Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 13(9): 923-31, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17617186

RESUMEN

In order to confirm the validity of the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) for patients in Europe, data from adults with pneumonia who were enrolled in two prospective multicentre studies, conducted in France (Pneumocom-1, n = 925) and Spain (Pneumocom-2, n = 853), were compared with data from the original North American study (Pneumonia PORT, n = 2287). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality; secondary outcomes were subsequent hospitalisation for outpatients, and intensive care unit admission and length of stay for inpatients. All outcomes within individual risk classes, and mortality rates in low-risk (PSI I-III) and higher-risk patients, were compared across the three cohorts. Overall mortality rates were 4.7% in Pneumonia PORT, 6.3% in Pneumocom-2 and 10.6% in Pneumocom-1 (p <0.01), ranging from 0.4% to 1.6% (p 0.06) for low-risk patients and from 13.0% to 19.1% (p 0.24) for high-risk patients. Despite significant differences in baseline patient characteristics, none of the study outcomes differed within the low-risk classes. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of low-risk classification for mortality exceeded 93% and 98%, respectively. Thus, in two independent European cohorts, the PSI predicted patient outcomes accurately and reliably, particularly for low-risk patients. These findings confirm the validity of the PSI when applied to patients from Europe.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/mortalidad , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/mortalidad , Neumonía Bacteriana/fisiopatología , Población Blanca
2.
Intensive Care Med ; 27(7): 1141-6, 2001 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11534561

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke who require mechanical ventilation and to determine early factors influencing mortality. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit with a cerebrovascular emergency unit in a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients (mean age 65+/-13 years) requiring mechanical ventilation in the early course of an acute ischemic stroke. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Clinical data were recorded before intubation according to a standardized procedure. Mortality and functional outcome were assessed after a 1-year follow-up. Mechanical ventilation was started within 48 h after admission in 53 patients (91.4%). The mean duration of ventilation was similar in survivors (9.7+/-9.0 days) and non-survivors (8.6+/-8.7 days). Mortality was 72.4% at 1 year. Among the 16 survivors, none were in a persistent vegetative state and 11 had a Barthel index of 60, reflecting good functional status. Bilateral absence of corneal reflex and bilateral absence of pupillary light reflex had a positive predictive value of death of 1 (95% CI 0.78-1.00 and 0.74-1.00, respectively). After Cox regression analysis, presence of stupor or coma (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-5.0), bilateral absence of corneal reflex before intubation (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.4-8.7) and presence of ischemic cardiopathy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.5) were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic withholding of endotracheal intubation in patients with AIS is not recommended. Careful and rigorous neurologic examination, including assessment of brain stem reflexes, might help to identify patients with a very high probability of death despite mechanical ventilation.


Asunto(s)
Respiración Artificial , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 21(1): 40-2, 2000 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10656354

RESUMEN

We compared, in three intensive care units, colonization of hubs with hub protection boxes or hubs with needleless closed connectors; 137 central venous catheters and 451 hubs were randomized in two groups with similar characteristics. Catheter and hub colonization were not different between the two groups. Among 30 colonized catheters, the same isolate was found in only two hubs; hub contamination rarely is responsible for catheter colonization in short-term catheters. Further studies are required to evaluate the benefit of protected hubs compared with unprotected hubs.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...