A critical role for B cells in the development of memory CD4 cells.

Activated B cells express high levels of class II MHC and costimulatory molecules and are nearly as effective as dendritic cells in their APC ability. Yet, their importance as APC in vivo is controversial and their role, if any, in the development of CD4 memory is unknown. We compared responses of CD4 cells from normal and B cell-deficient mice to keyhole limpet hemocyanin over 6 mo and observed diminished IL-2 production by cells primed in the absence of B cells. This was due to lower frequencies of Ag-responsive cells and not to decreased levels of IL-2 secretion per cell. The absence of B cells did not affect the survival of memory CD4 cells since frequencies remained stable. Despite normal dendritic cell function, multiple immunizations of B cell-deficient mice did not restore frequencies of memory cells. However, the transfer of B cells restored memory cell development. Ag presentation was not essential since B cells activated in vitro with irrelevant Ag also restored frequencies of memory cells. The results provide unequivocal evidence that B cells play a critical role in regulating clonal expansion of CD4 cells and, as such, are requisite for the optimal priming of memory in the CD4 population.

Regulation of development and function of memory CD4 subsets.

Immunologic memory refers to the dramatic response to previously encountered antigen (Ag) that is largely controlled by CD4 T cells. Understanding how CD4 memory is regulated is essential for exploiting the immune system to protect against disease and to dampen immunopathology in allergic responses and autoimmunity. Using defined adoptive-transfer models, we are studying parameters that affect differentiation of memory CD4 cells in vivo and have found that a complex interplay of T cell receptor signaling, costimulation, and cytokines can determine the extent of memory development and the balance of Th1 and Th2 memory subsets. On challenge, memory CD4 cells localize in sites of Ag exposure and develop into effectors that regulate memory responses. We are investigating the roles of adhesion molecules, cytokines, and chemokines in the selective recruitment of CD4 memory subsets to address mechanisms by which memory T cells provide long-lasting immunity and, in our recent studies, to determine how memory CD4 cells contribute to the development of autoimmune diabetes.

Memory CD4 cells do not migrate into peripheral lymphnodes in the absence of antigen.

Memory T cells are thought to protect against previously encountered pathogens in part by preferentially recirculating through the lymphoid tissues where they were primed and where challenge with antigen (Ag) is likely to occur. In this study, we examined the distribution of memory CD4 cells after priming, and analyzed their capacity to localize in lymph nodes after transfer to normal and Ag-primed recipients. Immunization induced a high frequency of Ag-specific CD4 cells in the primary response in draining lymph nodes and spleen. Thereafter, the numbers in lymph nodes declined dramatically whereas frequencies in the spleen were unchanged, suggesting that memory CD4 cells primarily reside in or recirculate through the spleen. Indeed, memory CD4 cells, unlike naive CD4 cells, failed to home to lymph nodes after adoptive transfer to normal recipients and were detected predominantly in the spleen for extended periods, suggesting that recirculation through lymph nodes was limited. Memory cells also did not home to lymph nodes recipients in response to specific Ag, but subsequently, recruitment that could be blocked with monoclonal antibodies to CD44 and LFA-1 and was independent of naive cells did occur. The data indicate that memory and naive CD4 cells can be distinguished on the basis of their patterns of circulation.

Islet-specific Th1, but not Th2, cells secrete multiple chemokines and promote rapid induction of autoimmune diabetes.

Migration of CD4 cells into the pancreas represents a hallmark event in the development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Th1, but not Th2, cells are associated with pathogenesis leading to destruction of islet beta-cells and disease onset. Lymphocyte extravasation from blood into tissue is regulated by multiple adhesion receptor/counter-receptor pairs and chemokines. To identify events that regulate entry of CD4 cells into the pancreas, we transferred Th1 or Th2 cells induced in vitro from islet-specific TCR transgenic CD4 cells into immunodeficient (NOD.scid) recipients. Although both subsets infiltrated the pancreas and elicited multiple adhesion receptors (peripheral lymph node addressin, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1, LFA-1, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1) on vascular endothelium, entry/accumulation of Th1 cells was more rapid than that of Th2 cells, and only Th1 cells induced diabetes. In vitro, Th1 cells were also distinguished from Th2 cells by the capacity to synthesize several chemokines that included lymphotactin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, whereas both subsets produced macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta. Some of these chemokines as well as RANTES, MCP-3, MCP-5, and cytokine-response gene-2 (CRG-2)/IFN-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) were associated with Th1, but not Th2, pancreatic infiltrates. The data demonstrate polarization of chemokine expression by Th1 vs Th2 cells, which, within the microenvironment of the pancreas, accounts for distinctive inflammatory infiltrates that determine whether insulin-producing beta-cells are protected or destroyed.

Diabetes induced by Coxsackie virus: initiation by bystander damage and not molecular mimicry.

Viral induction of autoimmunity is thought to occur by either bystander T-cell activation or molecular mimicry. Coxsackie B4 virus is strongly associated with the development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in humans and shares sequence similarity with the islet autoantigen glutamic acid decarboxylase. We infected different strains of mice with Coxsackie B4 virus to discriminate between the two possible induction mechanisms, and found that mice with susceptible MHC alleles had no viral acceleration of diabetes, but mice with a T cell receptor transgene specific for a different islet autoantigen rapidly developed diabetes. These results show that diabetes induced by Coxsackie virus infection is a direct result of local infection leading to inflammation, tissue damage, and the release of sequestered islet antigen resulting in the re-stimulation of resting autoreactive T cells, further indicating that the islet antigen sensitization is an indirect consequence of the viral infection.