Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 63(4): 473-478, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31332941

RESUMEN

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) has a number of uses including the work-up of inconclusive findings on mammography, assessment of breast symptoms, cancer staging, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recently as an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in high-risk screening. CESM can be swiftly incorporated into the workflow of busy breast clinics. We share our experiences with CESM at a large breast assessment centre in Western Australia.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Mamografía/métodos , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Australia Occidental
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 116(7): 1017-21, 2015 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26251004

RESUMEN

A 256-slice coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is an accurate method for detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease (OBS-CAD). However, accurate image interpretation requires expertise and may not be available at all hours. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a fully automated computer-assisted diagnosis (COMP-DIAG) tool for exclusion of OBS-CAD in patients in the emergency department (ED) presenting with chest pain. Three hundred sixty-nine patients in ED without known coronary disease underwent 256-slice CCTA as part of the assessment of chest pain of uncertain origin. COMP-DIAG (CorAnalyzer II) automatically reported presence or exclusion of OBS-CAD (>50% stenosis, ≥1 vessel). Performance characteristics of COMP-DIAG for exclusion and detection of OBS-CAD were determined using expert reading as the reference standard. Seventeen (5%) studies were unassessable by COMP-DIAG software, and 352 patients (1,056 vessels) were therefore available for analysis. COMP-DIAG identified 33% of assessable studies as having OBS-CAD, but the prevalence of OBS-CAD on CCTA was only 18% (66 of 352 patients) by standard expert reading. However, COMP-DIAG correctly identified 61 of the 66 patients (93%) with OBS-CAD with 21 vessels (2%) with OBS-CAD misclassified as negative. In conclusion, compared to expert reading, automated computer-assisted diagnosis using the CorAnalyzer showed high sensitivity but only moderate specificity for detection of obstructive coronary disease in patients in ED who underwent 256-slice CCTA. The high negative predictive value of this computer-assisted algorithm may be useful in the ED setting.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/métodos , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Oclusión Coronaria/complicaciones , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA