Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 61(4): 456-63, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25844709

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Amino acid-based formulas (AAFs) are recommended for children with cow's-milk allergy (CMA) failing to respond to extensively hydrolysed formulas (eHFs). We evaluated the effects of a new thickened AAF (TAAF, Novalac), containing a pectin-based thickener, and a reference AAF (RAAF, Neocate) on allergy symptoms and safety, through blood biochemistry analysis and growth. METHODS: Infants (ages < 18 months) with CMA symptoms failing to respond to eHFs were randomised in a double-blind manner to receive TAAF or RAAF for 3 months. All of the infants were then fed TAAF for 3 additional months. Paediatric visits occurred at 1, 3, and 6 months. Blood samples were collected at inclusion and 3 months. RESULTS: Results at 1 month were previously described. The 75 infants with proven CMA and eHF intolerance tolerated their allocated formula. At 3 months, the dominant allergic symptom had disappeared in 76.2% of the infants with TAAF and in 51.5% of the infants with RAAF (P = 0.026). The Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index significantly improved more with TAAF than with RAAF (-27.3 ±â€Š2.3 vs -20.8 ±â€Š2.2, P = 0.048). Of the infants, 92.9% had normal stools (soft or formed consistency) with TAAF vs 75.8% with RAAF (P = 0.051). More infants in TAAF group had better quality of nighttime sleep (P = 0.036) and low frequency of irritability signs (P < 0.001). With both formulas, all of the biochemical parameters were within normal ranges. There were no differences between the 2 groups in any of the anthropometric z scores. CONCLUSIONS: The new TAAF was tolerated by all of the infants with CMA and intolerance to eHFs. Anthropometric and clinical data showed that both formulas were safe.


Asunto(s)
Aminoácidos/administración & dosificación , Desarrollo Infantil , Conducta del Lactante , Fórmulas Infantiles , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/dietoterapia , Hidrolisados de Proteína/efectos adversos , Aminoácidos/efectos adversos , Aminoácidos/análisis , Aminoácidos/química , Bélgica , Biomarcadores/análisis , Carbohidratos/efectos adversos , Carbohidratos/química , Estudios de Cohortes , Grasas de la Dieta/efectos adversos , Fibras de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Fibras de la Dieta/análisis , Método Doble Ciego , Neurotoxina Derivada del Eosinófilo/análisis , Heces/química , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Francia , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/inmunología , Humanos , Lactante , Fórmulas Infantiles/química , Masculino , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/microbiología , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/fisiopatología , Pectinas/química , Viscosidad
2.
Paediatr Drugs ; 16(6): 513-22, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25446768

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Amino-acid-based formulas (AAFs) are recommended for children with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) failing to respond to extensively hydrolyzed formulas (eHFs). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the tolerance/hypoallergenicity and efficacy of a thickened AAF (TAAF) in these infants. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (NCT01940068) compared 3-month feeding with a pectin-based TAAF (Novalac(®), United Pharmaceuticals, Paris, France) and a commercially available "reference" AAF (RAAF; Neocate(®), Nutricia, Germany) in infants aged <18 months with CMPA and persistent allergy symptoms with eHF feeding. Reported here are the results of an interim analysis after 1 month of feeding. RESULTS: Of the 86 infants randomized, CMPA with eHF intolerance was confirmed in 75 infants; all of them tolerated the allocated AAFs. The major allergic symptom disappeared within 1 month in 61.9 and 51.5 % and regurgitations disappeared in 66.7 and 42.3 % of infants who received TAAF and RAAF, respectively. Infants had significantly more normal stools (soft or formed consistency) with the TAAF (90.5 vs. 66.7 %; p = 0.011). From baseline, daily family life significantly improved with both AAFs: crying time decreased by 97.3 (p < 0.001) and 28.6 min (p = 0.014) and sleeping time increased by 64.6 (p = 0.009) and 29.0 min with TAAF and RAAF, respectively. At day 30, weight and body mass index z-score gains were 0.1 and 0.2 with TAAF and 0.2 and 0.0 with RAAF. CONCLUSION: Both AAFs were well tolerated by infants with CMPA and eHF intolerance and ensured appropriate growth, with the TAAF providing additional comfort.


Asunto(s)
Aminoácidos/administración & dosificación , Carbohidratos/administración & dosificación , Grasas de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Fórmulas Infantiles/administración & dosificación , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/terapia , Hidrolisados de Proteína/administración & dosificación , Aminoácidos/efectos adversos , Animales , Carbohidratos/efectos adversos , Bovinos , Grasas de la Dieta/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Hidrolisados de Proteína/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...