Association of National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer Accreditation with Outcomes after Rectal Cancer Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) defined a set of standards in 2017 centered on multidisciplinary program structure, evidence-based care processes, and internal audit to address widely variable rectal cancer practices and outcomes across U.S. hospitals. There have been no studies to-date testing the association between NAPRC accreditation and rectal cancer outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective, observational study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-99 years with rectal cancer who underwent proctectomy from 2017-2020. The primary exposure was NAPRC accreditation and the primary outcomes included mortality (in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year) and 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. Associations between NAPRC accreditation and each outcome were tested using multivariable logistic regression with risk-adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Among 1,985 hospitals, 65 were NAPRC accredited (3.3%). Accredited hospitals were more likely to be nonprofit and teaching with ≥ 250 beds. Among 20,202 patients, 2,078 patients (10%) underwent proctectomy at an accredited hospital. Patients at accredited hospitals were more likely to have an elective procedure with a minimally invasive approach and sphincter preservation. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs. 1.3%; p=0.002), 30-day mortality (2.1% vs. 2.9%; p<0.001), 30-day complication (18.3% vs. 19.4%; p=0.01), and 1-year mortality rates (11.0% vs. 12.1%; p<0.001) were significantly lower at accredited compared to non-accredited hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: NAPRC accredited hospitals have lower risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality for major rectal cancer surgery. Although NAPRC standards address variability in practice, without directly addressing surgical safety, our findings suggest that NAPRC accredited hospitals may provide higher quality surgical care.

High-risk Opioid Prescribing Associated with Postoperative New Persistent Opioid Use in Adolescents and Young Adults.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we explored which postoperative opioid prescribing practices were associated with persistent opioid use among adolescents and young adults. BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of adolescents and young adults develop postoperative new persistent opioid use. The impact of physician prescribing practices on persistent use among young patients is unknown. METHODS: We identified opioid-naïve patients aged 13 to 21 who underwent 1 of 13 procedures (2008-2016) and filled a perioperative opioid prescription using commercial insurance claims (Optum Deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database). Persistent use was defined as ≥ 1 opioid prescription fill 91 to 180 days after surgery. High-risk opioid prescribing included overlapping opioid prescriptions, co-prescribed benzodiazepines, high daily prescribed dosage, long-acting formulations, and multiple prescribers. Logistic regression modeled persistent use as a function of exposure to high-risk prescribing, adjusted for patient demographics, procedure, and comorbidities. RESULTS: High-risk opioid prescribing practices increased from 34.9% to 43.5% over the study period; the largest increase was in co-prescribed benzodiazepines (24.1%-33.4%). High-risk opioid prescribing was associated with persistent use (aOR 1.235 [1.12,1.36]). Receipt of prescriptions from multiple opioid prescribers was individually associated with persistent use (aOR 1.288 [1.16,1.44]). The majority of opioid prescriptions to patients with persistent use beyond the postoperative period were from nonsurgical prescribers (79.6%). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk opioid prescribing practices, particularly receiving prescriptions from multiple prescribers across specialties, were associated with a significant increase in adolescent and young adult patients' risk of persistent opioid use. Prescription drug monitoring programs may help identify young patients at risk of persistent opioid use.

Positive margin rates for colorectal cancer vary significantly by hospital in Michigan: Can we achieve a 0 % positive margin rate?

Background: High quality surgical care for colorectal cancer (CRC) includes obtaining a negative surgical margin. The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) is a statewide consortium of hospitals dedicated to quality improvement; a subset of MSQC hospitals abstract quality of care measures for CRC surgery, including positive margin rate. The purpose of this study was to determine whether positive margin rates vary significantly by hospital, and whether positive margin rates should be a target for quality improvement. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent CRC resection from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcome was the presence of a positive margin. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to test the association of positive margins with patient, hospital, and tumor characteristics. Results: The cohort consisted of 4211 patients from 42 hospitals (85 % colon cancer and 15 % rectal cancer). The crude positive margin rate was 6.15 % (95 % CI 4.6-7.4 %); this ranged from 0 % to 22 % at individual hospitals. In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with positive margins included male sex, underweight BMI, metastatic cancer, rectal cancer (vs. colon), T4 T-stage, N1c/N2 N-stage, and open surgical approach. After adjusting for these factors, there remained significant variation by hospital, with 8 hospitals being statistically-significant outliers. Conclusions: Positive margins rates for CRC vary by hospital in Michigan, even after rigorous adjustment for case-mix. Furthermore, several hospitals achieved near-zero positive margin rates, suggesting opportunities for quality improvement through the identification of best practices among CRC surgery centers.

