and larger than 6 cm in size. METHODS: We reviewed the national cancer database for patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) and open adrenalectomy (OA) from 2010 to 2017. To adjust for differences between patients undergoing MIA and OA, we performed propensity score matching within each size strata of ≤6 cm, 6.1 to 10 cm, and 10.1 to 20 cm. We fit generalized estmiating equations with a logit link function to assess for the association of surgical approach with positive surgical margins and a Cox proportional hazards model to assess for the association of surgical approach with overall survival. RESULTS: We identified 364 patients that underwent MIA (182) and OA (182) in the matched cohort.  We noted 21% and 18% of patients undergoing MIA and OA had a positive surgical margin, respectively. We did not identify a significant association between surgical approach and positive surgical margins in the cohort as a whole or within each of strata. Furthermore, we did not appreciate a significant association between surgical approach and overall survival in the cohort as a whole or within each size strata. CONCLUSION: In the National Cancer Database, patients undergoing MIA had similar positive surgical margins and overall survival compared with OA for masses ≤6 cm, 6.1 to 10cm, and >10 cm in size. Patients undergoing MIA should be carefully selected with surgical oncologic integrity being the primary determinants of surgical approach.

Systemic Therapies Following Progression on First-line CDK4/6-inhibitor Treatment: Analysis of Real-world Data.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (Her2-) breast cancer remains a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. First-line treatment with endocrine therapy (ET) with a cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) has largely become the standard systemic therapy. Following progression, no prospective randomized data exist to help guide second-line treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database, specifically analyzing 1210 patients with HR+/Her2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who were treated in the first-line setting with a CDK4/6i from the years 2015-2020. The aim of this study was to assess what therapies were given after first-line progression on CDK4/6i and to observe treatment patterns over time. Determination of second-line treatment efficacy, specifically assessing real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 839 patients received a documented second-line therapy after progression on first-line CDK4/6i treatment. Chemotherapy was chosen for 29.7% of patients, and the use of chemotherapy decreased over time. Three hundred two (36.0%) of patients continued a CDK4/6i. Data were adjusted for age, race, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, stage at breast cancer diagnosis, and insurance payer type. Continuation of the CDK4/6i was associated with improved rwPFS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.43-0.53, P < .0001) and OS (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.26-0.35, P < .0001) compared to chemotherapy. A majority of these patients continued the same CDK4/6i in the second-line setting, as was given in the first-line setting. CONCLUSION: While prospective data are needed, analysis of real-world data suggests a survival benefit for continuation of a CDK4/6i beyond frontline progression for patients with HR+/Her2- MBC.

Association of Surgical Approach With Treatment Burden, Oncological Effectiveness, and Perioperative Morbidity in Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

MICROABSTRACT: In the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients treated with minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) had similar oncological outcomes and cumulative treatment burden with less morbidity compared with open adrenalectomy (OA). Although OA remains the standard of care for adrenal lesions concerninge for malignancy, MIA in appropriately selected patients may offer equivalent oncological outcomes. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: We investigated the cumulative treatment burden, oncological effectiveness, and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing MIA compared with (OA) for patients with ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the NCDB for patients undergoing surgical resection (MIA vs. OA) for ACC from 2010 to 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression, negative binomial, and Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess for an association of surgical approach with cumulative treatment burden (any adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy [RT], and systemic therapy), oncological effectiveness (positive surgical margins [PSM], lymph node yield [LNY], and overall survival [OS]), and perioperative morbidity (length of stay [LOS] and readmission) as appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 776 patients that underwent adrenalectomy for ACC, of which 307 underwent MIA. We noted patients with larger tumors (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86, P < .001) were less likely to have MIA prior to IPTW. We did not appreciate a significant association of MIA with cumulative treatment burden or the use of any adjuvant therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60-1.21, P = .375), adjuvant RT (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59-1.50, P = .801), or adjuvant systemic therapy (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.21, P = .352). Patients undergoing MIA had similar oncological effectiveness of surgery and OS when compared with patients which underwent OA. Patients that underwent MIA had a significantly shorter LOS (IRR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, P = .001) and lower odds of readmission (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.91, P = .026). CONCLUSIONS: Although the standard of care for adrenal lesions suspicious for ACC remains OA, in appropriately selected patients, MIA may offer similar oncological effectiveness and cumulative treatment burden, with less morbidity, than OA.

