The Utility of the Oncotype DX Test for Breast Cancer Patients in an Australian Multidisciplinary Setting.

Introduction: The Oncotype DX test is a genomic assay that generates a Recurrence Score (RS) predicting the 10-year risk of recurrence and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. The aims were to determine breast cancer distant recurrence and correlate with adjuvant chemoendocrine prescribing patterns based on the Oncotype DX recurrence score. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-institution case series of 71 patients who had Oncotype DX assay testing after definitive surgery between 2012 and 2016. Both node-positive and node-negative patients were included. Patients were divided into Oncotype DX low risk (RS < 11) (n = 10, 14%), intermediate risk (RS 11-25) (n = 45, 63%), and high risk (RS > 25) (n = 16, 23%). Median follow-up was 6.1 years (range 4-8.9 years). Adjuvant treatment regimens and oncological outcomes were determined. Results. Mean age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 33-77). Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) accounted for the majority (87%), with most tumors measuring between 10-20 mm (52%). 48% of the cohort were node positive. 15 of 16 high-risk patients (94%) received chemotherapy. 96% of intermediate-risk patients received endocrine therapy alone, one patient received chemoendocrine therapy (2%), and one declined systemic therapy (2%). In the low-risk group, 100% received endocrine therapy only. The high-risk group had the lowest mean ER% (P < 0.05), greatest mean mitotic rate (P < 0.05), and greatest proportion of Ki67% > 14. Five patients developed distant recurrence (7%): three from the intermediate-risk group (7%), one from the low-risk group (10%), and one from the high-risk group (6%). Conclusion: This is the first Australian study reporting the experience with medium-term recurrence outcomes of using the Oncotype DX assay in breast cancer. Chemotherapy was rarely given for patients with low-to-intermediate RS and always offered in high RS. This pattern of prescribing was associated with low rates of distant recurrence. National funding models should be considered.

Elevating CDCA3 Levels Enhances Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Sensitivity in TKI-Resistant EGFR Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the first-line therapy for non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) that harbour sensitising mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, resistance remains a key issue, with tumour relapse likely to occur. We have previously identified that cell division cycle-associated protein 3 (CDCA3) is elevated in adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and correlates with sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. Herein, we explored whether CDCA3 levels were associated with EGFR mutant LUAD and TKI response. We demonstrate that in a small-cohort tissue microarray and in vitro LUAD cell line panel, CDCA3 protein levels are elevated in EGFR mutant NSCLC as a result of increased protein stability downstream of receptor tyrosine kinase signalling. Here, CDCA3 protein levels correlated with TKI potency, whereby CDCA3high EGFR mutant NSCLC cells were most sensitive. Consistently, ectopic overexpression or inhibition of casein kinase 2 using CX-4945, which pharmacologically prevents CDCA3 degradation, upregulated CDCA3 levels and the response of T790M(+) H1975 cells and two models of acquired resistance to TKIs. Accordingly, it is possible that strategies to upregulate CDCA3 levels, particularly in CDCA3low tumours or upon the emergence of therapy resistance, might improve the response to EGFR TKIs and benefit patients.

Demonstrating the feasibility of collecting secondary, de-identified data on Australian patients receiving treatment as part of a Medicine Access Programme.

BACKGROUND: In Australia, data generated from the carefully selected, treated and monitored patients enrolled in clinical trials largely inform routine care and funding approvals. Medicine Access Programmes (MAP) enable drug access and while potentially a rich source of data, historically have not collected data beyond a participant list. AIMS: To explore the feasibility of using MAP to identify patient populations for inclusion in non-interventional studies. METHODS: Clinicians affiliated with the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute engaged with Roche to implement PeRSIA, a secondary data use non-interventional study of patients receiving neoadjuvant pertuzumab for non-metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. The study utilised a pre-existing Roche-sponsored MAP to identify clinicians as data contributors. Data security, ownership and reporting issues were addressed utilising the BioGrid platform and standards developed for existing Walter and Eliza Hall Institute registries. Disease experts developed project-specific Case Report Forms documenting treatment, surgical and cancer-specific outcomes, and adverse events. RESULTS: To date, 12 of 16 (75%) clinicians approached to participate in PeRSIA are contributing de-identified data. From February through September 2018, data on 41 patients from seven centres were collected. Median patient age is 56 years (range 36-81), 36 (88%) had Stage 2 to 3 disease and 27 (66%) were node positive. The median number of cycles of neoadjuvant pertuzumab planned was 4. CONCLUSIONS: This initial report is, to our knowledge, the first description of a secondary data use non-interventional study collecting comprehensive data on patients enrolled, independently, in a MAP. This effort continues and opportunities with other industry partners are being pursued.

