Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 2024 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632173

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The commonly used clinical indicators are not sensitive and comprehensive enough to evaluate the early staging of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to evaluate the differences in arterial spin labeling (ASL) and blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) parameter values among patients at various stages of chronic kidney disease and healthy individuals. METHODS: Electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase were searched from inception to March 29, 2024, to identify relevant studies on ASL and BOLD in CKD. The renal blood flow (RBF) and apparent relaxation rate (R2*) values were obtained from healthy individuals and patients with various stages of CKD. The meta-analysis was conducted using STATA version 12.0. The random-effects model was used to obtain estimates of the effects, and the results were expressed as 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and mean differences (MDs) of continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 18 published studies were included in this meta-analysis. The cortical RBF and R2* values and medulla RBF values were considerably distinct between patients with various stages of CKD and healthy controls (MD, - 78.162; 95% CI, - 85.103 to - 71.221; MD, 2.440; 95% CI, 1.843 to 3.037; and MD, - 36.787; 95% CI, - 47.107 to - 26.468, respectively). No obvious difference in medulla R2* values was noted between patients with various stages of CKD and healthy controls (MD, - 1.475; 95% CI, - 4.646 to 1.696). CONCLUSION: ASL and BOLD may provide complementary and distinct information regarding renal function and could potentially be used together to gain a more comprehensive understanding of renal physiology.

2.
BMJ Open ; 3(8): e003220, 2013 08 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23975264

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Design a metric to assess the comparative effectiveness of biomedical data elements within a study that incorporates their statistical relatedness to a given outcome variable as well as a measurement of the quality of their underlying data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 874 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung, each with 47 clinical data elements. The p value for each element was calculated using the Cox proportional hazard univariable regression model with overall survival as the endpoint. An attribute or A-score was calculated by quantification of an element's four quality attributes; Completeness, Comprehensiveness, Consistency and Overall-cost. An effectiveness or E-score was obtained by calculating the conditional probabilities of the p-value and A-score within the given data set with their product equaling the effectiveness score (E-score). RESULTS: The E-score metric provided information about the utility of an element beyond an outcome-related p value ranking. E-scores for elements age-at-diagnosis, gender and tobacco-use showed utility above what their respective p values alone would indicate due to their relative ease of acquisition, that is, higher A-scores. Conversely, elements surgery-site, histologic-type and pathological-TNM stage were down-ranked in comparison to their p values based on lower A-scores caused by significantly higher acquisition costs. CONCLUSIONS: A novel metric termed E-score was developed which incorporates standard statistics with data quality metrics and was tested on elements from a large lung cohort. Results show that an element's underlying data quality is an important consideration in addition to p value correlation to outcome when determining the element's clinical or research utility in a study.

3.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 21(5): 255-9, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17847107

RESUMEN

We evaluated a method for determination of human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) by CLIA, and analyzed its clinical value in patients with infectious mononucleosis. Serum samples from 407 participants were measured on an automatic CLIA analyzer. At the same time the serum samples were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). An assessment of technological quality (methodology) in diagnostic tests demonstrated that the sensitivity of CLIA was 1.0 AU/mL and the functional sensitivity was <1.6 AU/mL. The within- and between-assay imprecision values for different concentrations were all under 5%. Recoveries for both methods were 96-110%. The linear regression equation between expected values and measured values was y=0.644+0.986x, and correlation coefficient was 0.9991 (P<0.0001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that both the sensitivity and specificity of CLIA surpassed 90%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.990, which was significantly higher than that of ELISA (P<0.05). The results indicate that CLIA is an excellent method for hCMV IgM measurement, and thus may be useful for clinical diagnoses.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Mononucleosis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Mononucleosis Infecciosa/inmunología , Modelos Lineales , Mediciones Luminiscentes , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...