A Scoping Review of Suicide Prevention Interventions for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Other Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals.

Purpose: This scoping review summarizes the literature on suicide-specific psychological interventions among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) people to synthesize existing findings and support future intervention research and dissemination. Methods: Electronic databases PsycInfo and PubMed were searched for reports of psychological intervention studies with suicide-related outcome data among LGBTQ+ people. A total of 1269 articles were screened, and 19 studies met inclusion criteria (k = 3 examined suicide-specific interventions tailored to LGBTQ+ people, k = 4 examined nontailored suicide-specific interventions, k = 11 examined minority stress- or LGBTQ+ interventions that were not suicide-specific, and k = 1 examined other types of interventions). Results: Synthesis of this literature was made challenging by varied study designs, and features limit confidence in the degree of internal and external validity of the interventions evaluated. The only established suicide-specific intervention examined was Dialectical Behavior Therapy, and minority stress- and LGBTQ-specific interventions rarely targeted suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Nevertheless, most interventions reviewed demonstrated support for feasibility and/or acceptability. Only five studies tested suicide-related outcome differences between an LGBTQ+ group and a cisgender/heterosexual group. These studies did not find significant differences in STBs, but certain subgroups such as bisexual individuals may exhibit specific treatment disparities. Conclusion: Given the dearth of research, more research examining interventions that may reduce STBs among LGBTQ+ people is critically needed to address this public health issue.

Development and Evaluation of a Pragmatic Measure of Adherence to Dialectical Behavior Therapy: The DBT Adherence Checklist for Individual Therapy.

This paper presents two studies conducted to develop and evaluate a new pragmatic measure of therapist adherence to Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT): the DBT Adherence Checklist for Individual Therapy (DBT AC-I). Study 1 used item response analysis to select items from the gold standard DBT Adherence Coding Scale (DBT ACS) using archival data from 1271 DBT sessions. Items were then iteratively refined based on feedback from 33 target end-users to ensure relevance, usability, and understandability. Study 2 examined the psychometric properties of the DBT AC-I as a therapist self-report and observer-rated measure in 100 sessions from 50 therapist-client dyads, while also evaluating predictors of therapist accuracy in self-rated adherence. When used as a therapist self-report measure, concordance between therapist and observer ratings was at least moderate (AC1 ≥ 0.41) for all DBT AC-I items but overall concordance (ICC = 0.09) as well as convergent (r = 0.05) and criterion validity (AUC = 0.54) with the DBT ACS were poor. Higher therapist accuracy was predicted by greater DBT knowledge and adherence as well as more severe client suicidal ideation. When used by trained observers, the DBT AC-I had excellent interrater reliability (ICC = 0.93), convergent validity (r = 0.90), and criterion validity (AUC = 0.94). While therapists' self-rated adherence on the DBT AC-I should not be assumed to reflect their actual adherence, some therapists may self-rate accurately. The DBT AC-I offers an effective and relatively efficient method of evaluating adherence to DBT when used by trained observers.

Sexual identity and race/ethnicity as predictors of treatment outcome and retention in dialectical behavior therapy.

OBJECTIVE: There is inconclusive evidence regarding sexual identity and race/ethnicity differences in outcomes in evidence-based psychological treatments. Although dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is well-studied, little is known about the extent to which its efficacy generalizes to sexual minority and racial/ethnic minority people. This study examined sexual identity, race/ethnicity, and their interaction as predictors of treatment outcome and retention in DBT. METHOD: Data were from five clinical trials conducted in research and community settings with a variety of adult populations (N = 269) engaged in standard DBT, augmented DBT, or DBT components. Longitudinal mixed-effects models evaluated sexual identity and racial/ethnic differences in clinical outcomes (suicide attempts, nonsuicidal self-injury [NSSI], global functioning, psychiatric hospitalizations) and retention. RESULTS: Sexual identity, race/ethnicity, and their interaction did not predict the average severity or the rate of change in any clinical outcome over time. Sexual minority identity was associated with decreased risk of treatment dropout (OR = .44, p < .001). However, this effect was moderated by race/ethnicity, such that non-Hispanic White sexual minority participants had the lowest rates of dropout. Exploratory analyses suggested potential differences related to NSSI for certain sexual and racial/ethnic minority subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest no significant differences in DBT treatment outcomes when comparing between sexual minority and heterosexual individuals and between non-Hispanic White and racial/ethnic minority individuals. Sexual minority identity interacted with race/ethnicity to predict dropout, such that non-Hispanic sexual minority people were more likely to complete DBT compared to sexual minority people of color and heterosexual individuals. Further research is needed to clarify potential subgroup and intersectional differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

A meta-analysis on the affect regulation function of real-time self-injurious thoughts and behaviours.

Prominent theories suggest that self-injurious thoughts and behaviours are negatively reinforced by decreased negative affect. The present meta-analysis quantifies effects from intensive longitudinal studies measuring negative affect and self-injurious thoughts and behaviours. We obtained data from 38 of the 79 studies (48%, 22 unique datasets) involving N = 1,644 participants (80% female, 75% white). Individual-participant data meta-analyses revealed changes in affect pre/post self-injurious thoughts and behaviours. In antecedent models, results supported increased negative affect before nonsuicidal self-injurious behaviour (k = 14, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.31) and suicidal thoughts (k = 14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.19). For consequence models, negative affect was reduced following nonsuicidal self-injurious thoughts (k = 6, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.44), nonsuicidal self-injurious behaviours (k = 14, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.19) and suicidal thoughts (k = 13, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.23). Findings, which were not moderated by sampling strategies or sample composition, support the affect regulation function of self-injurious thoughts and behaviours.

The temporal relationships between therapist adherence and patient outcomes in dialectical behavior therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Although Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is a well-established evidence-based psychotherapy, little is known about the role of therapist adherence in promoting positive outcomes. This study evaluated the temporal relationships between therapist adherence to DBT and patient outcomes, as well as potential moderators of these relationships. METHOD: Data were from six clinical trials conducted in research and community settings with a variety of patient populations. In these trials, trained observers rated 83 therapists for adherence during 1,262 DBT individual therapy sessions with 288 patients. Patient outcomes included suicide attempts, nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), treatment dropout, psychiatric hospitalizations, and global functioning. Longitudinal mixed-effects models evaluated the time-ordered, bidirectional relationships between adherence and outcomes. RESULTS: Higher therapist adherence significantly predicted fewer subsequent suicide attempts (p = .002, η = 0.32) and a lower risk of dropout (p = .002, η = 0.33), and the latter relationship was strongest among patients with comorbid opioid dependence. Higher therapist adherence predicted fewer subsequent hospitalizations among community therapists (p = .001, η = 0.35) and patients that were not exclusively suicidal/self-injuring (p < .001, η = 0.41). Conversely, more frequent NSSI (p = .03, η = 0.22) and worse global functioning (p = .01, η = 0.26) predicted higher subsequent therapist adherence, and the latter relationship was moderated by patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Therapist adherence improves several key patient outcomes and retention, highlighting the importance of delivering DBT with adherence to the manual. Therapists may find it easier to deliver DBT adherently to more severely impaired patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Provider perspectives on delivering dialectical behavior therapy via telehealth during COVID-19 in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for repeated suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury and Borderline Personality Disorder. There has been little research on the effectiveness or implementation of DBT via telehealth. However, literature has demonstrated that other EBPs delivered via telehealth are just as effective as in person. DBT differs from these EBPs in complexity, inclusion of group sessions, length of treatment, and focus on individuals at high risk for suicide. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused mental health care services across the country and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to transition to telehealth to reduce infection risk for patients and providers. This transition offered an opportunity to learn about implementing DBT via telehealth on a national scale. We conducted a survey of DBT team points of contact in VA (N = 32) to gather information about how DBT via telehealth was being implemented, challenges and solutions, and provider perceptions. The majority reported that their site continued offering the modes of DBT via telehealth that they had offered in person. The predominant types of challenges in transitioning to telehealth were related to technology on the provider and patient side. Despite challenges, most providers reported their experience was better than expected and had positive perceptions of patient acceptability. Skills group was the more difficult mode to provide via telehealth. Providers endorsed needing additional tools (e.g., means to get diary card data electronically). Multiple benefits of DBT via telehealth were identified, such as addressing barriers to care including distance, transportation issues, and caregiving and work responsibilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Does Adding the Dialectical Behavior Therapy Prolonged Exposure (DBT PE) Protocol for PTSD to DBT Improve Outcomes in Public Mental Health Settings? A Pilot Nonrandomized Effectiveness Trial With Benchmarking.

The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Prolonged Exposure (DBT PE) protocol improves DBT's effects on PTSD in research settings, but its effectiveness in community settings is largely unknown. This pilot nonrandomized controlled trial examined DBT with and without DBT PE in four public mental health agencies. Patients (N = 35, 12-56 years old, 80.0% female, 64.7% racial/ethnic minorities, 44.1% sexual minorities) had PTSD, were receiving DBT, and completed assessments every four months over one year. Sixteen patients (45.7%) initiated DBT PE, 19 (54.3%) did not, and dropout did not differ between groups (31.3% vs. 26.3%). The primary barrier to initiating DBT PE was clinician turnover (57.9% of non-initiators). After adjusting for confounds, DBT PE initiators (g = 1.1) and completers (g = 1.4) showed a greater reduction in PTSD than patients who received DBT only (g = 0.5; p's < .05). Rates of reliable improvement in PTSD were 71.4% (DBT PE completers), 53.8% (DBT PE initiators), and 31.3% (DBT). Similar patterns were observed for posttraumatic cognitions, emotion dysregulation, general psychological distress, and limited activity days. There was no worsening of self-injurious behavior or crisis service use among patients who received DBT PE. Benchmarking analyses indicated comparable feasibility, acceptability, and safety, but a smaller magnitude of clinical change, than in efficacy studies. Results require replication in a randomized trial but suggest that DBT PE can be transported effectively to community settings.

The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Adherence Coding Scale (DBT ACS): Psychometric properties.

The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Adherence Coding Scale (DBT ACS) is an observer-rated measure used to evaluate the extent to which therapists deliver individual and group DBT with adherence to the manual. Despite its frequent use in clinical trials of DBT, relatively little is known about its psychometric properties. The present study utilized data from six clinical trials conducted in research and community settings with a variety of patient populations. Across these studies, the DBT ACS was used to code a total of 1,271 DBT individual therapy sessions and 180 DBT group sessions. Results indicate the DBT ACS computed global score has good internal consistency (α = .81) and excellent interrater reliability (ICC = .93). A confirmatory factor analysis found that a single factor yielded acceptable goodness of fit indices. The DBT ACS discriminated between DBT and another treatment and between research and community therapists. Across studies, variability in adherence scores was attributable more to therapists (33%) than to patients (15%). Both therapist and patient variability were higher in effectiveness than efficacy trials. Generalizability coefficients indicated that 5 sessions are needed to estimate a dependable adherence score at the patient level, whereas 9-15 sessions are needed to achieve adequate generalizability at the therapist level. Fewer sessions were needed to yield dependable scores for community therapists compared to research therapists. The DBT ACS appears to be a reliable, valid, and dependable method of assessing therapist adherence to individual and group DBT across diverse treatment settings, therapist types, and patient populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Effects of Workshop Training in the Dialectical Behavior Therapy Prolonged Exposure Protocol on Clinician Beliefs, Adoption, and Perceived Clinical Outcomes.

Although extensive efforts have been made to train clinicians in evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), relatively few PTSD patients are considered appropriate for and therefore receive these treatments. The dialectical behavior therapy prolonged exposure (DBT PE) protocol was developed to expand the reach of EBPs for PTSD to suicidal patients with severe comorbidities, but methods of training clinicians to deliver this treatment have not been evaluated. We examined the impact of DBT PE workshops on clinician beliefs, adoption, and perceived patient outcomes. Clinicians (N = 266) attended 2- or 4-day workshops and completed surveys at pretraining, posttraining, and 3- and 6-month follow-ups. From pretraining to 6-month follow-up, there were significant improvements in clinician concerns regarding worsening, perceived treatment credibility, and self-efficacy that did not differ by workshop length, R2 s = .20-.45. At 6-months posttraining, 53.5% of clinicians (38.8% 2-day, 66.3% 4-day) reported using DBT PE with 241 patients. Higher posttraining ratings of self-efficacy and perceived treatment credibility predicted later DBT PE use, R2 = .28. Among adopting clinicians, 81.3% reported that, on average, their patients' PTSD improved and 66.7% reported that patients were much to very much improved on average. Most clinicians reported that their patients' comorbid problems did not worsen during DBT PE and if worsening occurred, it typically involved temporary increases in distress. Workshops may be an effective method of changing clinician beliefs and promoting the use of DBT PE in a manner that clinicians experience as effective and safe for their patients.

Identifying Change Targets for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Suicidal and Self-Injuring Women With Borderline Personality Disorder.

Research on psychotherapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is increasingly focused on understanding not only which treatments work but why and for whom they work. The present pilot study evaluated the temporal relations between five hypothesized change targets-posttraumatic cognitions, guilt, shame, general emotion dysregulation, and experiential avoidance-and PTSD severity among women with PTSD, borderline personality disorder, and recent suicidal and/or self-injurious behaviors. Participants (N = 26) were randomized to receive 1 year of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) with or without the DBT prolonged exposure (DBT PE) protocol for PTSD. Potential change targets and PTSD were assessed at 4-month intervals during treatment and at 3-month posttreatment follow-up. Time-lagged mixed-effects models indicated that between-person differences in all change targets except guilt were associated with more severe PTSD, η2 s = .32-.55, and, except for general emotion dysregulation, slowed the rate of change in PTSD severity over time, η2 s = .20-.39. In DBT but not in DBT + DBT PE, individuals with higher levels of guilt and experiential avoidance relative to their own average had more severe PTSD at the next assessment point, η2 s = .12-.25. The associations between the proposed change targets and PTSD severity were not bidirectional, except for general emotion dysregulation, η2 = .50; and posttraumatic cognitions, η2 = .06. These preliminary findings suggest that trauma-related cognitions, shame, and guilt, as well as problems regulating them, may be important change targets for improving PTSD in this patient population.

Modeling the suicidal behavior cycle: Understanding repeated suicide attempts among individuals with borderline personality disorder and a history of attempting suicide.

OBJECTIVE: Suicide remains a leading cause of death in the United States, and recent reports have suggested the suicide rate is increasing. One of the most robust predictors of future suicidal behavior is a history of attempting suicide. Despite this, little is known about the factors that reduce the likelihood of reattempting suicide. This study compares theoretically derived suicide risk indicators to determine which factors are most predictive of future suicide attempts. METHOD: We used data from a randomized, controlled trial comparing 3 forms of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT; Linehan et al., 2015). Participants (N = 97, mean age = 30.3 years, 100% female, 71% White) met criteria for borderline personality disorder and had repeated and recent self-injurious behavior. Assessments occurred at 4-month intervals throughout 1 year of treatment and 1 year of follow-up. Time-lagged generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to evaluate relationship satisfaction, emotion dysregulation, and coping styles as predictors of suicide attempts. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate models suggested that higher between-person variance in problem-focused coping and lack of access to emotion regulation strategies were weakly associated with additional suicide attempts over the 2-year study. Within-person variance in the time-lagged predictors was not associated with subsequent suicide attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with a recent suicide attempt, problem-focused coping and specific deficits in emotion regulation may differentiate those likely to reattempt from those who stop suicidal behavior during and after psychotherapy. These results suggest that treatments for recent suicide attempters should target increasing problem-focused coping and decreasing maladaptive emotion regulation skills. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Beginning to envision a life worth living: An introduction to pretreatment sessions in dialectical behavior therapy.

The pretreatment phase in dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) sets the critical foundation for working with multiproblem, often highly suicidal clients. Despite the importance of this stage of treatment, very little has been written to aid DBT clinicians in navigating these early sessions most effectively. This article describes the functions and goals of pretreatment in DBT and research relevant to strategies employed in pretreatment. Additionally, a case example of a pretreatment session in DBT is provided, and challenges commonly encountered in pretreatment are discussed, along with recommendations for overcoming those challenges. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Predictors of Adoption and Reach Following Dialectical Behavior Therapy Intensive Training™.

