Disinfection of central venous access device needleless connectors: A human factors analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention guidelines recommend the use of an antiseptic scrub to disinfect needleless connectors before device access. Guideline noncompliance may render disinfection ineffective. The goal of this study was to observe needleless-connector disinfection practices and to identify perceived facilitators and barriers to best practices of needleless-connector access. METHODS: A human factors mixed-methods study involving nursing focus groups of perceived barriers and facilitators and clinical observations of compliance with instructions and protocols for use of 3.15% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol (CHG/IPA) and 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) antisepsis products for central venous access device (CVAD) needleless-connector disinfection was conducted in intensive care units (ICUs) at 2 academic medical centers. RESULTS: Access to the antiseptic product and lesser workload were identified as best-practice facilitators. Barriers were the time required per needleless-connector access and knowledge deficits. Of the 48 observed access events, 77% resulted in needleless-connector disinfection. The observed mean needleless-connector scrubbing times when using IPA were substantially below the recommended time. Drying time after product use was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of access to the disinfection product, emergency situations, and high workload were barriers to needleless-connector disinfection. Observed scrubbing and drying times were shorter than recommended, especially for IPA wipes. These needleless-connector disinfection deficits may increase the risk of CLABSI. Ongoing education and periodic competency evaluation of needleless-connector disinfection, improvement of supply management, and staffing workload are required to imbed and sustain best practices. Further study involving a larger sample size in diverse patient populations is warranted.

Infection preventionists in public health, consultant and academic roles: Results from the 2020 APIC MegaSurvey.

BACKGROUND: Infection preventionists (IPs) work and practice in a variety of roles across many practice settings. While the health care-based IP role has been well studied, less is known about IPs who work in public health, consultant, and academic roles. METHODS: Data were collected as a subset of the Association for Professionals in Infection Prevention and Control and Epidemiology 2020 MegaSurvey. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed to compare the responses of 147 IPs working in public health, consulting, or academic roles. RESULTS: Respondents identified their primary IP role as public health (40%), consulting (39%), or academic (21%). Most were White and non-Hispanic females working in long-term care, acute care, and outpatient settings. Most had over 11 years of experience in health care before IP, with nursing being the most common. More consultants were certified in infection control (74%). While half of the respondents in public health reported being certified in infection control, and a third had 6 or more years of experience in infection prevention and control, they reported the lowest annual salary and satisfaction with total compensation. DISCUSSION: These findings highlight the characteristics and contributions of infection prevention and control in nontraditional roles and settings. Certification and fair compensation are crucial factors for professional development and job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: These insights can guide future education, recruitment, and retention strategies for IPs in public health, consulting, and academic roles.

Health care...associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Health Care Safety Network data quality collaboration case study..÷Laboratory-identified event reporting validation.

This case study is part of a series centered on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) health care...associated infection surveillance definitions. This specific case study focuses on the application of the common surveillance concepts included in Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting (Chapter 12 of the NHSN Patient Safety Manual..÷Multidrug-Resistant Organism & Clostridioides difficile Infection Module) used with validation efforts. The intent of the case study series is to foster standardized application of the NHSN surveillance definitions and encourage accurate event determination among infection preventionists.

Health care-associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network Data Quality Collaboration Case Study - Chapter 9 Surgical site infection event (SSI) case study.

This case study is part of a series centered on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance definitions. This specific case study focuses on the application of common surveillance concepts included in the Patient Safety Component, Chapter 9 - Surgical Site Infection Event (SSI). The intent of the case study series is to foster standardized application of the NHSN HAI surveillance definitions and encourage accurate HAI event determination among Infection Preventionists (IPs).

Health care-associated infections studies project: An American journal of infection control and national healthcare safety network data quality collaboration case study - Chapter 2 Identifying Healthcare-associated Infections (HAI) for NHSN Surveillance case study vignettes.

This case study is part of a series centered on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance definitions. This specific case study focuses on the application of three of the surveillance concepts included in the Patient Safety Component, Chapter 2 - Identifying Healthcare-associated Infections (HAI) for NHSN Surveillance. The intent of the case study series is to foster standardized application of the NHSN HAI surveillance definitions and encourage accurate HAI event determination among Infection Preventionists (IPs).

How infection present at time of surgery (PATOS) data impacts your surgical site infection (SSI) standardized infection ratios (SIR), with focus on the complex 30-day SSI SIR model.

This case study is part of a series centered on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network's (NHSN) health care-associated infection (HAI) surveillance definitions. This is the first analytic case study published in AJIC since the CDC/ NHSN updated its HAI risk adjustment models and rebaselined the standardized infection ratios (SIRs) in 2015. This case describes a scenario that Infection Preventionists (IPs) have encountered during their analysis of surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance data. The case study is intended to illustrate how specific models can impact the SIR results by highlighting differences in the criteria for NHSN's older and newer risk models: the original versions and the updated models introduced in 2015. Understanding these differences provides insight into how SSI SIR calculations differ between the older and newer NHSN baseline models. NHSN plans to produce another set of HAI risk adjustment models in the future, using newer HAI incidence and risk factor data. While the timetable for these changes remains to be determined, the statistical methods used to produce future models and SIR calculations will continue the precedents that NHSN has established. An online survey link is provided where participants may confidentially answer questions related to the case study and receive immediate feedback in the form of correct answers, explanations, rationales, and summary of teaching points. Details of the case study, answers, and explanations have been reviewed and approved by NHSN staff. We hope that participants take advantage of this educational offering and thereby gain a greater understanding of the NHSN's HAI data analysis. There are 2 baselines available for SSI standardized infection ration (SIRs) in the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN); one based on the 2006-2008 national aggregate data and another based on the 2015 data. Each of the 2 baselines has a different set of inclusion criteria for the SSI data, which impact the calculation of the SIR. In this case study, we focused on the impact of the inclusion of PATOS in the calculation of the 2006-2008 baseline SSI SIR and the exclusion of PATOS from the calculation of the 2015 baseline SSI SIR. In the 2006-2008 baseline SSI SIRs, PATOS events and the procedures to which they are linked are included in the calculation of the SSI SIR whereas in the 2015 baseline SSI SIRs, PATOS events and the procedures to which they are linked are excluded from the calculation of the SSI SIR. Meaning, if we control for all other inclusion criteria other than PATOS data for both baselines, we will notice differences in the number of observed events as well as the number of predicted infections for the 2 baselines. For details of the 2015 baseline and risk adjustment calculation, please review the NHSN Guide to the SIR referenced below. For details of the 2006-2008 baseline4 and risk adjustment, please see the SHEA paper "Improving Risk-Adjusted Measures of Surgical Site Infection for the National Healthcare Safety Network" by author Yi Mu.

Healthcare-associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration.

This case study is part of a series centered on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance definitions. This specific case study focuses on the application of the Pneumonia (PNEU), Ventilator-associated event (VAE), and Bloodstream infections (BSI) surveillance definitions to a patient with COVID-19. The intent of the case study series is to foster standardized application of the NHSN HAI surveillance definitions among Infection Preventionists (IPs) and encourage accurate determination of HAI events.

Targeted gown and glove use to prevent Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in community-based nursing homes: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of targeted gown and glove use by healthcare personnel caring for high-risk nursing-home residents to prevent Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in short-stay residents. DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical trial. SETTING: This study was conducted in 2 community-based nursing homes in Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 322 residents on mixed short- and long-stay units. METHODS: During a 2-month baseline period, all residents had nose and inguinal fold swabs taken to estimate S. aureus acquisition. The intervention was iteratively developed using a participatory human factors engineering approach. During a 2-month intervention period, healthcare personnel wore gowns and gloves for high-risk care activities while caring for residents with wounds or medical devices, and S. aureus acquisition was measured again. Whole-genome sequencing was used to assess whether the acquisition represented resident-to-resident transmission. RESULTS: Among short-stay residents, the methicillin-resistant S. aureus acquisition rate decreased from 11.9% during the baseline period to 3.6% during the intervention period (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.92; P = .026). The methicillin-susceptible S. aureus acquisition rate went from 9.1% during the baseline period to 4.0% during the intervention period (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.12-1.42; P = .15). The S. aureus resident-to-resident transmission rate decreased from 5.9% during the baseline period to 0.8% during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted gown and glove use by healthcare personnel for high-risk care activities while caring for residents with wounds or medical devices, regardless of their S. aureus colonization status, is feasible and potentially decreases S. aureus acquisition and transmission in short-stay community-based nursing-home residents.

Health Care-associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration case study.

This National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance case study is part of a case-study series in the American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC). These cases reflect some of the complex patient scenarios Infection preventionists have encountered in their daily surveillance of health care-associated infections using NHSN definitions. Objectives have been previously published.

Correction to: Cluster identification, selection, and description in Cluster randomized crossover trials: the PREP-IT trials.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Cluster identification, selection, and description in cluster randomized crossover trials: the PREP-IT trials.

BACKGROUND: In cluster randomized crossover (CRXO) trials, groups of participants (i.e., clusters) are randomly allocated to receive a sequence of interventions over time (i.e., cluster periods). CRXO trials are becoming more comment when they are feasible, as they require fewer clusters than parallel group cluster randomized trials. However, CRXO trials have not been frequently used in orthopedic fracture trials and represent a novel methodological application within the field. To disseminate the early knowledge gained from our experience initiating two cluster randomized crossover trials, we describe our process for the identification and selection of the orthopedic practices (i.e., clusters) participating in the PREP-IT program and present data to describe their key characteristics. METHODS: The PREP-IT program comprises two ongoing pragmatic cluster randomized crossover trials (Aqueous-PREP and PREPARE) which compare the effect of iodophor versus chlorhexidine solutions on surgical site infection and unplanned fracture-related reoperations in patients undergoing operative fracture management. We describe the process we used to identify and select orthopedic practices (clusters) for the PREP-IT trials, along with their characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 58 potential orthopedic practices for inclusion in the PREP-IT trials. After screening each practice for eligibility, we selected 30 practices for participation and randomized each to a sequence of interventions (15 for Aqueous-PREP and 20 for PREPARE). The majority of orthopedic practices included in the Aqueous-PREP and PREPARE trials were situated in level I trauma centers (100% and 87%, respectively). Orthopedic practices in the Aqueous-PREP trial operatively treated a median of 149 open fracture patients per year, included a median of 11 orthopedic surgeons, and had access to a median of 5 infection preventionists. Orthopedic practices in the PREPARE trial treated a median of 142 open fracture and 1090 closed fracture patients per year, included a median of 7.5 orthopedic surgeons, and had access to a median of 6 infection preventionists. CONCLUSIONS: The PREP-IT trials provide an example of how to follow the reporting standards for cluster randomized crossover trials by providing a clear definition of the cluster unit, a thorough description of the cluster identification and selection process, and sufficient description of key cluster characteristics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Both trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (A-PREP: NCT03385304 December 28, 2017, and PREPARE: NCT03523962 May 14, 2018).

Effectiveness of Iodophor vs Chlorhexidine Solutions for Surgical Site Infections and Unplanned Reoperations for Patients Who Underwent Fracture Repair: The PREP-IT Master Protocol.

Importance: The risk of developing a surgical site infection after extremity fracture repair is nearly 5 times greater than in most elective orthopedic surgical procedures. For all surgical procedures, it is standard practice to prepare the operative site with an antiseptic solution; however, there is limited evidence to guide the choice of solution used for orthopedic fracture repair. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of iodophor vs chlorhexidine solutions to reduce surgical site infections and unplanned fracture-related reoperations for patients who underwent fracture repair. Design, Setting, and Participants: The PREP-IT (Program of Randomized Trials to Evaluate Pre-operative Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Orthopaedic Trauma) master protocol will be followed to conduct 2 multicenter pragmatic cluster randomized crossover trials, Aqueous-PREP (Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-Operative Aqueous Antiseptic Skin Solution in Open Fractures) and PREPARE (Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-Operative Alcohol Skin Solutions in Fractured Extremities). The Aqueous-PREP trial will compare 4% aqueous chlorhexidine vs 10% povidone-iodine for patients with open extremity fractures. The PREPARE trial will compare 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol vs 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol for patients with open extremity fractures and patients with closed lower extremity or pelvic fractures. Both trials will share key aspects of study design and trial infrastructure. The studies will follow a pragmatic cluster randomized crossover design with alternating treatment periods of approximately 2 months. The primary outcome will be surgical site infection and the secondary outcome will be unplanned fracture-related reoperations within 12 months. The Aqueous-PREP trial will enroll a minimum of 1540 patients with open extremity fractures from at least 12 hospitals; PREPARE will enroll a minimum of 1540 patients with open extremity fractures and 6280 patients with closed lower extremity and pelvic fractures from at least 18 hospitals. The primary analyses will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle and account for potential between-cluster and between-period variability. The patient-centered design, implementation, and dissemination of results are guided by a multidisciplinary team that includes 3 patients and other relevant stakeholders. Discussion: The PREP-IT master protocol increases efficiency through shared trial infrastructure and study design components. Because prophylactic skin antisepsis is used prior to all surgical procedures and the application, cost, and availability of all study solutions are similar, the results of the PREP-IT trials are poised to inform clinical guidelines and bring about an immediate change in clinical practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03385304 and NCT03523962.

Health care-associated infections studies project: an American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration.

This case study is part of a series centered on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) health care-associated infection (HAI) surveillance definitions. The intent of the case study series is to foster standardized application of the NHSN HAI surveillance definitions among infection preventionists and to promote accurate determination of HAI events. These cases reflect some of the complex patient scenarios that infection preventionists have encountered in their daily surveillance of HAIs using NHSN definitions. Objectives have been previously published.1.

Health care-associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration case study: Bloodstream infection-patient injection into vascular access 2018.

This case study is part of a series centered on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) health care-associated infection surveillance definitions. These cases reflect some of the complex patient scenarios infection preventionists have encountered in their daily surveillance of health care-associated infections using NHSN definitions and protocols. Teaching points for this case study are.

Healthcare-associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration: Location mapping.

This case study is part of a series centered on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) health care-associated infection (HAI) surveillance definitions. This specific case study focuses on appropriately mapping locations within an NHSN-enrolled facility. The intent of the case study series is to foster standardized application of the NHSN HAI surveillance definitions among IPs and encourage accurate determination of HAI events. An online survey link is provided where participants may confidentially answer questions related to the case study and receive immediate feedback in the form of correct answers and explanations and rationales. Details of the case study, answers, and explanations have been reviewed and approved by NHSN staff. We hope that participants take advantage of this educational offering and thereby gain a greater understanding of NHSN HAI surveillance definitions.