Multi-national observational study to assess quality of life and treatment preferences in patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are at risk of developing complications such as perianal fistulas. Patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) are affected by fecal incontinence (FI), bleeding, pain, swelling, and purulent perianal discharge, and generally face a higher treatment burden than patients with CD without CPF. AIM: To gain insights into the burden of illness/quality of life in patients with CPF and their treatment preferences and satisfaction. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in patients with CD aged 21-90 years via a web-enabled questionnaire in seven countries (April-August 2021). Patients were recruited into three cohorts: Cohort 1 included patients without perianal fistulas; cohort 2 included patients with perianal fistulas without fistula-related surgery; and cohort 3 included patients with perianal fistulas and fistula-related surgery. Validated patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess quality of life. Drivers of treatment preferences were measured using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). RESULTS: In total, 929 patients were recruited (cohort 1, n = 620; cohort 2, n = 174; cohort 3, n = 135). Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire scores were worse for patients with CPF (cohorts 2 and 3) than for those with CD without CPF (cohort 1): Mean score 3.8 and 3.7 vs 4.1, respectively, (P < 0.001). Similarly, mean Revised FI and FI Quality of Life scores were worse for patients with CPF than for those with CD without CPF. Quality of Life with Anal Fistula scores were similar in patients with CPF with or without CPF-related surgery (cohorts 2 and 3): Mean score 41 and 42, respectively. In the DCE, postoperative discomfort and fistula healing rate were the most important treatment attributes influencing treatment choice: Mean relative importance 35.7 and 24.7, respectively. CONCLUSION: The burden of illness in CD is significantly higher for patients with CPF and patients rate lower postoperative discomfort and higher healing rates as the most desirable treatment attributes.

Disease Burden, Treatment Patterns, and Economic Impact of Rectovaginal Fistulas in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Findings from a Retrospective, Observational, Longitudinal Study Based on US Claims Databases.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's-related rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) greatly impact quality of life and are notoriously difficult to treat. The aim of this study was to assess the burden of recurrent episodes of care for RVF and its economic impact. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of administrative US claims databases was conducted. Eligible patients were female adults, with a diagnosis code for Crohn's disease with or without a diagnosis/procedural code for RVF. For the RVF cohort, rates of recurrence of RVF episodes of care were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct healthcare costs were compared between the RVF cohort and RVF-free cohort. RESULTS: Mean ages in the RVF cohort (n = 963) and RVF-free cohort (n = 56,564) were 47.2 and 50.8 years, with a mean follow-up period of 58.7 and 49.8 months, respectively. For the RVF cohort, the probability of having a second RVF episode of care within 2 years of the first one was estimated to be 35.9% and of having a third episode within 2 years of the second was 47.8%. During the first 2 years, the RVF cohort had 67% more inpatient admissions than the RVF-free cohort with each RVF episode of care being associated with 16% more admissions. The estimated incremental cost associated with having RVF was US$17,561, with an incremental cost of US$11,607 for each additional RVF episode of care. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study highlights the significant impact of RVF in patients with Crohn's disease with regard to repeat interventions and associated HCRU and direct healthcare costs, suggesting novel therapeutics are needed in this patient population.

INSPECT: A Retrospective Study to Evaluate Long-term Effectiveness and Safety of Darvadstrocel in Patients With Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease Treated in the ADMIRE-CD Trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a single administration of darvadstrocel (expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells) for treating complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease was demonstrated in a randomized, double-blind trial (ADMIRE-CD [Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Induction of Remission in Perianal Fistulizing Crohn\'s Disease] trial). The current chart review study (INSPECT [A retrospectIve chart review study evaluatINg the longer-term effectiveneSs of darvadstrocel in PatiEnts who CompleTed ADMIRE-CD]) evaluated the longer-term effectiveness and safety of darvadstrocel. METHODS: Eligible patients had completed at least 52 weeks in the ADMIRE-CD trial. Data on clinical remission and fistula relapse outcomes were collected retrospectively at 104 and 156 weeks after treatment. Adverse events of special interest (tumorigenicity and ectopic tissue formation) were collected up to 208 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included (43 darvadstrocel patients, 46 control subjects). At 52, 104, and 156 weeks posttreatment, clinical remission was observed in 29 (67.4%) of 43, 23 (53.5%) of 43, and 23 (53.5%) of 43 darvadstrocel-treated patients, compared with 24 (52.2%) of 46, 20 (43.5%) of 46, and 21 (45.7%) of 46 control subjects, respectively. In patients with clinical remission at week 52, this remission was sustained at 104 and 156 weeks after treatment in 19 (65.5%) of 29 and 16 (55.2%) of 29 darvadstrocel-treated patients and in 17 (70.8%) of 24 and 13 (54.2%) of 24 control subjects, respectively. Time to fistula relapse and incidence of fistula relapse or new fistula occurrence were not significantly different between groups. Tumorigenicity was reported for 1 (2.2%) patient in the control group (malignant epidermoid carcinoma). No ectopic tissue formation was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world follow-up of patients from the ADMIRE-CD trial indicates that clinical remission of complex perianal fistulas can be sustained in the long term irrespective of whether it is achieved through darvadstrocel administration or maintenance treatment regimens and confirms a favorable long-term safety profile of darvadstrocel.