Institutional Trends in Opioid Prescribing and Utilization after Primary Cleft Lip and Palate Repair.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient prescriptions for postoperative pain play an important role in the opioid epidemic. Prescribing guidelines are an effective target for intervention but require procedure-specific data to be successful. The aim of this study was to examine opioid prescribing patterns and pain control after primary cleft lip and palate repair at a large academic center. METHODS: Children undergoing cleft lip and palate repair from April of 2018 to July of 2019 were included in a prospective cohort study. Data on discharge prescriptions, refills, and emergency room visits were obtained from the medical record. Caregivers were surveyed 7 to 21 days after surgery regarding pain control, opioid use, education exposure, storage, and disposal. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were used to examine predictors of pain control, opioid consumption, safe storage, and disposal. RESULTS: After screening, 59 children were included in the study. Patients were 55.8 percent male with a median age of 12 months (interquartile range, 5 to 15). Ninety percent of patients received an opioid prescription at discharge with a mean quantity of 10 doses (interquartile range, 5 to 15). Ninety-seven percent of caregivers used adjunct medication. Opioids were given for a median of 3 days (interquartile range, 2 to 6.5). Seventy-six percent of caregivers gave less opioid than prescribed. There was no association between pain control and opioid quantity ( p = 0.68). Twenty-four percent of caregivers used locked storage. Thirty-four percent of respondents with leftover medication reported disposal. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids are often overprescribed after cleft lip and palate repair. Providers should consider limiting prescriptions to a 3-day supply to help reduce the quantity of opioids available in the community.

Natural Language Processing to Estimate Clinical Competency Committee Ratings.

OBJECTIVE: Residency program faculty participate in clinical competency committee (CCC) meetings, which are designed to evaluate residents' performance and aid in the development of individualized learning plans. In preparation for the CCC meetings, faculty members synthesize performance information from a variety of sources. Natural language processing (NLP), a form of artificial intelligence, might facilitate these complex holistic reviews. However, there is little research involving the application of this technology to resident performance assessments. With this study, we examine whether NLP can be used to estimate CCC ratings. DESIGN: We analyzed end-of-rotation assessments and CCC assessments for all surgical residents who trained at one institution between 2014 and 2018. We created models of end-of-rotation assessment ratings and text to predict dichotomized CCC assessment ratings for 16 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones. We compared the performance of models with and without predictors derived from NLP of end-of-rotation assessment text. RESULTS: We analyzed 594 end-of-rotation assessments and 97 CCC assessments for 24 general surgery residents. The mean (standard deviation) for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.84 (0.05) for models with only non-NLP predictors, 0.83 (0.06) for models with only NLP predictors, and 0.87 (0.05) for models with both NLP and non-NLP predictors. CONCLUSIONS: NLP can identify language correlated with specific ACGME Milestone ratings. In preparation for CCC meetings, faculty could use information automatically extracted from text to focus attention on residents who might benefit from additional support and guide the development of educational interventions.

