Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 135
Filtrar
1.
Health Phys ; 87(6): 647-55; discussion 656-8, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15545771

RESUMEN

The large United States county-based study () in which an inverse relationship has been suggested between residential low-dose radon levels and lung cancer mortality has been reviewed. While this study has been used to evaluate the validity of the linear nonthreshold theory, the grouped nature of its data limits the usefulness of this application. Our assessment of the study's approach, including a reanalysis of its data, also indicates that the likelihood of strong, undetected confounding effects by cigarette smoking, coupled with approximations of data values and uncertainties in accuracy of data sources regarding levels of radon exposure and intensity of smoking, compromises the study's analytic power. The most clear data for estimating lung cancer risk from low levels of radon exposure continue to rest with higher-dose studies of miner populations in which projections to zero dose are consistent with estimates arising from most case-control studies regarding residential exposure.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Radón/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos
2.
Br J Cancer ; 87(11): 1234-45, 2002 Nov 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12439712

RESUMEN

Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Países en Desarrollo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo
3.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 92(20): 1666-73, 2000 Oct 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11036112

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported positive associations between environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and increased risk of breast cancer. However, studies of active smoking and risk of breast cancer are equivocal and in general do not support a positive association. To try to resolve this paradox, we examined the association between breast cancer mortality and potential ETS exposure from spousal smoking in an American Cancer Society prospective study of U.S. adult women. METHODS: We assessed breast cancer death rates in a cohort of 146 488 never-smoking, single-marriage women who were cancer free at enrollment in 1982. Breast cancer death rates among women whose husbands smoked were compared with those among women married to men who had never smoked. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to control for potential risk factors other than ETS exposure. RESULTS: After 12 years of follow-up, 669 cases of fatal breast cancer were observed in the cohort. Overall, we saw no association between exposure to ETS and death from breast cancer (rate ratio [RR] = 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8-1.2). We did, however, find a small, not statistically significant increased risk of breast cancer mortality among women who were married before age 20 years to smokers (RR = 1. 2; 95% CI = 0.8-1.8). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the results of previous studies, this study found no association between exposure to ETS and female breast cancer mortality. The results of our study are particularly compelling because of its prospective design as compared with most earlier studies, the relatively large number of exposed women with breast cancer deaths, and the reporting of exposure by the spouse rather than by proxy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , American Cancer Society , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Estado Civil , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Esposos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Am J Epidemiol ; 152(2): 149-62, 2000 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10909952

RESUMEN

To determine the relation between multivitamin use and death from heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and cancer, the authors examined a prospective cohort of 1,063,023 adult Americans in 1982-1989 and compared the mortality of users of multivitamins alone; vitamin A, C, or E alone; and multivitamin and vitamin A, C, or E in combination with that of vitamin nonusers by using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Multivitamin users had heart disease and cerebrovascular disease mortality risks similar to those of nonusers, whereas combination users had mortality risks that were 15% lower than those of nonusers. Multivitamin and combination use had minimal effect on cancer mortality overall, although mortality from all cancers combined was increased among male current smokers who used multivitamins alone (relative risk (RR) = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05, 1.23) or in combination with vitamin A, C, or E (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.26), but decreased in male combination users who had never (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.99) or had formerly (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.98) smoked. No such associations were seen in women. These observational data provide limited support for the hypothesis that multivitamin use in combination with vitamin A, C, or E may reduce heart disease and cardiovascular disease mortality, but add to concerns raised by randomized studies that some vitamin supplements may adversely affect male smokers.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Ácido Ascórbico/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Vitamina A/administración & dosificación , Vitamina E/administración & dosificación
5.
N Engl J Med ; 341(15): 1097-105, 1999 Oct 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10511607

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) is known to be associated with overall mortality. We investigated the effects of age, race, sex, smoking status, and history of disease on the relation between body-mass index and mortality. METHODS: In a prospective study of more than 1 million adults in the United States (457,785 men and 588,369 women), 201,622 deaths occurred during 14 years of follow-up. We examined the relation between body-mass index and the risk of death from all causes in four subgroups categorized according to smoking status and history of disease. In healthy people who had never smoked, we further examined whether the relation varied according to race, cause of death, or age. The relative risk was used to assess the relation between mortality and body-mass index. RESULTS: The association between body-mass index and the risk of death was substantially modified by smoking status and the presence of disease. In healthy people who had never smoked, the nadir of the curve for body-mass index and mortality was found at a body-mass index of 23.5 to 24.9 in men and 22.0 to 23.4 in women. Among subjects with the highest body-mass indexes, white men and women had a relative risk of death of 2.58 and 2.00, respectively, as compared with those with a body-mass index of 23.5 to 24.9. Black men and women with the highest body-mass indexes had much lower risks of death (1.35 and 1.21), which did not differ significantly from 1.00. A high body-mass index was most predictive of death from cardiovascular disease, especially in men (relative risk, 2.90; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.37 to 3.56). Heavier men and women in all age groups had an increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of death from all causes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, or other diseases increases throughout the range of moderate and severe overweight for both men and women in all age groups. The risk associated with a high body-mass index is greater for whites than for blacks.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Mortalidad , Obesidad/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Población Negra , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Fumar , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca
6.
Epidemiology ; 10(5): 500-12, 1999 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10468422

RESUMEN

We assessed the impact of smoking cessation on subsequent death rates among a cohort of 51,343 men and 66,751 women in California enrolled in late 1959 in the original American Cancer Society (ACS) Cancer Prevention Study (CPS I) and followed for 38 years. We compared the age-adjusted death rate, expressed as deaths per 1,000 person-years, among all subjects who smoked cigarettes in 1959 but who had largely quit as of 1997 with the death rate among never smokers over a 38-year period. The all causes death rate for males decreased from 20.67 during 1960-1969 to 18.68 during 1960-1997 for smokers and decreased from 10.51 to 9.46 for never smokers. The lung cancer death rate for males increased from 1.558 to 1.728 for smokers and increased from 0.127 to 0.133 for never smokers. The all causes death rate for females increased from 9.54 to 10.14 for smokers and decreased from 6.95 to 6.44 for never smokers. The lung cancer death rate for females increased greatly from 0.208 to 0.806 for smokers and increased from 0.094 to 0.116 for never smokers. These results indicate there has been no important decline in either the absolute or relative death rates from all causes and lung cancer for cigarette smokers as a whole compared with never smokers in this large cohort, in spite of a substantial degree of smoking cessation. While cessation clearly reduces the mortality risk among long-term former smokers, the population impact of cessation appears to be less than currently believed.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad/tendencias , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/mortalidad , Estadística como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo
7.
South Med J ; 92(5): 493-501, 1999 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10342896

