Changes in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance and Obstruction Score Following Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Pigs.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the contribution of mechanical obstruction and pulmonary vasoconstriction to pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in pigs. DESIGN: Controlled, animal study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital, animal research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Female Danish slaughter pigs (n = 12, ~60 kg). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PE was induced by infusion of autologous blood clots in pigs. CT pulmonary angiograms were performed at baseline, after PE (first experimental day [PEd0]) and the following 2 days (second experimental day [PEd1] and third experimental day [PEd2]), and clot burden quantified by a modified Qanadli Obstruction Score. Hemodynamics were evaluated with left and right heart catheterization and systemic invasive pressures each day before, under, and after treatment with the pulmonary vasodilators sildenafil (0.1 mg/kg) and oxygen (Fio2 40%). PE increased PVR (baseline vs. PEd0: 178 ± 54 vs. 526 ± 160 dynes; p < 0.0001) and obstruction score (baseline vs. PEd0: 0% vs. 45% ± 13%; p < 0.0001). PVR decreased toward baseline at day 1 (baseline vs. PEd1: 178 ± 54 vs. 219 ± 48; p = 0.16) and day 2 (baseline vs. PEd2: 178 ± 54 vs. 201 ± 50; p = 0.51). Obstruction score decreased only slightly at day 1 (PEd0 vs. PEd1: 45% ± 12% vs. 43% ± 14%; p = 0.04) and remained elevated throughout the study (PEd1 vs. PEd2: 43% ± 14% vs. 42% ± 17%; p = 0.74). Sildenafil and oxygen in combination decreased PVR at day 0 (-284 ± 154 dynes; p = 0.0064) but had no effects at day 1 (-8 ± 27 dynes; p = 0.4827) or day 2 (-18 ± 32 dynes; p = 0.0923). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary vasoconstriction, and not mechanical obstruction, was the predominant cause of increased PVR in acute PE in pigs. PVR rapidly declined over the first 2 days after onset despite a persistent mechanical obstruction of the pulmonary circulation from emboli. The findings suggest that treatment with pulmonary vasodilators might only be effective in the acute phase of PE thereby limiting the window for such therapy.

Levosimendan, milrinone, and dobutamine in experimental acute pulmonary embolism.

Acute pulmonary embolism is a frequent condition in emergency medicine and potentially fatal. Cause of death is right ventricular failure due to increased right ventricular afterload from both pulmonary vascular obstruction and vasoconstriction. Inodilators are interesting drugs of choice as they may improve right ventricular function and lower its afterload. We aimed to investigate the cardiovascular effects of three clinically relevant inodilators: levosimendan, milrinone, and dobutamine in acute pulmonary embolism. We conducted a randomized, blinded, animal study using 18 female pigs. Animals received large autologous pulmonary embolism until doubling of baseline mean pulmonary arterial pressure and were randomized to increasing doses of each inodilator. Effects were evaluated with bi-ventricular pressure-volume loop recordings, right heart catheterization, and blood gas analyses. Induction of pulmonary embolism increased right ventricular afterload and pulmonary pressure (p < 0.05) causing right ventricular dysfunction. Levosimendan and milrinone showed beneficial hemodynamic profiles by lowering right ventricular pressures and volume (p < 0.001) and improved right ventricular function and cardiac output (p < 0.05) without increasing right ventricular mechanical work. Dobutamine increased right ventricular pressure and function (p < 0.01) but at a cost of increased mechanical work at the highest doses, showing an adverse hemodynamic profile. In a porcine model of acute pulmonary embolism, levosimendan and milrinone reduced right ventricular afterload and improved right ventricular function, whereas dobutamine at higher doses increased right ventricular afterload and right ventricular mechanical work. The study motivates clinical testing of inodilators in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and right ventricular dysfunction.