Opioid use after outpatient elective general surgery: quantifying the burden of persistent use.

Purpose: Surgery is a major risk factor for chronic opioid use among patients who had not recently been prescribed opioids. This study identifies the rate of, and risk factors for, persistent opioid use following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open inguinal hernia repair in patients not recently prescribed opioids. Methods: This retrospective population-based cohort study included all patients who had not been prescribed opioids in the 6 months prior to undergoing open inguinal hernia repair or laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 2013 to July 2016 in Ontario. Opioid prescription was identified from the provincial Narcotics Monitoring System and data were obtained from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. The primary outcome was persistent opioid use after surgery (3, 6, 9 and 12 months). Associated risk factors and prescribing patterns were also examined. Results: Among the 90,326 patients in the study cohort, 80% filled an opioid prescription after surgery, with 11%, 9%, 5% and 1% filling a prescription at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively. Significant variability was identified in the type of opioid prescribed (41% codeine, 31% oxycodone, 18% tramadol) and in regional prescribing patterns (mean prescription/region range, 135-225 oral morphine equivalents). Predictors of continued opioid use included age, female gender, lower income quintile and being operated on by less experienced surgeons. Conclusion: Most patients who undergo elective cholecystectomy and hernia repair will fill a prescription for an opioid after surgery, and many will continue to fill opioid prescriptions for considerably longer than clinically anticipated. There is important variability in opioid type, regional prescribing patterns and risk factors that identify strategic targets to reduce the opioid burden in this patient population.

The Impact of Multidisciplinary Conferences on Treatment Plans for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Tertiary Canadian Centre.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary conference presentation may provide recommendations for diagnosis, monitoring and treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: A prospective observational study was completed evaluating if case presentation resulted in a direct change in management for patients presented over a 2-year period in a tertiary Canadian centre. Change in management was defined as hospital admission, surgery or surgical referral, start/change in biologic therapy or other medication or initiation of parenteral nutrition. Secondary outcomes included the involvement of specialists and other referrals. Data were analyzed using frequencies and means with standard deviations. RESULTS: In 63 multidisciplinary conferences, 181 patients were presented, of whom 136 patients met the inclusion criteria of inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's n = 45, ulcerative colitis n = 88, undifferentiated n = 3). The majority were outpatient cases 110 (81%). Indications included 71 (52%) patients presented for IBD management with diagnosis > 1 year, 37 (27%) with an acute IBD flare in a chronic patient (>1 year since diagnosis) and 24 (18%) with new diagnosis of IBD. Change in management was recommended in 35 (26%) patients. The most common change was referral to surgery in 17 (13%), surgery in 12 (9%) or change in biologic therapy 11 (8%). Compliance with the recommendations was 85%. There was frequent specialist involvement in case discussions (gastroenterologist 100%, surgeon 60%, radiologist 68% and pathologist 32%). CONCLUSIONS: Presentation of complex inflammatory bowel disease cases at multidisciplinary conference leads to a direct change in treatment in one quarter of cases, with surgical referral as the most frequent outcome.

The impact of a new hepatopancreatobiliary surgery program on the management of pancreatic cancer at Health Sciences North

Background: Centralization of specialist services to urban centres presents a challenge to patients living in rural communities. The hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (HPB) program at Health Sciences North (HSN) is the tenth and newest HPB centre by Cancer Care Ontario and presents a unique opportunity to evaluate the barriers to delivering HPB cancer care to patients in northern Ontario. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of patients referred to the Northeastern Ontario Cancer Centre and HSN with a pancreatic cancer diagnosis between 2009 and 2015. July 2013 marked the inception of the HPB surgical program. Our primary outcome was time to HPB surgical consultation. Secondary outcomes included distance of travel and time to curative intent operation. Results: Our population consisted of 207 patients (98 pre-HPB v. 109 post-HPB). Median time to consultation with an HPB surgeon was decreased in the post-HPB group (43 v. 11 d, p < 0.001). An increased proportion of patients with pancreatic malignancies in the post-HPB group received HPB surgical consultations (34% v. 74%, p < 0.001), with decreased median distance travelled to surgical consultation (411 v. 79 km, p < 0.001). Time to curative intent operation or medical oncology consultation did not significantly increase. Conclusion: A new HPB program appears to have facilitated the proportion of patients with pancreatic malignancies at HSN receiving an HPB surgical consultation. Patients received complex surgeries, closer to their home regions. It is anticipated that these changes may affect overall outcomes and patient satisfaction and will be the focus of future investigations.

Contexte: La concentration des services spécialisés dans les centres urbains pose un défi pour les patients des communautés rurales. Le programme de chirurgie hépatopancréatobiliaire (HPB) d'Horizon Santé-Nord (HSN) est le 10e et plus récent centre HPB d'Action Cancer Ontario; il offre une occasion unique d'évaluer les obstacles à la prestation des soins oncologiques HPB aux patients du Nord de l'Ontario. Méthodes: Nous avons passé en revue de manière rétrospective les cas adressés au Centre de cancérologie du Nord-Est de l'Ontario et à HSN pour un diagnostic de cancer du pancréas entre 2009 et 2015. Le programme chirurgical HPB a été lancé en juillet 2013. Notre principal paramètre était le délai d'obtention d'une consultation pour une chirurgie HPB. Les paramètres secondaires incluaient la distance à parcourir et le délai d'obtention d'une intervention à visée curative. Résultats: Notre population comportait 207 patients (98 pré-HPB c. 109 post-HPB). Le délai médian d'obtention de la consultation en chirurgie HPB a diminué dans le groupe post-HPB (43 j c. 11 j, p < 0,001). Une proportion plus grande de patients atteints de cancer du pancréas dans le groupe post-HPB a obtenu une consultation pour chirurgie HPB (34 % c. 74 %, p < 0,001), et une diminution de la distance médiane à parcourir pour se rendre à la consultation a été constatée (411 km c. 79 km, p < 0,001). Le délai d'obtention de la chirurgie à visée curative ou de la consultation en oncologie médicale n'a pas augmenté significativement. Conclusion: Le nouveau programme HPB semble avoir permis d'accroître la proportion de patients atteints de cancer du pancréas ayant pu bénéficier d'une consultation pour chirurgie HPB. Les patients ont pu subir des chirurgies complexes plus près de chez eux. On prévoit que ces modifications auront une incidence sur les paramètres globaux et la satisfaction des patients et qu'elles feront l'objet d'études.

The Standardization of Outpatient Procedure (STOP) Narcotics: A Prospective Health Systems Intervention to Reduce Opioid Use in Ambulatory Breast Surgery.

BACKGROUND: During the past 15 years, opioid-related overdose death rates for women have increased 471%. Many surgeons provide opioid prescriptions well in excess of what patients actually use. This study assessed a health systems intervention to control pain adequately while reducing opioid prescriptions in ambulatory breast surgery. METHODS: This prospective non-inferiority study included women 18-75 years of age undergoing elective ambulatory general surgical breast procedures. Pre- and postintervention groups were compared, separated by implementation of a multi-pronged, opioid-sparing strategy consisting of patient education, health care provider education and perioperative multimodal analgesic strategies. The primary outcome was average pain during the first 7 postoperative days on a numeric rating scale of 0-10. The secondary outcomes included medication use and prescription renewals. RESULTS: The average pain during the first 7 postoperative days was non-inferior in the postintervention group despite a significant decrease in median oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) prescribed (2.0/10 [100 OMEs] pre-intervention vs 2.1/10 [50 OMEs] post-intervention; p = 0.40 [p < 0.001]). Only 39 (44%) of the 88 patients in the post-intervention group filled their rescue opioid prescription, and 8 (9%) of the 88 patients reported needing an opioid for additional pain not controlled with acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) postoperatively. Prescription renewals did not change. CONCLUSION: A standardized pain care bundle was effective in minimizing and even eliminating opioid use after elective ambulatory breast surgery while adequately controlling postoperative pain. The Standardization of Outpatient Procedure Narcotics (STOP Narcotics) initiative decreases unnecessary and unused opioid medication and may decrease risk of persistent opioid use. This initiative provides a framework for future analgesia guidelines in ambulatory breast surgery.

Standardization of Outpatient Procedure (STOP) Narcotics: A Prospective Non-Inferiority Study to Reduce Opioid Use in Outpatient General Surgical Procedures.

BACKGROUND: There has been a dramatic rise in opioid abuse, and diversion of excess, unused prescriptions is a major contributor. We assess the impact of implementing a new standardized pain care bundle to reduce postoperative opioids in outpatient general surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority for the primary end point: patient-reported average pain in the first 7 postoperative days. We prospectively evaluated 224 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy or open hernia repair (inguinal, umbilical) pre-intervention to 192 patients post-intervention. We implemented a multimodal intra- and postoperative analgesic bundle, including promoting co-analgesia, opioid-reduced prescriptions, and patient education designed to clarify patient expectations. Patients completed a brief pain inventory at their first postoperative visit. Groups were compared using chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and independent samples t-test, where appropriate. RESULTS: No difference was seen in average postoperative pain scores in the pre- vs post-intervention groups (2.3 vs 2.1 of 10; p = 0.12). The reported quality of pain control improved post-intervention (good/very good pain control in 69% vs 85%; p < 0.001). The median total morphine equivalents for prescriptions filled in the post-intervention group were significantly less (100; interquartile range 75 to 116 pre-intervention vs 50; interquartile range 50 to 50 post-intervention; p < 0.001). Only 78 of 172 (45%) patients filled their opioid prescription in the post-intervention group (p < 0.001), with no significant difference in prescription renewals (3.5% pre-intervention vs 2.6% post-intervention; p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: For outpatient open hernia repair and cholecystectomy, a standardized pain care bundle decreased opioid prescribing significantly and frequently eliminated opioid use, and adequately treating postoperative pain and improving patient satisfaction.