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Age-adjusted rates of lung cancer among whites, but not blacks, in Duval County Jacksonville), Florida, have been among the highest of any metropolitan area of the United States for three decades. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study, interviewing 507 patients with lung cancer diagnosed from 1993 to 1996 and 1,007 control subjects, randomly selected from the county population. RESULTS: Cigarette smoking was the dominant cause of lung cancer (odds ratios, 59 among male current smokers; 30 among female current smokers). Both prevalence and intensity of smoking were excessive for whites but less for blacks when compared with national norms. Little association was found with residential patterns, indices of air quality, or occupation. Risk doubled with increased intake of dietary fat and with a family history of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Life-style factors, especially smoking, but not environmental factors, appear responsible for the high rates of lung cancer in northeast Florida.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Contaminación del Aire , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Demografía , Grasas de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Familia , Femenino , Florida/epidemiología , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ocupaciones , Características de la Residencia , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
Cancer ; 85(2): 326-32, 1999 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10023699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is among the few unequivocal risk factors for the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Activating mutations in codon 12 of the K-ras protooncogene is a frequent and early molecular event in the pathogenesis of PDAC and a variety of nonmalignant ductal pancreatic lesions. The molecular epidemiologic relation between heavy cigarette smoking and mutational activation of K-ras in PDAC has been examined to a limited extent. The authors have examined the mutational status of K-ras in nonneoplastic pancreata in relation to cigarette smoking status. METHODS: Archival formalin fixed paraffin embedded specimens of nonneoplastic pancreata (n = 39) were obtained from the American Cancer Society and evaluated histopathologically. Specimens from age- and gender-matched individuals were stratified into three groups: 1) those who never smoked cigarettes (n = 16), 2) those who smoked 1-2 packs/day for more than 20 years (n = 10 cases), and 3) those who smoked more than 2 packs/day for 20 or more years (n = 13). Cases were preselected from 77 specimens based on the quality, suitability, and cellularity of the archival tissues for analyses. Furthermore, none of the patients died of primary PDAC or had evidence of pancreatic metastases from an extrapancreatic primary tumor. Tissue sections were microdissected and deparaffinized, and genomic DNA was purified by standard proteinase K-phenol-chloroform extraction techniques. Genomic DNA was analyzed for mutations in codon 12 of the K-ras protooncogene by two mutant-allele-enriched polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assays and by multiplex PCR-based ligase chain reaction (LCR) analyses. RESULTS: Analyses of multiple microdissected pancreata specimens from 39 cases revealed wild-type K-ras codon 12 sequences in both nonsmoking individuals and those who smoked 1-2 packs/day for 20 or more years. K-ras codon 12 mutations were confirmed by PCR-RFLP and PCR-LCR assays in 5 of 13 pancreata cases (39%) obtained from individuals who smoked more than 2 packs of cigarettes/day for 20 years or more (P < 0.005). The K-ras mutation spectra revealed two G-->T transversions, one G-->C transversion and two G-->A transitions. There was no clear relation between the incidence or spectra of mutations and pancreatic histopathology, as overtly normal pancreata as well as pancreata with squamous metaplasia, periductal fibrosis, and ductal atypia revealed reproducible K-ras alterations. Similarly, among those 34 cases in which a wild-type K-ras sequence was revealed by both approaches, a similar histopathologic profile was evident. CONCLUSIONS: Mutational activation of codon 12 of the K-ras protooncogene was confirmed reproducibly by mutant allele-enriched PCR-RFLP and multiplex PCR-LCR analyses in 39% (5 of 13) of archival nonneoplastic pancreata from age- and gender-matched individuals who smoked more than 2 packs of cigarettes/day for 20 or more years. The presence of a mutated or wild-type or K-ras was independent of the histopathologic profile of the 39 cases examined. The data provide further suggestive molecular epidemiologic evidence of an association between a major and unequivocal risk factor for PDAC (heavy cigarette smoking) and mutations in a molecular target (K-ras), the activation of which is an important and early event both in the pathogenesis of PDAC and in the development of a variety of nonneoplastic ductal pancreatic lesions.


Asunto(s)
Genes ras , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/etiología , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/genética , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/genética , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Mutación Puntual , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción
9.
Cancer Causes Control ; 9(4): 403-10, 1998 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9794172

