EMBRACE: One Small Story in Lupus-One Giant Challenge in Clinical Trials.

Clinical trials of novel therapeutics in the United States have not been adequately representative of diverse populations, particularly racial and ethnic minorities. The challenges and consequences of underrepresentation in clinical trial recruitment are exemplified by the case of belimumab, a biologic treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a disease that is more prevalent in patients of Black African ancestry and of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity than in other patient populations. Although belimumab was found to be effective in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in the general population, post hoc analyses of efficacy data in patients of Black African ancestry showed inconsistent results. Consequently, a cautionary statement regarding belimumab use in this population was added to the product label. To alleviate concerns that belimumab may not be safe and effective for patients of Black African ancestry, the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab in Black Race Patients with SLE (EMBRACE) study was conducted in a post-marketing commitment to the Food and Drug Administration. The study recruited only patients who self-identified as being of Black race; its findings led to the removal of the cautionary labeling of belimumab use in patients of Black African ancestry. Our manuscript highlights the critical lessons learned from the successes and failures of the EMBRACE study. It also provides suggestions for overcoming health disparities, highlighting strategies for conducting well-designed clinical trials to overcome systematic barriers to diversity in recruitment, with a focus on enacting long-term support to ensure equity in the process, products, and benefits from drug development and clinical trials.

Clinical trial diversity: An opportunity for improved insight into the determinants of variability in drug response.

Although the number of countries participating in pivotal trials submitted to enable drug registration has nearly doubled over the past 25 years, there has not been a substantial increase in the diversity of clinical trial populations. In parallel, our understanding of factors that influence medicine response and variability has continued to evolve. The notion of intrinsic and extrinsic sources of variability has been embedded into different regulatory guidelines, including the recent guideline on the importance of enhancing the diversity of clinical trial populations. In addition to presenting the clinical and scientific reasons for ensuring that clinical trial populations represent the demographics of patient populations, this overview outlines the efforts of regulatory agencies, patient advocacy groups and clinical researchers to attain this goal through strategies to meet representation in recruitment targets and broaden eligibility criteria. Despite these efforts, challenges to participation in clinical trials remain, and certain groups continue to be underrepresented in development programmes. These challenges are amplified when the representativeness of specific groups may vary across countries and regions in a global clinical programme. Whilst enhanced trial diversity is a critical step towards ensuring that results will be representative of patient populations, a concerted effort is required to characterise further the factors influencing interindividual and regional differences in response for global populations. Quantitative clinical pharmacology principles should be applied to allow extrapolation of data across groups or regions as well as provide insight into the effect of patient-specific characteristics on a medicine's dose rationale and efficacy and safety profiles.

Investigating the effect of TRPV4 inhibition on pulmonary-vascular barrier permeability following segmental endotoxin challenge.

BACKGROUND: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is associated with increased pulmonary-vascular permeability. In the lung, transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4), a Ca2+-permeable cation channel, is a regulator of endothelial permeability and pulmonary edema. We performed a Phase I, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, proof-of-mechanism study to investigate the effects of TRPV4 channel blocker, GSK2798745, on pulmonary-vascular barrier permeability using a model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung inflammation. METHODS: Healthy participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 2 single doses of GSK2798745 or placebo, 12 h apart. Two hours after the first dose, participants underwent bronchoscopy and segmental LPS instillation. Total protein concentration and neutrophil counts were measured in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples collected before and 24 h after LPS challenge, as markers of barrier permeability and inflammation, respectively. The primary endpoint was baseline adjusted total protein concentration in BAL at 24 h after LPS challenge. A Bayesian framework was used to estimate the posterior probability of any percentage reduction (GSK2798745 relative to placebo). Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram, clinical laboratory and haematological evaluations, and spirometry. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were dosed and 45 completed the study (22 on GSK2798745 and 23 on placebo). Overall, GSK2798745 was well tolerated. Small reductions in mean baseline adjusted BAL total protein (~9%) and neutrophils (~7%) in the LPS-challenged segment were observed in the GSK2798745 group compared with the placebo group; however, the reductions did not meet pre-specified success criteria of at least a 95% posterior probability that the percentage reduction in the mean 24-h post LPS BAL total protein level (GSK2798745 relative to placebo) exceeded zero. Median plasma concentrations of GSK2798745 were predicted to inhibit TRPV4 on lung vascular endothelial cells by ~70-85% during the 24 h after LPS challenge; median urea-corrected BAL concentrations of GSK2798745 were 3.0- to 8.7-fold higher than those in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: GSK2798745 did not affect segmental LPS-induced elevation of BAL total protein or neutrophils, despite blood and lung exposures that were predicted to be efficacious. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03511105.

IFN-gamma induces cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2 expression and enhances the responsiveness of human endothelial cells to cysteinyl leukotrienes.

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) are important mediators of cell trafficking and innate immune responses, involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory processes, i.e., atherosclerosis, pulmonary fibrosis, and bronchial asthma. The aim of this study was to examine the regulation of cysLT signaling by IFN-gamma in human primary endothelial cells. IFN-gamma increased cysLT receptor 2 (CysLTR2) mRNA expression and CysLTR2-specific calcium signaling in endothelial cells. IFN-gamma signaled through Jak/STAT1, as both AG490, a Jak2 inhibitor, and expression of a STAT1 dominant-negative construct, significantly inhibited CysLTR2 mRNA expression in response to IFN-gamma. To determine mechanisms of IFN-gamma-induced CysLTR2 expression, the human CysLTR2 gene structure was characterized. The CysLTR2 gene has a TATA-less promoter, with multiple transcription start sites. It consists of six variably spliced exons. Eight different CysLTR2 transcripts were identified in endothelial and monocytic cells. Gene reporter assay showed potent basal promoter activity of a putative CysLTR2 promoter region. However, there were no significant changes in gene reporter and mRNA t(1/2) assays in response to IFN-gamma, suggesting transcriptional control of CysLTR2 mRNA up-regulation by IFN-gamma response motifs localized outside of the cloned CysLTR2 promoter region. Stimulation of endothelial cells by cysLTs induced mRNA and protein expression of early growth response genes 1, 2, and 3 and cycloxygenase-2. This response was mediated by CysLTR2 coupled to G(q/11), activation of phospholipase C, and inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate, and was enhanced further 2- to 5-fold by IFN-gamma stimulation. Thus, IFN-gamma induces CysLTR2 expression and enhances cysLT-induced inflammatory responses.