Evaluation of the Role of a Clinical Pharmacist on Medication Management in an Adult Burn Clinic via a Collaborative Drug Therapy Management Protocol.

Historically, pharmacists have not been formally involved in managing burn clinic patients. Collaborative Drug Therapy Management (CDTM) protocols allow pharmacists working within a defined context to independently assume responsibility for direct patient care activities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the number and type of medication-related interventions made by a clinical pharmacist, in an adult burn clinic, via a CDTM protocol. The protocol allows pharmacists to independently manage the following disease states: pain, agitation, delirium, insomnia, venous thromboembolism, skin/soft tissue infections, and hypermetabolic complications. All pharmacist visits between 1/1/22 and 9/22/22 were included. A total of 16 patients were seen at 28 visits with a clinical pharmacist for a total of 148 interventions. Patients were mostly males (81%) with a mean ± SD age of 41 ± 15 years. The majority of patients were in-state (94%), with 9 (56%) being from an outlying county. Patients were seen for a median (IQR) of 2 (1,2) visits. Interventions were made at all visits (100%) with a median of 5 (4,6) per visit. Interventions (per visit) included medication reconciliation [28 (100%)], a median of 1 (0,2) medication ordered or adjusted, labs ordered at 7 (25%) visits, with adherence and patient education both reviewed at over 90% of visits. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first burn center to implement a Clinical Pharmacist CDTM Protocol, with a pharmacist directly impacting transitions of care. This may serve as a framework for other sites. Future directions include continuing to track data for medication adherence and access, billing/reimbursement, and clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Using Oxychlorosene versus Triple Antibiotic Solution for Pocket Irrigation.

Background: Breast pocket irrigation with antiseptic solutions is performed to reduce contamination with breast implants. The optimal antiseptic irrigation solution and the efficacy of individual practices are unclear. Oxychlorosene sodium is frequently used at our institution. Oxychlorosene is bactericidal with a mechanism of action of oxidation and hypochlorination. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of oxychlorosene sodium irrigation with triple antibiotic solution (TAS) in implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods: All patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction after mastectomy were reviewed. The primary predictive variable was type of solution used for pocket irrigation (TAS or oxychlorosene). Outcome variables included surgical site infection, device removal, and wound complications. Results: Between 2013 and 2018, 331 implant-based breast reconstructions were performed. Of these, 62% (n = 206) received oxychlorosene for surgical pocket irrigation (group I), and 38% (n = 125) received TAS (group II). Group I had an 11.7% (n = 24) 90-day surgical site infection rate, with 4.9% (n = 10) requiring oral antibiotics, 2.4% (n = 5) requiring intravenous antibiotics without device removal, and 4.4% (n = 9) requiring prosthetic removal. Group II had an 11.2% (n = 14) 90-day infection rate, with 5.6% (n = 7) requiring oral antibiotics, 2.4% (n = 3) requiring intravenous antibiotics without device removal, and 3.2% (n = 4) requiring removal (P = 0.90). When comparing the cost of oxychlorosene irrigation with TAS irrigation, oxychlorosene was less expensive. Conclusions: Oxychlorosene and TAS have similar surgical site infection rates in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Ease of preparation and cost make oxychlorosene a more favorable option for antibiotic irrigation in reconstructive breast surgery with prosthetic devices.

Care of the Critically Injured Burn Patient.

Care of the critically injured burn patient presents unique challenges to the intensivist. Certified burn centers are rare and geographically sparse, necessitating that much of the initial management of patients with severe burn injuries must happen in the pre-burn center setting. Severe burn injuries often lead to a wide range of complications that extend beyond the loss of skin integrity and require specialized care. As such, medical intensivists are often called on to stabilize these critically injured patients. This focused review outlines the clinical care of these medically complex patients, including airway management, postburn complications, volume resuscitation, nutrition, and end-of-life care.

Five-Year Retrospective Analysis of a Vented Mobility Algorithm in the Burn ICU.

Early mobilization with mechanically ventilated patients has received significant attention within recent literature; however, limited research has focused specifically on the burn population. The purpose of this single-center, retrospective analysis was to review the use of a burn critical care mobility algorithm, to determine the safety and feasibility of a burn vented mobility program, share limitations preventing mobility progression at our facility, and discuss unique challenges to vented mobility with intubated burn patients. A retrospective review was completed for all intubated burn center admissions between January 2015 and December 2019. Burn therapy notes were then reviewed for data collection, during the intubation period, using stages of the mobility algorithm. In the 5-year period following initial implementation, the vented mobility algorithm was utilized on 127 patients with an average TBSA of 22.8%. No adverse events occurred. Stage 1 (range of motion) was completed with 100% of patients (n = 127). Chair mode of bed, stage 2a, was utilized in 39.4% (n = 50) of patients, while 15.8% (n = 20) of patients were dependently transferred to the cardiac chair in stage 2b. Stage 3 (sitting on the edge of the bed) was completed with 25% (n = 32) of patients, with 11% (n = 14) progressing to stage 5 (standing), and 3.9% (n = 5) actively transferring to a chair. In the 5 years, only 4.7% (n = 6) reached stage 6 (ambulation). The most common treatment limitations were medical complications (33%) and line placement (21%). Early mobilization during mechanical ventilation is safe and feasible within the burn population, despite challenges, including airway stability, sedation, and line limitations.

Do Patient Expectations of Discharge Affect Length of Stay after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction?

BACKGROUND: Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a common method of breast reconstruction. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) postoperative protocols have been used to optimize patient outcomes and facilitate shorter hospital stays. The effect of patient expectations on length of stay (LOS) after DIEP has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patient expectations affect LOS. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction from 2017 to 2020. All patients were managed with the same ERAS protocol. Patients were divided in Group I (early expectations) and Group II (standard expectations). Group I patients had expectations set for discharge postoperative day (POD) 2 for unilateral DIEP and POD 3 for bilateral DIEP. Group II patients were given expectations for POD 3 to 4 for unilateral DIEP and POD 4 to 5 for bilateral. The primary outcome variable was LOS. RESULTS: The study included 215 DIEP flaps (45 unilateral and 85 bilateral). The average age was 49.8 years old, and the average body mass index (BMI) was 31.4. Group I (early expectations) included 56 patients (24 unilateral DIEPs, 32 bilateral). Group II (standard expectations) had 74 patients (21 unilateral, 53 bilateral). LOS for unilateral DIEP was 2.9 days for Group I compared with 3.7 days for Group II (p = 0.004). Group I bilateral DIEP patients had LOS of 3.5 days compared with 3.9 days for Group II (p = 0.02). Immediate timing of DIEP (Group I 42.9 vs. Group II 52.7%) and BMI (Group I 32.1 vs. Group II 30.8) were similar (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Our study found significantly shorter hospital stay after DIEP flap for patients who expected an earlier discharge date despite similar patient characteristics and uniform ERAS protocol. Patient expectations should be considered during patient counseling and as a confounding variable when analyzing ERAS protocols.

The False Positive Rate of Transcutaneous Tissue Oximetry Alarms in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction Rises after 24 Hours.

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous tissue oximetry is widely used as an adjunct for postoperative monitoring after microvascular breast reconstruction. Despite a high sensitivity at detecting vascular issues, alarms from probe malfunctions/errors can generate unnecessary nursing calls, concerns, and evaluations. The purpose of this study is to analyze the false positive rate of transcutaneous tissue oximetry monitoring over the postoperative period and assess changes in its utility over time. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction at our institution with monitoring using transcutaneous tissue oximetry were assessed between 2017 and 2019. Variables of interest were transcutaneous tissue oximetry alarms, flap loss, re-exploration, and salvage rates. RESULTS: The study included 175 patients (286 flaps). The flap loss rate was 1.0% (3/286). Twelve patients (6.8%) required re-exploration, with 9 patients found to have actual flap compromise (all within 24 hours). The salvage rate was 67.0%. The 3 takebacks after 24 hours were for bleeding concerns rather than anastomotic problems. Within the initial 24-hour postoperative period, 43 tissue oximetry alarms triggered nursing calls; 7 alarms (16.2%) were confirmed to be for flap issues secondary to vascular compromise. After 24 hours, none of the 44 alarms were associated with flap compromise. The false positive rate within 24 hours was 83.7% (36/43) compared with 100% (44/44) after 24 hours (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The transcutaneous tissue oximetry false positive rate significantly rises after 24 hours. The benefit may not outweigh the concerns, labor, and effort that results from alarms after postoperative day 1. We recommend considering discontinuing this monitoring after 24 hours.

A prospective analysis describing the innovative use of liposomal bupivacaine in burn patients.

Burn patients frequently require autograft harvesting to facilitate wound healing, often resulting in significant pain. Liposomal bupivacaine is indicated for administration into a surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy, safety, and duration of postoperative analgesia with liposomal bupivacaine for donor site pain in burn patients. This was an observational, case-control study including adult patients with <20% total body surface area (TBSA) burned who received liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management after autograft harvesting from lower extremity donor site(s). Patients from the case group were matched to historical control patients treated with traditional pain management. The primary outcome was the cumulative pain scores on postoperative day one measured by the area under the curve (AUC0-24). Secondary outcomes included AUC0-72, total milligram morphine equivalents (MME), length of stay, and adverse events. Data were collected in 36 patients who received liposomal bupivacaine, with 21 patients eligible for matching to historical controls. Patients included in the intervention and control groups were well-matched at baseline. Patients in the intervention group had a significantly lower median (IQR) AUC0-24 [578 (408,740) vs. 680 (544,803); p = 0.05] and shorter length of stay [4 days (1,9.5) vs. 6 days (318); p = 0.01]. No differences in adverse events related to the administration of liposomal bupivacaine or opioid-related adverse events were observed. Results indicate liposomal bupivacaine is safe and effective in burn patients. The results of this study add to the limited body of literature examining efficacy in this population.

Risk Factors and Prevalence of QTc Prolongation in Adult Burn Patients Receiving Methadone.

Methadone is an opioid commonly used for acute pain management in burn patients. One adverse effect of methadone is QTc interval prolongation, which may be associated with adverse cardiac outcomes. There is currently a paucity of data regarding risk of QTc prolongation in burn patients taking methadone and a lack of evidence-based recommendations for monitoring strategies in this population. The study objective was to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and cardiac outcomes related to methadone-associated QTc prolongation in adult burn patients. A total of 91 patients were included and were divided into groups according to maximum QTc. QTc prolongation was defined as greater than or equal to 470 ms (males) or 480 ms (females). There were no differences between groups regarding patient-specific risk factors, baseline QTc, or time to longest QTc. Patients in the prolonged QTc group had a higher rate of cardiac events (44% vs 9%; P < .001), higher median (IQR) change from baseline to longest QTc (61 ms [18,88] vs 23 ms [13,38]; P < .001), higher median (IQR) total daily dose of methadone (90 mg [53,98] vs 53 mg [30,75]; P = .004), and longer median (IQR) length of stay (53 [33,82] vs 35 [26,52] days; P = .008). QTc prolongation in burn patients was associated with increased methadone dose and resulted in a higher rate of cardiac events. This study was the first of its kind to look at risk factors and cardiac outcomes associated with methadone use in burn patients.

Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction with Unilateral Deep Superior Epigastric Artery and Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Flaps.

Autologous breast reconstruction utilizing a perforator flap is an increasingly popular method for reducing donor site morbidity and implant-related complications. However, aberrant anatomy not readily visible on computed tomography angiography is a rare albeit real risk when undergoing perforator flap reconstruction. We present an operative case of a patient who successfully underwent a bilateral breast reconstruction sourced from a unilateral abdominal flap divided into deep superior epigastric artery and superficial circumflex iliac artery flap segments.

Pediatric burns: Kids' Inpatient Database vs the National Burn Repository.

OBJECTIVE: Burn injuries are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in young children. The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) and National Burn Repository (NBR) are two large national databases that can be used to evaluate outcomes and help quality improvement in burn care. Differences in the design of the KID and NBR could lead to differing results affecting resultant conclusions and quality improvement programs. This study was designed to validate the use of KID for burn epidemiologic studies, as an adjunct to the NBR. METHODS: Using the KID (2003, 2006, and 2009), a total of 17,300 nonelective burn patients younger than 20 y old were identified. Data from 13,828 similar patients were collected from the NBR. Outcome variables were compared between the two databases. RESULTS: Comparisons revealed similar patient distribution by gender, race, and burn size. Inhalation injury was more common among the NBR patients and was associated with increased mortality. The rates of respiratory failure, wound infection, cellulitis, sepsis, and urinary tract infection were higher in the KID. Multiple regression analysis adjusting for potential confounders demonstrated similar mortality rate but significantly longer length of stay for patients in the NBR. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in the design and sampling of the KID and NBR, the overall demographic and mortality results are similar. The differences in complication rate and length of stay should be explored by further studies to clarify underlying causes. Investigations into these differences should also better inform strategies to improve burn prevention and treatment.