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes mellitus and pancreatic cancer are known to be associated, but it is not known whether diabetes is a true risk factor, preceding development of the cancer, or if it is an early manifestation of the cancer. To address this uncertainty, we examined the association of pancreatic cancer mortality and reported diabetes of at least one year's duration in a large, prospective study of United States adults. The vast majority of diabetes in this cohort is likely to be non-insulin-dependent diabetes. METHODS: After 12 years of follow-up, 2,953 deaths from pancreatic cancer were observed in a cohort of 1,089,586 men and women who were cancer-free at study entry in 1982. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, race, smoking, family history of pancreatic cancer, body mass index (wt/ht2), and education, were used to assess associations. RESULTS: A history of diabetes was significantly related to pancreatic cancer mortality in both men (rate ratio [RR] = 1.49, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 1.25-1.77) and women (RR = 1.51, CI = 1.24-1.85). However, the strength of the association varied over the follow-up period. The death rate from pancreatic cancer was twice as high in diabetics as in non-diabetics during the second and third years of follow-up (adjusted RR = 2.05, CI = 1.56-2.69) but only about 40 percent higher in years nine to 12 (adjusted RR = 1.38, CI = 1.08-1.77). CONCLUSIONS: The small but persistent increased risk of death from pancreatic cancer, seen even when the diagnosis of diabetes preceded death by many years, supports the hypothesis that diabetes may be a true, albeit modest, risk factor for pancreatic cancer.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Intervalos de Confianza , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Epidemiology ; 9(5): 525-9, 1998 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9730031

RESUMEN

To examine the relation between family history of breast cancer in a mother or sister and a man's risk of fatal prostate cancer, we analyzed data from a prospective mortality study of adult men in the United States. During 12 years of follow-up, there were 3,141 deaths from prostate cancer in a cohort of 480,802 men who were cancer-free at study entry in 1982. Results from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for other risk factors, showed a modest increased risk of fatal prostate cancer associated with a family history of breast cancer (in the absence of a family history of prostate cancer) [rate ratio (RR) = 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.33]. The association was stronger among men younger than 65 years of age whose relatives were diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 years (RR = 1.65; 95% CI = 0.88-3.10) and among Jewish men (RR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.00-2.97). The increased risks observed in these subgroups may reflect genetic alterations underlying familial clustering of prostate and breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Salud de la Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Linaje , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
JAMA ; 280(10): 910-2, 1998 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9739976

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Cancer registries have reported an increased incidence of melanoma and certain noncutaneous cancers following nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Whether these findings were attributable to intensified surveillance, shared risk factors, or increased cancer susceptibility remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a history of NMSC predicts cancer mortality. DESIGN: Prospective cohort with 12-year mortality follow-up adjusted for multiple risk factors. SETTING: Cancer Prevention Study II, United States and Puerto Rico. PARTICIPANTS: Nearly 1.1 million adult volunteers who completed a baseline questionnaire in 1982. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Deaths due to all cancers and common cancers. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, race, education, smoking, obesity, alcohol use, and other conventional risk factors, a baseline history of NMSC was associated with increased total cancer mortality (men's relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.36; women's RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.35). Exclusion of deaths due to melanoma reduced these RRs only slightly. Mortality was increased for the following cancers: melanoma (RR, 3.36 in men, 3.52 in women); pharynx (RR, 2.77 in men, 2.81 in women); lung (RR, 1.37 in men, 1.46 in women); non-Hodgkin lymphoma (RR, 1.32 in men, 1.50 in women); in men only, salivary glands (RR, 2.96), prostate (RR, 1.28), testis (RR, 12.7), urinary bladder (RR, 1.41), and leukemia (RR, 1.37); and in women only, breast (RR, 1.34). All-cause mortality was slightly increased (adjusted men's RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.00-1.06]; women's RR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00-1.09]). CONCLUSIONS: Persons with a history of NMSC are at increased risk of cancer mortality. Although the biological mechanisms are unknown, a history of NMSC should increase the clinician's alertness for certain noncutaneous cancers as well as melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Am J Epidemiol ; 148(2): 191-7, 1998 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9676701

RESUMEN

The authors examined the association between main lifetime occupation and subsequent breast cancer mortality in a large prospective study of US adults. After 9 years of follow-up, 1,780 cases of fatal breast cancer were observed among 563,395 women who were cancer-free at interview in 1982. Main lifetime occupation was derived based on self-reports of current and former occupational titles and was classified into 14 broad occupational groups and 16 more narrowly defined occupational titles. Results from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for breast cancer risk factors, revealed little variability in breast cancer mortality by occupation. Two significant associations were observed: In comparison with housewives, women in "administrative support, including clerical" occupations were at a small increased risk (rate ratio (RR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.31), and an increased risk was seen for "executives" (RR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.03-3.62), based on 10 breast cancer deaths. No significant increases in risk were observed for teachers and librarians (RR = 0.89), nurses (RR = 0.84), managers (RR = 0.89), or women employed in sales (RR = 0.88) or service (RR = 0.84) occupations. When analyses were limited to women who had worked in their occupation for 10 or more years, the results for each occupational title were virtually unchanged. These results offer little support for an association between occupation and breast cancer mortality in general or for particular occupational titles, including teachers and nurses.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Ocupaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Escolaridad , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Enseñanza , Estados Unidos , Mujeres Trabajadoras/clasificación
13.
Soc Sci Med ; 47(1): 1-6, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9683373

RESUMEN

Geographic regions characterized by income inequality are associated with adverse mortality statistics, but the pathophysiologic mechanisms that mediate this ecologic relationship have not been elucidated. This study used a United States mail survey of 34158 male and 42741 female healthy-adult volunteers to test the association between residence in geographic regions with relative income inequality and the likelihood of weight gain at the waist. Respondents came from 21 states that were characterized by the household income inequality (HII) index, a measure reflecting the proportion of total income received by the more well off 50% of households in the state. The main outcome measure was self-reported weight gain mainly at the waist as opposed to weight gain at other anatomic sites. After controlling for age, other individual-level factors, and each state's median household income, men's likelihood of weight gain at the waist was positively associated (p = 0.0008) with the HII index. Men from states with a high HII (households above the median receive 81.6% to 82.6% of the income) described weight gain at the waist more often than men from states with a low HII (households above the median receive 77.0% to 78.5% of the income) (odds ratio = 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.22). Women's results showed a non-significant trend in the same direction. An association between ecologically defined socio-environmental stress and abdominal obesity may help to clarify the pathophysiologic pathways leading to several major chronic diseases.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/fisiología , Renta , Aumento de Peso , Anciano , Constitución Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
14.
J Gen Intern Med ; 13(5): 303-10, 1998 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9613885

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Investigate risk factors for colon polyp using multivariate analyses. DESIGN: In a group responding to a 1992 mail survey, we assessed the association between physician-diagnosed colon polyp and possible risk factors reported primarily 10 years earlier. SETTING: Survey respondents within the Cancer Prevention Study II. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents, 72,868 men and 81,356 women, who reported no polyp diagnosis when questioned in 1982 at ages 40 to 64 years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The characteristics of 7,504 men (10.3%) and 5,111 women (6.3%) reporting a first colon polyp were compared with those of participants who did not report a polyp. After adjustments for age, family history of colorectal cancer, and other potential risk factors, polyp occurrence was associated with 1982 histories of smoking, former smoking, alcohol use of at least two drinks per day (odds ratios [ORs] from 1.5 to 1.1; all p < .005), and a body mass index > or = 28 kg/m2 (men's OR 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00, 1.13; women's OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99, 1.17). Polyps were also associated with a diagnosis of gallbladder disease or gallstone at any time and with gallbladder surgery up to 1982 (OR from 2.7 to 1.3; all p < .001). Polyp occurrence was inversely associated with 1982 histories of high exercise level (men's OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76, 0.91; women's OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.78, 1.03), frequent aspirin use in women (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.77, 0.95), and high parity in women (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.75, 0.94). Among participants lacking a clinically normal gallbladder, the polyp risks associated with smoking and high body mass index were reduced (p < .04 for interactions). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations and potential biases in these self-reported data, the risk factors described here may be useful for identifying persons at modestly increased risk of having a colon polyp. The effect-modifying role of gallbladder status deserves further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon/epidemiología , Adulto , American Cancer Society , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 7(4): 271-82, 1998 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9568781

