Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 51(5): 539-543, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37003562

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To identify risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) after abdominal hysterectomy (HYST) procedures using National Health care Safety Network (NHSN) data augmented with diagnosis codes available using administrative data. METHODS: We analyzed 66,001 HYST procedures in 166 New York State hospitals between January 2015 and December 2018, reported in NHSN, and matched to billing data. Risks factors for SSI after abdominal HYST were identified using logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 66,001 HYST procedures were analyzed. SSI was reported following 1,093 procedures, resulting in an infection rate of 1.66%. Risk factors associated with SSIs were open approach (not laparoscopic) with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 2.72 and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.37-3.12, contaminated or dirty wound class (AOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.61-3.24), body mass index ≥30 (AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.56-2.02), procedures lasting 186 minutes or more (AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.56-2.02), American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score ≥3 (AOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.52-1.99), gynecological cancer (AOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.32-1.80), and diabetes mellitus (AOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.24-1.70). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, prolonged procedure duration, diabetes mellitus, wound contamination, open approach, ASA score ≥3, and gynecological cancer were significant independent risk factors associated with SSI after HYST.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , New York/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(2): 131-3, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26601706

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are an urgent concern in health care in the United States because of high attributable mortality and versatile resistance mechanisms. CRE reporting was mandated in New York State (NYS) hospitals in July 2013. METHODS: Infection preventionists from the NYS Department of Health audited hospital-reported CRE data by comparing laboratory records with cases reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Information regarding microbiology laboratory testing methodologies was obtained through a survey in October 2013. RESULTS: There were 1,151 CRE laboratory reports audited, with 13.6% determined not to have been reported to the NHSN when they should have been and 4.6% determined to be reported in error. There were a variety of errors, including lapses in surveillance and misinterpretation of the surveillance definition. CONCLUSION: Educational initiatives that include microbiology laboratory staff, improvements in the use of laboratory information systems to communicate with infection prevention, and updated NHSN definitions should improve the accuracy and consistency of CRE reporting in NYS.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Personal de Salud/educación , Resistencia betalactámica , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Recolección de Datos , Notificación de Enfermedades , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/prevención & control , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Hospitales Provinciales , Humanos , Incidencia , Auditoría Médica , Programas Nacionales de Salud , New York/epidemiología , Vigilancia en Salud Pública
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(3): 280-2, 2015 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25556048

RESUMEN

Surveillance criteria for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are continually being refined to more accurately reflect infections related to central lines. An audit of 567 medical records from adult, pediatric, and neonatal intensive care unit patients with a central line and a positive blood culture showed a 16% decrease in CLABSI rates after the 2013 National Healthcare Safety Network definitions compared with the 2012 definitions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 35(8): 1006-12, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25026617

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since 2007, New York State (NYS) hospitals have been required to report surgical site infections (SSIs) following colon procedures to the NYS Department of Health, using the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of SSIs in patients undergoing colon procedures. METHODS: NYS has been conducting validation studies at hospitals to assess the accuracy of the surveillance data reported by the participating hospitals. A sample of patients undergoing colon procedures in NYS hospitals were included in hospital-acquired infection program validation studies in 2009 and 2010. Medical chart reviews and on-site visits were performed to verify patient information reported and to evaluate additional risk factors for SSI. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2,656 colon procedures were included in this analysis, including 698 SSI cases. Multivariable analysis indicated that SSI following colon procedure was associated with body mass index greater than 30 (odds ratio [OR], 1.48 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21-1.80]), male sex (OR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.10-1.64]), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification score greater than 3 (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.08-1.64]), procedure duration, transfusion (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.05-1.66]), left-side colon surgical procedures, other gastroenterologic procedures, irrigation, hospital bed size greater than 500, and medical school affiliation. CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, obesity, transfusion, type of procedure, and prolonged duration were significant factors associated with overall infection risk after adjusting other factors. Additional factors not collected in the NHSN slightly improved prediction of SSIs.


Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , New York/epidemiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 41(12): 1200-4, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24035214

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2007, New York State (NYS) hospitals began mandatory public reporting of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) data associated with intensive care units (ICUs) into the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Facilities were required to use the NHSN device-associated CLABSI criteria to identify laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections. METHODS: Onsite audits were conducted in ICUs by NYS hospital-acquired infection program staff using a standardized database. Hospitals provided ICU patient medical records with a positive blood culture during a selected time frame. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2010, an average of 79% of all reporting hospitals were audited annually. Of the 5,697 patients audited, 3,104 (54%) had a central line in place, and 650 of the patients with a central line (21%) were identified as having a CLABSI by the hospital-acquired infection program reviewer. Between 2007 and 2010, the specificity increased from 90% to 99%, whereas the sensitivity remained stable at approximately 71%. As a result of the audit process, the NYS 2010 CLABSI rate increased by 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized audit process has helped improve the accuracy of CLABSI reporting. Data validation provides consistent data for measuring the progress of infection prevention strategies and allows for relevant comparison of ICU data.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/epidemiología , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , New York/epidemiología
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(6): 565-71, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22561711

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To efficiently validate the accuracy of surgical site infection (SSI) data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) by New York State (NYS) hospitals. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: 176 NYS hospitals. METHODS: NYS Department of Health staff validated the data reported to NHSN by review of a stratified sample of medical records from each hospital. The four strata were (1) SSIs reported to NHSN; (2) records with an indication of infection from diagnosis codes in administrative data but not reported to NHSN as SSIs; (3) records with discordant procedure codes in NHSN and state data sets; (4) records not in the other three strata. RESULTS: A total of 7,059 surgical charts (6% of the procedures reported by hospitals) were reviewed. In stratum 1, 7% of reported SSIs did not meet the criteria for inclusion in NHSN and were subsequently removed. In stratum 2, 24% of records indicated missed SSIs not reported to NHSN, whereas in strata 3 and 4, only 1% of records indicated missed SSIs; these SSIs were subsequently added to NHSN. Also, in stratum 3, 75% of records were not coded for the correct NHSN procedure. Errors were highest for colon data; the NYS colon SSI rate increased by 7.5% as a result of hospital audits. CONCLUSIONS: Audits are vital for ensuring the accuracy of hospital-acquired infection (HAI) data so that hospital HAI rates can be fairly compared. Use of administrative data increased the efficiency of identifying problems in hospitals' SSI surveillance that caused SSIs to be unreported and caused errors in denominator data.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitales Provinciales/normas , Control de Infecciones/normas , Auditoría Médica/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Registros Médicos , New York/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
7.
Am J Infect Control ; 40(1): 22-8, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22104613

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: All hospitals in New York State (NYS) are required to report surgical site infections (SSIs) occurring after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This report describes the risk adjustment method used by NYS for reporting hospital SSI rates, and additional methods used to explore remaining differences in infection rates. METHODS: All patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery in NYS in 2008 were monitored for chest SSI following the National Healthcare Safety Network protocol. The NYS Cardiac Surgery Reporting System and a survey of hospital infection prevention practices provided additional risk information. Models were developed to standardize hospital-specific infection rates and to assess additional risk factors and practices. RESULTS: The National Healthcare Safety Network risk score based on duration of surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and wound class were not highly predictive of chest SSIs. The addition of diabetes, obesity, end-stage renal disease, sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Medicaid payer to the model improved the discrimination between procedures that resulted in SSI and those that did not by 25%. Hospital-reported infection prevention practices were not significantly related to SSI rates. CONCLUSIONS: Additional risk factors collected using a secondary database improved the prediction of SSIs, however, there remained unexplained variation in rates between hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
8.
J Clin Microbiol ; 42(4): 1843-5, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15071066

RESUMEN

We report a linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis infection in a cord blood stem cell transplant recipient previously treated with linezolid for bloodstream infections by vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Sequencing showed a G2576U mutation in the 23S rRNA gene. Because of the important niche of linezolid in cancer treatment, linezolid-resistant E. faecalis is noteworthy.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/farmacología , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Sangre Fetal/citología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Oxazolidinonas/farmacología , Trasplante de Células Madre/efectos adversos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Enterococcus faecalis/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Linezolid , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , ARN Ribosómico 23S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...