Opioid prescribing is excessive and variable after pediatric ambulatory urologic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute pain after surgery is one of the most frequent indications for opioid prescribing in children. Opioids are often not stored or disposed of safely after their use, placing children and others in the home at risk for accidental ingestion or intentional misuse. We currently lack evidence-based guidelines for post-operative pain management after common ambulatory pediatric urologic procedures. Thus, each surgeon must decide if and how much opioid to prescribe based on his/her own assumptions of perceived post-operative pain. OBJECTIVES: As part of an effort to establish opioid prescribing guidelines across two academic centers, the objectives of this study were to evaluate current variability in pediatric urologists' opioid prescribing factors and identify patients at greatest risk of being prescribed high doses of opioids after common ambulatory pediatric urologic procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated post-operative opioid prescribing patterns after common ambulatory pediatric urology procedures (circumcision, orchiopexy, and hernia/hydrocele) at two major children's hospitals. Specifically, we evaluated if and how much opioid was prescribed for all children (18 years or younger) between 2016 and 2017. Bivariate analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis Test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine patient, surgeon, and procedural factors that predicted the prescription of a high dose of opioids (greater than the median number of doses prescribed for that procedure). RESULTS: Over the two-year period, 811 circumcisions and 883 inguinal surgeries (inguinal orchiopexy and hernia/hydrocele) were performed. 94% of patients undergoing circumcision and 97% of those undergoing inguinal surgery were prescribed opioid analgesia. The median number of doses prescribed for circumcision was 20; for inguinal surgeries, 23.75% of patients received 15 opioid doses or more. Patients ages 0-2 years, who represented the largest age group (41% of all patients), received significantly more opioid doses than all other age groups, followed by those >10 years (p < 0.01). There was significant variation in opioid prescribing patterns by provider (p < 0.01) (Figure 1) On multivariable logistic regression, younger age, pill form, and earlier year were all associated with a greater number of opioid doses prescribed for all surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Across two institutions without a formal post-operative opioid prescribing policy for ambulatory pediatric urologic procedures, we observed considerable variability in provider prescribing patterns, with nearly all patients receiving an opioid, and those 0-2 years receiving the highest number of doses. This highlights the need for evidence-based guidelines for post-operative pain management after ambulatory pediatric urologic surgeries.

Guidelines for Opioid Prescribing in Children and Adolescents After Surgery: An Expert Panel Opinion.

Importance: Opioids are frequently prescribed to children and adolescents after surgery. Prescription opioid misuse is associated with high-risk behavior in youth. Evidence-based guidelines for opioid prescribing practices in children are lacking. Objective: To assemble a multidisciplinary team of health care experts and leaders in opioid stewardship, review current literature regarding opioid use and risks unique to pediatric populations, and develop a broad framework for evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for children who require surgery. Evidence Review: Reviews of relevant literature were performed including all English-language articles published from January 1, 1988, to February 28, 2019, found via searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Pediatric was defined as children younger than 18 years. Animal and experimental studies, case reports, review articles, and editorials were excluded. Selected articles were graded using tools from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was applied throughout guideline creation. Consensus was determined using a modified Delphi technique. Findings: Overall, 14 574 articles were screened for inclusion, with 217 unique articles included for qualitative synthesis. Twenty guideline statements were generated from a 2-day in-person meeting and subsequently reviewed, edited, and endorsed externally by pediatric surgical specialists, the American Pediatric Surgery Association Board of Governors, the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery Executive Committee, and the American College of Surgeons Board of Regents. Review of the literature and guideline statements underscored 3 primary themes: (1) health care professionals caring for children who require surgery must recognize the risks of opioid misuse associated with prescription opioids, (2) nonopioid analgesic use should be optimized in the perioperative period, and (3) patient and family education regarding perioperative pain management and safe opioid use practices must occur both before and after surgery. Conclusions and Relevance: These are the first opioid-prescribing guidelines to address the unique needs of children who require surgery. Health care professionals caring for children and adolescents in the perioperative period should optimize pain management and minimize risks associated with opioid use by engaging patients and families in opioid stewardship efforts.

A national evaluation of opioid prescribing and persistent use after ambulatory anorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is a common gateway to opioid-related morbidity. Ambulatory anorectal cases are common, with opioids widely prescribed, but there is limited data on their role in this crisis. We sought to determine prescribing trends, new persistent opioid use rates, and factors associated with new persistent opioid use after ambulatory anorectal procedures. METHODS: The Optum Clinformatics claims database was analyzed for opioid-naïve adults undergoing outpatient hemorrhoid, fissure, or fistula procedures from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2017. The main outcome measure was the rate of new persistent opioid use after anorectal cases. Secondary outcomes were annual rates of perioperative opioid fills and the prescription size over time (oral morphine equivalents). RESULTS: A total of 23,426 cases were evaluated: 69.09% (n = 16,185) hemorrhoids, 24.29% (n = 5,690) fissures, and 6.45% (n = 1,512) fistulas. The annual rate of perioperative opioid fills decreased on average 1.2%/year, from 72% in 2010 to 66% in 2017 (P < .001). Prescribing rates were consistently highest for fistulas, followed by hemorrhoids, then fissures (P < .001). There was a significant reduction in prescription size (oral morphine equivalents) over the study period, with median oral morphine equivalents (interquartile range) of 280 (250-400) in 2010 and 225 (150-375) in 2017 (P < .0001). Overall, 2.1% (n = 499) developed new persistent opioid use. Logistic regression found new persistent opioid use was associated with additional perioperative opioid fills (odds ratio 3.92; 95% confidence interval: 2.92-5.27; P < .0001), increased comorbidity (odds ratio 1.15; confidence interval: 1.09-1.20; P < .00001), tobacco use (odds ratio 1.79; confidence interval: 1.37-2.36; P < .0001), and pain disorders (odds ratio, 1.49; confidence interval, 1.23-1.82); there was no significant association with procedure performed. CONCLUSION: Over 2% of ambulatory anorectal procedures develop new persistent opioid use. Despite small annual reductions in opioid prescriptions, there has been little change in the amount prescribed. This demonstrates a need to develop and disseminate best practices for anorectal surgery, focusing on eliminating unnecessary opioid prescribing.

Self-reported disposal of leftover opioids among US adults 50-80.

OBJECTIVE: To test the association between self-reported opioid disposal education and self-reported disposal of leftover opioids among older adults. DESIGN: Web-based survey from the National Poll on Healthy Aging (March 2018) using population-based weighting for nationally representative estimates. SUBJECTS: Older adults aged 50-80 years who reported filling an opioid prescription within the past 2 years. METHODS: Respondents were asked whether they received education from a prescriber or pharmacist on how to dispose of leftover opioids and whether they disposed of leftover opioids from recent prescriptions. The association between self-reported opioid disposal education and self-reported disposal of leftover opioids was estimated with multivariable logistic regression, testing for interactions with respondent demographics. RESULTS: Among 2013 respondents (74% response rate), 596 (28.9% (26.8%-31.2%)) were prescribed opioids within the past 2 years. Education on opioid disposal was reported by 40.1% of respondents (35.8%-44.5%). Among 295 respondents with leftover medication, 19.0% (14.6%-24.5%) disposed of the leftover medications. Opioid disposal education was associated with a greater likelihood of self-reported disposal of leftover opioids among non-white respondents as compared with white non-Hispanic respondents (36.7% (16.8%-56.6%) vs 7.8% (0.1%-15.6%), p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative survey, 49% had leftover opioids, yet only 20% of older adults reported disposal of leftover opioids. Opioid disposal education was variable in delivery, but was associated with disposal behaviors among certain populations. Strategies to promote disposal should integrate patient education on the risks of leftover opioid medications and explore additional barriers to accessing opioid disposal methods.

Association of caregiver-reported education with locked storage and disposal of prescription opioids after children's surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess whether caregiver-reported storage and disposal education were associated with locked opioid storage and disposal of leftover opioids after children's surgery. METHODS: Caregivers of children <18 years who were prescribed an opioid were surveyed 7-21 days after surgery at an academic children's hospital (4/1/2018-3/31/2019) on opioid-related education and management practices (54% response rate). Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated for locked storage and disposal of leftover opioids as functions of storage and disposal education, adjusting for demographics, procedure, prescription characteristics, and postoperative day at time of survey. MAIN FINDINGS: Among 606 respondents, storage education was reported by 366 (60.4%) and locked storage by 111 caregivers (18.3%). Caregivers who reported verbal storage education (aOR 3.01 (95% CI 1.52-5.94); p = 0.001) or both written and verbal storage education (aOR 2.18 (95% CI 1.30-3.68); p = 0.003) were more likely to lock opioids in storage. Among 451 caregivers with leftover opioids, disposal education was reported by 226 (50.1%) and disposal by 111 caregivers (24.6%). There was no association between verbal and/or written disposal education with disposal. CONCLUSION: Caregivers infrequently reported education, locked storage, and disposal of leftover opioids after children's surgery. Education may improve locked opioid storage, but additional strategies are needed to increase disposal. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Association of Opioid Quantity and Caregiver Education with Pain Control after Pediatric Tonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a service guideline reducing postoperative opioid prescription quantities and caregiver-reported education to use nonopioid analgesics first are associated with caregiver-reported pain control after pediatric tonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (July 2018-April 2019). SETTING: Pediatric otolaryngology service at a tertiary academic children's hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Caregivers of patients aged 1 to 11 years undergoing tonsillectomy (N = 764) were surveyed 7 to 21 days after surgery regarding pain control, education to use nonopioid analgesics first, and opioid use. Respondents who were not prescribed opioids or had missing data were excluded. Logistic regression modeled caregiver-reported pain control as a function of service guideline implementation (December 2018) recommending 20 rather than 30 doses for postoperative opioid prescriptions and caregiver-reported analgesic education, adjusting for patient demographics. RESULTS: Among 430 respondents (56% response), 387 patients were included. The sample was 43% female with a mean age of 5.0 years (SD, 2.5). Pain control was reported as good (226 respondents, 58%) or adequate/poor (161 respondents, 42%). Mean opioid prescription quantity was 27 doses (SD, 7.9) before and 21 doses (SD, 6.1) after guideline implementation (P < .001). Education to use nonopioids first was reported by 308 respondents (80%). In regression, prescribing guideline implementation was not associated with pain control (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0; P = .22), but caregiver-reported education to use nonopioids first was associated with a higher odds of good pain control (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Caregiver education to use nonopioid analgesics first may be a modifiable health care practice to improve pain control as postoperative opioid prescription quantities are reduced.

Youth Perspectives of Prescription Pain Medication in the Opioid Crisis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize current youth perspectives of prescription pain medication. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 1047 youths aged 14-24 years were recruited by targeted social media advertisements to match national demographic benchmarks. Youths were queried by open-ended text message prompts about exposure and access to prescription pain medication, perceived safety of prescribed and nonprescribed medication, and associations with the word "opioid." Responses were analyzed inductively for emerging themes and frequencies. RESULTS: Among 745 respondents (71.2% response rate), 439 identified as female (59.3%), 561 as white (75.8%), and mean age was 18.3 ± 3.2 years. Previous exposure to prescription pain medication was reported by 377 respondents (52.0%), most commonly related to dentistry (32.8%), surgery (19.2%), and injury (12.0%). Nonmedical sources of access to prescription pain medication were identified by 256 respondents (36.9%) and medical sources other than their doctor by an additional 111 respondents (16.0%). Three additional themes emerged from youth responses: (1) prescribed medication was thought to be safer than nonprescribed medication, based on trust in doctors; (2) risks of addiction and overdose were thought to be greater for nonprescribed medication; (3) respondents had a widely ranging understanding of the word "opioid," from historical to current events, medical to illicit substances, and personal to public associations. CONCLUSIONS: Although youths are aware of the opioid crisis, they perceive less risk of prescription pain medication prescribed by a doctor, than from other sources. Policies should target education to youth in clinical and nonclinical settings, highlighting the risks of addiction and overdose with all opioids.

