Experimental warming and drying increase older carbon contributions to soil respiration in lowland tropical forests.

Tropical forests account for over 50% of the global terrestrial carbon sink, but climate change threatens to alter the carbon balance of these ecosystems. We show that warming and drying of tropical forest soils may increase soil carbon vulnerability, by increasing degradation of older carbon. In situ whole-profile heating by 4 °C and 50% throughfall exclusion each increased the average radiocarbon age of soil CO2 efflux by ~2-3 years, but the mechanisms underlying this shift differed. Warming accelerated decomposition of older carbon as increased CO2 emissions depleted newer carbon. Drying suppressed decomposition of newer carbon inputs and decreased soil CO2 emissions, thereby increasing contributions of older carbon to CO2 efflux. These findings imply that both warming and drying, by accelerating the loss of older soil carbon or reducing the incorporation of fresh carbon inputs, will exacerbate soil carbon losses and negatively impact carbon storage in tropical forests under climate change.

High methane concentrations in tidal salt marsh soils: Where does the methane go?

Tidal salt marshes produce and emit CH4 . Therefore, it is critical to understand the biogeochemical controls that regulate CH4 spatial and temporal dynamics in wetlands. The prevailing paradigm assumes that acetoclastic methanogenesis is the dominant pathway for CH4 production, and higher salinity concentrations inhibit CH4 production in salt marshes. Recent evidence shows that CH4 is produced within salt marshes via methylotrophic methanogenesis, a process not inhibited by sulfate reduction. To further explore this conundrum, we performed measurements of soil-atmosphere CH4 and CO2 fluxes coupled with depth profiles of soil CH4 and CO2 pore water gas concentrations, stable and radioisotopes, pore water chemistry, and microbial community composition to assess CH4 production and fate within a temperate tidal salt marsh. We found unexpectedly high CH4 concentrations up to 145,000 µmol mol-1 positively correlated with S2- (salinity range: 6.6-14.5 ppt). Despite large CH4 production within the soil, soil-atmosphere CH4 fluxes were low but with higher emissions and extreme variability during plant senescence (84.3 ± 684.4 nmol m-2 s-1 ). CH4 and CO2 within the soil pore water were produced from young carbon, with most Δ14 C-CH4 and Δ14 C-CO2 values at or above modern. We found evidence that CH4 within soils was produced by methylotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Several pathways exist after CH4 is produced, including diffusion into the atmosphere, CH4 oxidation, and lateral export to adjacent tidal creeks; the latter being the most likely dominant flux. Our findings demonstrate that CH4 production and fluxes are biogeochemically heterogeneous, with multiple processes and pathways that can co-occur and vary in importance over the year. This study highlights the potential for high CH4 production, the need to understand the underlying biogeochemical controls, and the challenges of evaluating CH4 budgets and blue carbon in salt marshes.

Las marismas salinas producen y emiten CH4 . Por lo tanto, es esencial comprender los controles biogeoquímicos que regulan la dinámica espacial y temporal del CH4 en estos humedales. El paradigma predominante asume que la metanogénesis acetoclástica es la vía dominante para la producción de CH4 y que altas concentraciones de salinidad inhiben la producción de CH4 en estos ecosistemas. Hay evidencia que el CH4 se produce las marismas salinas a través de la metanogénesis metilotrófica, un proceso no inhibido por la reducción del sulfato. Para explorar esta paradoja, realizamos mediciones de los flujos de CH4 y CO2 del suelo a la atmósfera junto con perfiles de concentraciones de CH4 y CO2 en el suelo, isótopos estables y radioisótopos, química del agua y composición de la comunidad microbiana para evaluar la producción y el destino del CH4 en una marisma salina templada. Encontramos concentraciones de CH4 sorprendentemente altas de hasta 145,000 µmol mol−1 correlacionadas positivamente con S2− (rango de salinidad: 6.6 a 14.5 ppt). A pesar de la gran producción de CH4 en el suelo, los flujos de CH4 del suelo a la atmósfera fueron bajos, pero con mayores emisiones y variabilidad extrema durante la época de senescencia de las plantas (84.3 ± 684.4 nmol m−2 s−1 ). El CH4 y el CO2 en el suelo se produjeron a partir de carbono joven, con la mayoría de los valores Δ14 C-CH4 y Δ14 C-CO2 en o por encima de valores modernos. Encontramos evidencia de que el CH4 en los suelos fue producido por metanogénesis metilotrófica e hidrogenotrófica. Existen varias vías que el CH4 producido sigue, incluida la difusión hacia la atmósfera, la oxidación del CH4 y la exportación lateral a arroyos adyacentes a la marisma; siendo este último el flujo dominante más probable. Nuestros hallazgos demuestran que la producción y los flujos de CH4 son biogeoquímicamente heterogéneos, con múltiples procesos y vías que pueden coexistir y variar en importancia a lo largo del año. Este estudio destaca el potencial de alta producción de CH4 , la necesidad de comprender los controles biogeoquímicos de la producción de CH4 y los retos que existen para evaluar las reservas de CH4 y el carbono azul en marismas salinas.

Reducing climate impacts of beef production: A synthesis of life cycle assessments across management systems and global regions.

The global demand for beef is rapidly increasing (FAO, 2019), raising concern about climate change impacts (Clark et al., 2020; Leip et al., 2015; Springmann et al., 2018). Beef and dairy contribute over 70% of livestock greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), which collectively contribute ~6.3 Gt CO2 -eq/year (Gerber et al., 2013; Herrero et al., 2016) and account for 14%-18% of human GHG emissions (Friedlingstein et al., 2019; Gerber et al., 2013). The utility of beef GHG mitigation strategies, such as land-based carbon (C) sequestration and increased production efficiency, are actively debated (Garnett et al., 2017). We compiled 292 local comparisons of "improved" versus "conventional" beef production systems across global regions, assessing net GHG emission data from Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies. Our results indicate that net beef GHG emissions could be reduced substantially via changes in management. Overall, a 46 % reduction in net GHG emissions per unit of beef was achieved at sites using carbon (C) sequestration management strategies on grazed lands, and an 8% reduction in net GHGs was achieved at sites using growth efficiency strategies. However, net-zero emissions were only achieved in 2% of studies. Among regions, studies from Brazil had the greatest improvement, with management strategies for C sequestration and efficiency reducing beef GHG emissions by 57%. In the United States, C sequestration strategies reduced beef GHG emissions by over 100% (net-zero emissions) in a few grazing systems, whereas efficiency strategies were not successful at reducing GHGs, possibly because of high baseline efficiency in the region. This meta-analysis offers insight into pathways to substantially reduce beef production's global GHG emissions. Nonetheless, even if these improved land-based and efficiency management strategies could be fully applied globally, the trajectory of growth in beef demand will likely more than offset GHG emissions reductions and lead to further warming unless there is also reduced beef consumption.