Impact of left bundle branch block or permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve replacement on mid-term left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances have uncertain implications for long-term left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to examine LVEF changes in patients up to two years post-TAVR. METHODS: We examined patients who underwent TAVR between 2012 and 2020 and underwent echocardiography follow-up. Patients were categorized into four groups: 1) Those without a permanent pacemaker (PPM) or left bundle branch block (LBBB) pre- or post-TAVR; 2) Patients with pre- and post-TAVR LBBB; 3) Individuals with preexisting PPM; and 4) Patients requiring new PPM after TAVR. LVEF was assessed at the outset of TAVR, at 30 days, 1-year, and 2-years post-TAVR. RESULTS: The study included 730 patients: 421 (57.6 %) without conduction abnormalities, 151 (20.7 %) with post-TAVR LBBB (48 pre-existing, 103 new-onset), 63 (8.6 %) with pre-existing PPM, and 95 (13.1 %) requiring new PPM. At discharge, patients without conduction abnormalities exhibited the highest LVEF (57.4 ± 11.5 %), whereas those with pre-existing PPM had the lowest (48.1 ± 15.5 %). Over two years, LVEF remained constant in patients without conduction issues and in those with pre-existing PPM. However, patients with new LBBB experienced a 6.3 % decrease in LVEF, and those requiring new PPM showed a 4.1 % reduction. CONCLUSION: New conduction abnormalities, such as LBBB or the need for PPM, induce a decline in LVEF post-TAVR. It is imperative to focus on the long-term monitoring of left ventricular function in patients experiencing new conduction disturbances post-TAVR.

Recurrent Chest Pain After COVID-19: Diagnostic Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

We report a case of myocarditis in an adult patient with recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection presenting as recurrent ST-segment elevation, mimicking coronary vasospasm. This case highlights the wide range of presentations of COVID-19-related myocarditis. The novel teaching point is that COVID-19 myocarditis can present with acute manifestations such as chest pain and transient ST-segment elevation even several weeks after complete recovery from the initial infection. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be considered in patients with chest pain syndromes and angiographically normal coronary arteries, as the presence of late gadolinium enhancement and a high T2 signal can be diagnostic. Follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may be used to assess resolution.

Nous présentons un cas de myocardite chez un patient adulte infecté par le nouveau coronavirus (COVID-19) qui s'est traduit par une élévation récurrente du segment ST évoquant un vasospasme coronarien. Ce cas illustre le large éventail de tableaux cliniques de la myocardite associée à la COVID-19. Le nouveau point à retenir est que la myocardite associée à la COVID-19 peut se traduire par des manifestations aiguës telles que la douleur thoracique l'élévation transitoire du segment ST, même plusieurs semaines après le rétablissement complet de l'infection initiale. L'imagerie cardiaque par résonance magnétique devrait être envisagée chez les patients qui ont des syndromes de douleur thoracique et des artères coronariennes normales à l'angiographie, puisque la présence d'un rehaussement tardif après injection de gadolinium et d'un signal élevé en T2 peut servir à poser le diagnostic. Le suivi en imagerie cardiaque par résonance magnétique peut être utilisé pour évaluer la résolution.

What do people hospitalised with COVID-19 think about their care? Results of a satisfaction survey during the first wave of COVID-19 in Liverpool.

Despite huge advances in vaccines, testing and treatments for COVID-19, there is negligible evidence on the perceptions of people hospitalised with COVID-19 about the care they received. To address this, we developed a satisfaction survey for people with COVID-19 admitted to our hospital during the first COVID-19 wave in Liverpool. Of those invited, 98/160 (61%) responded, of whom 94/98 (96%) completed the survey. Respondents rated overall care highly (mean 4.7/5) and 89/94 (95%) reported that they would recommend the hospital to friends and/or family. Most respondents felt safe on the ward (94%), with privacy maintained (93%) and pain well managed (90%). Fewer than two-thirds (63%) of respondents considered themselves adequately consulted regarding medications and side effects. Sleep and food/drink quality were also highlighted as areas for improvement. To overcome the issues raised, we generated a 'COVID-19 practice pointers' poster within an integrated educational bundle on COVID-19 wards. The impact of the bundle on perceptions of people hospitalised with COVID-19 will be evaluated in people hospitalised with COVID-19 in Liverpool in 2021. Whether hospitalised for COVID-19 or other conditions, our survey results are a timely reminder of the importance of involving patients in shaping the care that they receive.

A patient satisfaction survey and educational package to improve the care of people hospitalised with COVID-19: a quality improvement project, Liverpool, UK.

Background: The perspectives and experiences of people hospitalised with COVID-19 have been under-reported during the coronavirus pandemic. We developed and conducted a COVID-19 patient satisfaction survey in a large university-affiliated secondary healthcare centre in Liverpool, UK, during Europe's first coronavirus wave (April-June 2020). The survey found that care was rated highly, including among people of Black Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) background. However, sleep-quality and communication about medications and discharge-planning were identified as areas for improvement.   Methods: To improve care for people with COVID-19 admitted to our centre, we designed an educational package for healthcare professionals working on COVID-19 wards. The package, implemented in August 2020, included healthcare worker training sessions on providing holistic care and placement of "Practice Pointers" posters. Patient satisfaction was re-evaluated during the second/third COVID-19 waves in Liverpool (September 2020 - February 2021). Results: Across waves, most (95%) respondents reported that they would recommend our hospital to friends and/or family and rated overall care highly. Comparison of the responses of second/third-wave respondents (n=101) with first-wave respondents (n=94) suggested improved patient satisfaction across most care domains but especially those related to having worries and fears addressed and being consulted about medications and their side-effects. Conclusions: People admitted with COVID-19 to our centre in Liverpool, including those from BAME background, rated the care they received highly. A simple education package improved the feedback on care received by respondents between the first and second/third waves. These UK-first findings are informing regional strategies to improve person-centred care of hospitalised people with COVID-19.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 induced hypoxia: Single-center study.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated pneumonia represent a clinical and scientific challenge. The role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in such a crisis remains unclear. METHODS: We examined COVID-19 patients who were supported for acute respiratory failure by both conventional mechanical ventilation (MV) and ECMO at a tertiary care institution in Washington DC. The study period extended from March 23 to April 29. We identified 59 patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation. Of those, 13 patients required ECMO. RESULTS: Nine out of 13 ECMO (69.2%) patients were decannulated from ECMO. All-cause ICU mortality was comparable between both ECMO and MV groups (6 patients [46.15%] vs. 22 patients [47.82 %], p = 0.92). ECMO non-survivors vs survivors had elevated D-dimer (9.740 mcg/ml [4.84-20.00] vs. 3.800 mcg/ml [2.19-9.11], p = 0.05), LDH (1158 ± 344.5 units/L vs. 575.9 ± 124.0 units/L, p = 0.001), and troponin (0.4315 ± 0.465 ng/ml vs. 0.034 ± 0.043 ng/ml, p = 0.04). Time on MV as expected was significantly longer in ECMO groups (563.3 hours [422.1-613.9] vs. 247.9 hours [101.8-479] in MV group, p = 0.0009) as well as ICU length of stay 576.2 hours [457.5-652.8] in ECMO group vs. 322.2 hours [120.6-569.3] in MV group, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: ECMO is a supportive intervention for COVID-19 associated pneumonia that could be considered if the optimum mechanical ventilation is deemed ineffective. Biomarkers such as D-dimer, LDH, and troponin could help with discerning the clinical prognosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.