Innovations in Surgical Communication-Provide Your Opinion, Don't Hide It.

This Viewpoint discusses why surgeons should reveal their initial impressions about surgery so that they can move forward in a space of deliberation to consider whether their inclination makes sense for the patient.

Evaluation of Prescribing Patterns Following Surgical Procedures in Opioid Naïve Patients at a Veterans Affairs Teaching Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate facility postoperative opioid prescribing patterns in comparison to published guidelines and adherence to opioid safety mandates. METHODS: This quality analysis was performed between November 2019 and March 2020. Patients were identified to have been opioid naïve prior to receiving a new opioid prescription postoperatively during the study period. Patient charts were reviewed, and patients were contacted to collect desired data. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate distributions of morphine equivalent daily dose and opioid day supply prescribed across study subpopulations. RESULTS: Ninety-four of 100 prescriptions evaluated were determined to be within quantity or duration recommendations of the selected guideline. Statistical analysis found no significantly different distributions between the duration and quantity of opioid prescribed at discharge and patient-specific risk factors. Forty-eight patients did not use the entire quantity of the initial opioid prescription dispensed. Of those patients, 26 still had opioids within the home. Opioid risk review documentation was completed in 19 of 65 patients indicated for documentation. CONCLUSION: Most opioid prescriptions provided within the study period aligned with recommendations from author-selected guidelines. However, a review of risk prior to opioid prescribing frequently was not performed. The number of patients utilizing less than 50% of prescribed opioids, and few refills indicate that reductions in opioids prescribed would improve safety for both patients and the surrounding community without increasing the risk for the under-treatment of postoperative pain. Improved prescribing habits and patient safety will be targeted through provider education regarding risk review documentation in opioid naïve patients.

Association Between Marital Status and Racial Disparities in Esophageal Cancer Care.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the impact of marital status on racial disparities in esophageal cancer care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data collected from the state cancer registry maintained by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. We identified patients with an esophageal cancer diagnosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013. χ2 test and logistics regression were used to analyze 6,809 patients who met our eligibility criteria. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ .05. RESULTS: Approximately 88.4% of our patients were White and 11.6% were Black. A significantly higher number of White patients were married when compared with Blacks (62.9% v 31.8%, respectively; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in cancer staging between the 2 groups (P = .0671). Married Blacks had similar rates of esophagectomy, chemotherapy, and radiation as married Whites. Both single groups had lower rates of esophagectomy and chemotherapy than married Whites, but single Blacks were the least likely to undergo esophagectomy. Single patients were more likely to refuse treatment. CONCLUSION: Marital status differs significantly in Black and White patients with esophageal cancer and may help explain racial disparities in cancer care. Further research is needed to explore reasons for care underutilization in single patients and whether these differences translate into clinical outcomes.

Gender Disparity in Referral for Definitive Care of Malignant Pleural Effusions.

BACKGROUND: Gender disparities exist in cancer care. Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) carry a poor prognosis and are managed by different physicians. This study sought to evaluate referral patterns and gender differences for definitive treatment and outcomes of MPE patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with MPE from 1999 to 2015 at a quaternary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed to obtain patient history, referral to thoracic surgery for definitive management, and outcomes. Analysis was performed using chi-squared/Fisher's exact test, logistic regression models, and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 224/686 patients (32.7%) were referred to thoracic surgery. No survival difference existed between referral and nonreferral groups or referred patients who received or did not receive pleurodesis. 405 patients (59.0%) were women. Women were statistically significantly less likely to be referred than men (27.9% versus 39.5%, P = 0.0014). This disparity persisted when comorbidities were controlled for (P = 0.0004) and when gynecologic cancers (e.g., uterine, ovarian, but not including breast; 55 female patients) were excluded from analysis (28.9% versus 39.5%, P = 0.0049). Women had statistically significantly more thoracenteses (3.34 versus 2.19, P < 0.0001) and improved survival compared with males (median survival = 136 d versus 54; P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Gender disparity exists in referral patterns for definitive management of MPE; women are less likely to be referred than men. Women have longer survival and a greater number of thoracenteses performed, despite a lower referral rate for definitive care. Further research is needed to understand the differences in referral rates and outcomes between men and women.