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder. The DBT Intensive Training™ is widely used to train community clinicians to deliver DBT, but little is known about its effectiveness. This study prospectively evaluated predictors of adoption and reach of DBT among 52 community teams (212 clinicians) after DBT Intensive Training™. Pre-post training questionnaires were completed by trainees and a follow-up survey by team leaders approximately 8 months later. Overall, 75% of teams adopted all DBT modes and delivered DBT to an average of 118 clients. Lower training and program needs, fewer bachelor's-level clinicians, and greater prior DBT experience predicted adoption of more DBT modes. More prior DBT experience, smaller team size, more negative team functioning, and staff with lower job satisfaction, growth, efficacy, and influence predicted greater DBT reach. DBT Intensive Training™ appears effective in promoting DBT adoption and reach in routine clinical practice settings.

Perspectives on a Stage-Based Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Dialectical Behavior Therapy Consumers in Public Mental Health Settings.

Difficulties with consumer engagement are a common barrier to implementing trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapies (TF-EBPs). Potential methods of increasing engagement include utilizing a stage-based treatment approach, and involving consumers in implementation efforts. This mixed method study explored consumers' perspectives on a stage-based TF-EBP, Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) with the DBT Prolonged Exposure (DBT PE) protocol. Nineteen DBT consumers in two public mental health agencies targeted for implementation of DBT + DBT PE participated in focus groups and completed questionnaires assessing treatment preferences and expectancies. Consumers reported positive treatment expectancies and a strong preference for DBT with DBT PE (89.5%) over DBT alone (5.3%) or PE alone (5.3%). This was primarily due to beliefs about the treatment's efficacy, a perceived need for PTSD treatment, and the stage-based approach. Consumer-focused strategies for increasing uptake and reach of TF-EBPs are discussed.

Improving functional outcomes in women with borderline personality disorder and PTSD by changing PTSD severity and post-traumatic cognitions.

Although functional impairment typically improves during evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for borderline personality disorder (BPD), functional levels often remain suboptimal after treatment. The present pilot study evaluated whether and how integrating PTSD treatment into an EBP for BPD would improve functional outcomes. Participants were 26 women with BPD, PTSD, and recent suicidal and/or self-injurious behavior who were randomized to receive one year of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) or DBT with the DBT Prolonged Exposure (DBT PE) protocol for PTSD. Five domains of functioning were assessed at 4-month intervals during treatment and at 3-months post-treatment. DBT + DBT PE was superior to DBT in improving global social adjustment, health-related quality of life, and achieving good global functioning, but not interpersonal problems or quality of life. Results of time-lagged mixed effects models indicated that, across both treatments, reductions in PTSD severity significantly predicted subsequent improvement in global social adjustment, global functioning, and health-related quality of life, whereas reductions in post-traumatic cognitions significantly predicted later improvement in all functional outcomes except global social adjustment. These findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the role of change in PTSD severity and trauma-related cognitions as active mechanisms in improving functional outcomes among individuals with BPD and PTSD.

What changes when? The course of improvement during a stage-based treatment for suicidal and self-injuring women with borderline personality disorder and PTSD.

OBJECTIVE: Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) with the DBT Prolonged Exposure (DBT PE) protocol is an integrated treatment for suicidal and self-injuring individuals with PTSD and borderline personality disorder (BPD) that occurs in three stages: Stage 1 targets behavioral dyscontrol, Stage 2 targets posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) via the DBT PE protocol, and Stage 3 addresses remaining problems. We evaluated the course of change in multiple outcomes across these three stages and compared them to changes found in DBT alone. METHOD: Participants were 38 women with BPD, PTSD and recent suicidal and/or non-suicidal self-injury. Data were collected weekly or bi-weekly to assess PTSD, BPD, global well-being, state dissociation, and urges to engage in problem behaviors. RESULTS: In DBT + DBT PE, there was a significant improvement in PTSD in Stage 2 and in PTSD, BPD, and state dissociation in Stage 3. Compared to DBT, DBT + DBT PE led to significantly higher global well-being and moderately, but non-significantly, lower PTSD and BPD in Stages 2 and/or 3. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD does not improve until it is directly targeted and changes in other comorbid problems occur after PTSD is treated. Adding the DBT PE protocol to DBT was associated with improvement rather than worsening of outcomes.

Evaluating a Multimedia Tool for Suicide Risk Assessment and Management: The Linehan Suicide Safety Net.

OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the usability and effectiveness of the Linehan Suicide Safety Net (LSSN), a web-based, multimedia tool designed to support clinicians working with individuals who are suicidal. The core feature of LSSN is the Linehan Risk Assessment and Management Protocol (LRAMP), an empirically derived protocol that provides a structured checklist for assessing, managing, and documenting suicide risk. METHOD: Mental health professionals (N = 44) completed assessments at baseline and monthly during a 3-month evaluation period. RESULTS: The LSSN was rated as acceptable and highly usable. Use of the LSSN was associated with a significant increase in confidence in conducting suicide risk assessment and management and a decrease in concerns related to treating suicidal clients. CONCLUSION: The LSSN appears to be a promising tool for clinicians working with suicidal clients.

Dialectical behavior therapy and domains of functioning over two years.

Individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) tend to have a significant degree of functional impairment across a range of social and occupational spheres including difficulty finding and maintaining satisfying employment, housing, or relationships. Understanding what factors are associated with functional impairment will enable treatment providers to move those diagnosed with BPD beyond symptomatic recovery and toward a life worth living. This paper investigated the trajectories and predictors of functional outcomes for suicidal women with BPD (N = 99) during a treatment outcome study of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). Results revealed that participants had statistical and clinical improvements in functioning. Individuals with high emotion dysregulation displayed poorer psychosocial functioning at the subsequent assessment period and slower rates of change, which was also seen in reverse for one psychosocial functioning variable. Skills use was not related to individual trajectories in functioning. This study highlights the relationship of emotion dysregulation to functioning within a sample of suicidal women with BPD as well as the importance researching multiple domains in functioning.

Emotional Activation and Habituation During Imaginal Exposure for PTSD Among Women With Borderline Personality Disorder.

The current study examined patterns and outcomes of emotional activation and habituation during imaginal exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Participants were 16 women with borderline personality disorder (BPD), PTSD, and recent suicidal and/or self-injurious behavior who received imaginal exposure for PTSD concurrently with dialectical behavior therapy. The intensity of global distress and 6 specific emotions were assessed before and after imaginal exposure trials. Results indicated that significant within-session habituation (WSH) occurred for global distress (Hedge's g effect size = -2.52) and fear (g = -0.80), whereas significant between-session habituation (BSH) occurred for global distress (g = -2.18), fear (g = -1.89), guilt (g = -1.14), shame (g = -0.74), and disgust (g = -0.41). BSH significantly predicted PTSD diagnostic status at posttreatment, whereas activation and WSH were unrelated to outcome. Clients who remitted from PTSD showed significantly more BSH in global distress than nonremitters (η(2) = .39). In addition, remitters reported reductions in sadness and anger across trials, whereas sadness and anger increased for those who did not remit (η(2) = .54 and .40, respectively). Overall, BPD clients exhibited patterns of activation and habituation during imaginal exposure comparable to other client populations, and there was no evidence of persistent emotional engagement or habituation problems.

Investigating bang for your training buck: a randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of training clinicians in two core strategies of dialectical behavior therapy.

The present study examined the efficacy of online training (OLT), instructor-led training (ILT), and a treatment manual (TM) in training mental health clinicians in two core strategies of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT): chain analysis and validation. A randomized controlled trial compared OLT, ILT, and TM among clinicians naïve to DBT (N=172) who were assessed at baseline, post-training, and 30, 60, and 90 days following training. Primary outcomes included satisfaction, self-efficacy, motivation, knowledge, clinical proficiency, and clinical use. Overall, ILT outperformed OLT and TM in satisfaction, self-efficacy, and motivation, whereas OLT was the most effective method for increasing knowledge. The conditions did not differ in observer-rated clinical proficiency or self-reported clinical use, which both increased to moderate levels after training. In addition, ILT was particularly effective at improving motivation to use chain analysis, whereas OLT was particularly effective at increasing knowledge of validation strategies. These findings suggest that these types of brief, didactic trainings may be effective methods of increasing knowledge of new treatment strategies, but may not be sufficient to enable clinicians to achieve a high level of clinical use or proficiency. Additional research examining the possible advantages of matching training methods to types of treatment strategies may help to determine a tailored, more effective approach to training clinicians in empirically supported treatments.