Prospective Comparison of Geriatric Assessment and Provider's Assessment of Older Adults With Metastatic Breast Cancer in the Community.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric assessment (GA) is recommended for evaluating fitness of an older adult with cancer. Our objective was to prospectively evaluate the gaps that exist in the assessment of older adults with metastatic breast cancer (OA-MBC) in community practices (CP). METHODS: Self-administered GA was compared to provider's assessment (PA) of patients living with MBC aged ≥65 years treated in CP Providers were blinded to the GA results until PA was completed. McNemar's test was used to detect differences between PA and GA. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled across 9 CP (median age 73.9). Geriatric assessment detected a total of 356 abnormalities in 96 patients; of which, 223 required interventions. African American and widowed/single patients were more likely to have abnormalities identified by GA. On average, across 100 patients, PA did not detect 25.5% of GA-detected abnormalities, mostly in functional status, social support, nutrition, and cognition. These differences were less pronounced among providers with more clinical experience. Patients with abnormal Timed Up and Go tests more likely had additional abnormalities in other domains, and more abnormalities that were not identified by PA. Providers were "surprised" by GA results in 33% of cases, mainly with cognitive or social support findings, and reported plans for management change for 39% of patients based on GA findings. CONCLUSIONS: Including a GA in the care of OA-MBC in CP is beneficial for the detection of multiple abnormalities not detected by routine PA.

Demographic and Psychosocial Characteristics Associated With Use of a Prostate Cancer Survivorship Website: Implications From a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Many prostate cancer (PC) survivors experience disease and treatment-related symptomatology in both the physical and psychosocial domains. Although the benefits and barriers to using web-based resources for cancer patients are well-documented, less research has focused on the personal characteristics important for efficient tailoring and targeting of information that are associated with usage. OBJECTIVE: We used the Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing (C-SHIP) framework to guide our exploration of personal characteristics associated with use of PROGRESS, an informational PC survivorship website that addresses physical, emotional, interpersonal, and practical concerns relevant for PC survivors. METHODS: PC survivors (N=217) were randomized to the intervention arm (PROGRESS) of a randomized controlled trial. Of those randomized to the intervention arm, 84 used PROGRESS, and 133 did not use PROGRESS. Multivariable analyses evaluated demographic and psychosocial characteristics (eg, style of coping, health literacy, self-efficacy, affective states of depression, anxiety, and fatigue) associated with website use. RESULTS: A larger proportion of non-Hispanic White (68/160, 42.5%), compared with non-Hispanic Black (9/40, 23%), participants used PROGRESS (P<.001). Further, PROGRESS users were older in age (P<.001), had a monitoring style of coping (P=.01), and were less depressed (P=.004), anxious (P=.02), and fatigued (P<.001) than nonusers. Education, income, health literacy, blunting style of coping, self-efficacy, and treatment type (radiation therapy or surgery) were not significantly related to use. On multivariable analyses, race (OR 0.28, P<.001), age (OR 1.05, P<.001), monitoring style of coping (OR 1.27, P=.02), and overall mood (OR 0.98, P<.001) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of monitoring and low levels of negative affect were associated with website use. Additionally, users were older, non-Hispanic White survivors. To ensure that important survivorship-relevant information reaches users, future efforts need to focus on enhancing patient engagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02224482; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02224482.

Understanding clinical communication about mood disturbance symptoms among breast cancer patients: A mixed methods analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to characterize the relationships between breast cancer patient mood symptom severity and demographic/medical factors with clinical communication about mood, and to explore mood discussion content. METHODS: 134 breast cancer patients (mean age=58.3; 14% minority; 13% metastatic) had oncology clinic visits audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for mood communication. Patient Care Monitor assessed mood symptoms (anxiety/depression presence/severity). Logistic regressions measured associations between mood, demographic/medical factors, and communication. Thematic analysis characterized discussion topics. RESULTS: Over half of patients (55%; n = 73) reported mood symptoms. Worse mood symptoms were associated with younger age and current treatment (p's < 0.05). 19% of clinic visits (n = 26/134) contained mood discussions. Discussions were more common for younger women and those with non-metastatic disease (p's < 0.05). Odds of discussing mood increased with symptom severity (OR=4.52, p = 0.018). Cancer-related anxiety and medication management were among the most common topics discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Communication about mood occurred infrequently, with women currently undergoing treatment, with metastatic disease, or with mild mood symptoms at potentially increased risk for inadequate discussion. Both patient-focused and provider-focused interventions to improve clinical communication about mood symptoms could be beneficial. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians hold a key role in supporting cancer patients' well-being by using and encouraging effective communication about patients' mood.

The Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Multi-Institutional Analysis.

PURPOSE: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was challenged by the results of the CARMENA trial. Here we evaluate the role of CN in mRCC patients, including those receiving modern therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients with synchronous mRCC between 2011-2020 from the de-identified nationwide Flatiron Health database. We evaluated 3 groups: systemic therapy alone, CN followed by systemic therapy (up-front CN [uCN]) and systemic therapy followed by CN (deferred CN [dCN]). The primary outcome was median overall survival (mOS) in patients receiving systemic therapy alone vs uCN. Secondary outcome was overall survival in patients receiving uCN vs dCN. First-treatment, landmark and time-varying covariate analyses were conducted to overcome immortal time bias. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to assess the effect of therapy on survival. RESULTS: Of 1,910 patients with mRCC, 972 (57%) received systemic therapy, 605 (32%) received uCN, 142 (8%) dCN and 191 (10%) CN alone; 433 (23%) patients received immunotherapy-based therapy. The adjusted mOS was significantly improved in first-treatment, landmark and time-varying covariate analysis (mOS 26.6 vs 14.6 months, 36.3 vs 21.1 months and 26.1 vs 12.2 months, respectively) in patients undergoing CN. Among patients receiving CN and systemic therapy, the timing of systemic therapy relative to CN was not significantly related to overall survival (HR=1.0, 95% CI 0.76-1.32, p=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support an oncologic role for CN in select mRCC patients. In patients receiving both CN and systemic therapy, the survival benefit compared to systemic alone was similar for up-front and deferred CN.

Total neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma increases probability for a complete pathologic response.

BACKGROUND: Multiple neoadjuvant therapy protocols have been proposed in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiation (CRT), and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as a CT plus CRT. A pathologic complete response (pCR) can be achieved in a minority of cases. We hypothesize that TNT is more likely to confer pCR than other neoadjuvant therapies, which may improve overall survival (OS). METHODS: A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2006 to 2016 was performed, identifying patients who underwent any neoadjuvant therapy followed by definitive pancreatic resection for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A pathologic complete response was defined as down-staging from any clinical stage to pathologic stage 0. RESULTS: A total of 5402 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection were identified. 177 patients (3.3%) achieved a pCR. Of the patients who achieved a pCR, 57 received CT, 41 CRT and 79 received TNT. On multivariate analysis, TNT was more likely to confer a pCR than CRT (OR 1.67, CI 1.13-2.46, p = 0.0103) or CT (OR 2.61, CI 1.83-3.71, p < 0.0001). Patients who achieved pCR had a significantly higher OS, with median survival of 64.9 months, compared to 21.6 months in patients who did not achieve pCR (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: TNT may be more likely to achieve a pCR than CT or CRT. Patients who achieve a pCR have a significant OS benefit as compared to those who have residual disease. TNT should be considered for patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy, as it may increase the likelihood of achieving a pCR, thus potentially improving OS.

A Telephone-Adapted Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program: Preliminary Effects among Healthcare Employees.

Healthcare employees often experience high stress and may benefit from accessible psychosocial interventions. In this pilot study, we explored preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and psychological effects of a telephone-based adaption of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) for healthcare employees. Eleven participants (M age = 49.9; 27.3% ethnic/racial minority) were enrolled in an eight-session group-based MBSR program adapted for telephone delivery. Feasibility was assessed using rates of program attrition and session completion; acceptability was explored qualitatively via participants' responses to an open-ended item about their program experience. Participants also completed pre-and post-program assessments on psychosocial outcomes (distress (overall distress, depression, anxiety, somatization), mindfulness, and self-compassion). We characterized mean change scores, 95% confidence intervals, and effect sizes to explore preliminary program effects. With regard to preliminary feasibility, one participant dropped out prior to the intervention; of the remaining 10 participants, 90% completed at least half (≥4) of the sessions; 70% completed at least three-quarters (≥6 sessions). Feedback reflected positive experiences and included suggestions for program delivery. Participants reported reductions in distress post-program (M difference range = -5.0 to -9.4), showing medium to large effect sizes (d range = 0.68 to 1.11). Mindfulness scores increased from pre- to post-intervention (M difference range = 1.0 to 10.4), with small-to-medium effects (d range = 0.18 to 0.55). Almost all aspects of self-compassion remained stable over time, with the exception of common humanity, which increased post-program (M difference = 2.9, CI 95% 0.5 to 5.4, d = 0.91). Preliminary findings from our small pilot trial suggest that telephone-based adaptations of MBSR may be a useful mode of delivery for healthcare employees; however, larger studies are needed to provide further evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and program effects.