RESUMEN

Although survival rates are useful for monitoring progress in the early detection and treatment of cancer and are of particular interest to patients with new diagnoses, there are limited population-based estimates of long-term survival rates. We used data collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for cases diagnosed during 1974-1991 and followed through 1992 to estimate relative survival at 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis of cancer of the breast, prostate, colon and rectum, and lung. Relative survival after diagnosis of breast and prostate cancer continued to decline up through 15 years after diagnosis, whereas survival after diagnosis of lung and colon or rectal cancer remained approximately constant after 5 and 10 years, respectively. Age-specific patterns of survival varied by site, stage, and demographics. Among patients with localized breast and prostate cancer, women who were younger than age 45 at breast cancer diagnosis and men who were 75 years and older at prostate cancer diagnosis had the poorest relative survival. Relative survival among lung cancer patients decreased with age at diagnosis, regardless of stage or demographics, and age-specific patterns of relative survival for patients with cancer of the colon and rectum differed according to race. Among white patients diagnosed with cancers of the colon and rectum, relative survival did not vary by age at diagnosis; among black patients older than 45 at diagnosis, relative survival decreased with age. This study provides population-based estimates of long-term survival and confirms black/white, male/female, and stage- and age-specific differences for the major cancers.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/mortalidad , Programa de VERF , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Factores Sexuales , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca
16.
Am J Epidemiol ; 147(6): 556-62, 1998 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9521182

RESUMEN

The accuracy of self-reported cancer diagnoses in a prospective study was compared with population-based cancer registry data in four states. The study cohort included 65,582 men and women aged 39-96 years who were participants in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Survey, begun by the American Cancer Society in 1992. Estimates of sensitivity (the proportion of study participants with a registry-documented cancer who self-reported the cancer) ranged from 0.79 for an exact match of cancer site and year of diagnosis (+/- 1 year) to 0.93 for a match of any reported cancer. The sensitivity of exact matches varied considerably by cancer site and was highest for breast, prostate, and lung cancers (0.91, 0.90, and 0.90, respectively) and lowest for rectal cancer and melanoma (0.16 and 0.53, respectively). Sensitivity also varied slightly by the age, education, and smoking status of study participants. Estimates of sensitivity were virtually identical for each of the four states. The positive predictive value (the proportion of self-reported cancers that were confirmed by the registries) was 0.75 overall and also varied by cancer site. Unlike sensitivity, however, this proportion varied considerably by state. All self-reports of cancer that were not confirmed by the registries were further investigated by repeat questionnaires and acquisition of medical records. Low positive predictive values were due to underascertainment of true cancer cases by the registries, inaccurate reporting on the part of study participants, and problems with the algorithm used by the state to link the study population to the registry data. In conclusion, the ability of members of this cohort to report a past diagnosis of cancer accurately is quite high, especially for cancers of the breast, prostate, lung, and colon, or for the occurrence of any cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/epidemiología , Anciano , Escolaridad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Fumar , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Cancer Causes Control ; 9(6): 645-51, 1998 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10189051

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: It is difficult to separate the possible role of fertility drugs from underlying infertility as risk factors for ovarian cancer. The present study examined the relationship between self-reported infertility and death from ovarian cancer among married women unlikely to have been exposured to fertility drugs. METHODS: Women were selected for study from the 676,526 female participants in Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS-II). After twelve years of follow-up, 797 deaths from ovarian cancer were observed among women with no prior history of cancer or hysterectomy and 40 years of age or older in 1967 when ovulatory stimulants were approved in the United States. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compute rate ratios (RRs) and to adjust for other potential risk factors. RESULTS: Overall, self-reported infertility was not significantly associated with ovarian cancer mortality (adjusted rate ratio (RR) = 1.1, 95 percent confidence interval (CI) = 0.9-1.3). Ovarian cancer death rates among nulligravid women with self-reported infertility, however, were 40 percent higher than for nulligravid women who never tried to become pregnant (RR = 1.4, 95 percent CI = 0.9-2.4). Multigravid women who reported infertility problems were not at increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that infertility itself, without concomitant exposure to fertility drugs, may increase risk of fatal ovarian cancer among nulligravid women.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/efectos adversos , Infertilidad/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/etiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
N Engl J Med ; 337(24): 1705-14, 1997 Dec 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9392695

