Body composition and chemotherapy toxicity among women treated for breast cancer: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Toxicity is a significant problem among women receiving systemic chemotherapy for breast cancer, with up to 60% experiencing hematologic and 14% experiencing non-hematologic toxicity. Chemotherapy is dosed using body surface area, which does not account for heterogeneity in lean body mass (LBM) and adipose tissue (AT). This systematic review, registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (#CRD42021279874), evaluates associations between body composition and chemotherapy-related toxicity during breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Scientific literature databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL) were systematically searched in November 2021 for studies evaluating associations between body composition (assessed using computed tomography or dual x-ray absorptiometry) and chemotherapy-related toxicity among women receiving breast cancer treatment. Eligibility was not limited by year or country of publication. Article screening and data abstraction was conducted using the Covidence Systematic Review Management System. Predetermined criteria were used to evaluate rigor of participant recruitment, representativeness of the population, and use of validated measures of body composition and toxicity. RESULTS: An inverse association between LBM and toxicity was reported in seven of the eight included studies, although definitions of low LBM differed across studies. Three studies evaluated the association between AT and chemotherapy toxicity with inconsistent findings. Heterogeneity in body composition measures/definitions and treatment regimens precluded the ability to perform meta-analyses. CONCLUSION: Low LBM appears to be a risk factor for chemotherapy toxicity, but the role of AT is unclear. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research that accounts for guideline concordance in chemotherapy prescriptions and the use of supportive care medications is needed.

Mapping outcomes for recovery of consciousness in studies from 1986 to 2020: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, heterogeneous outcome assessments have been used to measure recovery of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI), making it difficult to compare across studies. To date, however, there is no comprehensive review of clinical outcome assessments that are used in intervention studies of adults with DoC. The objective of this scoping review is to develop a comprehensive inventory of clinical outcome assessments for recovery of consciousness that have been used in clinical studies of adults with DoC following TBI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The methodological framework for this review is: (1) identify the research questions, (2) identify relevant studies, (3) select studies, (4) chart the data, (5) collate, summarise and report results and (6) consult stakeholders to drive knowledge translation. We will identify relevant studies by searching the following electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library (including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Methodology Register). Criteria for article inclusion are published in the English-language, peer-reviewed studies of interventions aimed at facilitating recovery of consciousness among adults (> 18 years) with DoC following a severe TBI, published from January 1986 to December 2020. Articles meeting inclusion criteria at this stage will undergo a full text review. We will chart the data by applying the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework to identify the content areas of clinical outcome assessments. To support knowledge translation efforts, we will involve clinicians and researchers experienced in TBI care throughout the project from conceptualisation of the study through dissemination of results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this study as it is not determined to be human subjects research. Results will be presented at national conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017058383.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Role of Chemotherapy in the Management of Adults With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Brain Tumors.

QUESTION 1: Should patients with brain metastases receive chemotherapy in addition to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for the treatment of their brain metastases? TARGET POPULATION: This recommendation applies to adult patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases amenable to both chemotherapy and radiation treatment. RECOMMENDATIONS: Level 1: Routine use of chemotherapy following WBRT for brain metastases is not recommended. Level 3: Routine use of WBRT plus temozolomide is recommended as a treatment for patients with triple negative breast cancer. QUESTION 2: Should patients with brain metastases receive chemotherapy in addition to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of their brain metastases? RECOMMENDATIONS: Level 1: Routine use of chemotherapy following SRS is not recommended. Level 2: SRS is recommended in combination with chemotherapy to improve overall survival and progression free survival in lung adenocarcinoma patients. QUESTION 3: Should patients with brain metastases receive chemotherapy alone? RECOMMENDATION: Level 1: Routine use of cytotoxic chemotherapy alone for brain metastases is not recommended as it has not been shown to increase overall survival.Please see the full-text version of this guideline (https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-treatment-adults-metastatic-brain-tumors/chapter_5) for the target population of each recommendation.

Creative Curriculum: The Experience of Writing and Teaching Formative Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (FOSCEs).

The launch of the revised medical school curriculum in fall 2014 provided new opportunities for librarians to collaborate with clinical faculty. As a result of past informatics instruction embedded in the first-year curriculum, librarians were invited to expand this content as part of a new Formative Objective Structured Clinical Examination (FOSCE) initiative. This article describes the stages of this project from writing and teaching the FOSCE informatics cases to improvements which were made after the first year. A description of the overall curriculum and information about lessons learned in each of these stages is included.

Rethinking library service to distance education students: analyzing the embedded librarian model.

Since fall 2009, reference librarians at The George Washington University's Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library have been embedded in online classes through Blackboard within the School of Nursing and School of Medicine and Health Sciences. The authors sought to determine the types of questions asked of the librarian, with the goal of informing future interactions with distance education classes to help develop a standard "protocol" for working with this population of students. Eighty-two questions were categorized and qualitatively analyzed. The findings have prompted librarians to explore tools such as Elluminate Live!, a tool that allows librarians to provide synchronous instruction within the Blackboard environment.