Spillover Effect of Opioid Reduction Interventions From Adult to Pediatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Procedure-specific prescribing guidelines and trainee education have reduced opioid overprescribing in adult surgical patients, but tailored interventions do not yet exist for children. It is unknown what effect these adult interventions have had on postoperative opioid prescribing in children at the same institution, where trainees rotate across both adult and pediatric services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study of patients (<18 y) undergoing pediatric surgery (PS), pediatric otolaryngology (ENT), or pediatric urology (URO) procedures at a single tertiary academic center assessed opioid doses per patient before (January 01, 2015 to September 30, 2016) and after (January 01, 2017 to March 31, 2018) opioid prescribing guidelines and trainee education were instituted for adult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patient demographics, postoperative opioid prescribing, opioid refills, and emergency department (ED) visits <21 d after surgery were compared using chi-squared analyses and t-tests. Interrupted time-series analyses (ITSA) assessed changes in the rate of opioid prescribing pre- and postintervention for each subspecialty. RESULTS: There were 3371 patients preintervention and 2439 patients postintervention. After the intervention, fewer patients were prescribed opioids (ENT: 97% versus 93%, P < 0.001; URO: 98% versus 94%, P < 0.001; PS: 61% versus 25%, P < 0.001) and fewer opioid doses were prescribed in each prescription (ENT: 63.8 ± 26.1 versus 50.8 ± 22.0 doses, P < 0.001; URO: 33.5 ± 23.4 versus 22.1 ± 11.3, P < 0.001; PS: 20.4 ± 12.8 versus 13.8 ± 11.4 doses, P < 0.001). There were no changes in opioid refill or ED visit rates postintervention. A decreasing rate in ENT prescribing was seen preintervention, with no significant change postintervention (-2.3 ± 1.1 versus -3.3 ± 0.7; P = 0.24). Whereas, the rate of decrease in PS and URO prescribing significantly slowed postintervention (PS: -2.0 ± 0.1 versus -0.9 ± 0.1, P < 0.001; URO: -4.2 ± 0.2 versus -2.3 ± 0.5, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescribing rates are decreasing, but adult interventions did not achieve reductions in pediatric opioid prescribing at the same institution. There was no concomitant rise in postoperative ED visits or opioid refills as prescribing declined, indicating that the risks of reducing opioid prescriptions may be minimal. Development of evidence-based, procedure-specific prescribing guidelines that specifically address pediatric patients are needed to effectively minimize opioid overprescribing in this population.

Leadership-Specific Feedback Practices in Surgical Residency: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: The importance of feedback is well recognized in surgical training. Although there is increased focus on leadership as an essential competency in surgical training, it is unclear whether surgical residents receive effective feedback on leadership performance. We performed an exploratory qualitative study with surgical residents to understand current leadership-specific feedback practices in one surgical training program. DESIGN: We conducted semistructured interviews with surgical residents. Using line-by-line coding in an iterative process, we focused on feedback on leadership performance to capture both semantic and conceptual data. SETTING: The general surgery residency program at the University of Michigan, a tertiary care, academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: Residents were purposively selected to include key informants and comprise a balanced sample with respect to postgraduate year, gender, and race. RESULTS: Four major themes were identified during the thematic analysis: (1) the importance of feedback for leadership development in residency; (2) inadequacy of current feedback mechanisms; (3) barriers to giving and receiving leadership-specific feedback; and (4) resident-driven recommendations for better leadership feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Many surgical residents do not receive effective leadership feedback, although they express strong desire for formal evaluation of leadership skills. Establishing avenues for feedback on leadership performance will help bridge this gap. Additionally, training to give and receive leadership-specific feedback may improve the quality and incorporation of delivered feedback for developing surgeon-leaders.

Use of cryoanalgesia for pain management for the modified ravitch procedure in children.

BACKGROUND: Intercostal cryoablation(IC) for pain management in children undergoing Nuss Procedure has been previously described. We evaluated postoperative outcomes following Modified Ravitch procedure for pectus disorders comparing IC to thoracic epidural(TE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective review of pediatric patients (age < 21) undergoing Modified Ravitch procedure (January 2015-March 2019) with either IC(9), or TE(20) analgesia. Primary outcome was length of stay (LOS) and secondary outcomes were inpatient opioid use (in oral morphine equivalents per kilogram; OME/kg), pain scores on each postoperative day (POD), discharge prescriptions, and complications. Pairwise comparisons made with Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher Exact test as appropriate. Two-tailed p values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar. LOS was shorter with IC compared to TE (4 days versus 6; p < 0.006). Postoperative opioid use was not significantly different (IC: 1.5 OME/kg versus TE: 1.1; p = 0.10). There was improved pain control on POD 2 in patients who underwent IC (median pain score 3 versus 4; p < 0.0004). There was no difference in discharge prescription (IC: 3.3 OME/kg; TE: 4.8; p = 0.19) or complication rate (IC: 55.6%, TE:50%; p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: IC during the Modified Ravitch reduced LOS compared to TE with improved pain control starting on POD 2, with similar narcotic utilization and complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment Study, Level III (Retrospective comparative study).

Caregiver knowledge, opinion, and willingness to consent to trainee involvement in pediatric surgical care.

PURPOSE: Surgical training is shifting toward competency-based models that promote earlier supervised autonomy. We assessed caregiver knowledge, willingness to consent, and opinions regarding trainee autonomy in their child's operation. METHODS: At two academic children's hospitals, 100 caregivers of children aged 0-17 years completed an electronic survey in the pediatric surgery clinic (1/2018-4/2018). Knowledge, willingness to consent, and opinions of trainee involvement in their child's operation in standard and competency-based training models were assessed. McNemar's test compared willingness to consent with standard and competency-based training (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Caregivers were 75% female, 41% age 30-39 years old, and 78% white. All provider roles were correctly identified by 14% of caregivers. For routine procedures, caregivers would consent to a fellow assisting (95%) or independently operating with the attending present (78%). They would less likely consent if the attending was not in the operating room (39%) or the hospital (25%). Competency-based training improved willingness to consent, but was significant only for independence with the attending present. Most caregivers wanted to know about (81%) and be asked permission for (82%) trainee involvement in their child's operation. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that surgeons in academic settings must balance transparency with trainee autonomy when obtaining caregiver consent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Association of Perioperative Opioid Prescriptions With Risk of Complications After Tonsillectomy in Children.

IMPORTANCE: Practice guidelines recommend nonopioid medications in children after tonsillectomy, but to date, studies have not used recent national data to assess perioperative opioid prescribing patterns or the factors associated with these patterns in this population. Closing this knowledge gap may help in assessing whether such prescribing and prescription duration could be safely reduced. OBJECTIVE: To assess national perioperative opioid prescribing patterns, clinical and demographic factors associated with these patterns, and association between these patterns and complications in children after tonsillectomy compared with children not using opioids. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort analysis used the 2016 to 2017 claims data from the database of a large national private insurer in the United States. Opioid-naive children aged 1 to 18 years with a claims code for tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy between April 1, 2016, and December 15, 2017, were identified (n = 22 567) and screened against the exclusion criteria. The final sample included 15 793 children. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The percentage of children with 1 or more perioperative fills (prescription drug claims for opioids between 7 days before to 1 day after tonsillectomy) was calculated, along with the duration of perioperative prescriptions (days supplied). Linear regression was used to identify the demographic and clinical factors associated with the duration of perioperative opioid prescriptions. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between having 1 or more perioperative fills and their duration and the risk of return visits 2 to 14 days after tonsillectomy for pain or dehydration, secondary hemorrhage, and constipation compared with children not using opioids. RESULTS: Among 15 793 children, the mean (SD) age was 7.8 (4.2) years, 12 807 (81.1%) were younger than 12 years, 2986 (18.9%) were between 12 and 18 years of age, and 8289 (52.6%) were female. In total, 9411 (59.6%) children had 1 or more perioperative fills, and the median (25th-75th percentile) duration was 8 (6-10) days; 6382 had no perioperative fills. The probability of having 1 or more perioperative fills and the duration of prescription varied across US census divisions. Having 1 or more perioperative fills was not associated with return visits for pain or dehydration (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.95-1.34) or secondary hemorrhage (AOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.10) compared with children not using opioids, but it was associated with increased risk of return visits for constipation (AOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.24-3.28). Duration was not associated with return visits for complications. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that reducing perioperative opioid prescribing and the duration of perioperative opioid prescriptions may be possible without increasing the risk of these complications.