Severe haemorrhages leading to a diagnosis of rare bleeding disorder occur at a very young age: A study from the FranceCoag network.

INTRODUCTION: In the context of severe unexplained haemorrhage (SH), it is usual to seek haematological evaluation and investigate for an inherited rare bleeding disorder (IRBD). In such circumstances, appropriate screen can discriminate between IRBD and suspected child abuse. Yet, little information is available about the frequency of SH in the population of patients with IRBD. AIM: To collect epidemiologic data about SH and IRBD. METHOD: The database of the FranceCoag network has collected information about IRBD since January 2004. Based on data gathered up to 16 March 2022, a retrospective search was conducted for of SH events having occurred before or at the time of IRBD diagnosis. Demographics and diagnosis circumstances were retrieved, as well as information about SH, defined as any life-threatening bleeding or intracranial haemorrhage. RESULTS: Among the 13,433 patients of the database, 109 (0.8%) fulfilled inclusion criteria including a known date of IRBD diagnosis, haemophilia A or B (HA/HB) being the most frequent (82.5%). IRBD was discovered as a consequence of an SH event in 82.6% of the cases while CNS was involved in 55%. Severe and moderate HA/HB and other severe IRBD presented significantly more intracranial haemorrhage (p < .02) and a lower age at diagnosis (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: These data support that any unusual SH should raise a suspicion of IRBD. Particularly before 1-year of age, it is suggested to first confirm moderate or severe haemophilia and severe IRBD by standard coagulation tests (APTT, PT and fibrinogen), combined with a clotting FXIII assay as first-line investigation. Subsequent assays of coagulation factors should be performed in the case of abnormal values, in second-line investigation.

Acquired haemophilia A in paediatric patients: A retrospective French cohort of eight cases.

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare haemorrhagic disease characterised by new-onset haemorrhagic symptoms associated with a dramatic decrease in factor VIII levels and an anti-factor VIII neutralising autoantibody concentration >0.6 Bethesda units. Elderly people are often affected, whereas children are rarely affected; the paediatric incidence reported in the literature is about 0.045 case/million/year. For some time, the paediatric standard of care has been that for adults, but clinicians have often reported poor outcomes. Here, we describe the largest retrospective paediatric AHA cohort assembled to date, including eight patients diagnosed in France from 2000 to 2020.

Pediatric intracranial empyema complicating otogenic and sinogenic infection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare clinical and microbiological features, surgical and medical management, and outcomes of children with otogenic and sinogenic intracranial empyema (IE) in an institution with an established multidisciplinary protocol. To use the study findings to inform and update the institutional algorithm. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was carried out on the electronic healthcare records of all children with oto-sinogenic IE admitted in a 5-year period. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were identified and treated according to an institutional protocol. Two distinct groups were identified: intracranial empyema related to otogenic infection (OI-IE, n = 36) or sinogenic infection (SI-IE, n = 40). SI-IE was seen in older children and had a significantly higher morbidity. Sub-dural IE was seen in a minority (n = 16) and only in SI-IE and required urgent collaborative ENT-neurosurgery. Extra-dural IE occurred more frequently and was seen in both SI-IE and OI-IE. No death and overall low morbidity were observed. Particularities found in SI-IE and OI-IE groups (as thrombosis, microbiology, antibiotic treatment, duration and outcome) permitted the delineation of these groups in our updated algorithm. CONCLUSION: The presence of a collaborative multidisciplinary protocol permits the step-wise co-ordination of care for these complex patients in our institution. All patients received prompt imaging, urgent surgical intervention, and antibiotic treatment. Microbiological identification was possible for each patient and antibiotic rationalization was permitted through use of Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in cases of sterile cultures. Of note, intracranial empyema related to sinogenic infection is shown to have significantly more severe clinical presentation, a higher morbidity, and a longer duration of antibiotic therapy than that related to otogenic infection. Study findings allowed for the update and clarification of the institutional protocol, which now clearly demarcates the clinical presentation, biological evidence, radiology, surgical and medical treatments in children with oto-sinogenic IE.