Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Lab Med ; 43(1): 71-86, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36764809

RESUMEN

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an indispensable tool to augment decision making in different health care settings and by various members of the patient pathway, including the patient. AI provides the ability to optimize data to bring clinical decision support for clinicians and laboratorians and/or empower patients to actively participate in their own health care. Though there are many examples of AI in health care, the exact role of AI and digital health solutions is still taking shape. Although AI will not replace the clinician, those who do not adopt AI may in time, be left behind.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Humanos
3.
Clin Chim Acta ; 523: 178-184, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34499870

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Laboratory test interferences can cause spurious test results and patient harm. Knowing the frequency of various interfering substances in patient populations likely to be tested with a particular laboratory assay may inform test development, test utilization and strategies to mitigate interference risk. METHODS: We developed REACTIR (Real Evidence to Assess Clinical Testing Interference Risk), an approach using real world data to assess the prevalence of various interfering substances in patients tested with a particular type of assay. REACTIR uses administrative real world data to identify and subgroup patient cohorts tested with a particular laboratory test and evaluate interference risk. RESULTS: We demonstrate the application REACTIR to point of care (POC) blood glucose testing. We found that exposure to several substances with the potential to interfere in POC blood glucose tests, including N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) and high dose vitamin C was uncommon in most patients undergoing POC glucose tests with several key exceptions, such as burn patients receiving high dose IV-vitamin C or acetaminophen overdose patients receiving NAC. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from REACTIR may support risk mitigation strategies including targeted clinician education and clinical decision support. Likewise, adaptations of REACTIR to premarket assay development may inform optimal assay design and assessment.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Humanos , Laboratorios Clínicos , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Prevalencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA