Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 2022: 9250370, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36345379

RESUMEN

Background: The lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has been increasingly used for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic fluid collection (WOPFC) in recent years. Nevertheless, some WOPFCs may require additional drainage methods including another LAMS as a result of complexity of the lesions. This current study aimed to compare clinical parameters of patients with complex WOPFC requiring LAMS with additional methods (complex WOPFC: group A) versus single LAMS alone (noncomplex WOPFC; group B). Method: Medical records of patients with complex (group A) versus noncomplex WOPFCs (group B) were reviewed and compared in three centers in Thailand and Malaysia, between January 2016 to December 2020. Result: 31 patients with WOPFCs were recruited. 6 of 31 (19%) patients were in group A. Multivariate analysis showed that the maximal diameter of WOPFCs in group A was significantly larger than that of group B (18 ± 6 versus 13 ± 3 cm in diameter, respectively, p = 0.021). Solid component proportion was higher in group A versus B (35.8% versus 17.8%, respectively, p = 0.025). The prevalence of pancreatic duct leakage was significantly higher in group A (67% versus 20%, p = 0.23). The need of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) and the number of DEN sessions were higher in group A versus B (100% vs. 48%, p = 0.020 and 3.5 vs 0 p = 0.031, respectively). Conclusions: Complex WOPFC had larger diameter of lesions, higher proportion of solid component, higher prevalence of pancreatic duct leakage, and higher number of DEN is required than group noncomplex lesions. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with TCTR20180223004.


Asunto(s)
Drenaje , Enfermedades Pancreáticas , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Drenaje/métodos , Stents , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/cirugía , Endosonografía
3.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 37(2): 335-341, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34652861

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common problem in gastroenterology practice. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of Curcuma longa Linn versus omeprazole and placebo among patients diagnosed with FD. METHODS: From November 2017 to November 2018, patients diagnosed with FD according to ROME IV criteria were enrolled. Patients were randomized into curcumin, omeprazole, or placebo groups. The Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA) was used to evaluate clinical effectiveness after 2 and 4 weeks. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were randomized. Forty-five, 43, and 44 patients were in the curcumin, omeprazole, and placebo groups, respectively. At 4 weeks, the mean SODA score change of pain and non-pain symptoms decreased in the curcumin group compared with the placebo group (pain -16.98 ± 8.09 vs -10.53 ± 4.43; P < 0.001, non-pain -7.96 ± 3.41 vs -6.05 ± 3.03; P < 0.008). No significant difference was observed between curcumin and omeprazole groups (pain -16.98 ± 8.09 vs -14.69 ± 6.41; P = 0.302, non-pain -7.96 ± 3.41 vs -7.07 ± 2.27; P = 0.486). The mean change of the SODA satisfaction score at 4 weeks was higher in the curcumin group compared with the omeprazole group but without statistical significance (9.17 ± 3.88 vs 8.63 ± 3.89, P = 1). The mean change of EQ-5D index at 4 weeks was highest in the curcumin group but not statistically different from other groups (0.12 ± 0.13 vs 0.09 ± 0.10 vs 0.07 ± 0.05; P = 0.055). CONCLUSION: Curcuma longa Linn can improve dyspeptic symptoms, improve quality of life, and provide satisfaction equivalent to omeprazole in treatment of FD.


Asunto(s)
Curcuma , Curcumina , Dispepsia , Omeprazol , Curcumina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Dispepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Dolor/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 37(4): 632-643, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34907597

RESUMEN

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent and bothersome functional gastrointestinal disorders worldwide, including in Thailand. After a decade of the first Thailand GERD guideline, physician and gastroenterologist encountered substantially increase of patients with GERD. Many of them are complicated case and refractory to standard treatment. Concurrently, the evolution of clinical characteristics as well as the progression of investigations and treatment have developed and changed tremendously. As a member of Association of Southeast Asian Nations, which are developing countries, we considered that the counterbalance between advancement and sufficient economy is essential in taking care of patients with GERD. We gather physicians from university hospitals, as well as internist and general practitioners who served in rural area, to make a consensus in this updated version of GERD guideline focusing in medical management of GERD. This clinical practice guideline was constructed adhering with standard procedure. We categorized the guideline in to four parts including definition, investigation, treatment, and long-term follow up. We anticipate that this guideline would improve physicians' proficiency and help direct readers to choose investigations and treatments in patients with GERD wisely. Moreover, we wish that this guideline would be applicable in countries with limited resources as well.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Consenso , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Tailandia
6.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0242879, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33253239

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data on external validation of models developed to distinguish Crohn's disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) are limited. This study aimed to validate and compare models using clinical, endoscopic, and/or pathology findings to differentiate CD from ITB. METHODS: Data from newly diagnosed ITB and CD patients were retrospectively collected from 5 centers located in Thailand or Hong Kong. The data was applied to Lee, et al., Makharia, et al., Jung, et al., and Limsrivilai, et al. model. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty patients (383 CD, 147 ITB) with clinical and endoscopic data were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of Limsrivilai's clinical-endoscopy (CE) model was 0.853, which was comparable to the value of 0.862 in Jung's model (p = 0.52). Both models performed significantly better than Lee's endoscopy model (AUROC: 0.713, p<0.01). Pathology was available for review in 199 patients (116 CD, 83 ITB). When 3 modalities were combined, Limsrivilai's clinical-endoscopy-pathology (CEP) model performed significantly better (AUROC: 0.887) than Limsrivilai's CE model (AUROC: 0.824, p = 0.01), Jung's model (AUROC: 0.798, p = 0.005) and Makharia's model (AUROC: 0.637, p<0.01). In 83 ITB patients, the rate of misdiagnosis with CD when used the proposed cutoff values in each original study was 9.6% for Limsrivilai's CEP, 15.7% for Jung's, and 66.3% for Makharia's model. CONCLUSIONS: Scoring systems with more parameters and diagnostic modalities performed better; however, application to clinical practice is still limited owing to high rate of misdiagnosis of ITB as CD. Models integrating more modalities such as imaging and serological tests are needed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Adulto , Colon/patología , Colonoscopía , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/patología
7.
Pancreatology ; 18(5): 507-512, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29754857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Aggressive fluid resuscitation is recommended for initial management of acute pancreatitis. However, there are few studies which focus on types of fluid therapy. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial in patients with acute pancreatitis. The patients were randomized into two groups. Each group received Normal Saline solution (NSS) or Lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) through a goal-directed fluid resuscitation protocol. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at 24 and 48 h, mortality, presence of local complications and inflammatory markers were measured. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included. Twenty-four patients (51%) received NSS and 23 patients received LRS. There was significant reduction in SIRS after 24 h among subjects who resuscitated with LRS compared with NSS (4.2% in NSS, 26.1% in LRS, P = 0.02). However, SIRS reduction at 48 h was not different between groups (33.4% in NSS, 26.1% in LRS, P = 0.88). Mortality was not different between NSS and LRS (4.2% in NSS, 0% in LRS, P = 1.00). CRP, ESR and procalcitonin increased at 24 h and 48 h after admission with no difference between the two groups. Local complications were 29.2% in NSS and 21.7% in LRS (P = 0.74). The median length of hospital stay was not significantly different in the two groups (5.5 days in NSS, 6 days in LRS, P = 0.915). CONCLUSIONS: Lactated Ringer's solution was superior to NSS in SIRS reduction in acute pancreatitis only in the first 24 h. But SIRS at 48 h and mortality were not different between LRS and NSS.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...