Pathological outcomes of HER2-positive non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant dual anti-HER2 therapy and taxane: An Australian experience.

AIMS: Internationally, there has recently been growing interest in the use of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with non-metastatic HER-2 positive breast cancer following the NEOSPHERE trial in 2012. However, pertuzumab is currently not funded by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in Australia for use in this setting. The authors sought to assess the clinical and pathological response rates at the time of surgery in patients who received neoadjuvant dual anti-HER2 and taxane therapy in a multidisciplinary breast cancer unit. METHODS: A retrospective case series of all patients treated with the neoadjuvant therapy, and who had definitive surgery was conducted. Demographic data, size, grade, tumor type, receptor status prior to neoadjuvant treatment, pathological complete response (pCR) rates, and adverse effects were analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included in the study. Sixty-eight percent of all patients achieved pCR, of which 54% further demonstrated no residual ductal carcinoma in situ. Eight patients (42%) had N1 disease pretreatment, of these 88% demonstrated total pCR in the axilla and the breast. Most adverse effects to treatment were manageable grade 1-2 side effects. CONCLUSION: This is the first reported Australian experience using neoadjuvant dual anti-HER2 and taxane therapy for HER-2 positive nonmetastatic breast cancer. The authors have demonstrated favorable pCR rates for invasive disease compared to the NEOSPHERE trial (68% vs 46%), with reasonable patient tolerability. Larger collaborative data sets are required to fully evaluate correlation of pCR with survival outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. National funding models need to be considered.

Incidence and outcomes of pregnancy-associated melanoma in New South Wales 1994-2008.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about the interaction between melanoma and pregnancy. There is a lack of Australian data on pregnancy outcomes associated with melanoma in pregnancy, despite Australia having the highest incidence of melanoma in the world. AIMS: Describe trends, maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes associated with pregnancy-associated melanoma in New South Wales. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Population-based cohort study of all births (n = 1 309 501) of at least 20-week gestation or 400 g birthweight in New South Wales, 1994-2008. Logistic regression was used to analyse the association between melanoma in pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. RESULTS: 577 pregnancy-associated melanomas were identified, including 195 diagnosed during pregnancy and 382 diagnosed within 12 months postpartum. The crude incidence of pregnancy-associated melanoma increased from 37.1 per 100 000 maternities in 1994 to 51.84 per 100 000 maternities in 2008. Adjusting for maternal age accounted for the trend in pregnancy-associated melanoma. Melanomas diagnosed in pregnancy were thicker (median = 0.75 mm) than melanomas diagnosed postpartum (median = 0.60 mm) (P = 0.002). Pregnancy-associated melanoma was associated with the increased risk of large-for-gestational-age infant but not preterm birth, planned birth, caesarean section or stillbirth. Parity was inversely associated with pregnancy-associated melanoma, as women with three or more previous pregnancies had 0.59 times the odds of pregnancy-associated melanoma compared to nulliparous women (95% CI 0.42-0.84, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pregnancy-associated melanoma has increased with increasing maternal age. The observation of thicker melanomas in pregnancy and increased risk of large-for-gestational-age infants may suggest a role for growth-related pregnancy factors in pregnancy-associated melanoma.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis remains a significant cause of morbidity and is a marker of poor prognosis in a range of malignancies, including those of the gastrointestinal and gynaecological tracts. In these cases, regional therapy has been explored as a treatment strategy to take advantage of the prolonged confinement of such tumours within the peritoneal cavity and the steep dose-response relationship for most cytotoxic agents. The pharmacokinetic rationale is based on exploiting the peritoneal-plasma barrier, which slows the rate of drug clearance from the peritoneal to systemic compartments and creates a concentration differential in favour of the peritoneal cavity. This allows higher drug concentrations, and thus increased cytotoxicity, to be achieved at the site of a tumour within the peritoneal cavity. There is pharmacodynamic evidence from a number of clinical trials to support the translation of these pharmacokinetic advantages of intraperitoneal chemotherapy into clinical benefit. However, its clinical application remains controversial because of concerns regarding intraperitoneal drug distribution, technical challenges and toxicity associated with regional drug delivery and the clinical relevance of the studies undertaken. The purpose of this review is to summarize the pharmacokinetic rationale of intraperitoneal drug delivery, review the pharmacodynamic studies performed in ovarian, colorectal and gastric cancers, and outline the future directions and challenges in the clinical application of this mode of treatment.