Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transplantation ; 102(5): e195-e204, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29266033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated in vitro whether HLA highly sensitized patients with end-stage renal disease will be disadvantaged immunologically after a genetically engineered pig kidney transplant. METHODS: Blood was drawn from patients with a calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) 99% to 100% (Gp1, n = 10) or cPRA 0% (Gp2, n = 12), and from healthy volunteers (Gp3, n = 10). Serum IgM and IgG binding was measured (i) to galactose-α1-3 galactose and N-glycolylneuraminic acid glycans by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and (ii) to pig red blood cell, pig aortic endothelial cells, and pig peripheral blood mononuclear cell from α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO)/CD46 and GTKO/CD46/cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase-knockout (CMAHKO) pigs by flow cytometry. (iii) T-cell and B-cell phenotypes were determined by flow cytometry, and (iv) proliferation of T-cell and B-cell carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester-mixed lymphocyte reaction. RESULTS: (i) By enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, there was no difference in IgM or IgG binding to galactose-α1-3 galactose or N-glycolylneuraminic acid between Gps1 and 2, but binding was significantly reduced in both groups compared to Gp3. (ii) IgM and IgG binding in Gps1 and 2 was also significantly lower to GTKO/CD46 pig cells than in healthy controls, but there were no differences between the 3 groups in binding to GTKO/CD46/CMAHKO cells. (iii and iv) Gp1 patients had more memory T cells than Gp2, but there was no difference in T or B cell proliferation when stimulated by any pig cells. The proliferative responses in all 3 groups were weakest when stimulated by GTKO/CD46/CMAHKO pig peripheral blood mononuclear cell. CONCLUSIONS: (i) End-stage renal disease was associated with low antipig antibody levels. (ii) Xenoreactivity decreased with increased genetic engineering of pig cells. (iii) High cPRA status had no significant effect on antibody binding or T-cell and B-cell response.


Asunto(s)
Galactosiltransferasas/genética , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Proteína Cofactora de Membrana/genética , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/genética , Animales , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Células Cultivadas , Galactosiltransferasas/deficiencia , Galactosiltransferasas/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Antígenos HLA/sangre , Xenoinjertos , Humanos , Memoria Inmunológica , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Activación de Linfocitos , Proteína Cofactora de Membrana/deficiencia , Proteína Cofactora de Membrana/inmunología , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/deficiencia , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/inmunología , Sus scrofa , Linfocitos T/inmunología
2.
Transplantation ; 96(11): 937-45, 2013 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23851935

RESUMEN

The shortage of human organs for transplantation has focused research on the possibility of transplanting pig organs into humans. Many factors contribute to the failure of a pig organ graft in a primate. A rapid innate immune response (natural anti-pig antibody, complement activation, and an innate cellular response; e.g., neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and natural killer cells) is followed by an adaptive immune response, although T-cell infiltration of the graft has rarely been reported. Other factors (e.g., coagulation dysregulation and inflammation) appear to play a significantly greater role than in allotransplantation. The immune responses to a pig xenograft cannot therefore be controlled simply by suppression of T-cell activity. Before xenotransplantation can be introduced successfully into the clinic, the problems of the innate, coagulopathic, and inflammatory responses will have to be overcome, most likely by the transplantation of organs from genetically engineered pigs. Many of the genetic manipulations aimed at protecting against these responses also reduce the adaptive response. The T-cell and elicited antibody responses can be prevented by the biological and/or pharmacologic agents currently available, in particular, by costimulation blockade-based regimens. The exogenous immunosuppressive regimen may be significantly reduced by the presence of a graft from a pig transgenic for a mutant (human) class II transactivator gene, resulting in down-regulation of swine leukocyte antigen class II expression, or from a pig with "local" vascular endothelial cell expression of an immunosuppressive gene (e.g., CTLA4-Ig). The immunomodulatory efficacy of regulatory T cells or mesenchymal stromal cells has been demonstrated in vitro but not yet in vivo.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Tolerancia al Trasplante , Trasplante Heterólogo/efectos adversos , Inmunidad Adaptativa/genética , Animales , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Terapia Genética , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto/genética , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata/genética , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Primates , Porcinos/genética , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/trasplante , Tolerancia al Trasplante/genética , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA