Teaching NICU Fellows How to Relay Difficult News Using a Simulation-Based Curriculum: Does Comfort Lead to Competence?

PROBLEM: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) clinicians must frequently relay difficult news to patient families, and the need for formal training for NICU trainees to develop this skill has been established. Although previous studies have shown improved trainee self-efficacy and comfort in handling difficult conversations after formal communication training, it remains unclear whether these interventions lead to improved objectively assessed short-term and long-term performance. INTERVENTION: A simulation-based intervention emphasizing the SPIKES protocol for delivery of bad news was implemented for 15 fellows in the 3-year Baylor College of Medicine Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine fellowship program in the 2013-2014 academic year. Simulations involved video-recorded encounters between each fellow and a standardized parent (SP) involving communication of difficult news. Each fellow was evaluated before (preintervention), immediately after (postintervention), and 3-4 months after the intervention (follow-up) with an (a) evaluation of video-recorded sessions by two expert raters blinded to the timing of the encounter (blinded rater evaluation [BRE]), (b) Self-Assessment Questionnaire, (c) Content Test evaluating knowledge of taught concepts, and (d) SP evaluation (SPE). CONTEXT: The 1st- and 2nd/3rd-year fellows participated in the study at separate times in the academic year to accommodate their schedules. First-year fellows had had more prior communication training and less NICU clinical experience than the 2nd/3rd-year fellows at the time of their intervention. OUTCOME: Although all fellows displayed improved Self-Assessment and Content Test scores at postintervention with retention at the follow-up assessment, the BREs showed no statistically significant improvement in postintervention scores and showed a decline in follow-up scores. First-year fellows had higher BRE postintervention scores than the senior fellows. SPEs showed no difference in scores at all 3 assessment stages. LESSONS LEARNED: As previously described in the literature, trainee self-efficacy and knowledge may improve in the short term and long term with a simulation-based curriculum in communication of difficult news. However, these results may be inconsistent with those of objective evaluations by expert raters and standardized parents. The impact of the curriculum may be heightened if it reinforces previously learned skills, but the effect may wane over time if not reinforced frequently with additional formal training or in the clinical setting. The results of this study highlight the importance of objective assessments in evaluating the utility of a simulation-based communication curriculum and the need for longitudinal curricula to promote retention of the concepts and skills being taught.

A Structured End-of-Life Curriculum for Neonatal-Perinatal Postdoctoral Fellows.

Death in tertiary care neonatal intensive care units is a common occurrence. Despite recent advances in pediatric palliative education, evidence indicates that physicians are poorly prepared to care for dying infants and their families. Numerous organizations recommend increased training in palliative and end-of-life care for pediatric physicians. The purpose of this study is to develop a structured end-of-life curriculum for neonatal-perinatal postdoctoral fellows based on previously established principles and curricular guidelines on end-of-life care in the pediatric setting. Results demonstrate statistically significant curriculum effectiveness in increasing fellow knowledge regarding patient qualification for comfort care and withdrawal of support (P = .03). Although not statistically significant, results suggest the curriculum may have improved fellows' knowledge of appropriate end-of-life medical management, comfort with addressing the family, and patient pain assessment and control.

Expanding the genotype-phenotype correlation in subtelomeric 19p13.3 microdeletions using high resolution clinical chromosomal microarray analysis.

Structural rearrangements of chromosome 19p are rare, and their resulting phenotypic consequences are not well defined. This is the first study to report a cohort of eight patients with subtelomeric 19p13.3 microdeletions, identified using clinical chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). The deletion sizes ranged from 0.1 to 0.86 Mb. Detailed analysis of the patients' clinical features has enabled us to define a constellation of clinical abnormalities that include growth delay, multiple congenital anomalies, global developmental delay, learning difficulties, and dysmorphic facial features. There are eight genes in the 19p13.3 region that may potentially contribute to the clinical phenotype via haploinsufficiency. Moreover, in silico genomic analysis of 19p13.3 microdeletion breakpoints revealed numerous highly repetitive sequences, suggesting LINEs/SINEs-mediated events in generating these microdeletions. Thus, subtelomeric 19p13.3 appears important for normal embryonic and childhood development. The clinical description of patients with deletions in this genomic interval will assist clinicians to identify and treat individuals with similar deletions.