A prospective single-blind randomised clinical trial comparing two treatment tables for the initial management of mild decompression sickness.

INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence suggests that shorter recompression schedules may be as efficacious as the US Navy Treatment Table 6 (USN TT6) for treatment of milder presentations of decompression sickness (DCS). This study aimed to determine if divers with mild DCS could be effectively treated with a shorter chamber treatment table. METHODS: All patients presenting to the Fremantle Hospital Hyperbaric Medicine Unit with suspected DCS were assessed for inclusion. Participants with mild DCS were randomly allocated to receive recompression in a monoplace chamber via either a modified USN TT6 (TT6m) or a shorter, custom treatment table (FH01). The primary outcome was the number of treatments required until resolution or no further improvement (plateau). RESULTS: Forty-one DCS cases were included, 21 TT6m and 20 FH01. Two patients allocated to FH01 were moved to TT6m mid-treatment due to failure to significantly improve (as per protocol), and two TT6m required extensions. The median total number of treatments till symptom resolution was 1 (IQR 1-1) for FH01 and 2 (IQR 1-2) for TT6m (P = 0.01). More patients in the FH01 arm (17/20, 85%) showed complete symptom resolution after the initial treatment, versus 8/21 (38%) for TT6m (P = 0.003). Both FH01 and TT6m had similar overall outcomes, with 19/20 and 20/21 respectively asymptomatic at the completion of their final treatment (P = 0.97). In all cases where two-week follow-up contact was made, (n = 14 FH01 and n = 12 TT6m), patients reported maintaining full symptom resolution. CONCLUSIONS: The median total number of treatments till symptom resolution was meaningfully fewer with FH01 and the shorter treatment more frequently resulted in complete symptom resolution after the initial treatment. There were similar patient outcomes at treatment completion, and at follow-up. We conclude that FH01 appears superior to TT6m for the treatment of mild decompression sickness.

Job satisfaction of rural medical interns: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To study reasons for job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among interns. DESIGN: Using a qualitative methodology, one-to-one interviews were conducted with interns. SETTING: The study was based at a Victorian Rural Intern Training program. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve interns from the program were interviewed during their final rotation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reasons for job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among rural interns. RESULTS: Reasons for job satisfaction included feeling supported in the workplace as well as getting quality supervision, teaching and clinical exposure. Reasons for job dissatisfaction included poor access to administration, unduly stressful working situations, lack of support for mental health and well-being, and poorly organised teaching sessions. CONCLUSION: The internship experience, together with the people they are influenced by, can determine a doctor's future career pathway. It is therefore vital for internship coordinators and hospital managers to facilitate a positive internship experience. The findings have implications for human resource management policy and practice in rural hospitals.