This retrospective chart review of patients treated with darvadstrocel indicates sustained remission and confirms a favorable safety profile up to 156 weeks after a single administration of stem cells for treatment of complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease.

Vedolizumab use is not associated with increased malignancy incidence: GEMINI LTS study results and post-marketing data.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective antibody to α4 ß7 integrin approved to treat moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in adults. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and immunosuppressant use are associated with increased risk of malignancy. AIM: To analyse the incidence of malignancy with vedolizumab treatment in the GEMINI long-term safety (LTS) study and post-marketing (PM) setting. METHODS: Malignancy data from the LTS study (May 2009 to May 2018), and data from the vedolizumab Global Safety Database (20 May 2014 to 19 May 2018), were identified using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities coding. The number of patients experiencing malignancies in the LTS study (excluding malignancies within 1 year following vedolizumab initiation) was indirectly standardised against the number expected, using age- and sex-specific rates in patients with IBD from Optum's Clinformatics™ Data Mart (CDM) database. RESULTS: Among 1785 patients with ≥1 year of follow-up post-vedolizumab initiation in the LTS study (total 5670 patient-years), observed numbers of malignancies were similar to those expected compared with CDM data (31 vs 29; ratio of observed to expected events = 1.08; P = 0.71; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.73, 1.53). The most common malignancies were renal and bladder (6). PM, 293 patients reported 299 malignancies (including malignancies within 1 year following vedolizumab initiation), in approximately 208 050 patient-years of vedolizumab exposure. Lower gastrointestinal malignancies were most common (59). CONCLUSIONS: The number of malignancies in the LTS study was similar to that expected from an IBD population with no statistically significant differences, although few confounders could be corrected for. Limitations of PM safety reporting require consideration; however, the number of malignancies with vedolizumab appeared low.

Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study to assess the ocular safety of mirabegron in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the effect of mirabegron on ocular safety in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an 8-week, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting adults aged ≥18 years with a normal intraocular pressure (IOP, ≥10 to ≤21 mmHg) were eligible to enter the study. Of the 321 randomized subjects, 305 completed the study. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to a supratherapeutic dose of oral mirabegron 100 mg or placebo once daily for 56 days. The IOP was measured at screening, baseline, day 10, and day 56/end of treatment using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Visual acuity and biomicroscopy were also evaluated. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the IOP at 56 days or end of treatment with mirabegron versus placebo. Secondary outcome variables included change from baseline to day 10 in the IOP, and increases in the IOP of ≥6 mmHg and ≥10 mmHg in either eye from baseline to day 10 and day 56. RESULTS: The mean (standard error, SE) IOP at baseline was 15.3 (0.16) mmHg for mirabegron and 15.4 (0.16) mmHg for placebo; values at day 56 were 15.0 (0.16) mmHg and 15.2 (0.17) mmHg, respectively. The adjusted mean IOP change from baseline to day 56 was -0.3 mmHg for mirabegron and -0.2 mmHg for placebo (-0.1 mmHg difference [95% confidence interval, CI, -0.4 to 0.3]). For the primary endpoint, mirabegron was noninferior to placebo, based on the prespecified limit of 1.5 mmHg. No statistically significant treatment effects on the IOP were seen at day 10. No subject discontinued due to increased IOP. Clinically significant increases from baseline in the IOP occurred rarely and only with placebo treatment. Changes in the visual acuity and biomicroscopy were not suggestive of a mirabegron effect. No treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) of glaucoma was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron 100 mg orally once daily for 8 weeks of treatment does not increase the IOP, and was generally safe and well tolerated.

Tolerability and efficacy of multiple escalating doses of ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether multiple intravitreal doses of up to 2 mg of an antigen-binding fragment known as ranibizumab, derived from a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, can be tolerated and are biologically active when injected using a dose-escalating strategy in eyes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Open-label, 2-center, uncontrolled, randomized clinical study of 3 different dose-escalating regimens of ranibizumab. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two patients with primary or recurrent subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD were enrolled. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (VA) in the study eye was from 20/40 to 20/640 (Snellen equivalent). METHODS: Treatment regimens consisted of 5, 7, or 9 intravitreal injections of ranibizumab at 2- or 4-week intervals for 16 weeks, with escalating doses ranging from 0.3 to 2.0 mg. Patients were evaluated through day 140, 4 weeks after their last injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety was assessed based on ocular and nonocular adverse events, changes in VA, changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), slit-lamp ocular examination, changes in lesion characteristics based on fluorescein angiography and color fundus photography, and the presence of anti-ranibizumab antibodies. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients received an injection at baseline, and 27 patients completed the study through day 140. Results were similar across the 3 treatment groups. All patients experienced ocular adverse events, most of which were mild. The most common ocular adverse events were iridocyclitis (83%) and injection-site reactions (72%). Inflammation did not increase with repeated injections, despite the increasing ranibizumab doses. Transient mild IOP elevations were common after ranibizumab injection. No serum anti-ranibizumab antibodies were detected. Overall, median and mean VAs in the study eyes improved by day 140 in all 3 groups. Only 3 of the 27 patients lost significant vision. There was no significant lesion growth, and a decrease in area of leakage from choroidal neovascularization was detected through day 140. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple intravitreal injections of ranibizumab at escalating doses ranging from 0.3 to 2.0 mg were well tolerated and biologically active in eyes with neovascular AMD through 20 weeks. Mild transient ocular inflammation was the most common postinjection adverse event.

Ranibizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a phase I/II multicenter, controlled, multidose study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety of repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and to assess changes in visual acuity (VA) and AMD lesion characteristics. DESIGN: Multicenter, controlled, open-label, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four patients with subfoveal predominantly or minimally classic AMD-related choroidal neovascularization. METHODS: In part 1, subjects were randomized to monthly intravitreal ranibizumab for 3 months (4 injections of 0.3 mg or 1 injection of 0.3 mg followed by 3 injections of 0.5 mg; n = 53) or usual care (UC; n = 11). In part 2, subjects could continue their regimen for 3 additional months or cross over to the alternative treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse events (AEs), intraocular pressure (IOP), VA, and lesion characteristics assessed by fluorescein angiography and fundus photography. RESULTS: Of the 64 randomized subjects, 62 completed the 6-month study. Twenty of 25 subjects (80%) randomized to 0.3 mg, and 22 of 28 subjects (79%) randomized to 0.5-mg ranibizumab in part 1 continued on that treatment in part 2; 9 of 11 (82%) subjects randomized to UC in part 1 crossed over to ranibizumab treatment in part 2. The most common AEs with ranibizumab were reversible inflammation and minor injection-site hemorrhages. Serious AEs were iridocyclitis, endophthalmitis, and central retinal vein occlusion (1 subject each). Postinjection, IOP increased transiently in 22.6% of ranibizumab-treated eyes in parts 1 and 2. After 4 ranibizumab injections (day 98), mean (+/- standard deviation) VA had increased 9.4+/-13.3 and 9.1+/-17.2 letters in the 0.3- and 0.5-mg groups, respectively, but had decreased 5.1+/-9.6 letters with UC. In part 2 (day 210), VA increased from baseline 12.8+/-14.7 and 15.0+/-14.2 letters in subjects continuing on 0.3 and 0.5 mg, respectively. Visual acuity improved from baseline > or =15 letters in 26% (day 98) and 45% (day 210) of subjects initially randomized to and continuing on ranibizumab, respectively, and areas of leakage and subretinal fluid decreased. No UC subject had a > or =15-letter improvement at day 98. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab had a good safety profile and were associated with improved VA and decreased leakage from choroidal neovascularization in subjects with neovascular AMD.