The effects of heparin versus normal saline for maintenance of peripheral intravenous locks in pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two available preparations (heparin, 10 U/mL, 1 mL, vs. normal saline, 1 mL) used for maintaining patency in peripheral intravenous (IV) locks during pregnancy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and double-blind. Eligible patients who were to receive a peripheral intermittent IV lock were randomly assigned to receive either heparin flushes or normal saline flushes for IV lock maintenance. IV locks were flushed after each medication administration, or at least every 24 hours, with the assigned blinded flush solution. Intermittent IV lock sites were also evaluated every 12 hours for the development of phlebitis. SETTING: A large academic medical center in the Midwest that has both community-based and regional-referral obstetric practices with more than 2,000 deliveries per year. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample included 73 hospitalized pregnant women who were between 24 and 42 weeks gestation. Exclusions from the study were women with significant abnormalities in the fetal heart tracing on admission, cervical dilation > 4 cm, presence of hypersensitivity to heparin, presence of clotting abnormalities, and anticoagulation therapy (including low-dose aspirin). RESULTS: Data indicate there were no statistically significant differences in IV lock patency nor in phlebitis between heparin or normal saline flushes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support that both normal saline and heparin in the doses studied may be equally effective in the maintenance of peripheral IV locks. Due to small sample size, additional studies are needed to determine optimal therapy over time.

Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the relative efficacy and cost of three commercially available prostaglandin analogs, misoprostol (Cytotec), dinoprostone gel (Prepidil), and dinoprostone insert (Cervidil), as labor preinduction agents. STUDY DESIGN: One-hundred eleven women with an unfavorable cervix who underwent labor induction were assigned randomly to receive either misoprostol 50 microg every 6 hours for two doses, dinoprostone gel 0.5 mg every 6 hours for two doses, or dinoprostone insert 10 mg for one dose intravaginally. Twelve hours later, oxytocin induction was initiated per standardized protocol. Efficacy and cost of the labor preinduction/induction with the study treatments were compared. RESULTS: Mean Bishop score change (+/-SD) over the initial 12-hour interval was significantly greater in the misoprostol group (5.2 +/- 3.1) compared with the dinoprostone insert (3.2 +/- 2.3) or the dinoprostone gel groups (2.2 +/- 1.3, P <.0001). The proportion of women who reached complete dilation (68.4%, 50.0%, 51.4%, respectively; P =.14) and who were delivered (60.5%, 47.4%, 40.0%, respectively; P =.10) within 24 hours of the initiation of induction were not significantly different between the misoprostol, dinoprostone insert, and dinoprostone gel groups. Induction-to-delivery intervals, however, were significantly shorter among women who treated with misoprostol (24.0 +/- 10.8 hours) compared with either the dinoprostone gel (31.6 +/- 13.4 hours) or the dinoprostone insert (32.2 +/- 14.7 hours, P <.05). Overall mean cost per patient that was incurred by labor induction was significantly less for the misoprostol group ($1036.13) compared with the dinoprostone insert group ($1565.72) or the dinoprostone gel group ($1572.92, P <.0001). No significant differences were noted with respect to the mode of delivery or to the adverse maternal/neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: Misoprostol is more cost-effective than the comparable commercial dinoprostone prostaglandin preparations as an adjuvant to labor induction in women with an unfavorable cervix.

Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether vaginal pH has an effect on the efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-two women with an unfavorable cervix who were undergoing labor induction were enrolled in this prospective, double-blinded investigation. Initial vaginal pH and Bishop score assessment were made by an independent examiner. All women received cervical ripening with the dinoprostone gel 5 mg intracervically, with repeated dosing one time 6 hours later. Twelve hours later, oxytocin induction was initiated per standardized protocol, and outcome data were collected. RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) initial vaginal pH was 4.7 +/- 0.6 (range, 4.0-6.0) for the study cohort. No significant differences were noted between women with a high vaginal pH (>4.5, n = 16 women) and women with a low vaginal pH (< or =4.5, n = 16 women) with respect to maternal age, parity, gestational age, or initial Bishop score. Although Bishop score change over the initial 12 hours of cervical ripening did not significantly differ between the high vaginal pH (2.3 +/- 2.3) and the low vaginal pH group (2.3 +/- 2.5, P = not significant), time to active labor (19 +/- 10 hours vs 33 +/- 17 hours, P =.001), complete dilation (24 +/- 10 hours vs 37 +/- 19 hours, P =.03), and delivery (26 +/- 10 hours vs 38 +/- 18 hours, P =.02) were significantly shorter in women with a high vaginal pH compared with women with a low vaginal pH, respectively. A significant association was noted between vaginal pH and time to active labor (r = -0.52, P =.003), complete dilation (r = -0.50, P =.006), and delivery (r = -0.44, P =.01); however, pH was not significantly associated with Bishop score change during the initial 12 hours of cervical ripening. CONCLUSION: Vaginal pH is an important factor that affects the efficacy of the dinoprostone gel as an adjuvant for labor induction.