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption has both adverse and beneficial effects on survival. We examined the balance of these in a large prospective study of mortality among U.S. adults. METHODS: Of 490,000 men and women (mean age, 56 years; range, 30 to 104) who reported their alcohol and tobacco use in 1982, 46,000 died during nine years of follow-up. We compared cause-specific and rates of death from all causes across categories of base-line alcohol consumption, adjusting for other risk factors, and related drinking and smoking habits to the cumulative probability of dying between the ages of 35 and 69 years. RESULTS: Causes of death associated with drinking were cirrhosis and alcoholism; cancers of the mouth, esophagus, pharynx, larynx, and liver combined; breast cancer in women; and injuries and other external causes in men. The mortality from breast cancer was 30 percent higher among women reporting at least one drink daily than among nondrinkers (relative risk, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.6). The rates of death from all cardiovascular diseases were 30 to 40 percent lower among men (relative risk, 0.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 0.8) and women (relative risk, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 0.7) reporting at least one drink daily than among nondrinkers, with little relation to the level of consumption. The overall death rates were lowest among men and women reporting about one drink daily. Mortality from all causes increased with heavier drinking, particularly among adults under age 60 with lower risk of cardiovascular disease. Alcohol consumption was associated with a small reduction in the overall risk of death in middle age (ages 35 to 69), whereas smoking approximately doubled this risk. CONCLUSIONS: In this middle-aged and elderly population, moderate alcohol consumption slightly reduced overall mortality. The benefit depended in part on age and background cardiovascular risk and was far smaller than the large increase in risk produced by tobacco.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/etiología , Cirrosis Hepática/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias/etiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord ; 21(10): 903-11, 1997 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9347409

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify contrasts between the risk factors associated with abdominal weight gain and those associated with peripheral weight gain. DESIGN: Prospective mail survey. SUBJECTS: 44080 white, non-Hispanic, healthy women who were questioned in 1982 (baseline age 40-54 y) and 1992 about weight, diet, alcohol use, smoking, 10 physical activities and other variables. MEASUREMENTS: Self reports in 1992 identified 4261 women who gained weight in the abdomen and 7440 women who gained in the periphery (sites other than the abdomen). Using identical logistic models adjusted for age, baseline body mass index (BMI) and numerous covariates, the abdominal-gain group and the peripheral-gain group were separately compared with 10,888 women who did not gain weight. RESULTS: The likelihood of abdominal gain exceeded that of peripheral gain (by comparison of estimated odds ratios, abdominal vs peripheral) for high meat eaters (1.50 vs 1.15), frequent users of liquor (1.09 vs 0.54), moderate cigarette smokers (0.86 vs 0.59), heavy cigarette smokers (0.96 vs 0.36), cigarette quitters (2.13 vs 1.63), women with high parity (1.52 vs 1.15) and those who reported major weight gain since age 18 y (1.22 vs 0.65). Abdominal gain was less likely than peripheral gain for high vegetable eaters (0.71 vs 0.91), women who exercised > or = 4 h/wk [(especially aerobics/ calisthenics (0.28 vs 0.91) or walking (0.84 vs 1.06)], women who completed menopause (0.74 vs 0.98) and consistent users of estrogen replacement therapy (0.93 vs 1.22). CONCLUSION: A behavior or characteristic may be associated differently with the risks of abdominal and peripheral weight gain. This insight could strengthen recommendations for preventing major chronic diseases.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen , Extremidades , Aumento de Peso , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Ejercicio Físico , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Paridad , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA